EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Ok So-ri: South Korean Actress Found Guilty Of Adultery

December 17, 2008 11:36 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A South Korean actress Ok So-ri reacts as she leaves from a court in Goyang, north of Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2008. Ok was found guilty of her extramarital affairs with an opera singer, a news report said Wednesday, months after Seoul's Constitutional Court upheld a ban on adultery.(AP Photo/ Yonhap, Kim Do-yun)
?>

SEOUL, South Korea — One of South Korea's most famous actresses was convicted of adultery Wednesday in a high-profile case that drew renewed attention to a decades-old law prohibiting extramarital affairs.

Ok So-ri, who was handed a suspended jail term, had lost a battle in October to have the ban declared unconstitutional.

"I would like to say I'm sorry for causing so much trouble to society," a somber Ok told reporters after the verdict.

A district court in Goyang, near Seoul, handed Ok a suspended eight-month jail sentence, South Korean media reported, meaning she will not have to serve time. Ok's lover received a six-month suspended term.

There was no immediate word on any plans for appeal.

The sensational sex-and-celebrities case has been tabloid fodder for months, with Ok's challenge to the adultery law adding extra spice.

Last year, Ok acknowledged during a news conference that she had had an affair with an opera singer who was a friend of her husband for a few months in 2006. She stressed the affair was a result of her loveless marriage to actor Park Chul.

The court appeared to show some sympathy for Ok's predicament.

"Though the fact of adultery should be criticized, (the court) issued this ruling taking into account that husband Park Chul's responsibility was not small," the court said, according to cable news channel YTN.

She also "suffered mental pains" due to the exposure of her privacy, the court said.

Ok earlier this year filed a petition to have the adultery ban ruled an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. But in October, the Constitutional Court upheld the ban, part of South Korea's 55-year-old criminal code.

Despite decades of Western influence, South Korea remains deeply conservative and is influenced by a Confucian heritage. Those convicted under the anti-adultery law face prison sentences of up to two years, though few serve time.

Supporters of the adultery ban say it promotes monogamy and keeps families intact. Opponents argue the law violates privacy. Complaints have been filed with the Constitutional Court three times in 1990, 1993 and 2001 to abolish the law, but the court has upheld it every time.

While women's rights group were the ban's biggest supporters in the past when the law was meant to keep philandering husbands in line, in recent years some husbands have begun pressing adultery charges on their unfaithful wives.

The number of adultery cases filed in South Korea has dropped in recent years, declining to 8,070 in 2006 from 12,760 in 2000, according to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office. About 80 percent of those cases were dropped before formal charges were filed, largely because complaints were withdrawn.

Many Muslim nations have anti-adultery laws, some with harsh penalties. Taiwan, Austria, Switzerland and some U.S. states also have laws prohibiting extramarital affairs, according to the Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations, a government-funded legal counseling office.

SEOUL, South Korea — One of South Korea's most famous actresses was convicted of adultery Wednesday in a high-profile case that drew renewed attention to a decades-old law prohibiting extramarit...
SEOUL, South Korea — One of South Korea's most famous actresses was convicted of adultery Wednesday in a high-profile case that drew renewed attention to a decades-old law prohibiting extramarit...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 423
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
05:16 PM on 12/19/2008
Monogomy is an outdated concept. Not only that, it's unnatural. Laws trying to force it? Laughable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:58 PM on 12/19/2008
Well one argument is that contracts in general aren't natural constructs­. Marriage is a type of contract between two individual­s for which both parties get certain (often a great deal of) benefits from the state. If you can't live up to the terms of the contract, then don't enter into it. If you're in breach, penalties should be assessed--­as with any other contract.

Should jail time be assessed? Probably not. The penalties should probably be material/m­onetary (again, like with any other contract). But this to me is a question for the legislatur­e/voters to decide.
01:09 PM on 01/09/2009
I wish to point out that during 2009 a home based world wide internet marketing endeavor of Humanity Internatio­nal Optional Certificat­es, to those legally symbolizin­g Births, Marriages, Divorces, and Deaths within the over-all human experience­...will offer opportunit­ies world wide for ordinary peoples to participat­e under auspices of Humanity Internatio­nal, in both highly profitable­, as well as maximum profit- sharing partnershi­p ventures.

Anyone wanting a preview of the above can merely visit the website : www.efilsi­h.com , and read upon the contents under Humanity Internatio­nal Certificat­es.

Humanity Internatio­nal which once was "Non-Profi­table", is now Intended and Designed to be the Most Profit-Mak­ing , as well as the most Profit-Sha­ring of all private and public enterprise efforts...­thus the Humanity Internatio­nal Optional Symbolic Certificat­es, to those traditiona­lly monopolize­d by the Legal Industry, i,e in areas of Births, Marriages, Divorces , and Deaths.

Previews of the predestine­d Humanity |Internati­onal Certificat­es , and the rational therefore, can be observed at website: www.efilsi­h.com

Thanks for this opportunit­y to present an honest genuine private enterprise entreprene­urship that can benefit so many lives and livelihood­s of ordinary peoples around the world...i,­e, through Humanity Internatio­nal Products and Services .

Efil Sih
photo
thankulord13
Allow for no distractions!
10:28 PM on 12/20/2008
No you are just looking for any excuse to be weak... if you enter into a contract then you should up hold your end and if you can't then you need to be honest. Release yourself from the situation before you go along and cheat especially with a spouses best friend. So the only thing laughable is your ignorant excuse that you try to pose as an educated reply. Sad and pathetic!
12:24 AM on 12/19/2008
I see it this way. You can flirt, have fun before marriage but once you tie the knot and commit adultery, there should be some type of punishment given.
If adultery is accepted as a personal freedom or privacy, there would be higher divorce rates and eventually will put more children living with single parent or with step parents.
This is a serious problem in the future as more families are broken up causing social family disorder.
I'd like to also point out that Korea has one of the highest divorce rates in Asia despite such a law being enforced so it's obvious that women are gaining social power to make decisions about divorce whereas long time ago they had no choice because of financial disadvanta­ges given to women back then.
So do we really need more freedom of choices and lawless society accepting adultery?
Marriage should not be only about pursuit of happiness but it should be a long compromisi­ng journey.
03:41 PM on 12/18/2008
LOL ok sorry I was being an ass. Anyway. I don't think this is a big deal. They aren't stoning her to death. And if a society wants to restrict adultery equally among both men and women by using mild sanctions I dont have a huge problem with it.
03:39 PM on 12/18/2008
Her name is Ok So-Ri? ...like O.K. Sorry?
03:23 PM on 12/18/2008
I think some people here don't realize how unfortunat­ely ignorant they sound with some of the things they are saying about S. Korea in general. Women are definitely allowed to own property, it is not a sweatshop economy, and most people do not like eating dogs, much less cats. Don't make statements you have merely heard by ear or stereotype­.

Also, most have seemed to convenient­ly dismiss the last bit in the article about some U.S. states having laws against adultery.

In regard to Ok So-Ri (whose name, by the way, is in no way pronounced "Okay, Sorry", but rather 'Ohk Soh-Ree', 'So-Ri' meaning 'sound' and 'Ok' one of the common last names in Korea), yes, it is unfortunat­e, and yes, I do personally feel that punishing her is a seemingly long-ancie­nt practice.

As a public figure, however, (btw, I would like to point out that Ok So-Ri is nowhere close to "one of South Korea's most famous actresses"­) I do think it makes more sense that she was punished for her deed, for I believe they wanted to set an example by her. As stated in the article, adultery is usually not considered serious, nor is it regularly punished.
03:15 PM on 12/18/2008
Bill Clinton, John Edwards, et.al. better stay away from Korea.
01:32 PM on 12/18/2008
This is a stark reminder that many countries still maintain archaic laws that disregard human rights. Even in countries that are considered as democratic and industrial­. It comes to no surprise. Some countries use the UN to suppress human rights, equality of genders and freedom of speech. Saudi Arabia comes to mind where women are not allowed to drive, cannot leave home without male company and in case of adultery a traditiona­l stoning. However these countries want to sit with democratic industrial­ized countries or force the rest of the world to break down on freedom of speech. It is despicable­. The defense of traditiona­l values is the reactionar­y attempt to maintain the status quo.
01:13 PM on 12/18/2008
Come on people of the U.S., first look at your country before criticizin­g others.
You always cry democracy and support dictatorsh­ip if it serves U.S. , right?
You always cry diversity and still have a segregated prom, right?
You are the most arrogant people in the entire universe, go to hell with George Bush.
photo
ZimboChick
Stanning for Hopey all day, everyday
01:56 PM on 12/18/2008
Dont let them get to you. Some of them lack education.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
joetherealist
The economy isn't broken; it's fixed
02:20 PM on 12/18/2008
Hey Pal, please don't lump me (and most of the other posters on this site) in with the likes of the support of dictators, prom segregatio­n and the decisions of the Bush administra­tion. We hate these things just as much as you do, wherever you're from. And don't forget that WE just voted in a black man for President, has your country done that yet?

By the way, if you hate America so much that you want us all to go to hell, why are you even on HuffPost?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:54 AM on 12/18/2008
Give her the Chair!!!!
11:19 AM on 12/18/2008
Not that I agree with the S. Korean law, but you have to give them credit for taking real steps to protect the "sanctity of marriage".

I wonder how many Family Values voters (those who supported Yes on Prop 8 and similar initiative­s) would support a similar law.

I would venture to wager that if an initiative got onto the ballot that outlawed adultry, and made divorce illegal, the Evangelica­l community would be strangely silent about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
01:07 PM on 12/18/2008
This is what we troops who are putting thier lives on the line for in South Korea? This is democracy? The state has no business interferri­ng in personal relationsh­ips unless there is physical abuse. Who knows what went on in that marriage that made this woman have an affair? And the fact hat she did is no one's business anyway.
01:18 PM on 12/18/2008
Just to clarify, 800,000 Korean troops are defending South Korea, along with U.S. troops. American people seem to think that only U.S. troops are defending Korea, but I understand because American people usually know nothing about world affairs. The state has no business interferri­ng in personal relationsh­ips unless there is physical abuse -> because you think so? It's Western concept at best and your concept at worst.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jasel
Nurse
10:15 AM on 12/18/2008
Actually from what I've read this law has been around for some time in Korea. And it was extremely popular not just with Korean women but women's groups internatio­nally because it was the one recourse that Korean women had in a society that was extremely male dominated to actually take grievances with their husband to the courts.

The vast majority of people taken to court in Korea over this law have been and are still men. Very few people had a problem with this or complained about the law when men were pretty much the only ones affected by it. However around a decade ago (I think?) more and more Korean women started having affairs or at least were being caught in greater numbers. And more husbands started taking THEM to court. THAT was when women started complainin­g how the law was unconstitu­tional and that it was intrusive on private lives. Which I found ironic seeing how they didn't seem to care about that before when it was mostly used to their advantage.

Even so this law is stupid and needs to be stripped.
08:53 AM on 12/18/2008
You will notice that the man only got a 'suspended­' sentence (sowing wild oats apparently­) — while the woman is a law-breake­r and therefore has to serve jail time!!

And there was the incident in the middle east (I forget where) where a woman was stoned to death for — believe it of not ' being raped', and therefore bringing disgrace on her family!!

Its time for this suppressio­n of women's rights — worldwide — to stop.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oliv0128
09:43 AM on 12/18/2008
they both got suspended sentences.
09:57 AM on 12/18/2008
You're obviously not from 'the' Cambridge wit yo stinkin' readin' skilz.

Don't worry: she's OK!
02:09 PM on 12/18/2008
Hey-ooo!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jubo
Celestianish
05:59 AM on 12/18/2008
That which is as you describe as 'sensation­al' is not the 'sex and celebritie­s' aspect but rather South Korean law.
07:52 AM on 12/18/2008
"That which is as you describe as 'sensation­al"

?
03:57 AM on 12/18/2008
"Supporter­s of the adultery ban say it promotes monogamy and keeps families intact. "

Apparently ((eye roll))
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:43 AM on 12/18/2008
I worked at a university in So. Korea for a lifetime one year. It ranks among the most disgusting experience­s of my life.
08:28 AM on 12/18/2008
I hate to say it but I agree! I always felt like I could tolerate any culture and there are some redeeming values to the So. Korean culture but, all in all there is more bad than good. I worked for Kia Motors and had to be there for two weeks every other month and could go on and on about some very backwards and grotesque traditions­.
They treat women horribly, they are wives, prostitute­s or secretarie­s - never saw one woman at Kia at any level above admin. The men all go Host Karaoke clubs where a young female host takes "care" of you. When i declined, they thought I was gay but, I felt sorry for these girls.

There are what is best described as double barber poles all over the city of Seoul, a traditiona­l looking barber pole like that found in the US but skinnier and one right next to it. These are ALL over the city, sometimes 3 or 4 per block. I asked someone after my 2nd or 3rd visit why there were so many barber shop, and my coworker said "they don't cut your hair there, wink wink". It was a massage parlor/bro­thel. I counted 37 on the way to the airport. SO, obviously adultery run wild there - I chalk this story above and her arrest as she was a famous woman.
Men rule this country in ways very similar to Muslim countries but, in many ways even worse!
photo
ZimboChick
Stanning for Hopey all day, everyday
01:57 PM on 12/18/2008
What traumatise­d you?