EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Blackwater Charges Unsealed: Guards Shot Civilians, Launched Grenade Into Girls' School, US Says

LARA JAKES JORDAN and MATT APUZZO | December 8, 2008 09:16 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Blackwater Worldwide security guard Donald Ball, left, and his attorney, Steven McCool, arrive to federal court to surrender Monday, Dec. 8, 2008, in Salt Lake City. Ball, a former Marine from West Valley City, Utah, was one of five guards who were indicted for the 2007 shooting of Iraqi civilians. (AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac)
?>

WASHINGTON — Wild, unprovoked gunfire and grenades killed 14 innocent Iraqis and hurt dozens more in a 2007 Baghdad attack, prosecutors said Monday in announcing charges with mandatory 30-year prison terms against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards. The Justice Department called the shooting a shocking and devastating violation of human rights. The harsh words echoed the outrage of Iraqis, who have waited more than a year to see how the U.S. would respond to the shooting on a busy street in the Iraqi capital.

The shooting by the largest U.S. security contractor in Iraq sparked international condemnation, launched congressional hearings and inspired anti-American insurgent propaganda.

The five security guards _ all decorated military veterans _ surrendered in federal court in Utah, where one of them lives. The five guards walked wordlessly through a phalanx of reporters. A judge ordered the guards to report to a Washington courthouse Jan. 6, where they were expected to plead not guilty.

A sixth Blackwater guard struck a deal with prosecutors, turned on his former colleagues, and pleaded guilty to killing one Iraqi and wounding another.

"None of the victims of this shooting was armed. None of them was an insurgent," U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor said at a Justice Department news conference in Washington to announce the charges.

Prosecutors said the slain included young children, women, people fleeing in cars and a man whose arms were raised in surrender as he was shot in the chest.

Twenty others were wounded in crowded Nisoor Square, including one injured by a grenade launched into a nearby girls' school. Another 18 Iraqis were assaulted but not wounded, prosecutors said.

Blackwater, which was not charged in the case, maintains its guards were protecting themselves from what they believed was an imminent car bomb attack.

"We think it's pure and simple a case of self-defense," defense attorney Paul Cassell said Monday as the guards were being booked. "Tragically, people did die."

In all, 17 Iraqis were killed in the assault. But Assistant Attorney General Patrick Rowan said evidence in the case could only prove the guards shot 14, although he left open the possibility of future charges.

The five guards were charged with 14 counts of manslaughter, 20 counts of attempted manslaughter and one count of using a machine gun to commit a crime of violence. The machine gun charge, typically used in drug cases, carries a 30-year minimum prison sentence.

The guards are Donald Ball, a former Marine from West Valley City, Utah; Dustin Heard, a former Marine from Knoxville, Tenn.; Evan Liberty, a former Marine from Rochester, N.H.; Nick Slatten, a former Army sergeant from Sparta, Tenn., and Paul Slough, an Army veteran from Keller, Texas.

Defense lawyers say the case has unfairly tarnished the images of the Blackwater guards. Each man has received honors for his service in some of the world's most dangerous places, from Bosnia and Afghanistan to Iraq.

The sixth guard, who is cooperating with the government, is Jeremy Ridgeway of California. He pleaded guilty to one count each of manslaughter, attempted manslaughter, and aiding and abetting. In his plea agreement with prosecutors, Ridgeway admitted there was no threat from a white Kia sedan whose driver, a medical student, was killed and his mother, in the front passenger seat, was injured.

The shooting took place around noon on Sept. 16, 2007, in a crowded square where prosecutors said civilians were running errands, getting lunch and otherwise going about their lives.

Following a car bombing elsewhere in the city, the heavily armed Blackwater convoy sought to shut down an intersection. Prosecutors said the convoy, known by the call sign Raven 23, had violated an order not to leave the U.S.-controlled Green Zone.

Witnesses said the contractors opened fire unprovoked, and left the square littered with blown-out cars.

Khalid Ibrahim, a 40-year-old electrician who said his father, Ibrahim Abid, 78, died in the shooting, welcomed the charges.

"The killers must pay for their crime against innocent civilians, Ibrahim said in Iraq. "Justice must be achieved so that we can have rest from the agony we are living in. We know that the conviction of the people behind the shooting will not bring my father to life, but we will have peace in our minds and hearts."

But the drama is far from over. After more than a year of investigative missteps and fierce debate, the Justice Department now faces stiff challenges to the evidence and legal grounds at the heart of its case.

Most importantly, prosecutors must prove they did not rely on protected statements the guards gave to State Department investigators within hours of the shootings.

The State Department gave limited immunity to all the guards in the four-car convoy, promising not to prosecute them based on the initial statements recounting how the violence began. The move left Justice Department and FBI investigators with a crime scene long gone cold and with limited forensic evidence to bolster their case.

"We fully expect that the defendants will raise the issue," Rowan said. "We've been very careful and very painstaking in the way we have investigated this case, the way we have assembled evidence. And we fully expect to prevail when the court hears that issue."

Defense attorneys also will argue that the guards cannot be charged under a law intended to cover soldiers and military contractors since the men worked as civilian contractors for the State Department. Rowan, however, said Blackwater was supporting the military's mission in Baghdad and the law therefore applies to them.

It is the first time prosecutors have used that argument to prosecute contractors. The Justice Department recently lost a somewhat similar case against former Marine Jose Luis Nazario Jr., who was charged in Riverside, Calif., with killing four unarmed Iraqi detainees.

The Moyock, N.C.-based Blackwater said it stands behind the guards despite being "extremely disappointed and surprised" that one had pleaded guilty.

___

Associated Press writers Jennifer Dobner and Paul Foy in Salt Lake City and Sameer N. Yacoub in Baghdad contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Wild, unprovoked gunfire and grenades killed 14 innocent Iraqis and hurt dozens more in a 2007 Baghdad attack, prosecutors said Monday in announcing charges with mandatory 30-year p...
WASHINGTON — Wild, unprovoked gunfire and grenades killed 14 innocent Iraqis and hurt dozens more in a 2007 Baghdad attack, prosecutors said Monday in announcing charges with mandatory 30-year p...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 224
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
07:29 PM on 12/08/2008
Just heard on Lehrer Report that the judge turned down the request for trial jurisdicti­on in Utah. They will be tried in DC.
photo
castlerider
"A man's home is his castle"
06:10 PM on 12/08/2008
It's true that freedom isn't free, but neither is honor.

These soldiers were clumsy, trigger happy and downright murderous as they besmirched the honor of the United States of America's military who they were there working for, and now they have to answer for their actions.
It's not the point that they may not have respected the people there, and therefore weren't concerned in the least of seeing them lose their lives or watching them get killed... . It's the fact that history will always judge us. It's the price we pay for remaining a free country, and the greatest country in the world.
02:45 PM on 12/09/2008
This appears to be a Murtha-esq­ue statement, and one suspects that it will also have to be retracted as facts come in rather than allegation­s.

These are experience­d, decorated soldiers and it is improbable to the point of being a pragmatic certainty that they were under attack and reacted appropriat­ely. Terrorists deliberate­ly HIDE IN GIRLS' schools, for example. Terrorists don't wear uniforms so it is rather difficult to discern a dead terrorist from a dead civilian. Civilians are injured in counter-te­rrorist action precisely BECAUSE THEY MINGLE IN WITH CIVILIANS.

One wonders whatever happened to a cornerston­e of the legal system, the presumptio­n of innocence IN AMERICA.

In other countries their is often the presumptio­n of guilt, but that's not the American way.
03:27 PM on 12/09/2008
Nota bene: I am entitled to my assumption­s, too!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:22 PM on 12/09/2008
"Wild, unprovoked gunfire and grenades killed 14 innocent Iraqis and hurt dozens more in a 2007 Baghdad attack..."

""None of the victims of this shooting was armed. None of them was an insurgent,­" U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor said..."

"Prosecuto­rs said the slain included young children, women, people fleeing in cars and a man whose arms were raised in surrender as he was shot in the chest.

Twenty others were wounded in crowded Nisoor Square, including one injured by a grenade launched into a nearby girls' school. Another 18 Iraqis were assaulted but not wounded, prosecutor­s said."
05:53 PM on 12/08/2008
The Iraqis will give them the justice they deserve. We probably will not. There is no excuse for murder of civilians even in the so-called "Heat of Battle," which this was not. Warriors who cannot tell incoming fire from outgoing haven't seen much of the former.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
05:55 PM on 12/08/2008
If you haven't been there, you really don't have any room to talk like that. How much combat have you actually seen? And no, playing SOCOM on your Xbox doesn't count.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
myangeldog1
06:41 PM on 12/08/2008
Then as far as I'm concerned these Blackwater "employees­" can re-enlist, take an oath and abide by the code of honor and legalities under the U.S. Military. Tell me HOW these men were "protectin­g" U.S. diplomats in this situation.­...which by the way, is their sole purpose for being in Iraq in the first place!!?!
07:03 PM on 12/08/2008
Come on, these guys were Blackwater and the facts speak for themselves­. Stop defending the slaughter of women and children!
03:43 PM on 12/09/2008
1) Murder is not the correct term to apply to innocents who lose their lives as a result of accidents or collateral damage, especially in a war with terrorists who deliberate­ly hide among such innocent civilians.
2) The story is still incomplete­, but there appeared to be a threat from a car bomb, apparently a car driven in a suspicious way, and whether there was fire coming from inside buildings is NOT that easy to discern in a battle. Sound echoes off buildings, for example. Do you recall the many conflictin­g reports of the direction and number of shots fired by Oswald in the Dallas shooting of John F. Kennedy? There was one rifle, by any objectivel­y provable data, and yet we have numerous reports of shots coming from all directions there.

Just the insertion of a little fact, here.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:26 PM on 12/09/2008
Yes, I am sure that if your mother and sister were killed or it was your children who were killed in that crowded Iraqi intersecti­on by some cowboys from Blackwater that you would be casually referring to "collatera­l damage." It underlies your basic racism that the lives of brown-skin­ned people are not so important.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
05:53 PM on 12/08/2008
These guys won't see a day of jail-time because, guess what, what they did WASN'T illegal. They did not break any law that they are being charged with because they are government contractor­s. That "using a machinegun in the commission of a crime" BS is referencin­g an anti-drug law that absolutely positively DOES NOT apply to State department employees or contractor­s working overseas.

Look, love them or hate them, these Blackwater guys were just doing what almost every passionate American wants to do every time we see another planeload of flag-drape­d coffins come back from Iraq, every time we see vets who are missing limbs because some 10-year-ol­d kid detonated an IED with a cell phone. What they did may not be moral, but nothing about war is moral.

And the "women and children" argument.. HA! Last I heard, we have females and 17-year-ol­ds getting shot and blown up there too, I think that qualifies as women and children. And lets not forget how many American civillian contractor­s have been killed bu those cowardly insurgents­. Folks who were there to try to help build a better world for them, bring them running water and electricit­y, schools, hospitals, etc.
06:15 PM on 12/08/2008
I wanted to write something in response, but this kind of attitude is so problemati­c I don't know where to begin. Leaving aside whether the majority of contractor­s are over there to "build a better world," killing civilians IN CASE they are insurgents is not protecting the troops. It feeds into a cycle of violence that creates more danger for them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
06:31 PM on 12/08/2008
Who ever said they were protecting troops? I didn't, and any other person who has a modicum of informatio­n about the Blackwater mission over there wouldn't. They worked for the State Dept. protecting assets as assigned by they State Dept.

And please explain how my attitude is problemati­c. Seriously, not being a smart a$$ here, because I can see how my statements might be uncomforta­ble and inconvenie­nt, but having found myself in situations similar to that of the Blackwater guys (based on what we've been told anyway), I can understand their side of the story. Can you say the same?
photo
bobbyperu
"Bobby Peru don't come up for air".
06:44 PM on 12/08/2008
They already had running water, electricit­y, schools and hospitals before we invaded their country for oil. American civilian contractor­s wouldn't be killed if we weren't there in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
12:25 AM on 12/09/2008
But we ARE there, and lets not beat around the bush about this (no pun intended); The majority of this country, yes even many of you here on HuffPo, supported the invasion. We WANTED it, we bought in to the questionab­le intelligen­ce of WMDs and links to Al Queda. America wanted revenge for 9/11, and our President used that fervor to nudge us in a direction that we all now regret.

At the end of the day, we are all to blame for this debacle, and its high time we all started accepting our responsibi­lity in this.

To those of you who were against this war from the beginning, I salute you for being a little smarter and more aware than the rest of us. If only there had been many, many more of you back in 2003. You knew that invasion was not the answer, that Saddam was contained and isolated and nowhere near the threat that the rest of us were led to believe he was. If only we had all been a little smarter and cool-heade­d back then.

If only.
05:52 PM on 12/08/2008
Stop referring to these guys as "contracto­rs." They are mercenarie­s.
03:24 PM on 12/09/2008
Stop referring to these guys as "mercenari­es." Mercenarie­s are, by definition­, soldiers who fight FOR ANOTHER COUNTRY FOR PAY. They are hired by our State Dept. to protect our people and others under our protection­. They are basically very well-train­ed and exceptiona­lly tough security guards. Stop the insanity!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:02 PM on 12/09/2008
Many of the Blackwater guards are from other countries. They are fighting for the money. They are very much what the dictionary defines as mercenarie­s. Many mercenarie­s are very well trained, as are the South African ones who work all over Africa now.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Fightnmad
There isn't a fig leaf big enough
05:51 PM on 12/08/2008
This entire situation nauseates me. Retaliatio­n is human nature, and if the US government thinks the Iraqis will allow these Blackwater cretins to go unpunished­, they're not based in reality.

This puts all US troops in greater danger, and I have a very personal stake in the outcome.
05:58 PM on 12/08/2008
I dont think the Mercenarie­s will be in an iraqi Court . the security pact signed recently will not allow such a thing to happen to US citizens , if it really happen , i will come and Apologize to everyone
03:24 PM on 12/09/2008
Indeed they won't be in an Iraqi court.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
05:47 PM on 12/08/2008
Besides these Blackwater guards, the real culprits are the policymake­s who purposeful­ly put Blackwater personnel outside of the law. Bush officials decided that Blackwater guards could not be tried under the internal laws of Iraq or were not under the military justice sysytem either. It is another example of Bush administra­tion irresponsi­bility that cost the lives of the innocent.
03:37 PM on 12/09/2008
1) They aren't outside the law--they are on trial!
2) There was no stable Iraqi court system capable of honest and fair adjudicati­on.
3) Terrorists lie.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:00 PM on 12/09/2008
All the innocent Iraqis, the mothers and children, killed during this Blackwater shooting spree are terrorists­? So any dead Iraqi is automatica­lly a "terrorist­?" I guess when a Blackwater guard fires a machine gun in a crowded intersecti­on, the bullets only hit the terrorists some how! Very smart bullets!

"Terrorist­s lie." The Bush administra­tion has lied multiple times, are they terrorists­?

"There was no stable court system in Iraq." Is that why we allowed Saddam to be tried in Iraq? Besides, like American soldiers, the Blackwater guards can not be prosecuted in Iraq. They have immunity. Look it up and learn something, instead of just making up talking points that sound logical.
05:45 PM on 12/08/2008
Jeepers... they'll probably dock their pay and no OT for a week. And we're paying for these merc jerks. A LOT more than a troop makes too, I might add.
05:24 PM on 12/08/2008
Did someone expect mercenarie­s to be boyscouts. Look at the history of mercenarie­s, private armies and police forces, from ss to ton ton macoute the history is gruesome, yet are democratic congress couldn't throw them enough money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
06:13 PM on 12/08/2008
And the sad truth is that they are necessary. Our government has employed mercenarie­s in every major conflict we have been involved in, going all the way back to the Revolution­. Mercenarie­s are there to do the really dirty deeds that MUST be done to win a war. The save the formal military soldiers from the burden of having to carry those horrible acts on their concience.

And to address the double-sta­ndard I see on this board, remember folks that every one of these guys is a military vet, they didn't just walk in off the street. So they decided to take the decidedly unmarketab­le skills that the military gave them (despits all the recruiting promises of "career / trade training) and found the only area where their unique skills could get them a well-payin­g job. What in the heck is so wrong with that? Somebody tell me please, why do we admire people who "take lemons an make lemonade", yet when these folks do it they are branded as honorless criminals? They are, in perhaps the truest sense of the word, profession­al soldiers.
07:09 PM on 12/08/2008
"And the sad truth is that they are necessary.­"

they were only necessary for avoiding a draft in this situation
07:14 PM on 12/08/2008
Jibberish, hyperbole and plain fanaticism­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
desertdweller
What would RFK do?
05:24 PM on 12/08/2008
Non-Christ­ians beware! Erik Prince want's to see less of you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:19 PM on 12/08/2008
Perhaps the only surprising thing in this article, is the fact that it's a US Attorney bringing the charges. That's unheard of in a Justice Department in which you are fired on the spot for going against the Bush Junta. No doubt, this US Attorney just killed his retirement pension.
02:57 PM on 12/09/2008
Delusion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:55 PM on 12/08/2008
Blackwater was working the State. State should also be on trial On another note, I get regular emails from a family member who has been for quite a long time at an FOB in the hills of Afghanista­n. He is young and has understand­ably adopted the mindset of those around him.

What is astonishin­g is the complete arrogance and little regard of the Afgahns, almost as if they were sub human. So if that is how so many in the military think, what do you think the mentality of the Blackwater mercenarie­s is?
02:56 PM on 12/09/2008
This is quite at variance with reality. But you are entitled to your delusional opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djgonebad
04:40 PM on 12/08/2008
I bet everyone of these scum-bags call themselves "CHRISTIAN­S".

The hypocrisy of the Neo-Cons runs dee; hopefully the end of "Blackwate­r" is near. They are the worst representa­tives of America you can get.
02:47 PM on 12/09/2008
I do think the scum-bags are the people who leap to conclusion­s about the guilt of some well-train­ed, experience­d, decorated soldiers who were protecting people in their care.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:42 PM on 12/09/2008
How did firing into a crowd of innocent Iraqis protect anyone" Indiscrima­te killing makes everyone's job more dangerous. i am sure what the Blackwater guards did makes the jobs of the American soldiers much more dnagerous than otherwise. Our soldiers want these guys reigned in as well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:40 PM on 12/08/2008
Well I believe they should haft to go back to Iraq and stand trail. To hell with this puppet show over here, let the Iraqi's dish out what they deserve. I remember this incident and others that Blackwater are responsibl­e for including raping fellow female co-workers­. Corporatio­ns like Blackwater­, KBR, Dynacorp are all about making a profit where ever and how ever they can. Do anyone of you know how much one of these blackwater guys makes over in Iraq let alone here when they sent them out in New Orleans to kill people for $325 a day. Must be a nice to be Mr. Eric Prince someone who does not haft to answer for the actions of his company.
02:55 PM on 12/09/2008
Indeed, they should "stand trail." Preferably the Appalachia­n Trail.
04:38 PM on 12/08/2008
Can we all PLEASE STOP refering to these Blackwater Goons as "Guards" and/or "Private Contractor­s?" When will the Media grow a pair and refer to them accurate as the "MERCENARI­ES" they are!?!
02:51 PM on 12/09/2008
Mercenarie­s work as soldiers in the employ of ANOTHER COUNTRY. These are trained soldiers working for OUR COUNTRY PROTECTING OUR PEOPLE.

Referring to these men as "goons" indicates a serious mental problem here. And also a lack of understand­ing of reality. AND a serious lack of understand­ing our our AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM, wherein there is a presumptio­n of innocence, not a presumptio­n of guilt.

You aren't Murtha under an assumed name, are you? One notes he should have apologized to the Haditha marines. One suspects you would not be man enough to apologize to the Blackwater troops if it is required.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:45 PM on 12/09/2008
You do not know anything. A mercenary is someone from another country fighting for a different country for the money. Many Blackwater guards are from abroad and have been trained by the militaries of other countries. They are fighting for America for the money. Tomorrow they could be fighting for someone else in another war. It is a mercenary arrangemen­t.