Environmentalists draft bold roadmap for Obama

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Environmentalists draft bold roadmap for Obama stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DINA CAPPIELLO | November 25, 2008 11:17 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — A united and diverse coalition of environmental advocacy groups has sent President-elect Barack Obama its roadmap for change _ and it represents a U-turn from the policies of President George W. Bush.

The 391-page report titled "Transition to Green" lays out what the incoming Obama administration can do in its first 100 days and beyond at more than a dozen different agencies to achieve the dual goals of cleaning up the environment and revitalizing the economy.

"It gives a whole vision on how to move forward to repower, rebuild, refuel America," said Jim Lyon, senior vice president for conservation for the National Wildlife Federation, one of 29 groups that signed onto the laundry list of policy recommendations.

Many of the suggestions in the report released Tuesday echo what Obama has said on the campaign trail and signaled during the transition: capping the gases blamed for global warming; basing environmental decisions on sound science; and taking a more cautious approach to energy production on federal lands.

Other recommendations appear to be more aggressive than Obama's stated policies. The groups call for cutting funding for nuclear energy, reinstating a moratorium on drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and reconsidering recent oil and gas leases in some parts of Alaska.

The bold outline from groups working to protect oceans, increase park space and reduce pollution shows that the environmental community is going on the offensive, after eight years of playing defense. The Bush administration in the last eight years has eased some environmental protections, and in the next eight weeks it is set to relax regulations governing power plant emissions and protecting endangered species.

Environmentalists are hoping to capitalize on a new Democratic administration and a larger Democratic majority in Congress that have already signaled that energy and environmental policy are a priority.

"We know this administration is much more friendly to environmental protection than the one that is leaving town," said Rodger Schlickeisen, president of Defenders of Wildlife, which signed onto the report with the Natural Resources Defense Council, American Rivers, Greenpeace and the National Audubon Society.

"We all see this as an opportunity to right the wrongs of the past," Schlickeisen said.

But they admit there could be some stumbling blocks _ namely, a nation in the throes of an economic crisis and larger caucus of moderate Democrats from manufacturing states.

"We need to be able to show that an aggressive response to reducing global warming emissions will not harm the economy, but in fact generate new jobs and marshal investment in clean technologies," said Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists. "It has to be done in a way that is sensitive to regional concerns and jobs."

___

On the Net:

Save Our Environment Action Center: http://www.saveourenvironment.org

WASHINGTON — A united and diverse coalition of environmental advocacy groups has sent President-elect Barack Obama its roadmap for change _ and it represents a U-turn from the policies of Presid...
WASHINGTON — A united and diverse coalition of environmental advocacy groups has sent President-elect Barack Obama its roadmap for change _ and it represents a U-turn from the policies of Presid...
Filed by Johanna Smith  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
77
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Nice piece, I found this summary of Obama's energy plan for those whose don't have the time to read a full pdf report: http://www.ethanolplug.com/PlugNews/WebExclusiveObamasEnergyPolicy/tabid/125/Default.aspx

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 11/29/2008

The www.ethanolplug.com report may be well out of date already. It's dated Nov. 11th! Things changing at super speed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 12/06/2008
- Patterman I'm a Fan of Patterman 6 fans permalink
photo

The absolute first thing he's going to have to do is everything he can to reverse the abominable "midnight" regulations, leases and wildland giveaways Bush Inc. is undertaking at this very moment. It will be very very difficult, but Obama MUST do it. It's criminal what Bush is doing but -- there's nothing surprising about that, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 11/29/2008
- ZellaBee I'm a Fan of ZellaBee 14 fans permalink

We also need to address the chem trail spraying all over the world. It isn't enough to just go green we have to clean up our air, water and food supply .....NOW.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 11/29/2008

Obama's Green Plan Is The New Black: http://newsone.blackplanet.com/nation/ricketts-obamas-green-is-the-new-black/

He should follow closely what the experts are saying before jumping in bed with the auto-makers and failing industrialists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 11/28/2008

I don't understand the fear of nuclear power. The technology is a long way from where it was in the 1980s. France hasn't had any problems with it. It's a whole lot cleaner than coal. It should be one more option provided that storage issues are worked out. At least consider improving the technology instead of automatically saying no to nuclear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 AM on 11/27/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 293 fans permalink

Actually the Nuclear tech has hardly budged since 1980.
We only have enough fresh Uranium to power the world for 13 years. Uranium has quadruples in price in the last few years, and is so rare, we are willing to destroy the Grand Canyon to get more.

Then you have 1 millions years of deadly waste.

The More Nukes we have the more Mushroom clouds we will see.

Solar and Wind CAN REPLACE COAL AND NUKES:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/08/mini-nuclear-plants-power_n_142412.html?show_comment_id=17903027#comment_17903027

Read my Profile for more links and comments on Nukes versus solar and wind:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-parker/debate---mccain-mocks-nuc_b_135094.html?show_comment_id=17008667#comment_17008667

http://www.ieer.org/sdafiles/14-2.pdf
See what MIT thinks about nukes.
"Insurmountable Risks"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 11/27/2008
- BSERIUS I'm a Fan of BSERIUS 8 fans permalink

are you paying attention Ganggreen??? Barack is not putting up with special interest groups ... One of the reasons he has Rahm is to prevent any bs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 11/26/2008
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 41 fans permalink
photo

Anything about stopping those oil leases in Utah or that coal strip mining in Virginia?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 AM on 11/26/2008
photo

Obama needs to watch this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ol_6Ju3oYI

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 11/26/2008

I hope that in our rush to implement renewable energy technologies we might be wise enough to consider the design of their implementation and development and the effects that such design might have on other ecological values - wildlife habitats etc.

there is no reason why we should not be able to deploy renewable energy technologies locally. use the subsidies to enrich communities by directing them toward solar panels on roof-tops and wind generators in back-yards, as close to the communities that they will serve as possible. doing so avoids the loss of energy on transit, and prevents the further degradation of public landscapes via fragmentation that accompanies development of roads and transmission corridors that are wastefully inefficient.

Similarly, localized deployment keeps the federal dollars in the respective communities and decreases the likelihood that those dollars will enrich a select few, the same select few energy prospectors and corporate entities - as it turns out - that have been destroying our environment with fossil fuel utilities and exploitative behaviors.

Planning and design of the 'green' utilities that serve us is as important as the production technology.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 11/25/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 293 fans permalink

Absolutely!, There is enough rooftop area to supply all the electricity we need.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 11/28/2008
- tbirdalum I'm a Fan of tbirdalum 29 fans permalink
photo

Begreen, I agree with you. Incentives and tax rebates for home owners to be able to afford placing large enough systems on the property and all to be grid-tyed systems and the excess energy from each home owners system to go back into the grid and that home owner gets a check from the electric utility. I live on 3 acres and would love to have a large enough system to provide for my needs and to sell back to the electric utility. Thanks for your input.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 11/28/2008
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

This sounds very extensive but as my mom always say Reach for moon that way you have a shot of getting something decent

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 11/25/2008

This road map will be the first thing President Obama throws in the oval office's waste basket. The man already got job, he's not going to kowtow to greenies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 11/25/2008
- NWBrunette I'm a Fan of NWBrunette 70 fans permalink

It takes a while for some to catch up to the 21st century, and, apparently, to actually pay attention to what Obama's stated policy positions are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 11/25/2008

every politician has pre-election positions and post election positions. Obama is not any different then any other politician

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 11/25/2008
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

I disagree. Obama is an Environmentalist he is not someone who just says it because its politically sexy to say. Thats why he wont give a blank check to the auto industry thats why he is using this economic crisis to get us towards a green economy by investing in green technology. Thats why he is ready to repeal the executive orders from the bush administration as far as enviromental policy.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 11/25/2008
photo

You're in his head now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 11/25/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 168 fans permalink

Yes, I am sure Obama wants to be as successful a president as George Bush by ditching environmental poliices and making it easier for polluters to pollute.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 11/25/2008
photo

When exactly did come to this uninformed conclusion?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 11/26/2008

There are lots of federalism issues that will need to be worked through as we tackle the greening of America. For example, North Dakota has the most wind potential of any state, but has done next to diddly squat because its legislature and governor have been big proponents of coal and petroleum interests. Uncle Sam needs to get North Dakota to do more, and assist in building a grid infrastructure to get wind created electricity to market. The Dakotas, with their wind, could supply two-thirds the nation with electricity. Let's do it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 11/25/2008
- Synoia I'm a Fan of Synoia 8 fans permalink

And loose 50-60% of the energy in transmission.
Might be more efficient to place the windmills closer to the mississippi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 11/25/2008
- strandwolf I'm a Fan of strandwolf 6 fans permalink

Put the electrons on barges, eh? Stinkin' barges....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 11/25/2008

Yup, planning & design ought not be ignored. renewables are great when they're deployed locally - keep the wealth and energy security in the community for which it serves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 11/25/2008
- Mugzi I'm a Fan of Mugzi 13 fans permalink

Yes, and maybe it will be a part of the energy technology...we certainly do have a bright future!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 11/25/2008

well now that we are going to have an administration that isn't hellbent on serving business at all costs, maybe we can get back to some basics - making sure we have clean air, water and soil, things we need to survive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 11/25/2008

+DINA

what are the enviros offering up now? more idiotic cap and trade policies that represent a failed policy that is a false paradigm similar to the 1960's adage dilution is the solution ot pollution -- that was untl rivers started catching on fire?

or how about the way NRDC sold out the environmental community on the dioxin issue in the 90's under Clinton/Gore because they did not want to loose their acces

give me a break the big 7 environmental organizations are worse for the environment than industry -- environmental change will have to come from the grassroots

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 11/25/2008
- wildmother I'm a Fan of wildmother 10 fans permalink
photo

I agree EVERYTHING is best done by grassroots. That was the way Obama got elected. He got elected because the people turned out. The people can't go back to their old ways of just leaving it up to government. The citizen must learn to be a more empowered citizen. The people are the Third Voice that needs to be heard and if you want Obama to be Your President, then You are going to have to keep showing up just like you did to get him elected.

He needs the Voice of the people. He will heed your call, but you must be as loud , if not Louder, then when you elected him.

Did you read Bush's decision to make it harder to get protections from Toxins and Chemicals?
Ecuador and some other places have made environmental concerns a right of the people by Constitutional Admendment.

I've been toxed out of my house by a contaminated brownfield and political cover up here in Philadelphia. It's been impossible to get any help. I wrote this Bill of Rights to give the lone person the right to know what is in their Water, Soil and Air. We shouldn't have to go through a lot of legal bull to know what we are breathing, drinking or what's in the dirt our children are playing in.

I'm a bit romantic and artsy about it, but that's me. Can't help it.

www.motherlaw.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 11/29/2008

That is why this man, will be thee best President EVER!!!! He will get things done....and I was watching that sicking FOX and Bill Kirstol and his pompous ass was up there saying how we will be left with only the change in our pockets after Obama is done.....BUT YOU KNOW WHAT????? YOUR PRESIDENT,(BUSH) KRISTOL HAS BEAT OBAMA TO IT.........YOU SEE THE FININCIAL MESS HE HAS GOTTEN US IN.......I KNOW OBAMA CAN DO NO WORSE!!


BUZZARDS KORNER

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 11/25/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect