House OKs $14B auto bill _ but it's still in peril

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | December 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Joel Kaplan briefs reporters, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2008, at the White House in Washington, about negotiations on a bill to provide government assistance to the financially ailing auto industry. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — A $14 billion rescue package for the nation's imperiled auto industry sped to approval in the House Wednesday night, but the emergency bailout was still in jeopardy from Republicans who were setting out roadblocks in the Senate.

Democrats and the Bush White House hoped for a Senate vote as early as Thursday and enactment by week's end. They argued that the loans authorized by the measure were needed to stave off disaster for the auto industry _ and a crushing further blow to the reeling national economy.

The legislation, approved 237-170 by the House, would provide money within days to cash-starved General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. Ford Motor Co., which has said it has enough to stay afloat, would also be eligible for federal aid.

Republicans were preparing a strong fight against the aid plan in the Senate, not only taking on the Democrats but standing in open revolt against their party's lame-duck president on the measure.

The Republicans want to force the companies into bankruptcy or mandate hefty concessions from autoworkers and creditors as a condition of any federal aid. They also oppose an environmental mandate that House Democrats insisted on including in the measure.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the House-passed bill represented "tough love" for U.S. auto companies and "giving a chance _ this one more chance _ to this great industry."

The White House, struggling to sell the package to congressional Republicans, said earlier that a carmaker bankruptcy could be fatal to the auto industry and have a devastating impact on workers, families and the economy.

"We believe the legislation developed in recent days is an effective and responsible approach to deal with troubled automakers and ensure the necessary restructuring occurs," said Dana Perino, the White House press secretary.

Story continues below
advertisement

But the measure faces a difficult road in the Senate, where it needs 60 votes to advance. Rank-and-file Senate Republicans skewered the bill during a closed-door luncheon with White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten, who was dispatched to Capitol Hill to make a case for the rescue package.

Even among Senate Democrats, the level of support was still uncertain. In the House, 20 Democrats joined 150 Republicans in voting "no," while 32 Republicans sided with 205 Democrats to back the bill.

Besides providing cash for the auto companies, it would create a government "car czar," to be named by President George W. Bush to dole out the loans, with the power to take back the money and force the carmakers into bankruptcy next spring if they didn't cut quick deals with labor unions, creditors and others to restructure their businesses and become viable.

"To give up on the auto industry now would be to condemn the American economy at one of its most vulnerable periods in our economic history to a degree of further hurt," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, the Financial Services Committee chairman.

Behind the scenes, Senate Democratic and Republican leaders scrambled for a deal that would allow votes on the bill on Thursday. Some GOP senators were demanding votes on an alternative that would order the automakers to take specific actions to restructure _ including steep wage cuts and debt restructuring _ in return for any federal money.

Opposition from Republicans reflected the tricky task of pushing yet another federal rescue through a bailout-weary Congress, with Bush's influence on the wane.

"People realize that this bill is an incredibly weak bill (and) is the product of an administration that wants to kick the can down the road and let somebody else deal with it," said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.

The auto aid debate was replete with echoes of the tense, early-October drama surrounding the $700 billion Wall Street bailout, when a marathon set of negotiations yielded a much-celebrated deal that came apart quickly amid GOP opposition and public outrage. That bill ultimately passed after much arguing, cajoling, threatening and lobbying among lawmakers, and Bush signed it.

Before passing the auto measure Wednesday, the House voted to add language requiring that banks that are bailed out by the government report quarterly on how much they have increased or decreased lending.

In the Senate, opposition to the auto rescue wasn't limited to Republicans.

Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana announced he was against the measure because of a provision to bail out transit agencies that were involved in transactions that are now considered unlawful tax shelters.

House Republicans swiftly voiced their opposition and called for a plan that would instead provide government insurance to subsidize new private investment in the Big Three automakers, demand major labor givebacks and debt restructuring at the companies and encourage them to declare bankruptcy.

Under the House-passed measure, the carmakers would have to submit blueprints on March 31 to the industry overseer showing how they would restructure to ensure their survival, although they could be given until the end of May to negotiate with the government on a final agreement.

The carmakers initially asked Congress for $25 billion, then returned two weeks later to plead for as much as $34 billion. But with the White House refusing to dole out new spending for the Big Three, congressional Democrats agreed to use an existing program that was to help carmakers retool their factories to make more fuel-efficient cars.

That fund yielded only $15 billion in emergency loans, and when negotiators agreed to leave some money in the environmental program, the amount fell to $14 billion.

Democrats agreed to scrap language _ which the White House had called a deal-breaker _ that would have forced the carmakers to drop lawsuits challenging tough emissions limits in California and other states. But they kept a provision to force the automakers to abide by those states' limits _ a kind of consolation prize for environmentalists, who already were livid at the raid of the fuel-efficiency program.

Senate Democrats unveiled a nearly identical measure that omitted the requirement, but that bill still faced long odds.

At the White House, Deputy Chief of Staff Joel Kaplan said the Bush administration would work with President-elect Barack Obama's team on choosing industry czar.

Obama defended the auto bailout as necessary given the threat a potential Big Three collapse could pose to an already battered economy.

"As messy as it may be, I think there's a sense of, 'Let's stabilize the patient,'" he said in an interview published in Wednesday's Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times.

The car czar would have say-so over any major business decisions by the automakers while they were taking advantage of federal aid, with veto power over any transaction of $100 million or more. The companies _ including the private equity firm Cerberus, which owns a majority stake in Chrysler _ would have to open their books to the government overseer.

And if Chrysler defaulted on its loan, Cerberus would be responsible for reimbursing the government.

The measure also would attach an array of conditions to the bailout money, including some of the same restrictions imposed on banks as part of the $700 billion Wall Street rescue. Among them are limits on executive compensation, a prohibition on paying dividends and requirements that the government share in future profits and taxpayers be repaid before any other shareholders.

Also included in the bill is an unrelated pay raise for federal judges.

___

Associated Press writers Ben Feller, Andrew Taylor and Jim Abrams contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — A $14 billion rescue package for the nation's imperiled auto industry sped to approval in the House Wednesday night, but the emergency bailout was still in jeopardy from Republicans...
WASHINGTON — A $14 billion rescue package for the nation's imperiled auto industry sped to approval in the House Wednesday night, but the emergency bailout was still in jeopardy from Republicans...
 
Comments
317
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- research I'm a Fan of research 238 fans permalink

It's Hoover/GOP­/Conservat­ives/Banke­rs

Versus

FDR/Obama/Public Works

all over again.

Hoover Failed

FDR succeeded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 12/11/2008

Keep an eye on which Senators do the filibustering. Willing to bet ALL of them are from southern states, where the foreign car makers have their factories. The Republicans are trying to FORCE Americans to buy foreign cars...............

Well, tough cookies...­.........I am an American vehicle not a foreign one.

p.s. Yes I do currently own American.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 12/11/2008
- onalimb I'm a Fan of onalimb 4 fans permalink

Please! What about the banks?
Even trying to see things relatively the auto industry is asking for peanuts in comparrison.
In addition to the 15 billion from ATP - American Tax Payer Inc - the banks should at least be required to open up a special line of credit to the auto industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 12/11/2008

This is where the problem begins, the private sector i.e. the banks don't think the Big 3 auto companies are credit worthy enough to loan money to at any interest rate.

In a situation like this the Auto industry is large enough to come the gov't as a lender of last resort. If the Republicans say no, then it is lights out for GM

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 12/11/2008
photo

The republicants in CONgress want voters to believe it's about anything else besides - crushing these unions.

Voters and the polls continue to be ignored by neoCONmen republicants in favor of their wealthiest friends, and their small, closed, hypocritical minds can see nothing wrong with that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 12/11/2008

People seem to forget that there is a union involved. Republicans and Unions are mortal enemies. If the auto industry goes in to banckruptcy the union will basically have no say in what happens so the Repugs will get their wish. Starvation wages with no representation. A neoconservatives wet dream.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 12/11/2008

If the republicans succeed in causing GM to go bankrupt and then liquidate I can garantee you that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi will not bring up any bills that are important to the republican leadership and this will cause unbelivable hardship to all americans. It is unimaginable that republicans are willing to throw this country into such a depression. I guess that it what is means to be a free market nazi. Pat Buchanan Is right when he said that the Republicans can forget about the industrial midwest voting for republicans any time soon if there are massive job losses because of the callous hearts of visicous republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 12/11/2008
photo

Latest benefit numbers for unemployme­nt..573,00­0 Americans. That's 50,000 more than projected.

I dare the GOP to kill this bill...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 12/11/2008
- Nova16 I'm a Fan of Nova16 34 fans permalink

It amazes me that these republicans who have created the abominable financial and economic mess in this country from which we may never recover have the gall, audacity and hypocricy to demean and chastize anyone for the way they run their business. The auto industry deserves blame but to carry the issues to the extreme on the matter is a result of partisan politics, sectionalism and arrogance. This country is in serious trouble and deserves the concerned, enlightened approach that only common sense brings to solving our national dilemma. "These are the times that try men's souls" certainly applies, even though the greedy republicans can see no further than their own self interests.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 12/11/2008
photo

Oh boy, another Pelosi negotiated deal with the Bush White House. Would someone please ask Nancy to give up her job. Her idea of tough negotiations is giving the Bush White House what ever it asks for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 AM on 12/11/2008
- Teritt I'm a Fan of Teritt 9 fans permalink

4 out of 5 Republicans in the House voted AGAINST slowing down unemployment and foreclosures by voting against loaning the American auto industry the money. I guess they enjoy seeing Americans out of work and small blue collar towns decimated. I hope everyone remembers how their Congressman voted the next time they are up for re-election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 12/11/2008
- hotwire I'm a Fan of hotwire 22 fans permalink

I sit here and while reading the posts on this topic, I came to a conclusion, 99.7% of you people are uneducted, misinformed morons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 12/11/2008
photo

Well, please, "educt" us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 12/11/2008
photo

Very nice! LMAO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 12/11/2008

I can think of so many ways that I think would be smarter - and would insulate the taxpayer from the business risks of these large private corporations.

What's wrong with "Nationalizing" the off-shore subsidiaries of GM, Ford and Chrysler instead of the on-shore "mother" corporations ?

Force the off-shore subsidiaries (by meaningful government regulation) to pay to upgrade the on-shore "mother" corporations.

How many billions are the top 25% executives and shareholders worth ?

Force (by meaningful government regulation if necessary) those top executives (who created this mess to begin with) to 1st dig into their pockets to cover their corporation's losses.

How can they even ask the taxpayer to assume their risk in business ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 12/11/2008
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

The PR campaign surrounding the big three bailout will continue to be looked at with a skeptical eye until the hysteria, which conveniently denies the real number of affected jobs, i.e. not segmenting the actual market affected, ignoring the fact that the financial crisis resulted in 10+ businesses each as large as an auto company already gone into conservatorship, bankruptcy protection or acquired, stops claiming that people who already do not buy domestic will stop buying domestic, and the best one, if we don’t do this we will have the biggest recession since the great depression. Hello. I knew these people were slow on the uptake, but have they been paying attention? We already are in the biggest recession since the great depression.

The added pork, like the 170 Billion added to the Financial Bailout does not help either.

Why do the domestic auto makes get to restructure with government help and not go into conservatorship or bankruptcy protection when every one of the financial companies had to? They need to be helped, but where is the change? We are fools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 12/11/2008

The banks got bailed out, the car companies are asking for a LOAN, i.e. line of credit, borrowing money from the gubMent at low interest. If they aren't helped good bye jobs, which would mean more foreclosures, and more communities being in upheval

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 12/11/2008
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

Sorry, but you are uninformed. The bank money comprised of loans and equity. No difference except that the automakers, want to be bailed out and still run the businesses to the ground with our money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 12/11/2008
- Chris I'm a Fan of Chris 12 fans permalink

Why is the democrat controlled congress insisting on punihsing the investors of GM, those would be the unions and mutual funds as well as individual investors, by insisting that stock dividends not be paid. Do you want investors to sell all holdings and make the company truly bankrupt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 12/11/2008

Look at these Republicans..what a waste !!! LOL. As an independent voter, this makes me laugh. You ask next to NO questions about how corp banks will utilize the $700 Bil that we (The people) gave to them. Now you pick apart the Auto industry. Perhaps there are no luxury payoffs to some of the politicians this is why they are not interested in approving this money.

NEWS FLASH !! You already screwed up by giving $700 Billion away (literally). Give the Auto industry what they need and save the 4 Million jobs this American industry needs. END OF STORY. Now is NOT the time for Repubs to sing the "see we didnt give it to them, we're the good guys" song. Get on with it. so we can move on to the next bailout issue "WE THE PEOPLE". Good grief. We should clear everyone in congress, they are wasting my precious time and money with these antics !! We're going to PAY FOR IT ANYWAY, if 4 million people need to collect unemployment. DUMB DUMB DUMB

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 12/11/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect