Ok So-ri: South Korean Actress Found Guilty Of Adultery

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ok So-ri: South Korean Actress Found Guilty Of Adultery stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 17, 2008 11:36 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A South Korean actress Ok So-ri reacts as she leaves from a court in Goyang, north of Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2008. Ok was found guilty of her extramarital affairs with an opera singer, a news report said Wednesday, months after Seoul's Constitutional Court upheld a ban on adultery.(AP Photo/ Yonhap, Kim Do-yun)

SEOUL, South Korea — One of South Korea's most famous actresses was convicted of adultery Wednesday in a high-profile case that drew renewed attention to a decades-old law prohibiting extramarital affairs.

Ok So-ri, who was handed a suspended jail term, had lost a battle in October to have the ban declared unconstitutional.

"I would like to say I'm sorry for causing so much trouble to society," a somber Ok told reporters after the verdict.

A district court in Goyang, near Seoul, handed Ok a suspended eight-month jail sentence, South Korean media reported, meaning she will not have to serve time. Ok's lover received a six-month suspended term.

There was no immediate word on any plans for appeal.

The sensational sex-and-celebrities case has been tabloid fodder for months, with Ok's challenge to the adultery law adding extra spice.

Last year, Ok acknowledged during a news conference that she had had an affair with an opera singer who was a friend of her husband for a few months in 2006. She stressed the affair was a result of her loveless marriage to actor Park Chul.

The court appeared to show some sympathy for Ok's predicament.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Though the fact of adultery should be criticized, (the court) issued this ruling taking into account that husband Park Chul's responsibility was not small," the court said, according to cable news channel YTN.

She also "suffered mental pains" due to the exposure of her privacy, the court said.

Ok earlier this year filed a petition to have the adultery ban ruled an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. But in October, the Constitutional Court upheld the ban, part of South Korea's 55-year-old criminal code.

Despite decades of Western influence, South Korea remains deeply conservative and is influenced by a Confucian heritage. Those convicted under the anti-adultery law face prison sentences of up to two years, though few serve time.

Supporters of the adultery ban say it promotes monogamy and keeps families intact. Opponents argue the law violates privacy. Complaints have been filed with the Constitutional Court three times in 1990, 1993 and 2001 to abolish the law, but the court has upheld it every time.

While women's rights group were the ban's biggest supporters in the past when the law was meant to keep philandering husbands in line, in recent years some husbands have begun pressing adultery charges on their unfaithful wives.

The number of adultery cases filed in South Korea has dropped in recent years, declining to 8,070 in 2006 from 12,760 in 2000, according to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office. About 80 percent of those cases were dropped before formal charges were filed, largely because complaints were withdrawn.

Many Muslim nations have anti-adultery laws, some with harsh penalties. Taiwan, Austria, Switzerland and some U.S. states also have laws prohibiting extramarital affairs, according to the Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations, a government-funded legal counseling office.

SEOUL, South Korea — One of South Korea's most famous actresses was convicted of adultery Wednesday in a high-profile case that drew renewed attention to a decades-old law prohibiting extramarit...
SEOUL, South Korea — One of South Korea's most famous actresses was convicted of adultery Wednesday in a high-profile case that drew renewed attention to a decades-old law prohibiting extramarit...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
423
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

Monogomy is an outdated concept. Not only that, it's unnatural. Laws trying to force it? Laughable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 12/19/2008
- poster1122 I'm a Fan of poster1122 23 fans permalink

Well one argument is that contracts in general aren't natural constructs. Marriage is a type of contract between two individuals for which both parties get certain (often a great deal of) benefits from the state. If you can't live up to the terms of the contract, then don't enter into it. If you're in breach, penalties should be assessed--as with any other contract.

Should jail time be assessed? Probably not. The penalties should probably be material/monetary (again, like with any other contract). But this to me is a question for the legislature/voters to decide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 12/19/2008

I wish to point out that during 2009 a home based world wide internet marketing endeavor of Humanity International Optional Certificates, to those legally symbolizing Births, Marriages, Divorces, and Deaths within the over-all human experience...will offer opportunities world wide for ordinary peoples to participate under auspices of Humanity International, in both highly profitable, as well as maximum profit- sharing partnership ventures.

Anyone wanting a preview of the above can merely visit the website : www.efilsih.com , and read upon the contents under Humanity International Certificates.

Humanity International which once was "Non-Profitable", is now Intended and Designed to be the Most Profit-Making , as well as the most Profit-Sharing of all private and public enterprise efforts...thus the Humanity International Optional Symbolic Certificates, to those traditionally monopolized by the Legal Industry, i,e in areas of Births, Marriages, Divorces , and Deaths.

Previews of the predestined Humanity |International Certificates , and the rational therefore, can be observed at website: www.efilsih.com

Thanks for this opportunity to present an honest genuine private enterprise entrepreneurship that can benefit so many lives and livelihoods of ordinary peoples around the world...i,e, through Humanity International Products and Services .

Efil Sih

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

No you are just looking for any excuse to be weak... if you enter into a contract then you should up hold your end and if you can't then you need to be honest. Release yourself from the situation before you go along and cheat especially with a spouses best friend. So the only thing laughable is your ignorant excuse that you try to pose as an educated reply. Sad and pathetic!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 12/20/2008

I see it this way. You can flirt, have fun before marriage but once you tie the knot and commit adultery, there should be some type of punishment given.
If adultery is accepted as a personal freedom or privacy, there would be higher divorce rates and eventually will put more children living with single parent or with step parents.
This is a serious problem in the future as more families are broken up causing social family disorder.
I'd like to also point out that Korea has one of the highest divorce rates in Asia despite such a law being enforced so it's obvious that women are gaining social power to make decisions about divorce whereas long time ago they had no choice because of financial disadvantages given to women back then.
So do we really need more freedom of choices and lawless society accepting adultery?
Marriage should not be only about pursuit of happiness but it should be a long compromising journey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 12/19/2008

LOL ok sorry I was being an ass. Anyway. I don't think this is a big deal. They aren't stoning her to death. And if a society wants to restrict adultery equally among both men and women by using mild sanctions I dont have a huge problem with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 12/18/2008

Her name is Ok So-Ri? ...like O.K. Sorry?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 12/18/2008

I think some people here don't realize how unfortunately ignorant they sound with some of the things they are saying about S. Korea in general. Women are definitely allowed to own property, it is not a sweatshop economy, and most people do not like eating dogs, much less cats. Don't make statements you have merely heard by ear or stereotype.

Also, most have seemed to conveniently dismiss the last bit in the article about some U.S. states having laws against adultery.

In regard to Ok So-Ri (whose name, by the way, is in no way pronounced "Okay, Sorry", but rather 'Ohk Soh-Ree', 'So-Ri' meaning 'sound' and 'Ok' one of the common last names in Korea), yes, it is unfortunate, and yes, I do personally feel that punishing her is a seemingly long-ancient practice.

As a public figure, however, (btw, I would like to point out that Ok So-Ri is nowhere close to "one of South Korea's most famous actresses") I do think it makes more sense that she was punished for her deed, for I believe they wanted to set an example by her. As stated in the article, adultery is usually not considered serious, nor is it regularly punished.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 12/18/2008
- tre I'm a Fan of tre 12 fans permalink

Bill Clinton, John Edwards, et.al. better stay away from Korea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 12/18/2008
- Hoelder I'm a Fan of Hoelder 15 fans permalink
photo

This is a stark reminder that many countries still maintain archaic laws that disregard human rights. Even in countries that are considered as democratic and industrial. It comes to no surprise. Some countries use the UN to suppress human rights, equality of genders and freedom of speech. Saudi Arabia comes to mind where women are not allowed to drive, cannot leave home without male company and in case of adultery a traditional stoning. However these countries want to sit with democratic industrialized countries or force the rest of the world to break down on freedom of speech. It is despicable. The defense of traditional values is the reactionary attempt to maintain the status quo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 12/18/2008

Come on people of the U.S., first look at your country before criticizing others.
You always cry democracy and support dictatorship if it serves U.S. , right?
You always cry diversity and still have a segregated prom, right?
You are the most arrogant people in the entire universe, go to hell with George Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 12/18/2008
- ZimboChick I'm a Fan of ZimboChick 83 fans permalink
photo

Dont let them get to you. Some of them lack education.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 12/18/2008

Hey Pal, please don't lump me (and most of the other posters on this site) in with the likes of the support of dictators, prom segregation and the decisions of the Bush administration. We hate these things just as much as you do, wherever you're from. And don't forget that WE just voted in a black man for President, has your country done that yet?

By the way, if you hate America so much that you want us all to go to hell, why are you even on HuffPost?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 12/18/2008
photo

It's unfortunate that what you're saying is true

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 12/18/2008
- Hoisin I'm a Fan of Hoisin 2 fans permalink

Your just angry your carbon credits haven't offset your recently industrialized countries pollution output.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 AM on 12/21/2008
photo

Give her the Chair!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 12/18/2008

Not that I agree with the S. Korean law, but you have to give them credit for taking real steps to protect the "sanctity of marriage".

I wonder how many Family Values voters (those who supported Yes on Prop 8 and similar initiatives) would support a similar law.

I would venture to wager that if an initiative got onto the ballot that outlawed adultry, and made divorce illegal, the Evangelical community would be strangely silent about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 12/18/2008
- Steamboater I'm a Fan of Steamboater 159 fans permalink
photo

This is what we troops who are putting thier lives on the line for in South Korea? This is democracy? The state has no business interferring in personal relationships unless there is physical abuse. Who knows what went on in that marriage that made this woman have an affair? And the fact hat she did is no one's business anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 12/18/2008

Just to clarify, 800,000 Korean troops are defending South Korea, along with U.S. troops. American people seem to think that only U.S. troops are defending Korea, but I understand because American people usually know nothing about world affairs. The state has no business interferring in personal relationships unless there is physical abuse -> because you think so? It's Western concept at best and your concept at worst.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 12/18/2008
- Jasel I'm a Fan of Jasel 6 fans permalink
photo

Actually from what I've read this law has been around for some time in Korea. And it was extremely popular not just with Korean women but women's groups internationally because it was the one recourse that Korean women had in a society that was extremely male dominated to actually take grievances with their husband to the courts.

The vast majority of people taken to court in Korea over this law have been and are still men. Very few people had a problem with this or complained about the law when men were pretty much the only ones affected by it. However around a decade ago (I think?) more and more Korean women started having affairs or at least were being caught in greater numbers. And more husbands started taking THEM to court. THAT was when women started complaining how the law was unconstitutional and that it was intrusive on private lives. Which I found ironic seeing how they didn't seem to care about that before when it was mostly used to their advantage.

Even so this law is stupid and needs to be stripped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 12/18/2008
- Cambridge9 I'm a Fan of Cambridge9 74 fans permalink
photo

You will notice that the man only got a 'suspended' sentence (sowing wild oats apparently) — while the woman is a law-breaker and therefore has to serve jail time!!

And there was the incident in the middle east (I forget where) where a woman was stoned to death for — believe it of not ' being raped', and therefore bringing disgrace on her family!!

Its time for this suppression of women's rights — worldwide — to stop.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 12/18/2008
- oliv0128 I'm a Fan of oliv0128 25 fans permalink
photo

they both got suspended sentences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 12/18/2008

You're obviously not from 'the' Cambridge wit yo stinkin' readin' skilz.

Don't worry: she's OK!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 12/18/2008
- mathme I'm a Fan of mathme 26 fans permalink
photo

Hey-ooo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 12/18/2008

Re-read the post she will NOT have to serve time, but I do agree that the ruling is very sexist and it needs to stop!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 12/18/2008
- jubo I'm a Fan of jubo 6 fans permalink
photo

That which is as you describe as 'sensational' is not the 'sex and celebrities' aspect but rather South Korean law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 AM on 12/18/2008

"That which is as you describe as 'sensational"

?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 AM on 12/18/2008
- jazzence I'm a Fan of jazzence 2 fans permalink

"Supporters of the adultery ban say it promotes monogamy and keeps families intact. "

Apparently ((eye roll))

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 12/18/2008
photo

I worked at a university in So. Korea for a lifetime one year. It ranks among the most disgusting experiences of my life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 AM on 12/18/2008
- bluzz I'm a Fan of bluzz 2 fans permalink

I hate to say it but I agree! I always felt like I could tolerate any culture and there are some redeeming values to the So. Korean culture but, all in all there is more bad than good. I worked for Kia Motors and had to be there for two weeks every other month and could go on and on about some very backwards and grotesque traditions.
They treat women horribly, they are wives, prostitutes or secretaries - never saw one woman at Kia at any level above admin. The men all go Host Karaoke clubs where a young female host takes "care" of you. When i declined, they thought I was gay but, I felt sorry for these girls.

There are what is best described as double barber poles all over the city of Seoul, a traditional looking barber pole like that found in the US but skinnier and one right next to it. These are ALL over the city, sometimes 3 or 4 per block. I asked someone after my 2nd or 3rd visit why there were so many barber shop, and my coworker said "they don't cut your hair there, wink wink". It was a massage parlor/brothel. I counted 37 on the way to the airport. SO, obviously adultery run wild there - I chalk this story above and her arrest as she was a famous woman.
Men rule this country in ways very similar to Muslim countries but, in many ways even worse!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 12/18/2008
- ZimboChick I'm a Fan of ZimboChick 83 fans permalink
photo

What traumatised you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 12/18/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect