iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Science Team: 4 Top Members Named

First Posted: 01/20/09 05:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:55 PM ET

Obama

SCROLL DOWN TO WATCH OBAMA'S ANNOUNCEMENT

President-elect Barack Obama's selection Saturday of a Harvard physicist and a marine biologist for science posts is a sign he plans a more aggressive response to global warming than did the Bush administration.

John Holdren and Jane Lubchenco are leading experts on climate change who have advocated forceful government action. Holdren will become Obama's science adviser as director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Lubchenco will lead the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees ocean and atmospheric studies and does much of the government's research on global warming.

Holdren also will direct the president's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology. Joining him as co-chairs will be Nobel Prize-winning scientist Harold Varmus, a former director of the National Institutes of Health, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Eric Lander, a specialist in human genome research.

"It's time we once again put science at the top of our agenda and worked to restore America's place as the world leader in science and technology," Obama said in announcing the selections in his weekly radio address.

The president-elect said promoting science means more than just providing money, but also is about ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by politics or ideology.

"From landing on the moon, to sequencing the human genome, to inventing the Internet, America has been the first to cross that new frontier because we had leaders who paved the way," Obama said. "Leaders who not only invested in our scientists, but who respected the integrity of the scientific process."

The four scientists will confront challenges in global warming after years of inaction by the Bush administration, which opposed mandatory cuts of greenhouse gas pollution. Last year, former Surgeon General Richard Carmona testified to Congress that top administration officials often dismissed global warming as a "liberal cause" and sought to play down public health reports out of political considerations.

Since 1993, summer Arctic sea ice has lost the equivalent of Alaska, California and Texas, and global warming is accelerating. The amount of carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere has already pushed past the level some scientists say is safe.

Holdren, 64, is a former president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington who has pushed for more urgent action on global warming. As Obama's top science adviser, he would manage about 40 Ph.D-level experts who help shape and communicate science and technology policy.

"Global warming is a misnomer. It implies something gradual, something uniform, something quite possibly benign, and what we're experiencing is none of those," Holdren said a year ago in a speech at Harvard. "There is already widespread harm ... occurring from climate change. This is not just a problem for our children and our grandchildren."

Lubchenco, an Oregon State University professor specializing in overfishing and climate change, will be the first woman to head NOAA. A member of the Pew Oceans Commission, Lubchenco has recommended steps to overcome crippling damage to the world's oceans from overfishing and pollution and has expressed optimism for change once President George W. Bush leaves office.

"The Bush administration has not been respectful of the science," she said this year. "But I think that's not true of Republicans in general. I know it's not. I am very much looking forward to a new administration that does respect scientific information and that considers it very seriously in making environmental policies."

Varmus, who was a co-recipient of the Nobel Prize for his research on the causes of cancer, served as NIH director during the Clinton administration. A former medical professor at the University of California, San Francisco, he helped found the Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention and chairs a scientific board at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Lander, who teaches at both MIT and Harvard, founded the Whitehead Institute-MIT Center for Genome Research in 1990, which became part of the Broad Institute in 2003. A leading researcher in the Human Genome Project, he and his colleagues are using the findings to explore the molecular mechanisms behind human disease.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

SCROLL DOWN TO WATCH OBAMA'S ANNOUNCEMENT President-elect Barack Obama's selection Saturday of a Harvard physicist and a marine biologist for science posts is a sign he plans a more aggressive respon...
SCROLL DOWN TO WATCH OBAMA'S ANNOUNCEMENT President-elect Barack Obama's selection Saturday of a Harvard physicist and a marine biologist for science posts is a sign he plans a more aggressive respon...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,613
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
photo
HMDMSR
Workers of the world, unite!
04:23 PM on 12/21/2008
We need a federally directed science education program. This program would come up with standards which all fifty states would use in K-12. It could be called "No Science Left Behind."
Red states would try to wiggle out of this. After a long fight, let them wiggle free. I don't need fifty stars on the flag. If people don't want to live in the modern era, they should become a part of something else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LeftLeanWing
Ah.. I said..Ah Said I said... Proceed Guv'nah
02:08 PM on 12/21/2008
It's interesting in seeing what happens when the mission is NOT to establish a partisan or ideological dynasty.
12:00 PM on 12/21/2008
If the global economy hasn't already been pushed to the brink, throwing money at "climate change" ought to do the trick.
12:10 PM on 12/21/2008
Trolls are funny.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
12:12 PM on 12/21/2008
Republicans seem to know even less about economics than they do about science.
01:13 PM on 12/21/2008
Republicans seems to know less about economics and absolutely nothing about science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vjoseph
04:43 PM on 12/21/2008
That's very true
11:14 AM on 12/21/2008
Rock on Obama!
photo
HMDMSR
Workers of the world, unite!
10:45 AM on 12/21/2008
President Obama and his science advisors will have to speak to the public frequently about how scientific thinking fits into everyday, real life. The rapture ideology lives in the minds of at least a third of all Americans. A deeper look into science requires us to answer the question: can science be free of ideology itself? This would be a question about science--not scientists themselves. It seems to me that science needs to be protected from business-think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:45 AM on 12/21/2008
How refreshing, real scientists and top notch one's at that instead of astrologers, tarot card readers and other 'mystics'.
10:56 AM on 12/21/2008
Wow, where have YOU been. That was 20 years ago~
10:32 AM on 12/21/2008
This is the first sign that America will be getting real science, it's been a long time since the government cared much about this issue.
10:23 AM on 12/21/2008
Wow real scientists working in an administration. What a concept. Phew I wish someone had thought of this sooner.
09:35 AM on 12/21/2008
Well, we already know that trees absorbs CO2. So why don't we just line our roads and freeways with trees, as well as making it mandatory that every person over 18 be repsonsible for growing and maintaining at least one fruit tree.
10:44 AM on 12/21/2008
That is a kick a$$ idea.

What's also a great idea for a small gift for people is planting a tree in their name.
I customer of mine recently had her beloved dog put down and since she's a very spiritual person and loves nature, we bought planted a tree in her dog's name.
Got the idea since someone did it for a friend of mine and planted one in her dog's name...

http://www.treesinstead.com/

The best $25 you'll ever spend and you get a map of where exactly it is.
10:57 AM on 12/21/2008
What a scam ~
11:55 AM on 12/21/2008
Excellent idea! Trees also expel oxygen while we breathe it in. I would say that humans and trees form a great symbiotic relationship. So, everytime I see people cutting down trees, they are cutting down the oxygen that we breathe. We are slowly killng ourselves. Here is a link to a website that gives a perfect explanation of the process in layman's terms for all non-scientific people.
http://fplenergy.apogee.net/kids/whatsupwithcarbon.aspx
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lolyla
Happy happy joy joy
09:32 AM on 12/21/2008
I am so looking forward to January 20, 2009. I love this guy.
09:08 AM on 12/21/2008
Lets not forget NUCLEAR ! it would be really great if the new administration would promote ALL kinds of alternative energies other than oil. There are interesting new developments going on in the field of nuclear power : I just read about a new company that is making small PORTABLE nuclear power units that are buried underground, have no movable parts, and are based on a 50 year old technology that has proven safe. The technology is licensed from Los Alamos National Laboratory.
I understand that this company is already starting to EXPORT these units. This could be another opportunity for US exports of manufactured products, which we need so much.
Perhaps these easy -to-set up units could be used to power new biomass production or similar, to make new fuels to replace oil.
I apologise for not writing about this well enough, in any case I hope that some knowledgeable people will read this. Weve got to investigate ALL things for a better future for our country
Their website :
http://www.hyperionpowergeneration.com/
cheers !!
10:59 AM on 12/21/2008
However, most do not advocate nuclear power. I do. I think it is a great resource we haven't fully tapped.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
02:11 PM on 12/21/2008
only if we can keep all the waste at YOUR house.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:50 AM on 12/21/2008
Tee hee (democrats and science).

Who believes leftist admire science? No me.

Especially after " the Alar fraud, the dioxin fraud, the asbestos fraud, the lead fraud, and radom, radiation, polytyrene, acid-rain, global-warning, greenhouse, and ozone-depletion frauds

Children die in Africa inpart because of leftists and their "science".
09:39 AM on 12/21/2008
? "asbestos fraud"? Tell that to my dad , who died of mesothelioma, a cancer only caused by exposure to asbestos. And, he couldn't remember where he may have been exposed. Where do you get your science? The Creation Museum?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
09:51 AM on 12/21/2008
And yet another looser still wallowing in dreamland.
08:32 AM on 12/21/2008
FINALLY! Obama makes some Progressive choices for his Administration. Granted, the need to combat climate change has become so painfully obvious at this point (to anyone whose capacity to understand science exceeds their capacity for myopic self-interest, at any rate) that this was really almost a no-brainer.

I'd like to see more than token involvement by Progressives in this Administration. This is a start -- a day late and a dollar short, but potentially, it's a start.
photo
Itsmyland2
It's not my fault reality has a liberal bias...
08:01 AM on 12/21/2008
It will be so refreshing to have a President who believes in science rather than one waiting for the rapture
07:59 AM on 12/21/2008
What a change the new presidency would bring !
Last eight years were the most frustating period for the scientists. With the above four and many more they had a petition against the Bush government, citing as the most secretive of all times. Funds were being cut so much so that so many of the dedicated ones moved abroad sacrificing everything they had, only to continue their work uninterrupted .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prostock69
09:10 AM on 12/21/2008
I watched a show recently either on PBS or NOVA regarding the war on science in America. It made me so angry. At the end it of the show, it showed all the budget cuts that were made and how the scientists were forced to leave the country. Yet, Bush enacts the Welfare Reform Act without Congress' approval, and creates the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives which essentially erased the line between church and state, encouraging all religious groups to apply for federal money without the need to set up a separate organization or pretend to be secular. Since 2001, thousands of religious "charities" have sprung up, all attracted by the promise of public dollars. Many had no previous track record. BILLIONS!!!!! of tax dollars have freely flowed to undisguised religious organizations that openly laud faith to accomplish their mission. For many of these groups, social work is secondary to their primary mission of saving souls and promoting their gospel. What makes me so angry is Obama said he was going to continue this office. Our tax dollars should not be used in this. It ridiculous that groups like the Secular Coalition of America and The Freedom From Religion Foundation have to file lawsuits against these charities in order to enforce separation of church and state. They filed a lawsuit against the Executive Branch but the Supreme Court said they had no standing, because you can only sue Congress, and since Congress didn't enact this office, they lost.
10:03 AM on 12/21/2008
Thanks for more information . Funding for Science and Religion are two sides of a coin.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
02:14 PM on 12/21/2008
that was a disturbing little pronouncement from him early on but i believe he may have backed down from that way of thinking after seeing how unpopular it was.

we can't afford to be such luddites any more. our lives are literally depending on it.