New Mortgage Crisis Looms, Number Of Defaults Expected To Double

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - New Mortgage Crisis Looms, Number Of Defaults Expected To Double stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MATT APUZZO | November 28, 2008 04:45 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
The Vanity Fair Outlet stores opened at 12:01 a.m. EST for Black Friday sales has shoppers seeking bargins and discounts Nov. 28, 2008 in Reading, Pa. (AP Photos/Bradley C Bower)

WASHINGTON — Black Friday's retail shoppers hunting for holiday bargains won't be enough to stave off what's likely to become the next economic crisis. Malls from Michigan to Georgia are entering foreclosure, commercial victims of the same events poisoning the housing market.

Hotels in Tucson, Ariz., and Hilton Head, S.C., also are about to default on their mortgages.

That pace is expected to quicken. The number of late payments and defaults will double, if not triple, by the end of next year, according to analysts from Fitch Ratings Ltd., which evaluates companies' credit.

"We're probably in the first inning of the commercial mortgage problem," said Scott Tross, a real estate lawyer with Herrick Feinstein in New Jersey.

That's bad news for more than just property owners. When businesses go dark, employees lose jobs. Towns lose tax revenue. School budgets and social services feel the pinch.

Companies have survived plenty of downturns, but economists see this one playing out like never before. In the past, when businesses hit rough patches, owners negotiated with banks or refinanced their loans.

But many banks no longer hold the loans they made. Over the past decade, banks have increasingly bundled mortgages and sold them to investors. Pension funds, insurance companies, and hedge funds bought the seemingly safe securities and are now bracing for losses that could ripple through the financial system.

"It's a toxic drug and nobody knows how bad it's going to be," said Paul Miller, an analyst with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, who was among the first to sound alarm bells in the residential market.

Story continues below
advertisement

Unlike home mortgages, businesses don't pay their loans over 30 years. Commercial mortgages are usually written for five, seven or 10 years with big payments due at the end. About $20 billion will be due next year, covering everything from office and condo complexes to hotels and malls.

The retail outlook is particularly bad. Circuit City and Linens 'n Things have sought bankruptcy protection. Home Depot, Sears, Ann Taylor and Foot Locker are closing stores.

Those retailers typically were paying rent that was expected to cover mortgage payments. When those $20 billion in mortgages come due next year _ 2010 and 2011 totals are projected to be even higher _ many property owners won't have the money.

Some will survive, but those property owners whose loans required little money up front will have less incentive to weather the storm.

Refinancing formerly was an option, but many properties are worth less than when they were purchased. And since investors no longer want to buy commercial mortgages, banks are reluctant to write new loans to refinance those facing foreclosure.

California, New York, Texas and Florida _ states with a high concentration of mortgages in the securities market, according to Fitch _ are particularly vulnerable. Texas and Florida are already seeing increased delinquencies and defaults, as are Michigan, Tennessee and Georgia.

The worst-case scenario goes something like this: With banks unwilling to refinance, a shopping center goes into foreclosure. Nobody can buy the mall because banks won't write mortgages as long as investors won't purchase them.

"Credit markets have seized up," corporate securities lawyer Michael Gambro said. "People are not willing to take risks. They're not buying anything."

That drives down investments already on the books. Insurance companies are seeing their stock prices fall on fears they are too invested in commercial mortgages.

"The system has never been tested for a deep recession," said Ken Rosen, a real estate hedge fund manager and University of California at Berkeley professor of real estate economics.

One hope was that the U.S. would use some of the $700 billion financial bailout to buy shaky investments from banks and insurance companies. That was the original plan. But Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has issued a stunning turnabout, saying the U.S. no longer planned to buy troubled securities. For those watching the wave of commercial defaults about to crest, the announcement was poorly received.

"He's created havoc in the marketplace by changing the rules," Rosen said. "It was the stupidest statement on Earth."

The Securities and Exchange Commission is considering another option that might ease the crisis, one that would change accounting rules so banks don't have to declare huge losses whenever the market declines.

But the only surefire remedy is for the economy to stabilize, for businesses to start expanding and for investors to trust the market again. Until then, Tross said, "There's going to be a lot of pain going forward."

WASHINGTON — Black Friday's retail shoppers hunting for holiday bargains won't be enough to stave off what's likely to become the next economic crisis. Malls from Michigan to Georgia are enterin...
WASHINGTON — Black Friday's retail shoppers hunting for holiday bargains won't be enough to stave off what's likely to become the next economic crisis. Malls from Michigan to Georgia are enterin...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
71
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

The day is at hand that I have been telling friends and associates about for years. No one has any money to buy things. Their credit is tapped out. No money to buy means production of the items usally bought and sold grinds to a halt, which means jobs are lost and companies shut down. The banks made things worse by backing a lot of bad loans and hastened the the credit crunch, but the credit was going to run out sooner or later....when you owe more than you ae worth and could ever hope to repay, the game is over. America has spent beyond its means for years and he reckless Dubya deficits have accelerated the process. The day is at hand. Soon, America will owe more than she can ever repay....without factories, high-paying jobs to build a good tax base....and the note will come due. America....going out of business after 200+ years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 12/01/2008
- Caliwoman I'm a Fan of Caliwoman 9 fans permalink

Here's an example. Wife's job in danger 2006, moves for job security, husband commutes weekends for a year, too much stress on family and kids, husband quits job to move near wife where cost of living less, but house in old town doesn't sell, rents at a loss, husband can't find even part time work in new community. Credit card bills mount. So, does one even try to stay afloat, or declare bankruptcy, loose the rental (probably a wash with the mortgage if that), the one car that has payments due, and live with crappy credit for seven years? The only reason to hang on is so son can get student loans cosigned with parents excellent credit in a year and a half. BTW, wife's income likely getting cut in 2009, which could make the whole situation impossible anyhow. So is it stupid to be responsible and pay on the rental mortgage and the cards? Bush should resign now. He has ruined middle America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 12/01/2008
- wagadog I'm a Fan of wagadog 43 fans permalink

Look at the bright side. That condo complex and "mixed use" strip mall that was going to overshadow your home and increase traffic tenfold on your quiet side street isn't going to be built now. Property developers having to work for a living, and not knowing how to do anything else but show up at city hall trying to grind ordinary neighborhood associations down...will have to find something else to do. High end retail outfits not in a position to price neighborhood businesses (who have always run on cash anyway) out of their own stores.

All together now: AWWWWWW!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 11/30/2008
photo

They need to start a lease to own program through the bank. If you show you can pay for your home for two years without incident than you have a option to buy it. This will make the house inventory go down. This is cucial if these malls close down because to many jobs will be lost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 11/30/2008

We no longer have a capitalist society. We are a Fascist economy, where profits are private and losses socialized, but are rapidly devolving into modern feudalism, where the state owns everything including the people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 11/30/2008

the great collapse of the banking system otherwise known as a ponzi scheme or piramid scheme.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYZM58dulPE&feature=related

http://davidfromsandiego.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/why-we-will-live-in-debt-always/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 11/29/2008

As an owner of a commercial building, my only concern is that my mortgage payment is within the norms of my industry, which is about 10% of gross revenues. Since I financed the building with an SBA 504, the interest rate has gone down substantially (30% down) along with my gross revenues (20% down) during this crisis and remains well within those norms. (Thank God!)

However, as the article says, my loan has a balloon payment after 10 years, which in my case will be due in 2012, about 4 years from now. Who knows what the economy will be like then? Six years ago, my building appraised lower than it did a few weeks ago, and I still have an equity margin of about 25% left. If the circumstances of other commercial building owners are about the same, then commercial property is not so bad off as residential property.

As far as residential real estate goes, I am not clear about what it costs to build houses. The cost of replacing a home seems to me to be a better approach to determining a home's value than just looking at this hysterical housing market. One of my friends advised me that it takes about $100,000 of lumber to build a median home now, and that labor costs, with the tighter labor market, should be about half what it used to be. Does anybody have more facts and information on this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 11/29/2008

SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE LET REPUBLICANS SWING DOWN FROM THE TREES AND TRY TO RUN THINGS ... ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 11/29/2008

More like crawled out from under rocks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 11/30/2008
- dozaa I'm a Fan of dozaa 9 fans permalink
photo

Really good question. Someone have an answer?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 11/29/2008

Ya just use that half-priced labor. Me thinks your new house will last only half as long, be half as energy efficient, half as nice. Cheap labor is not the answer, in fact, it is a big part of the problem.

However, for an individual, I also disagree. I'd say go buy a 50 year old home built by craftsmen and it will last way longer than your new home built with stix and faux brix from Home Depot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 11/30/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

Empty abandoned shopping malls would be a beautiful thing, and possibly converted into affordable housing or skate boarding super tracks...even better..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 11/29/2008
- TexMex69 I'm a Fan of TexMex69 3 fans permalink
photo

That's the old Bush Admin that we have come to know and despise. Don't like the way the game is going change the rules. So in essence they are legally cooking the books. Frocking Great !!

"The Securities and Exchange Commission is considering another option that might ease the crisis, one that would change accounting rules so banks don't have to declare huge losses whenever the market declines."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 11/29/2008
- tomas0808 I'm a Fan of tomas0808 8 fans permalink

Burn baby burn disco inferno

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 11/29/2008
- JayDDrew I'm a Fan of JayDDrew 42 fans permalink

All the commenters are pointing to the same problems, different parts, but a common view.
The Hank Paulsons, Robert Rubins, etc. have no idea how to fix the problems - they have lived in a subculture of extreme wealth for too long.
You writers are right in that it doesn't matter what the interest rates are, it doesn't matter if the banks have money to lend - people are afraid to borrow or simply have such bad credit, they can't!
It's too difficult for these bigshots to get their hands dirty down here with Real America. These mortgage loans have to be refinanced on an individual basis to keep people in their homes, solvent, paying their bills and to keep the DEMAND for employment up. The longer they wait to do this, the longer this recession will be, and the greater the chance of it becoming a depression.
Meanwhile, they continue to reassure us this won't become a depression because they don't want to have a panic which crashes the markets, thus destroying THEIR wealth! Unfortunately, until they can see these problems from Middle Americans' eyes, they can't fix them.
They are trying to spackle holes in the dam with their eyes closed: no matter how much spackle they throw at it, they keep missing and more leaks are sprouting everywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 11/29/2008
- sean6886 I'm a Fan of sean6886 14 fans permalink
photo

I think this is a better idea than throwing another stimulus check in the mail. Sure, everyone could use the extra cash, but it doesn't really solve anything.
The morgage crisis is quite a few issues. Yes, there are people who spent on homes well beyond their means. Yes, there are people who had affordable mortgages but either took out equity or maxed out their credit cards and now the rate has adjusted and their in trouble. I agree people should know what their getting into, but honestly, the banks are also supposed to red flag someone when they can't afford something they want, such as a home.
But for those who are currently in the process of foreclosure, or about to go there, the government should force these banks, who've taken tax dollars for their bailout, to work with homeowners. Make their payment an affordable one, and make it a 40 or 50 year loan rather than a 30. I don't want to give anyone perks, but the more homes that go into foreclosure, the more we're going to continue to be in this issue and the values of homes, for those that pay faithfully, are going to collapse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 11/29/2008

A prior poster sa id $100,000 to everyone over 18. That amount would be too much and would go to too many people. Limit the package to $10,000 to those who actually work (full time through 2007 or laid off through downsizing) and pay taxes. The amount would be just enough to stimulate the economyand cut off the lazy, shiftless, and those who don't pay taxes. It wouldn't create inflation because of the relatively small amount of money. It should be taxed (spread out over 10 years @ the lowest tax rate).

People would be able to pay their mortgages (liquidity to banks).
People would be able to buy items (help stores and employment)
People would save some or all (liquidity to banks).
People would be able to buy a used car or place money down on a new car (liquidity and employment)

Bypasses banks and the stupidity that everyone who needs money right now can qualify for a loan.
Those who are unemployed can't qualify for a loan!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 11/29/2008
photo

Those who already have loans and have lost their jobs, YOU KNOW, THOSE LAZY SHIFTLESS PEOPLE WITH THE BAD SENSE TO GET LAYED OFF, are part of the reason the economy is in so much trouble.


Do the lazy and shiftless you refer to include paople who have been downsized into part time jobs?

Were I work, we have people working 40 hours a week who have been told they can do this, an be classified as part time employees, or go somewhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 11/29/2008
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 244 fans permalink

First it takes a 100K investment to create a single NEW job. Think about the cost of recreating the 3 million about to be lost in the Auto industry.

Secondly, that would create consummer spending which is how we got here.. a short term fix when the money for the most part would go to buy products not made in the U.S. or foreign cars imported or just assembled here from protected markets. Low return on the dollar.

Spend the money here and only government can insure that. Infrastructure, green technology.

The BUSH tax cut money borrowed from Communist China flowed to China for the higher profits of low wages and because of their 22.5% tarrif on our goods shipped to them ( FREE Market my A$$) and built nice new American plants there while ours rust here and 4.5 million MFG jobs followed. That gave us the first jobless recovery in history.


Its not just cash, its how its spent. And supporting 750 bases in foreign countries is another BIG economic loss to the U.S.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 11/29/2008
- CAPlatt I'm a Fan of CAPlatt 3 fans permalink

Control the population growth or nobody's money will matter. The economies of the world can't keep growing without stop. You can't support the world with a Wall Mart mentality. We're all being trampled to death by religion and the view that you can have as many kids as you want. In God we bust.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 11/29/2008
- Eriq I'm a Fan of Eriq 15 fans permalink
photo

Yes, bravíssimo!! I completely agree with this view. The American brand of Christianity that has come to view itself as manifested through ostentatious wealth, and this kind of religion requires people to make and spend more money. In God we bust, indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 11/29/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Why is Paulson acting like he is in the pay of big finance? Everything he has done in conjunction with Bernanke indicate they are looking to sink the economy, not rescue it. The U.S. had a $14 trillion dollar economy last year. After pumping over $8 trillion of new money into the system in just a few months, the financial situation and the markets have not stabilized.

Why is that? Who are they really working for? And what are the ill intentions of their masters?

With so many dollars floating around in the world today, an additional $8 trillion in a few months, what happens when world economies do recover? What will the value of the dollar be then? Next to nothing. The collapse of America as a financial power, and the end of superpower status.

In addition, with so many countries holding dollar reserves, the collapse of the currency would trigger an even greater financial crisis than is currently being experienced. Entire countries will be bankrupt. Witness Iceland. A Global Great Depression.

Giving the loss of prosperity in such a case, chaos would ensue. What happens then? What figure will step forward to offer stability when governments have failed to do so, purposely. This is history repeating itself. Remember what happened after The Weimar Republic collapsed. Who rose to power then.

This is a war, you poor people. Those who have and want to control you are winning. You are losing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 11/29/2008
- Eriq I'm a Fan of Eriq 15 fans permalink
photo

Hear, hear!! This is the REAL class warfare the Republicans have been talking about! It's time to take back the country and put these evil GOP citizens where they belong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 11/29/2008

And the Democrats like Mr. Rubin et al.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 11/29/2008
- Tinkeraw I'm a Fan of Tinkeraw 2 fans permalink

Just give every tax payer over the age of 18 $100,000. That would take care of everything ... we would pay our bills off, shop, buy new cars, maybe a new house, contribute to non-profits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 11/29/2008
- Eriq I'm a Fan of Eriq 15 fans permalink
photo

I've got a much, much better idea:

Confiscate the wealth of these political families who have been squeezing the rest of us in order to rule the roost: Bush, Cheney, Rove, Stevens, etc., and put that money back into the national coffers.
This could be rather like the French Revolution. Aren't we already hearing Bush saying, "Oh, let them eat cake" ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 11/29/2008
photo

$20 loaf of bread?
$200 pack of tshirts?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 11/29/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect