Bush Acknowledges Absence Of Al Qaeda In Pre-Occupation Iraq With A 'So What?'

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 15, 2008 01:12 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Reality-based observers have long known that the Bush administration's attempts to connect al Qaeda with pre-invasion Iraq have been nothing more than a campaign of misinformation. Al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq prior to the 2003 invasion, and even afterward, the so-called "al Qaeda in Iraq" never amounted to anything more than a "microscopic terrorist organization" with "850 full time fighters." But regardless of the facts, one theme has been constant from this administration. The presence of al Qaeda, terrorists, "special groups," and foreign fighters (typically from Iran) is sold as justification for the invasion and occupation, when it is actually the result of the invasion and occupation.

That's what makes this part of the interview between President George W. Bush and ABC News' Martha Raddatz, highlighted by Ali Frick at Think Progress, so extraordinary.

BUSH: One of the major theaters against al Qaeda turns out to have been Iraq. This is where al Qaeda said they were going to take their stand. This is where al Qaeda was hoping to take-


RADDATZ: But not until after the U.S. invaded.

BUSH: Yeah, that's right. So what? The point is that al Qaeda said they're going to take a stand. Well, first of all in the post-9/11 environment Saddam Hussein posed a threat. And then upon removal, al Qaeda decides to take a stand.

Wow. "That's right. So what?" That's how he admits that the repeatedly mentioned links between the September 11 attacks, al Qaeda, and Iraq were just manipulations?

I believe President Bush just threw both his shoes at our intelligence. Duck!

[WATCH.]

Reality-based observers have long known that the Bush administration's attempts to connect al Qaeda with pre-invasion Iraq have been nothing more than a campaign of misinformation. Al Qaeda had no pr...
Reality-based observers have long known that the Bush administration's attempts to connect al Qaeda with pre-invasion Iraq have been nothing more than a campaign of misinformation. Al Qaeda had no pr...
 
Comments
888
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (25 pages total)
photo

Oh what a web weave, when first we practice to deceive!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 12/19/2008

To paraphrase Forest Gump: Some days there just aren't enough shoes . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 12/17/2008

*interesting that Bush says he attacked Iraq because Al Qaeda SAID Iraq is where they will take a stand, Yet when Al Qaeda said in Aug 2001 that they would attack with planes inside the USA, Bush and his team took no notice of that and Bush went on vacation.
Lies never work Georgie boy. Better think again even though I am aware that thinking is not something you do very often.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 12/17/2008
photo

I wish I had a good throwing arm and some shoes to spare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 12/17/2008
photo

Use bricks!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 12/19/2008

"There have been no attacks since I've been the President, since 9/11."
He often says this, and it is paraded out by his supporters as proof of
his successful defense of our security.

What is not said, is that there were no attacks before he was the President.
The only recent attack has been under his watch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 AM on 12/17/2008

Wow. He uttered the words that Iraq posed no threat of al-Qaeda before we invaded; and like the existence of WMDs, which there were none, the invasion actually caused al Qaeda presence.......wow. Bushisms are one thing. Bush logic is seizure inducing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

No George, the world will be better off without YOU!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 12/16/2008

"Ouch."

The thrown shoes are especially painful to all of us in the US as a symbol of our Iraq failure and must hurt w and his family deeply.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

Seriously? I don't think so.

Bush also said "So What?" when the shoes were thrown at him:

This is the "So What?" Presidency of George W. Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

Yep..the " What, Me Worry?" president

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 12/17/2008

From everything I know, this is a man who has ruined every business has has own or run, why would the US be any different?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 12/16/2008

This man is evil!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 12/16/2008

4200 dead soldiers=so what
30000 wounded soldiers=so what
100 000 civilians killed=so what
612,429,300,000 dollars=so what
this man is....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 12/16/2008

Wow. A reporter who doesn't turn off their brain when the interviewee is talking. Amazing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 12/16/2008

WHAT A DDICCK!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 12/16/2008

OLD SHES SHOULD GO TO THE WHITE HOUSE !!!!

MAYBE WITH A FEW 100,000 SHOES ON HIS DOOR STEP HE MIGHT JUST GET IT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

What you don't get is he doesn't care. He knows; he doesn't care.

And why should he? He won't be held accountable for any of it.

Disgraceful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 12/16/2008

But the ongoing comical media coverage of the shoes blocking the mail box, and causing the post office endless head aches and delays, would sure be some great media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 12/16/2008

MAIL YOUR OLD SHES TO THE WHITE HOUSE

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 12/16/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (25 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE

MOSCOW — Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry...

STANDOFF IN HONDURAS HEATS UPMilitary Blocks Ousted President Zelaya's Plane From...

(AP) TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Ousted President Manuel...

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPost Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More

Sam Stein is the White House correspondent for the Huffington Post. Previously he worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Ryan Grim is the senior congressional correspondent for the Huffington Post. He is a former staff reporter with Politico.com and Washington City Paper.
Read More

Jason Linkins is editor of Huffington Post's media commentary blog Eat the Press. He is based in Washington, DC, and previously contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is the Senior News Editor at the Huffington Post. She is based in New York.
Read More