iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Obama's Windfall Taxes Shift: First Broken Promise?


First Posted: 12- 3-08 05:30 PM   |   Updated: 01- 3-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Obama

The Obama team's decision to drop the idea of forcing oil and natural gas companies to pay a tax on their windfall profits has caused a firestorm among liberals and small business coalitions.

As first reported in the Houston Chronicle, Obama's reference to a windfall profits tax, which he articulated during the campaign at a time of skyrocketing gas prices, had been removed from the transition team's Website, change.gov:

President-elect Barack Obama has quietly shelved a proposal to slap oil and natural gas companies with a new windfall profits tax.


An aide for the transition team acknowledged the policy shift Tuesday, after a small-business group discovered the proposal -- touted throughout much of the campaign -- had been dropped from the incoming administration's Web site.

"President-elect Obama announced the policy during the campaign because oil prices were above $80 per barrel," the aide said. "They are below that now and expected to stay below that."

At liberal blog Campaign For America's Future, David Sirota writes:

Between this move and the move to wait to repeal the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, it seems like the Obama team is buying into the right-wing frame that raising any taxes - even those on the richest citizens and wealthiest corporations - is bad for the economy. Of course, that frame is debunked by history. And while sure, it's OK to rack up deficits so as to spend our way out of the economic crisis, it's sorta silly to ignore the tax moves that could be implemented to limit those deficits where possible.


Oh, and one last thing - if oil prices are down and oil industry profits are truly down, what's the harm in passing a windfall profits tax? Even if you buy the right-wing nonsense about a windfall profits tax "hurting the industry" or "hurting the economy" when it is applied, if there really are no windfall profits to tax, then it won't be applied.

On Mother Jones' blog, Nick Baumann wrote a post asking, "Did Barack Obama just break his first camaign promise?":

Obama talked about a windfall profits tax as early as April. As crude oil prices topped $110 a barrel, Obama promised to "put a windfall profits tax on oil companies and use it to help ... families pay their heating and cooling bills and reduce energy costs." And in August, the Democratic nominee issued a campaign ad that promised "a windfall profits tax on big oil to give families a thousand dollar rebate." The windfall profits tax was a key point of contention between President-elect Obama and McCain in June, when McCain criticized Obama for the plan, calling it "dangerous".

The removal was noticed by the American Small Business League which fumed in a press release:

The American Small Business League questions whether the sudden elimination of this issue is a further indication that large corporations are already demonstrating their ability to influence the Obama adminstration...


President-elect Obama owes the American people an explanation as to why these campaign promises have been pulled from his agenda.

Filed by Marcus Baram  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,483
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (64 total)
02:22 PM on 12/07/2008
The oil companies are in a boom/bust industry. They are bust now for sure. Taxing the heck out of them would make it impossible for them to replenish their oil reserves and the the price of crude would swing back harder. $250/barrel could happen.

Obama will do what he believes makes sense. You O-maniacs who now want to hold his feet to the fire continue to look for the "bad guys". The world ain't black and white.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:18 AM on 12/07/2008
Addendum: With all the profits the oil companies have been making, OIL COMPANIES should do the Bailing out for the banks, not the jobless taxpayers!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:16 AM on 12/07/2008
Obama reversed his commitment to holding telecoms accountable for participating in warentless domestic spying while telecoms donated to his campaign. He is hardly immune to corporate influence on his policies. It would be foolhardy to imagine otherwise, especially with a hawkish, corporate shill like Rahm Emanual as his Chief of Staff.
10:21 PM on 12/06/2008
He is not The President of The United States. On January 20th, 2009, he will be the President of the United States. So enough with the silly articles, fake outrage, and just straight up nonsense! It's not on the website! How does one break a promise before they have any authority to implement anything or set any policy. I know how....take it off your website!
12:27 PM on 12/07/2008
I agree. At least let the guy be sworn in first before we start critiquing what a 'job' he's doing as President.

In the meantime, grab your little kids and watch this cool video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo5cCmbnWTc
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:21 PM on 12/06/2008
This reason to not break that promise:

passing a bill now is easier than when there are windfall profits.

That way, when oil skyrockets to 150 a barrel again the law is already in place.

Get it?
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
12:24 PM on 12/06/2008
The false outrage about this is ridiculous!
Why bother fighting with the Republicans in congress over this when the price of oil is $40 per barrel?
I am POSITIVE that if oil prices go back up like they were he would then fight for a Windfall Profits tax.

I see the reality of the situation.
I am a Liberal and I am not outraged about this.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
01:52 PM on 12/06/2008
Here's a trip. Bush & Cheney,McCain & Obama are all related to each other. Go to you tube Bush,Cheney,McCain,Obama family tree,lol.
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
03:22 PM on 12/06/2008
EVERYONE is related if you go back far enough in their genealogy.

And if you're a Bible thumper then you have to believe everyone is descended from Adam & Eve.

I am a second cousin to John McCain, I guess if I checked further I would probably be related to Bush as well!
11:32 AM on 12/06/2008
How silly is this. Unlike Bush, he is smart enough to realize that the situation has changed and his approach to a different situation must also change. Bush would have promised to to it and if oil dropped to 1 penny a gallon he would have done it anyway just because he said so.

So you want a person who is like Bush, unwilling to change on anything regardless of how the situation changes? Unfortunately, there are people who only know how to fight the system, When their guy gets power they still fight the system because they have no other way of dealing with things.

These people can't even wait until he actually gets in office to start criticizing him. Fortunately, most people have more intelligence thatn that.

His Cabinet choices are wrong, he isn't doing enough, he is breaking promises...give me a break, let the man get in office before you start bellyaching.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SharonWantsToTalk
12:35 AM on 12/07/2008
Yes, fortunately most folks live and work outside the world of the bloggers and spokespeople that make it their living to follow this stuff. Not saying that those jobs aren't important, but "these people" do become kind of isolated and fixated on every nuance that presents itself. Thats why it is apparent to us outside it is not a crisis. We can see the bigger picture. We are more level headed. I think President ELECT Obama is the most level headed candidate for the office that I can remember in my life time.
10:10 AM on 12/06/2008
Sorry, but there's no windfall, why a windfall tax then? Thats just bureaucracy. Keep it simple and focus on the problems at hand. There may come a time, when things change again and I have no doubt the windfall tax will be back in the picture then. Discussions like this one remind me, that many have not fully understood the scope of the economic crisis in the US, otherwise this discussion wouldn't take place in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WilliamGossett
09:58 AM on 12/06/2008
Barack is a politician. As such he is not bound to any campaign promises.

To wit, if gas prices are down, there is no need for a windfall profits tax right now. Why bring on opposition when it isn't necessary? We have a lot of other things to fight about..

Standing on principle and being forthright is about the most stupid thing a politician can do. Winning is the most important thing a politician can do. What Barack has to do is to "win" by obtaining as much success as he can in governing. Taking on fights on the the basis of "principle" or prior promises to fix a problem which has gone away is JUST PLAIN DUMB.

Barack never would have had a filibuster proof Senate even if he had gotten the sixty Senate seats. Filibusters in the past were always a bipartisan closure, never one party alone.

To you folks who are annoyed at the sixty vote rule - remember the last eight years and various measures by the Bush administration which were not passed because of the sixty vote rule?

Privatization of Social Security? Folks, after the 2004 election, that was a done deal. Ony the sixty vote rule in the Senate blocked it. So don't be too critical.
09:51 AM on 12/06/2008
This article is lie and should be retracted.

A spokesperson for the Obama transition team is reaffirming the President-elect's commitment to rolling back the subsidies that oil companies enjoy, confirming that Obama's campaign promise on this score is still fully operative.

"Yes," replied Obama transition team spokesperson Nick Shapiro, when we asked him whether Obama remained committed to rolling back the oil company subsidies....


http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/obama_spokesperson_reaffirms_c.php
09:49 AM on 12/06/2008
This article is a lie. Actually ....

A spokesperson for the Obama transition team is reaffirming the President-elect's commitment to rolling back the subsidies that oil companies enjoy, confirming that Obama's campaign promise on this score is still fully operative.

"Yes," replied Obama transition team spokesperson Nick Shapiro, when we asked him whether Obama remained committed to rolling back the oil company subsidies....

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/obama_spokesperson_reaffirms_c.php
12:04 AM on 12/06/2008
Where do you get your info Adam? GWB lifted an executive order banning off shore drilling that has been in place since the Carter administration and upheld by every president since including St. Ronnie and Bush the Elder. Dems in congress had nothing to do with banning off shore drilling in '07.
As far as this sudden influx of oil coming in from US off shore wells, that is pure fantasy. Do you really believe it is possible to get off shore oil wells operational in a few months? Quit getting your info from Rush and Hannity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:40 PM on 12/05/2008
Just a beginning. He is a politician. Get accustomed to it.
However, it is still much better than McCain.
"Plan your change. Change your plan."
10:10 PM on 12/05/2008
Oh snap. Did the Obama Presidency start already and I missed it? Did he do all that as President and I slept it like Rip "freakin" Van Ripple?
07:15 PM on 12/05/2008
The sad thing is the majority of people here that scream about the "EVIL BIG OIL" companies don't now anythign about them. Probably have never looked at a financial statement; probably don't even know what a financial statement is. That's why Obama played the windfall profits tax card in the campaign; Since most voters don't know what the hell they're talking about, its easy to pick a scapegoat and say i'll tax them if you elect me. Then the sheep voters go for it.

Disclaimer: I was/am still an Obama supporter; I'm just merely pointing this out.

"the best argument against democracy is a five minute converstaion with the average voter" --Winston Churchill
01:56 PM on 12/07/2008
You've got to be kiddin' you are not an Obama supporter. You are on here playing politics and doing what the Republicans do best and the media pundits hop on every cue? Truth is the Obama true supporters asked him to fix the economy first even if "WE" have to wait for the tax break. Jerk! Give it up and let the man get sworn in to office, even though we didn't vote Bushed in 2000 we at least did that, and for the record "I" didn't vote for him in 2004 either. Give it a rest and get a LIFE!