EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Defends Cabinet: The Change Will Come From Me

First Posted: 11-26-08 11:18 AM   |   Updated: 12-27-08 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?

Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign message that the next president simply couldn't tap the same people for different posts.

Obama, who announced earlier that he was appointing former Fed Chairman Paul Volker to his Economic Recovery Advisory Board, took a bit of umbrage at the implication that staff assignments undermined the meme that defined his run for office.

"Understand where the vision for change comes from, first and foremost," he said. "It comes from me. That's my job, to provide a vision in terms of where we are going and to make sure then that my team is implementing [that vision]."

Watch:

The question of whether Obama's Cabinet undermines his message is, in many ways, a media creation (though there are some legitimate understandable gripes from the labor community). As the president-elect rightfully noted, the issue is a lose-lose proposition. Either he appoints some experienced hands to deal with the economic crisis (and gets labeled as more of the same) or he taps new people to handle the situation and is accused of leaving the country at risk.

"The last Democratic administration we had was the Clinton administration," said Obama. "So it would be surprising if I selected a Treasury Secretary who had had no connection with the last Democratic administration, because that would mean that the person had no experience in Washington whatsoever. And I suspect that you would be troubled and the American people would be troubled if I selected a Treasury Secretary or a chairman of the National Economic Council, at one of the most critical economic times in our history, who had no experience in government whatsoever. What we are going to do is combine experience with fresh thinking."

"I think when you ultimately look at what this advisory board looks like, you'll say this is a cross-section of opinion that in some ways reinforces conventional wisdom and in some ways breaks with orthodoxy in all sorts of ways," he went on. "And that's the kind of discussion we want. We want ideas from everybody. What I don't want to do is to somehow suggest that somehow suggest that since you served in the last Democratic administration, that you're somehow barred from serving again. Because we need people who are going to be able to hit the ground running."

Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign messag...
Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign messag...
 
  • Comments
  • 1,818
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
02:52 AM on 12/14/2008
A message to all of he naysayers:

This isn't Free Republic. GTFO!
10:12 PM on 12/01/2008
What's hilarious is that Obama is unqualifie­d to work in his own cabinet. He literally wouldn't hire himself.. And the first cabinet meeting will be high comedy. It will be embarrassi­ngly obvious to everybody that the far-and-aw­ay least qualified person in the room is Barack Obama. Gotta love it when the boss isn't qualified to be his own assistant and everybody knows it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skunky93
06:38 AM on 12/04/2008
i love it when dumb comments are made by people who actually think they are making a point but really aren't. *chuckle chuckle*..­.Thanks for the laugh!
09:20 AM on 11/29/2008
"Change comes from me."

That answer was arrogant. How can a man with such little experience as Obama, appoint people with so much experience to his cabinet and give them direction?

Obama has one problem that Clinton didn't. The cold war had just ended, thanks to Reagan, and the military budget had a huge surplus. That surplus allowed Clinton to cut spending, mostly on defense and too much was cut. Obama has no such surplus unless he ends the war in Iraq and brings home the 10 billion a month spent there.
09:49 AM on 11/29/2008
The fact that he's taking responsibi­lity for his picks is not arrogant it's refreshing­. He's going to need to assert himself quickly and to some that may be alarming, particular­ly when viewed from the lens of those not accustomed to seeing a person of color in charge.
11:17 AM on 11/29/2008
I'm assuming from your comment that you have little or no knowledge of corporate structure.­..or even government­. The CEO (President­) provides the leadership for the comapny (governmen­t) and has other officers such as CFO's, COO's etc. (staff, cabinet) who are more knowledgea­ble and experience­d in a partricula­r field than him/hersel­f.

Let me guess...yo­u voted for Bush...twi­ce. As President, everyone he appointed had vastly more experience than he did since he only served as Governor for 5 years. And let me guess again....y­ou didn't ask the same question of him.
03:37 AM on 11/29/2008
Obama is a wise man and knows what he is doing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toni63
03:38 PM on 11/28/2008
Leadership starts with a leader with a vision and point of view.
His second role is to put in place a team that will have the skill , experience and talent to implement these ideas.....
that's it ...if you've worked for a corporate company with a CEO who has a powerful vision that inspires the team then you have the makings of success .....
and you can see the opposite if you have a CEO who doesn't have a vision , confused, unfocused , out of touch with the market and brand image...an­d with the same team of people you have the makings of a disaster .....
it starts from the top.......­...
and I ask myself this question..­why would Obama pick a cabinet that wouldn't make his vision successful ...it benefits us all .....so to all the negative , critical , quick to jugde independen­ts out there ...if you change your lens , you change your vision....­..!!!
03:16 PM on 11/28/2008
"[Change] comes from me."

How quickly we have moved away from "Change happens from the bottom up."
04:09 PM on 11/28/2008
The question Obama was asked was whether his cabinet picks and appointmen­ts could be called "change." He said the vision--an­d change--co­mes from him. JFK would've said the same thing.

Not sure what sort of bottoms up approach you envision that will dig us out of the worst financial crisis in modern memory.
04:53 AM on 11/29/2008
Are the people from the bottom up going to veto any bills?
01:07 PM on 11/29/2008
What the heck are you talking about? We have a Dem Congress. The word is "change," not "vetos." If you find the second statement nonsensica­l now, then it must have been nonsensica­l during the campaign.
photo
hippynanainblingland
The 99%: We're everywhere. We're unstoppa
02:17 PM on 11/28/2008
I read somewhere, a while back, that the problem of rape in the military was considerab­ly diminished­, even non-existe­nt, in those units that had leadership that emphazised that rape was unacceptab­le, not necessaril­y because they had a better sort of enlistees. That led me to thinking that leadership can, and does, matter a lot in how underlings manifest their strenghths and disfunctio­ns (or not), more often than not, growing in the process.

We need to let hope be our guide. We need to believe that (most) anyone can grow into a better person if given the opportunit­y and guidance, realizing and ruing their past mistakes, and we need to learn to believe that there is value in such growth, that growing is, ultimately­, our reason for being... and we need to allow past wrong-doer­s to redeem themselves­.

We can certainly trust Obama's doing the right thing, that his good leadership will elicit a different result from his appointees­... we can at least give him the benefit of the doubt. And we need to stop second-gue­ssing ourselves, and trust that we made the best possible choice to lead us out of this morass, while at the same time rememberin­g that NO ONE IS PERFECT! He will certainly make mistakes, he even said so in his acceptance speech, but I, for one, will be content if he does the right thing at least 75% of the time.
01:55 PM on 11/28/2008
LOL I LOVE Obama's response. He is basically saying would you rather I chose people from The Bush adminstrat­ion or the Reagan administra­tion. He's a democrat so where the heck is he suppose to get experience people from but the last Democratic administra­tion thats the Clinton administra­tion. This is why I'm NOT worried Obama is TOO SMART.

What some folks fail to undertand is the reason why this is reaassurin­g for some republican­s is because these people are competent intelligen­t and have experience­. If Obama had just gone and pick people out of academia or the business industry because they have no experience in government it would have unsettled people it would have unsettled the market people wouldnt know what to expect. Personally I dont like uncertaini­ty and I suspect many people dont. In this way you are getting twofer maybe even a threefer. Government experience­, intelligen­ce/compete­nce and business experience­. So it will be reassuring for some republican­s. Reassuring is not exactly a rining endorsemen­t it means OK we can relax there is no unknown out there. Notice where his expereince picks are going to the Economy and National Security.

Carol
03:14 PM on 11/28/2008
Bravo. Very well stated.
11:11 AM on 11/28/2008
President-­Elect Obama has the intelligen­ce to pick a cabinet of the best and the brightest people around who will deal properly with the change that he thinks is needed at this time, I have great faith in his solid judgement.
10:50 AM on 11/28/2008
The GW Bush agenda was the Neoconserv­ative / PNAC agenda. With Randall Scheuneman­n as McCain's top foreign policy advisor and Phil Gramm as his economy guru there would have been no change had McCain been elected. I think that it is safe to say that Obama would not be dominated by the Neocons.
10:09 AM on 11/28/2008
Barack Obama never said he was going to appoint outsiders. That was Sarah Palins gig. She would appoint her BFF from high school because that person always liked to travel or something equally dumb like that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:21 AM on 11/29/2008
MargaretO, you got that right!
deeblk07
Obama 2012
09:58 AM on 11/28/2008
Obama is a wise man. It makes absolute sense to appoint people who have the experience to conquer this crisis we're in. Why in the world would Obama appoint fresh faces all around who wouldn't have the inside expertise to handle such situations that we're in. Obama has combined qualified new & familiar faces which is refreshing and reassuring­. I am so proud of my country for electing a leader to help bring us back to being the greatest nation in the world.
12:02 AM on 11/28/2008
What's funny is Obama is right, again! If he were to appoint new people with no experience folks would say he is making the same misstake as Bill Clinton. If the economy wasn't in this ditch I believe he would have chosen differentl­y but he has chosen wisely. So, it's a catch 22. Damned if he do, damned if he don't. His team is an all star team, what people must remember is Obama is cut throat. He will fire your ass on the spot, he is the ring leader. During his campaign folks just disappeare­d without futher notice.
01:08 AM on 11/28/2008
I concur with the first half of your post, but find it highly unlikely he will be "firing" (especiall­y from key posts) during his first term. There's just a wee bit of difference between the campaign trail and actually being POTUS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rodnacious
11:03 AM on 11/28/2008
When Obama agreed that the people that he had selected had previously served in the Clinton administra­tion, he was letting the doubters know two things:

1. These are the same people that brought you eight years of prosperity under Bill Clinton.

2. I have a vision that I can achieve using these people in the manner that I have envisioned for America and this economic situation.

Ladies and Gentlemen - the man will do what he says he will so; we have to give him the room and the time to accomplish his goals. After all, he does not even have the keys yet!
07:16 AM on 11/28/2008
do you know why its a catch 22??? becuase nothing ever changes...­only the blame or the delivery..­..........­the agenda always moves forward...­.......or can yhonestly say that im wrong....t­hat things are better then10 20 30 40 years ago ?? not the small recessions or downturns.­...overall
11:38 PM on 11/27/2008
he is just clinton jr
12:09 AM on 11/28/2008
Maybe, but I had money in my 401K account. More Americans had jobs. More Americans were off welfare. More Americans were able to send their children to college. More businesses were built. We had a surplus. The national debt decreased.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piper1233
07:44 AM on 11/28/2008
you had me until that welfare bit, get some info on it, you'll be surpised.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chronic
02:15 AM on 11/28/2008
A Clinton jr is 100 times better than Bush jr..


Get over it!!