Mark Penn Given Column By Wall Street Journal, For Some Reason

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 12, 2008 08:31 AM


"Microtrend"-enthusiast and Devourer Of Hilary Clinton's Hopes Mark Penn had a column in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, for some reason, about how the economic downturn has bred a new cohort of "people who have lost their trust in the financial world, and are preparing for the next meltdown." Penn calls these people "the New Mattress Stuffers."

Anyway, Penn believes the recession will bring about a boom in the area of "personal financial security" in the same way September 11 brought about "a vast industry in building security." "As a result," Penn says, "firms which can offer ironclad guarantees of safety will appeal to this new group." But ha ha! What is an "ironclad guarantee of financial safety," anyway? Anyone got a favorite post-9/11 security firm they want to cite that fills your heart with confidence? Will the financial security agents of the future make sure all our nickels take their shoes off before they're allowed in our mattresses? Who knows?

Penn cites many ways that the New Mattress Stuffers can "calm themselves" during these bleak financial times. Buy gold coins, for instance! Purchases of guns, safes, and home vaults are in the increase, so get in on some of that action, Laid-Off Middle Class America! Oh, and listen to your jeweler, Joe Sixpack, because Penn reckons they "may start to tell you to 'don't forget to stash away a diamond or two.'" Personally, the solutions all look like the sorts of things that are only within the reach of those for whom the times won't be so bleak, but Penn broadly compares the New Mattress Stuffers to people who, in times past, hid "tin cans of cash in [their] walls."

Penn asserts that New Mattress Stuffers "don't care about the 10% interest rate on GE preferred stock that Warren Buffett snapped up; they care about making it through if hard times get even worse." That's too bad! You know, in time's past the Wall Street Journal might have run a column to help people understand why Warren Buffet loads up on preferred stock in General Electric, and, more importantly, Goldman Sachs. It might be the sort of news a Mattress Stuffer could use, to ensure they're asking their elected representatives the right questions before their Mattress Stuffing is offset by any fanciful government bailout programs.

Anyway, I guess a few enterprising Americans can bail themselves out during Inauguration weekend by going to Mark Penn's home and excavating his front lawn to find where he's stashed all of his gold doubloons and blood diamonds.

"Microtrend"-enthusiast and Devourer Of Hilary Clinton's Hopes Mark Penn had a column in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, for some reason, about how the economic downturn has bred a new cohort of "p...
"Microtrend"-enthusiast and Devourer Of Hilary Clinton's Hopes Mark Penn had a column in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, for some reason, about how the economic downturn has bred a new cohort of "p...
 
Comments
38
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

I can think of three prominent members of Mrs Clinton's appallingly bad presidential campaign who now work for Rupert Murdoch just off the top of my head. It would be interesting to research thie question of how many of Bill and Hillary's former staffers have selected Murdoch as their employer

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 12/14/2008

Mark Penn influenced Hillary and Bill Clinton to trash Obama. This would have been a cleaner primary without Penn. Hopefully the Democrats have learned that even if you want to be President, you don't go around saying the other contenders are not ready to take on the job, etc. The watchword for 2016 has to be, "Mr./Ms X would be fine as President, but here's why I would be better . . . "

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 12/13/2008

Penn was wrong about a lot of things-
Just because he wrote a book doesn't mean that he knows what he's talking about-
His book was proven wrong, Clinton lost due to him, and now
we're supposed to bank money on his word? NOT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 12/13/2008
photo

Yet another reason why newspapers are falling on their faces and can't figure out why. Apparently the WSJ is like a retirement community for failed strategists and pundits. Wrong then, wrong now and still given a place to proclaim their public wrongness.

If Milton Friedman was still alive he'd probably be the editor-in-chief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 12/13/2008
photo

I wonder what they see in him. I mean, I don't see him increasing circulation/sales -- he's not that interesting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 12/13/2008
- XME I'm a Fan of XME permalink
photo

Seems like a fitting place for him!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 12/12/2008
photo

"Hey, ya know that guy at the Times, Kristol, who's always WRONG about EVERYTHING? Do ya think we find a guy like that to work for US?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 12/12/2008

No wonder all of you are going out of business, all you do is hire failed washed up losers

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 12/12/2008

This is a good example of why standard media is dying. What's the value of having a hired gun/lobbyist write columns and give him a platform from which to influence public opinion? The obvious question: What's his agenda, who's paying him? Lobby all you want Mark, but nobody will believe that you have a pure agenda in anything you write. More analysis on this here:

http://thedailyoracle.com/index.php/media-watch-mark-penn-and-the-wall-street-journal

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 12/12/2008

This is a good example of why standard media is dying. What's the value of having a hired gun/lobbyist write columns and give him a platform from which to influence public opinion? The obvious question: What's his agenda, who's paying him? Lobby all you want Mark, but nobody will believe that you have a pure agenda in anything you write. More analysis on this here:

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 12/12/2008

I cancelled my subscription to the WSJ when murdoch bought it. Now I'm twice as happy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 12/12/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG permalink
photo

It's all in the family, business-lobbyists-media-government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 12/12/2008
photo

Mark doesn't seem like a likeable guy, but there's got to be something good about him, after all he sunk old Hillary's A$$!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 12/12/2008
photo

If you understand Penn, then you understand everything wrong in American politics. He is such an insider, up there with Matalin and Carville for collusion between the parties and a member of the upper e c h e l o n of the corporatocracy which has everything to do with money and not party. Don't be fooled by their good cop bad cop routine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 12/12/2008

jason, that headline is priceless. :)

incompetents like mark penn never seem to fall butter-side down, do they.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 12/12/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect