Government plans massive Citigroup rescue effort

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA | November 24, 2008 11:11 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

WASHINGTON — Rushing to rescue Citigroup, the government agreed to shoulder hundreds of billions of dollars in possible losses at the stricken bank and to plow a fresh $20 billion into the company.

Regulators hope the dramatic action will bolster badly shaken confidence in the once-mighty banking giant as well as the nation's financial system, a goal that so far has been elusive despite a flurry of government interventions to battle the worst global crisis since the 1930s.

Wall Street investors reacted enthusiastically. The Dow Jones industrials shot up about 300 points in morning trading. Stock markets in Britain and Germany also gained ground. Citigroup shares themselves climbed 61.3 percent to $6.08 in morning trading.

"If they didn't help, the damage would be beyond imagination," said Teck-Kin Suan, economist at United Overseas Bank in Singapore.

The action, announced late Sunday by the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., is aimed at shoring up a huge financial institution whose collapse would wreak havoc on the already fragile financial system and the U.S. economy.

"With these transactions, the U.S. government is taking the actions necessary to strengthen the financial system and protect U.S. taxpayers and the U.S. economy," the three agencies said in a joint statement. "We will continue to use all of our resources to preserve the strength of our banking institutions, and promote the process of repair and recovery and to manage risks."

President George W. Bush held open the prospect Monday of similar arrangements should other companies falter. "If need be, we will make these kind of decisions to safeguard our financial system in the future," Bush said.

Analysts said a Citigroup failure would have seized up still fragile lending markets and caused untold losses among institutions holding debt and financial products backed by the company.

Story continues below
advertisement

"It would create chaos," said Winson Fong, managing director at SG Asset Management in Hong Kong, which oversees about $3 billion in equities in Asia. "Simply put, you couldn't borrow or lend for a while. This is a nightmare scenario."

The bold move is the latest in a string of high-profile government bailout efforts. The Fed in March provided financial backing to JPMorgan Chase's buyout of ailing Bear Stearns. Six months later, the government was forced to take over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and throw a financial lifeline _ which was recently rejiggered _ to insurer American International Group.

Critics worry the actions could put billions of taxpayers' dollars in jeopardy and encourage financial companies to take excessive risk on the belief that the government will bail them out of their messes.

The Citigroup rescue came after a weekend of marathon discussions led by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, who is being tapped by President-elect Barack Obama as his Treasury chief also participated. Bush said Monday he consulted with Obama on the Citigroup rescue.

Vikram S. Pandit, Citi's chief executive officer, welcomed the action. "We appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market stability," he said in a statement issued early Monday.

The $20 billion cash injection by the Treasury Department will come from the $700 billion financial bailout package. The capital infusion follows an earlier one _ of $25 billion _ in Citigroup in which the government also received an ownership stake.

As part of the plan, Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky loans and securities backed by commercial and residential mortgages.

Under the loss-sharing arrangement, Citigroup Inc. will assume the first $29 billion in losses on the risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citigroup 10 percent. Money from the $700 billion bailout and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses. The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup.

In exchange for the guarantees, the government will get $7 billion in preferred shares of Citigroup. In addition, Citi said it will issue warrants to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC for about 254 million shares of the company's common stock at a strike price of $10.61.

As a condition of the rescue, Citigroup is barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years unless the company obtains consent from the three federal agencies. The bank is currently paying a dividend of 16 cents, halved from a 32-cent payout in the previous quarter. The agreement also places restrictions on executive compensation, including bonuses.

Importantly, the agreement calls on Citigroup to take steps to help distressed homeowners.

Specifically, Citigroup will modify mortgages to help people avoid foreclosure along the lines of an FDIC plan that was put into effect at IndyMac Bank, a major failed savings and loan based in Pasadena, Calif.

Under the IndyMac plan, struggling home borrowers pay interest rates of about 3 percent for five years. Rates are reduced so that borrowers aren't paying more than 38 percent of their pretax income on housing.

The IndyMac plan also was used as a model for a new program by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for two other failed thrifts taken over by the government on Friday. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair has been pressing Treasury to use $24 billion from the $700 billion bailout program to put the mortgage modification program on national footing, but Paulson is opposed to that idea.

Citigroup has seen its shares lose 60 percent of their value in the past week, reflecting a crisis of confidence among skittish investors. They are worried all the risky debt on Citigroup's balance sheet will turn into losses as the economy worsens and the markets stay turbulent _ losses that could be nearly impossible to reverse.

