Gates Praises Obama, Outlines New Defense World

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 2, 2008 03:49 PM


Newly re-appointed Defense Secretary Bob Gates took questions from the press on Tuesday, outlining some agenda items that the Obama administration is likely to pursue, dismissing suggestions that not being able to appoint his own staff might hinder the Pentagon's work, and heaping praise on the president-elect who just renewed his job. Gates also rejected the notion that he would be a "caretaker secretary" in the next administration.

"It really didn't [feel strange]" being a Republican Defense Secretary appointed by a Democrat, said Gates. "The president-elect will be the eight president I have worked for. And all I can say is I look forward to it."

"I have been very impressed by several things," he said of his soon-to-be-boss. "First of all the things he said to me and on the campaign trail about the military and his respect for the institution; I was impressed by his reaching out to Admiral Mullen, and he has made clear he wants to have a regular dialogue with the chairman, the chiefs and the commanders. I have also been very impressed by Michelle Obama's desire to work on behalf of military families. All these things send very positive signals to the men and women in uniform."

Gates revealed the details of the secret meeting with Obama to discuss his role in the next administration: "We did meet the day he came to Washington to meet with the President. We met when he went back to the airport. We actually met in the fire station at National Airport and they pulled the trucks out so that our cars could go in."

Obama announced Monday that Gates would continue to serve as Defense Secretary during the early stages of his presidency, at the very least. The move was hailed as a gesture towards national security bipartisanship, but also as a shrewd move to give Obama the cover he needs to pursue different foreign policy proposals.

On Tuesday, Gates was quizzed on several of those areas, telling reporters that he would like to slow down the stop-loss program, whereby veterans are called back into service (though this, he said, would be driven by the winding down of the Iraq war), close Guantanamo (through legislation), and bolster the nation's foreign service corps.

"The dollars required significant to enhance our capabilities in that area, are relatively speaking, small, compared to a new weapons system," he said. "The personnel required to plus up the capabilities of the national security arena... are relatively small."

Gates also discussed the need to be pragmatic in revising our approach to Afghanistan, arguing that an addition of three brigades into that theater would be helpful if it was accompanied by "enablers" who could help deliver on U.S. policy.

One reporter questioned whether the debate over Iraq withdrawal was, with the signing of a Status of Forces Agreement, a moot point -- U.S. forces will be pulled out whether due to deadline or accomplishment.

"I still think the pacing needs to be seen in the context of what's going on, both in terms of the deadlines we've agreed to and in terms of the situation on the ground," Gates responded. "The new factor is we have agreed to some deadlines that change the nature of the mission in considerable ways."

Finally, Gates was asked about the staffing of Defense under his leadership. The president-elect will choose the high-ranking figures to serve in the bureaucracy, the Secretary said, but that did not portend major conflicts. In fact, Gates came into the job without his own people in place.

"When I came here two years ago, every single position was filled by somebody who was appointed by somebody else," he noted. "I think it has worked out okay."

Newly re-appointed Defense Secretary Bob Gates took questions from the press on Tuesday, outlining some agenda items that the Obama administration is likely to pursue, dismissing suggestions that not ...
Newly re-appointed Defense Secretary Bob Gates took questions from the press on Tuesday, outlining some agenda items that the Obama administration is likely to pursue, dismissing suggestions that not ...
 
Comments
183
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Gates supported the actions of the contras, created by the CIA to illegally overthrow the Democratic Republic of Nicaragua in the 1980's. Lies are a fact of his past., but history shows people died, cocaine flowed into Oakland and other US cities, guns were bought and people suffered greatly.

Accountability...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 12/03/2008

I have to agree with what a lot of you are saying. It does seem that Gates did not buy into the Bush doctrine. Quite the opposite, he seems to support a view that is more in line with Obama. Obama obviously knew what he was doing when he decided to keep Gates.

http://www.youspar.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 12/03/2008

I never saw a smile from Gates while he served under W like the one on Huff. he knew W was a blowhard idiot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

So, where was this guy while the GOP was calling 0bama a terrist?
Keeping his mouth shut like a good Republican.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

The best way to describe Robert Gates is nondescript.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 12/03/2008

Obama is going to put a lot of these crooks in their place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 12/03/2008

I think the big smile on the front page says it all. This is one happy man to be going to work for adults for a change. I like this pick more and more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 AM on 12/03/2008

Or it may say, "I got mine, how you doin'?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 AM on 12/03/2008

HE'S EVILLLL!!!~! I DON'T' AGREE WITH HIM POLITICALLY, SO HE MUST BE EVILLL~!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

ditto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

For those of you wanting some evidence that Obama is a warmonger, here are some quotes and a website full of information. Better than Bush or McCain? Yes. A man of peace? No. It's going to be interesting watching "liberals" suddenly support the same foreign policy they have been claiming to reject for the past few years. First the quotes, then the website:

Obama's starry-eyed defenders have tried to downplay the importance of his cabinet selections, saying Obama will call the shots, but the ruling elite in this country see it for what it is. Karl Rove, "Bush's Brain", called Obama's cabinet selections, "reassuring", which itself is disconcerting, but neoconservative leader and former McCain campaign staffer Max Boot summed it up best. "I am gobsmacked by these appointments, most of which could just as easily have come from a President McCain," Boot wrote. The appointment of General Jones and the retention of Gates at defence "all but puts an end to the 16-month timetable for withdrawal from Iraq, the unconditional summits with dictators and other foolishness that once emanated from the Obama campaign."

www.informationclearinghouse.info

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 12/03/2008

The reason they are "gobsmacked" is because they spent the better part of 2 years trying to make Obama out to be the marxist/ terrorist, radical of all radical leftist of the left bogeyman and scare their less than intelligent supporters out of their (dim) wits. I am not downplaying any of his choices, and I am neither starry-eyed, nor cynical. I have always known if Obama won, one of his mandates would be to try and stop some of the partisan practices that allow the government to stagnate, and render it useless. With the insurmountable tsunami of issues this pres.elect is faced with, and the agenda that he needs to be facilitated, don't you think this is informing his choices? Would you rather he approach his cabinet choices the way Bush ran the government the past 8 years, with no understanding of the big picture, and to be the "decider" that sees government as "us" and "them"?

BTW, I wouldn't put it past Rove to try to undermine Obama and do him damage merely by agreeing with him! I couldn't think of a worse endorsement...unless Cheney and Palin jump on board as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 AM on 12/03/2008

Actually the 16 month withdrawal isn't an issue anymore. The Iraqi parliament has approved a measure that would pull most if not all forces out of Iraq by summer 2009. If you saw the press conference Gates gave, then you would know that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

I don't know who you think you voted for but I did NOT vote for Dennis Kucinich. In other words I have always known that Barack was a centrist / pragmatist. This is proof.

Sit back and relax. He's not even taken the oath. We gave Bush 8 years ferchrissake...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 12/03/2008

If you think that's what Rove was really saying you don't know him very well. He is the living personification of forked tongue. When he's waving the right hand in from of your eyes, best be looking for the left hand somewhere in your pants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

I think Gates is a smart guy and can tell that president-elect Obama RESPECTS our military's sacrifice in more than words.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

unlike the guy who went to Yale and Harvard

WHAT George Bush was educated at Yale AND Harvard?

He should demand his tuition back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 AM on 12/03/2008

LOL..., it's not even mid-day yet and you already made my day pal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 12/03/2008

Our military's sacrifices are due entirely to a misguided foreign policy that advocates the projection of American power and interventionism around the world. The national security team that Obama has assembled are all believers in this misguided approach and they are not likely to change it, just put a nicer face on it. They only thing that might place limits on it is the financial crisis. Ron Paul was the only one during the recent campaign that spoke honestly about how our foreign policy is contributing to our bankruptcy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

This is going to be a good Team!

Gates is a sound thinker and like Obama is low key, "No Drama Gates" and they will achieve a smooth transition to peace in Iraq!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 12/03/2008

Gates may be the man we need in this office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 AM on 12/03/2008

What I really like about what Gates said is everything. Class act and has done a great job so far.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

Gates will not last more than 2 yrs...


Bank on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 AM on 12/03/2008

I'm sorry you got a head shaped like a potato

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 12/03/2008

I was thinking medicine ball.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 12/03/2008

Its sad how few people here are able to see the entire field.

Obama is keeping Gates so he can get out of Iraq quickly.

Iraq is a mess and will more than likely sink into some form of chaos in 2010 or 2011 and probably will be in some form of chaos going into the 2012 election. Its far more difficult to make a convincing case that Obama is "weak on defense" or "lost Iraq" if a Sec Defense appointed by George W. Bush oversaw the withdrawal of US troops from that country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 12/03/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect