Obama Defends Cabinet: The Change Will Come From Me

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

November 26, 2008 11:18 AM


Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign message that the next president simply couldn't tap the same people for different posts.

Obama, who announced earlier that he was appointing former Fed Chairman Paul Volker to his Economic Recovery Advisory Board, took a bit of umbrage at the implication that staff assignments undermined the meme that defined his run for office.

"Understand where the vision for change comes from, first and foremost," he said. "It comes from me. That's my job, to provide a vision in terms of where we are going and to make sure then that my team is implementing [that vision]."

Watch:

The question of whether Obama's Cabinet undermines his message is, in many ways, a media creation (though there are some legitimate understandable gripes from the labor community). As the president-elect rightfully noted, the issue is a lose-lose proposition. Either he appoints some experienced hands to deal with the economic crisis (and gets labeled as more of the same) or he taps new people to handle the situation and is accused of leaving the country at risk.

"The last Democratic administration we had was the Clinton administration," said Obama. "So it would be surprising if I selected a Treasury Secretary who had had no connection with the last Democratic administration, because that would mean that the person had no experience in Washington whatsoever. And I suspect that you would be troubled and the American people would be troubled if I selected a Treasury Secretary or a chairman of the National Economic Council, at one of the most critical economic times in our history, who had no experience in government whatsoever. What we are going to do is combine experience with fresh thinking."

"I think when you ultimately look at what this advisory board looks like, you'll say this is a cross-section of opinion that in some ways reinforces conventional wisdom and in some ways breaks with orthodoxy in all sorts of ways," he went on. "And that's the kind of discussion we want. We want ideas from everybody. What I don't want to do is to somehow suggest that somehow suggest that since you served in the last Democratic administration, that you're somehow barred from serving again. Because we need people who are going to be able to hit the ground running."

Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign messag...
Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign messag...
 
Comments
1822
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (39 pages total)
photo

A message to all of he naysayers:

This isn't Free Republic. GTFO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 AM on 12/14/2008

What's hilarious is that Obama is unqualified to work in his own cabinet. He literally wouldn't hire himself.. And the first cabinet meeting will be high comedy. It will be embarrassingly obvious to everybody that the far-and-away least qualified person in the room is Barack Obama. Gotta love it when the boss isn't qualified to be his own assistant and everybody knows it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 12/01/2008

i love it when dumb comments are made by people who actually think they are making a point but really aren't. *chuckle chuckle*...Thanks for the laugh!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 AM on 12/04/2008

"Change comes from me."

That answer was arrogant. How can a man with such little experience as Obama, appoint people with so much experience to his cabinet and give them direction?

Obama has one problem that Clinton didn't. The cold war had just ended, thanks to Reagan, and the military budget had a huge surplus. That surplus allowed Clinton to cut spending, mostly on defense and too much was cut. Obama has no such surplus unless he ends the war in Iraq and brings home the 10 billion a month spent there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 11/29/2008

The fact that he's taking responsibility for his picks is not arrogant it's refreshing. He's going to need to assert himself quickly and to some that may be alarming, particularly when viewed from the lens of those not accustomed to seeing a person of color in charge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 11/29/2008

I'm assuming from your comment that you have little or no knowledge of corporate structure...or even government. The CEO (President) provides the leadership for the comapny (government) and has other officers such as CFO's, COO's etc. (staff, cabinet) who are more knowledgeable and experienced in a partricular field than him/herself.

Let me guess...you voted for Bush...twice. As President, everyone he appointed had vastly more experience than he did since he only served as Governor for 5 years. And let me guess again....you didn't ask the same question of him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 11/29/2008

you would rather have a president of our nation who is led around by the nose by his advisors? Or someone who proactively sets forth an agenda?

This is Leadership 101--and I don't understand what you don't grasp about that. It's not arrogant--it's called an organizational chart. Even the Old Testament verse notes: if there is no vision, the people will perish. Which part of that don't you understand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 11/29/2008

Oh yeah, and you actually misread history here too. Reagan didn't end the Cold War; most historians now understand that the Soviet Union was deteriorating long before Reagan got into office. They had pledged far too much of GDP on defense (which should be a lesson for us), putting roughly 50% of theirs toward it while the US had a *historical* legacy of about 5% GDP toward defense. Reagan can't get credit for that, because it preceded him. In other words, he was a beneficiary of longer term trends that, in popular culture, have solely been attributed to him; now, he TOOK credit for it, but that didn't make those changes his. Add to that their powerful losses in Afghanistan, and the growing independence of the Soviet satellites, and Reagan's contribution looks pretty small by comparison.

Remember, it was under Reagan that hammers started costing $300 bucks a pop. Remember Americans in cheese lines? Remember the MX Missile debacle?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 11/29/2008

Obama is a wise man and knows what he is doing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 AM on 11/29/2008
photo

Leadership starts with a leader with a vision and point of view.
His second role is to put in place a team that will have the skill , experience and talent to implement these ideas.....
that's it ...if you've worked for a corporate company with a CEO who has a powerful vision that inspires the team then you have the makings of success .....
and you can see the opposite if you have a CEO who doesn't have a vision , confused, unfocused , out of touch with the market and brand image...and with the same team of people you have the makings of a disaster .....
it starts from the top..........
and I ask myself this question..why would Obama pick a cabinet that wouldn't make his vision successful ...it benefits us all .....so to all the negative , critical , quick to jugde independents out there ...if you change your lens , you change your vision......!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 11/28/2008
- qwr I'm a Fan of qwr permalink

"[Change] comes from me."

How quickly we have moved away from "Change happens from the bottom up."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 11/28/2008

The question Obama was asked was whether his cabinet picks and appointments could be called "change." He said the vision--and change--comes from him. JFK would've said the same thing.

Not sure what sort of bottoms up approach you envision that will dig us out of the worst financial crisis in modern memory.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 11/28/2008

Are the people from the bottom up going to veto any bills?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 AM on 11/29/2008
- qwr I'm a Fan of qwr permalink

What the heck are you talking about? We have a Dem Congress. The word is "change," not "vetos." If you find the second statement nonsensical now, then it must have been nonsensical during the campaign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 11/29/2008

That's the economy, stupid. Policy is a whole other ball game.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 11/29/2008

Why don't you use the whole quote? It's only a few more words:

"Understand where the vision for change comes from, first and foremost," he said. "It comes from me."

Reads a little differently with all the words, eh?

Where else would you expect the *vision* for change to come from? That is always the leader's job, whether the leader is a company commander, a company CEO, or a President. The IMPLEMENTATION happens from the bottom up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 AM on 11/30/2008

I read somewhere, a while back, that the problem of rape in the military was considerably diminished, even non-existent, in those units that had leadership that emphazised that rape was unacceptable, not necessarily because they had a better sort of enlistees. That led me to thinking that leadership can, and does, matter a lot in how underlings manifest their strenghths and disfunctions (or not), more often than not, growing in the process.

We need to let hope be our guide. We need to believe that (most) anyone can grow into a better person if given the opportunity and guidance, realizing and ruing their past mistakes, and we need to learn to believe that there is value in such growth, that growing is, ultimately, our reason for being... and we need to allow past wrong-doers to redeem themselves.

We can certainly trust Obama's doing the right thing, that his good leadership will elicit a different result from his appointees... we can at least give him the benefit of the doubt. And we need to stop second-guessing ourselves, and trust that we made the best possible choice to lead us out of this morass, while at the same time remembering that NO ONE IS PERFECT! He will certainly make mistakes, he even said so in his acceptance speech, but I, for one, will be content if he does the right thing at least 75% of the time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 11/28/2008

LOL I LOVE Obama's response. He is basically saying would you rather I chose people from The Bush adminstration or the Reagan administration. He's a democrat so where the heck is he suppose to get experience people from but the last Democratic administration thats the Clinton administration. This is why I'm NOT worried Obama is TOO SMART.

What some folks fail to undertand is the reason why this is reaassuring for some republicans is because these people are competent intelligent and have experience. If Obama had just gone and pick people out of academia or the business industry because they have no experience in government it would have unsettled people it would have unsettled the market people wouldnt know what to expect. Personally I dont like uncertainity and I suspect many people dont. In this way you are getting twofer maybe even a threefer. Government experience, intelligence/competence and business experience. So it will be reassuring for some republicans. Reassuring is not exactly a rining endorsement it means OK we can relax there is no unknown out there. Notice where his expereince picks are going to the Economy and National Security.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 11/28/2008

Bravo. Very well stated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 11/28/2008

President-Elect Obama has the intelligence to pick a cabinet of the best and the brightest people around who will deal properly with the change that he thinks is needed at this time, I have great faith in his solid judgement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 11/28/2008

The GW Bush agenda was the Neoconservative / PNAC agenda. With Randall Scheunemann as McCain's top foreign policy advisor and Phil Gramm as his economy guru there would have been no change had McCain been elected. I think that it is safe to say that Obama would not be dominated by the Neocons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 11/28/2008

Barack Obama never said he was going to appoint outsiders. That was Sarah Palins gig. She would appoint her BFF from high school because that person always liked to travel or something equally dumb like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 11/28/2008

MargaretO, you got that right!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 11/29/2008

Obama is a wise man. It makes absolute sense to appoint people who have the experience to conquer this crisis we're in. Why in the world would Obama appoint fresh faces all around who wouldn't have the inside expertise to handle such situations that we're in. Obama has combined qualified new & familiar faces which is refreshing and reassuring. I am so proud of my country for electing a leader to help bring us back to being the greatest nation in the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 11/28/2008

What's funny is Obama is right, again! If he were to appoint new people with no experience folks would say he is making the same misstake as Bill Clinton. If the economy wasn't in this ditch I believe he would have chosen differently but he has chosen wisely. So, it's a catch 22. Damned if he do, damned if he don't. His team is an all star team, what people must remember is Obama is cut throat. He will fire your ass on the spot, he is the ring leader. During his campaign folks just disappeared without futher notice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 11/28/2008

I concur with the first half of your post, but find it highly unlikely he will be "firing" (especially from key posts) during his first term. There's just a wee bit of difference between the campaign trail and actually being POTUS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 11/28/2008
photo

When Obama agreed that the people that he had selected had previously served in the Clinton administration, he was letting the doubters know two things:

1. These are the same people that brought you eight years of prosperity under Bill Clinton.

2. I have a vision that I can achieve using these people in the manner that I have envisioned for America and this economic situation.

Ladies and Gentlemen - the man will do what he says he will so; we have to give him the room and the time to accomplish his goals. After all, he does not even have the keys yet!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 11/28/2008

do you know why its a catch 22??? becuase nothing ever changes...only the blame or the delivery............the agenda always moves forward..........or can yhonestly say that im wrong....that things are better then10 20 30 40 years ago ?? not the small recessions or downturns....overall

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 AM on 11/28/2008

he is just clinton jr

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 11/27/2008

Maybe, but I had money in my 401K account. More Americans had jobs. More Americans were off welfare. More Americans were able to send their children to college. More businesses were built. We had a surplus. The national debt decreased.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 11/28/2008

you had me until that welfare bit, get some info on it, you'll be surpised.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 11/28/2008
photo

A Clinton jr is 100 times better than Bush jr..


Get over it!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 AM on 11/28/2008

You mean Bill Clinton is really Barack's father? Oh, get the heck out of here! *head spins*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 AM on 11/29/2008

No he's not. But even if he was, better a Clinton jr than a bush sr or jr any day

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 11/29/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (39 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER CAN BE GUESSED

Researchers have found that it is possible to guess many -- if...

Obamas Tour The Kremlin

MOSCOW — Russia's first lady Svetlana Medvedev took...

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPost Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More

Sam Stein is the White House correspondent for the Huffington Post. Previously he worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Ryan Grim is the senior congressional correspondent for the Huffington Post. He is a former staff reporter with Politico.com and Washington City Paper.
Read More

Jason Linkins is editor of Huffington Post's media commentary blog Eat the Press. He is based in Washington, DC, and previously contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is the Senior News Editor at the Huffington Post. She is based in New York.
Read More