Citigroup is such a large, interconnected player in the financial system that it is seen by Washington policymakers as too big to fail. The company, with some 200 million customers, has operations stretching around the globe in more than 100 countries.

Analysts consider Citigroup the most vulnerable among the major U.S. banks _ especially after it failed to nab Wachovia Corp., which was bought instead by Wells Fargo & Co. That was a missed opportunity for Citi to gets its hands on much-needed U.S. deposits that would bolster its cash position.

Citigroup was especially hard hit by the meltdown in risky, subprime mortgages made to people with tarnished credit or low incomes. Foreclosures on those mortgages spiked, leaving Citi and other financial companies wracking up huge losses on the soured investments. The company has failed to turn a profit during the past four quarters and has announced plans to slash thousands of jobs.

____

AP Business writers Marcy Gordon in Washington and Madlen Read in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Rushing to rescue Citigroup, the government agreed to shoulder hundreds of billions of dollars in possible losses at the stricken bank and to plow a fresh $20 billion into the compa...
WASHINGTON — Rushing to rescue Citigroup, the government agreed to shoulder hundreds of billions of dollars in possible losses at the stricken bank and to plow a fresh $20 billion into the compa...
 
Comments
64
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I'm Barack Obama and I support these bailouts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 11/24/2008

Dubya?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 11/25/2008
photo

While our infrastructure crumbles: roadways, runways, bridges, power grid, dams, water pipes, drainage pipes, natural gas pipes, and protected lands, we loan money to the businesses that cannot loan money to fix these things. What's wrong with this? It's time to completely restructure all banking on the Credit Union model. Don't scoff. The old banking system has inflated itself through usury not the fiduciary responsibility to help communities and the nation.

What ever happened to the"Public Trust"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Why isn't it the responsibility of stockholders to bail out a financially strapped company?

This simple question is almost laughed at in your first class of economics 101 and never discussed in business school, but why? Doesn't ownership equal responsibility?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 11/24/2008

Three automakers collectively want $25 billion, and everybody goes crazy over the fact executives flew in private planes...lawmakers want to know why $25billion is needed... fine... but Citigroup (1 company) wants $20 billion, and nobody asks any questions. Don't top Citigroup executives fly in private planes? Where is Citigroup's plan? Where are lawmakers asking Citigroup "will you be back asking for more"?

The hypocrisy is palpable. Every citizen needs to ask why there is a discrepency between how automakers are treated and how Citigroup is treated. It is just more evidence the global banking industry is corrupt and following an agenda CONTRARY to the nation's best interests. Through global capital control instruments such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the robber barron families (Rockefeller, Rothschild, Morgan, Warburg) controlling these banks BENEFIT by de-industrializing the United States and plunging it into bankruptcy.
In truth, it would be initially painful, but in the long run, the best thing that could happen to our economy is for Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan-Chase (and their robber barron controllers) to FAIL. Since 1913, these institutions have been a cancer in our economy, weilding undue influence in our government.
Corrupt lawmakers are working on behalf of banks rather than "We the People"... we need to make clear... through letters, phone calls, letters to the Editor of your local paper, and the internet, etc that the will of the People is:
NOT ONE MORE CENT TO ANY BANK...EVER!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 11/24/2008

If I stop paying my Citi mortgage I can get a 3% loan for five years whoot!!
A trillion here a trillion there and voila ...no inflation and 3% loans for mortgage holders
Who came up with this dream I want more of what these bailout people are smoking.
Are they gonna payout Pandit he had a 100 million tied to his performance and in this environment
every one is paid to fuckup.... Away go your troubles down the drain...where is Joe the plumber now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 11/24/2008

I don't understand where the money from all these bailouts is coming from. If it is from taxpayers, well, you can only tax workers so much or they won't have any income. I'm not an economist, so I don't completely understand all the intricate workings of the system (I'm sure the government counts on this!) but it seems to me that the system is totally screwed and that these bailouts are just prolonging the agony. If people don't have money, they can't buy anything. All I know is that this whole bailout thing seems fishy and of no real lasting value.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 11/24/2008

It's just corporate socialism. No socialism for the common folk though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Not all of the federal governments' money comes from taxing individuals. There are many types of taxes paced on commerce, foreign trade, and foreign nations doing business in the USA. Far too often the story of taxes is talked about as being solely on the backs of individuals, you & me. I for one have never paid 700 billion dollars in taxes or paid for an aircraft carrier or a guided missile. I have probably paid enough for a couple of flights around the worlds in first class for and executive or two.

Question: What would be lost to our government if income tax was abolished?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 11/24/2008

"all this money" is being printed as we type. Its being printed hand over fist. And one day, soon, you'll see so darn many dollars floating around that we won't need to buy toilet paper ever again. And we'll make the peso look good.

That's why China and the EU are trying to shift their assets out of dollars and into Euros or some other currency. When that day happens, the world won't care how worthless our dollar is.

Then, the middle class WILL be those making between $1 million to $25 million. Everyone else won't afford groceries. Hello hyperinflation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Over-printing money is a real threat, but is it true? Can anyone site any real data from the Treasury that we have increased the amount of our currency, the M1?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 11/24/2008

Here's how it's done...

(1) Promise me that you have one silver dollar in your pocket. That's all I ask... "promise? Scout's honor?" Thank you.
(2) I'm now going to sell to eight different people the right to collect that dollar from you. (Don't worry; they never will.)
(3) Each of those eight people ... on paper at least ... are going to "issue derivative-securities" based on the right to exercise the right to collect the right to collect that dollar from you.
(4) This process will be repeated, exponentially, 13 times. Now, I have just "created" $549,755,813,888.00. Yes, out of thin air.
(5) You may now turn your pockets inside-out and show that you never had a silver dollar in there in the first place. It's okay, I don't care. How much of $549 billion would you like to have for your troubles?

I "made" this money by selling THE RIGHT TO COLLECT a debt ... that would be "one dollar" ... from "someone else." Catch is, nobody knows (and nobody actually cares) who that "somebody else" is, nor how many competing claims there might be for that one dollar.

You or I might go to jail with Mr. Ponzi for doing that, but the Federal Government won't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 11/24/2008

The ultimate solution is for Big Gov to get out of the way and let fail those institutions that are in decline. It was government excess, not deregulation, which caused the problem and more of Big Gov will not solve it.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122748912533552007.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 11/24/2008

The WSJ is a shill for the Republican party now. Their economic analysis has deteriorated into the nonsensical. Government excess had nothing to do with this failure. The deregulation of the derivatives industry, the lack of oversight in the credit default swap market, is what caused this. But now, we are throwing good money after bad. That's simply insane. Regulation should increase. Free money should stop now. Let them fail. And then make sure that no institution will ever be allowed to get so big it can destroy the NATIONAL economy with it. That's what the Antitrust division was supposed to be doing these past 8 years. What happened?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

I have to disagree. Unregulated markets in this day and age allow a few (too many) to exercise their darker side. That is greed. We are not a simple village based agrarian society anymore. Adam Smith would have a different insight today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 11/24/2008

Very true Fabini. Adam Smith wrote the book "Wealth of Nations." He did NOT write the book, "Wealth of Multinational Corporations at the expense of Nations."

Big difference.

Today's "Free Market" fundamentalists, the so-called Republican Party, believes that the only thing that matters is a version of Capitalism that allows the largest multinational corporations to take as much as possible, relocate HQ to foreign nations (Halliburton), and then drive down costs at all costs - regardless of societal impact, national security, or national well-being.

Now, power in this world is in the boardrooms - not the national capitals. Mutlinational Corporations are more powerful than nation-states. The United States has been held captive to Multinationals that are "too big too fail" so they can demand national treasure at a moment's notice. The wealthy elite of our early Republic allowed only the white, land-owning wealthy elite to vote. Once the 20th century came, allowing women, minorities, and the poor to vote, the wealthy elite had to find another way to maintain power. They quietly and deliberately have transferred the "Wealth of Nations" into the "wealth of multinationals." Citizenship is no longer relevant. Now, it matters who has voting stock and %ownership in the right corporations.

The Republicans have never been about "Country First." Its been about "Capitalism First." And not just any capitalism. Their cronyism version of Capitalism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 11/24/2008

sALLI U ARE WRONG, OUR BUSH GOVT SPENT MONEY OVER SEAS AND NOT IN OUR NATION, NO FOR FBI NOT FOR POLICE NOT FOR THE SEC, NOT FOR THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, NOT FOR FHA, MANY DEPTS IN OUR GOVT HAVE BEEN RUNNING WITHOUT ADEQUATE STAFF TO HANDLE THEIR JOBS, COULD AND WOULD NOT EVEN INVESTIGATE THE WRONG DOINGS. WTF!
AS FAR A DE REGULATION, U ARE WRONG ON THAT I AM INTHE SECURITIES INDUSTRY, IT WAS DEFINITELY A LACK OF REGULATION AND UTTER LACK OF ENFORCEMENT, SOME CRAZY BELIEF THAT THE FREE MARKETS WERE PERFECT AND WOULD NOT CORRUPT THEMSELVES, GREEDY BASTARDS....WHAT IDIOT THOUGHT THAT THE 1930'S WAS A FAIRY TALE, TOO BIG TO FAIL, THANKS GRAMM LEACH BAILEY ACT SIGNED NOV 1999, U BLEW THE WHOLE ANTI TRUST THAING APART, NOW CITI IS TOO BIG TO FAIL, GET OUTTA HERE, WE NEED MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF REGULATION FOR THESE BUMBS, LIERS AND CHEATERS, YES THE BILLIONAIRES. AND HANDCUFFS, WHERE ARE THE HANDCUFFS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 11/25/2008
photo

Question: Who is the single largest shareholder in Citigroup?
Answer: Prince Alaweed Bin Talal of Saudi Arabia

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Why isn't it the responsibility of stockholders to "bail out" a financially strapped company?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 11/24/2008

Citgroup has been ripping people off for years. Why should the American people bail them out? I think we, the American people, have no voice here, and as usual Corporate America drives everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 11/24/2008

So corporate America is driving Obama too? Who would have thought...!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 11/24/2008

Here is an interesting youtube video on stagflation. which seems to be the inevitable outcome of this massive liquidty injection. especially if the economy doesn't recover any time soon. Once Velocity picks up, the already huge monetary base will lead to inflation? Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDM4xCz581o

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 11/24/2008

After a short rally for the $ it's now plummented down again due to bailouts.

http://money.cnn.com/data/commodities/
Corn (+5.36%), Soybeans (+6.79%), Gold (+4.19%), Silver (+9.79%), Platinum (+5.0%), Copper (+6.33%), Light Crude (+6.95%), Unleaded Gas (+7.48%)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Funny that Citibank played a key role in prevent people from escaping credit card debt in the bankruptcy law they shoved down America's throat.
Now those same taxpayers are being forced to providing hundreds of billions to bail out deadbeat Citibank.
Profits are strictly private but corporate risks are all "socialized" in fascist America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 11/24/2008

ProfessorDuh -- I agree. Its amazing how unrestrained the Fed and the Treasury can be with tax dollars. The American people have so long been clubbed by the twin cudgels of "patriotism" and "religious morality" into accepting this F@$ci$t regime (starting with Reaganomics and culminating with the Bush nightmares), that January 20, 2009 can't come fast enough. My only question is this: what will be left of the national treasure in the next 60 days?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

We are a nation of "dead beat " bankers..!

Don't you love it..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 11/24/2008

What a bunch of bull.

Citi's market cap was 25 Billion on Thursday. The feds could of bought Citi outright.

Now we are getting options at a strike price 4 times higher than the Friday close and only 7 billion in prefered shares.

This is theft.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 11/24/2008

agreed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 11/24/2008

IT IS GARBAGE, WHAT FOOL DOES BUSINESS DEALS LIKE THIS, IT IS THE LAST ROBBERY OF OUR NATIONAL TREASURE.
BY THE VERY INSITIUTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN CHARGING TO HOLD YOU MONEY IN THEIR BANKS, THIS A FEE THAT A FEE, THIS CHARGE, THIS HIGH INTEREST RATE, THAT BALLOON PAYMENT.
IF ANY OF US WERE IN THEIR SITUATION, FINANCIALLY, WE COULD NOT GET A MOMENT OF THE DAY LET ALONE AN ACTUAL LOAN WITH SUCH GRACIOUS TERMS.
WHERE ARE THE FBI AGENTS AND INVESTIGATIONS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 11/25/2008
photo

I really want to know what the interest rate is and how long it takes them to pay us back. Isn't that basic when loaning money?? Thats why we have chapter 11; yeah it sucks....but that's what anyone else would do.

The government should get its nose out of the private sector. Thats borderline socialism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 11/24/2008

Well, well, specifically and exactly WHAT has Robert Rubin been paid over $100 million to do in the past 9 years????? Citigroup's destruction is an "inside" job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 11/24/2008

That goes without saying. They more telling comment is that Citigroup's bailout is an inside job. What else would explain the logic in allowing Washington Mutual to fail (or be purchased for $1.9 Billion, whatever you want to call it) while bailing out Citigroup? WaMu didn't have Robert Rubin on its board.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 11/24/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect