Do It Yourself DNA: Amateurs Trying Genetic Engineering At Home

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Do It Yourself DNA: Amateurs Trying Genetic Engineering At Home stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARCUS WOHLSEN | 12/25/08 09:38 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Genetics

SAN FRANCISCO — The Apple computer was invented in a garage. Same with the Google search engine. Now, tinkerers are working at home with the basic building blocks of life itself.

Using homemade lab equipment and the wealth of scientific knowledge available online, these hobbyists are trying to create new life forms through genetic engineering _ a field long dominated by Ph.D.s toiling in university and corporate laboratories.

In her San Francisco dining room lab, for example, 31-year-old computer programmer Meredith L. Patterson is trying to develop genetically altered yogurt bacteria that will glow green to signal the presence of melamine, the chemical that turned Chinese-made baby formula and pet food deadly.

"People can really work on projects for the good of humanity while learning about something they want to learn about in the process," she said.

So far, no major gene-splicing discoveries have come out anybody's kitchen or garage.

But critics of the movement worry that these amateurs could one day unleash an environmental or medical disaster. Defenders say the future Bill Gates of biotech could be developing a cure for cancer in the garage.

Many of these amateurs may have studied biology in college but have no advanced degrees and are not earning a living in the biotechnology field. Some proudly call themselves "biohackers" _ innovators who push technological boundaries and put the spread of knowledge before profits.

In Cambridge, Mass., a group called DIYbio is setting up a community lab where the public could use chemicals and lab equipment, including a used freezer, scored for free off Craigslist, that drops to 80 degrees below zero, the temperature needed to keep many kinds of bacteria alive.

Story continues below
advertisement

Co-founder Mackenzie Cowell, a 24-year-old who majored in biology in college, said amateurs will probably pursue serious work such as new vaccines and super-efficient biofuels, but they might also try, for example, to use squid genes to create tattoos that glow.

Cowell said such unfettered creativity could produce important discoveries.

"We should try to make science more sexy and more fun and more like a game," he said.

Patterson, the computer programmer, wants to insert the gene for fluorescence into yogurt bacteria, applying techniques developed in the 1970s.

She learned about genetic engineering by reading scientific papers and getting tips from online forums. She ordered jellyfish DNA for a green fluorescent protein from a biological supply company for less than $100. And she built her own lab equipment, including a gel electrophoresis chamber, or DNA analyzer, which she constructed for less than $25, versus more than $200 for a low-end off-the-shelf model.

Jim Thomas of ETC Group, a biotechnology watchdog organization, warned that synthetic organisms in the hands of amateurs could escape and cause outbreaks of incurable diseases or unpredictable environmental damage.

"Once you move to people working in their garage or other informal location, there's no safety process in place," he said.

Some also fear that terrorists might attempt do-it-yourself genetic engineering. But Patterson said: "A terrorist doesn't need to go to the DIYbio community. They can just enroll in their local community college."

SAN FRANCISCO — The Apple computer was invented in a garage. Same with the Google search engine. Now, tinkerers are working at home with the basic building blocks of life itself. Using homemade...
SAN FRANCISCO — The Apple computer was invented in a garage. Same with the Google search engine. Now, tinkerers are working at home with the basic building blocks of life itself. Using homemade...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
91
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

It's really a shame that home research of any kind is practically demonized these days. Many of the innovations we take for granted came from amateur science. People are such sheep nowadays, when they hear "home" and "lab" in the same sentence, they think meth or bombs. People fear what they don't understand. I applaud these home innovators and wish them luck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 12/30/2008
- JScott I'm a Fan of JScott 20 fans permalink

Next - stovetop cold fusion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 12/29/2008

The genie is out of the bottle no matter what the US government says. There will be no controlling this in third world countries, and anyone who is serious about doing this in spite of government controls can simply move to a place where there's no regulation. The majority of home tinkers don't fall into this category, but any corporation with decent resources that wants to get out from under the thumb of regulators can set up labs in any one of dozens of countries where bribery speaks louder than regulation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 12/27/2008

I am not too concerned. Amateurs can barely make a dent in conventional engineering disciplines like EE, and that requires no more than a trivial amount of professional knowledge (I am a EE and I know). I have no knowledge of any amateur who would have made a contribution to physics lately. Physics is easy, mind you, all that's needed is money and dedication (and more often than not collaborations of hundreds or thousands of people). But in comparison life sciences are hard AND even more expensive. The kinds of experiments that can be done with household items and low cost chemistry are extremely limited and don't come even close to the total effort required to make substantial contributions.

CS, on the other hand, has created a mythos that amateurs can contribute substantially to the field but even that's an illusion. None of the internet was created by amateurs and all of the materials to build computer hardware come from professionals. The major contribution of amateurs is Linux, and even there the question needs to be asked how much of an amateur status the kernel development team really has. After all, most of these people are being paid full time for what they are doing, as far as I know, and all of them qualify as professionals in terms of their background.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 12/27/2008

Oh, by the way... commercial melamine test kits are available. And if you have a LC/MS or GC/MS in your lab and know how to use it, you have all the tools you need.

Now, why do we all need a melamine test kit at home? Because the FDA is not doing their job to keep us safe? Well, the solution to that is to reform the FDA, not to make the kitchen into chemistry central.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 12/27/2008

I do not think home research should be made illegal, but there should be some restrictions placed upon it, just as there are guidelines (self-imposed, or governmentally mandated) in academia and industry. There were many great discoveries that came out of home laboratories. It was the norm before the 20th century. Of course there were accidents and mishaps--today this is still the truth, but fear of accidents should not rule our course of research, nor should bounds be set on scientific progress. To think that nothing useful could come from independent private research, done even by non-degree­d/accredit­ed individuals in substandard conditions would be naive and reeks of academic snobbery and narcissism. It might be unlikely that the cure from cancer would come from someone's garage, but I would never rule that out as impossible. I can parody this statement by saying that the next supervirus/chemical weapon/"dirty" radiological bomb is unlikely to come from a home laboratory, but I also cannot rule that out as being an impossibility. The fact remains: if someone really wants to do something, they will do it. After all, there are plenty of breakthroughs we use daily that are, or are descendants of humble origin. As a scientist, it would be not only elitist of me to say that an amateur is incapable of professional quality research, but also factually incorrect. Garbage science can come from anywhere; so too can gems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 12/30/2008

Playing with the basic building blocks of life has the potential to inextricably alter life ont he planet as we know it. It should never be undertaken without having appropriate bio-containment facilities, including appropriate airlocks. It is something the United States military knows quite well, as its initial experimentation in recombinant DNA, was performed without such controls in the American backyard of Canada.

The recombinant DNA experimentation using the gut bacteria E. coli as its base, continues to create social havoc, with the periodic report of outbreak of so-called "hamburger disease" -- E. Coli-0157 - a variant of the basic E. Coli which is of harm to the elderly, young children, and the immune compromised.

Those who have worked on those projects, projects without these controls know full well of how dangerous they can be. Silly as it sounds, these are potential WMD's, and we wouldn't wish to have peoplw building nuclear bombs on their basement workbench either.

Manuel

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 12/26/2008

People have been playing with life since the first farmers discovered that they can breed livestock and the ecological impact of that on the planet was enormous. No big deal. The worst sins have already been committed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 12/27/2008

Dude, no way.

Here's an article from 2001 which describes the accidental creation of a "super-virus" in mice:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9505E0DA103CF930A15752C0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

Seven years have passed since this finding hit the popular press. Do you think that's enough time for someone with bad intentions to do something with the discovery? I do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 12/28/2008

It's time to write your State and Federal leaders and demand legislation to outlaw this dangerous practice.

Due to the secrecy with which it can be conducted, it will have to carry a very high penalty if discovered.

This is a serious danger to the public. As such, the legislation should be equivalent to terror!st acts with equivalent consequences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 12/26/2008

I don't think one can or even should outlaw scientific experimentation at home. There are plenty of legal hurdles for this kind of work. Chemical and bio-hazard regulations apply to everyone and much of this can be conducted legally only in industrial areas where buildings are properly classified and marked for their hazardous materials content. If an amateur is willing to violate these restrictions, how likely is it that they will follow a more restrictive law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 12/27/2008
- drkazmd65 I'm a Fan of drkazmd65 51 fans permalink
photo

True - speaking as a Bio-science professional - the really dangerous kinds of chemicals, and potential biological agents (at least the known ones) are already relatively hard to get, are heavily regulated, and are mostly fairly hard to grow or maintain in a small, non-complex lab setting.

I have done a bit of (legal - edible) Shitake mushroom cultivation at home, and brew my own beer with a yeast strain isolated by a friend of mine back in Grad School. These things are relatively easy and don't require too much specialized equipment.

Much beyond that - the home-style biologist / experimenters can't get into too much trouble. But - somebody just might figure out a better / simpler / cheeper way of doing something practical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 12/29/2008
- sparkey I'm a Fan of sparkey 10 fans permalink
photo

State and federal leaders won't listen to you unless you stuff a wad of cash up their backsides. It why they don't listen to me or the majority of other Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 12/28/2008
- MyTake I'm a Fan of MyTake 30 fans permalink
photo

I hope the bio-hackers take this florescent green gene and modify it to activate when in vicinity of the enzymes controlling bio-electrical heart rate rhythm. Lie detectors, in part, operate on sensing the speeding up of the heart rhythm when a person lies. Then if the person turned florescent green when they are lying, the world would be a better place.

What a perfect way in weeding out lying politicians and/or the whole damn lying population­-at-large!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 12/26/2008

Dangerously foolish!!

Manipulating the genetics of organisms in an uncontrolled environment by unskilled "hobbiests' is a disaster waiting to happen. It's not a matter of IF, but rather WHEN one of their mutants is loosed on the public.

I work as Molecular Biologist in a Bio-safety Level 3 laboratory and this idea sounds like a nightmare to me. I don't trust half the Ph.D.'s I work with, let alone some curious "know-it-all" who read a few journal/news articles and thinks, "I can do that!"

A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing! In this case, it could be the end of us all... If you live near Ms. Patterson, I suggest not shopping at the same grocery store.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 12/26/2008

Relax. People have spent billions on manipulating organisms to make them into bio-warfare agents with very little to show for. Superbugs don't happen by accident. As far as we know they don't even happen by design. But they happen naturally: AIDS, Ebola, Influenza anyone? That's where the real danger is: by nature experimenting simultaneously in a hundred trillion test tubes. It's called evolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 12/27/2008

"Superbugs don't happen by accident. As far as we know they don't even happen by design."

Sorry, that's not quite true:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9505E0DA103CF930A15752C0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 12/28/2008
- sunzen I'm a Fan of sunzen 4 fans permalink
photo

We are doomed...can everyone say unintended consequences

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 12/26/2008

"Unintended consequences"..... I can see them already.

I can imagine Ms. Patterson transfer a gene, selected by size, that she believes is GFP (green florescence protein), but in fact is a blend containing a "pathogenic island" such as Shiga-toxin (E.coli po!son) or worse. She successfully makes her first batch of yogurt and sells it at the local farms' market. With in days, or maybe weeks, people start flooding emergency rooms with an bloody d!arrhea and kidney failure.

That's just one potential... there are so many others that the idea is terrifying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 12/26/2008

Yeah. She's going to sell modified yogurt. Without testing it. Without telling people what it is. At a farmer's market. And selling it as food when the point of it is to detect melamine.

I know that an hysterical reaction isn't really supposed to make sense but COME ON!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 12/29/2008
photo

Monsanto 'll take care of them. How dare they infringe on their copyrighted genetic material!

Pretty soon Monsanto will start copyrighting common food crops. Got a garden? Hope your income's high.

Put this into google video: "health dangers of genetically modified foods"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 12/26/2008
- MoeJava I'm a Fan of MoeJava 34 fans permalink
photo

This story sounds like what the Duggar's are doing in Arkansas...... their own home made science lab, complete with clones. However, no scientific observation, documentation or research - just cashing those welfare checks - and by "welfare" I mean their being subsidized by TLC, the religious right wing, and all their sponsors....... including the makers of Pampers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 12/26/2008

"Hey you kids, knock it off!"
-- Dr. Frank N. Stein

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 12/26/2008

By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 12/26/2008

I'm a research biologist, in the process of launch my own biotech business.

I have been aware from some time that I COULD operate the startup phase of my company out of my garage. But I'm appalled that someone actually WOULD do such a thing.

Biotechnology can be powerful and dangerous stuff. Benign activities, however, are nearly impossible for a casual observer to distinguish from dangerous ones. And make no mistake about it -- if you had biotech labs in garages around the country, the only types of inspections you could count on getting for those labs would be the casual kind.

Several metropolitan areas have biotech "incubator" facilities. You can rent laboratory space for a modest fee. Safe biological waste disposal is included with the lab space. I urge anyone who wants to try anything more sophisticated than what is allowed in a high school bio lab to seek out like-minded partners, and rent a space at an incubator facility. That includes ALL gene-splicing.

If laws do not already restrict homebrew biotechnology, they should be revised immediately.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 12/26/2008
- grn1 I'm a Fan of grn1 6 fans permalink

No worries, no cures, no ending starvation, no technological advances for humaitarian purpose? Only mining through propriety.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 12/26/2008

Give me a break! It's not all about money or proprietary ownership... it's about public safety.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 12/26/2008

Huh? You think this is about keeping biotech in the hands of profiteers?

Read Laurie Garrett's _The_Comin­g_Plague_. Trust me, you don't want just anyone to mess around with this stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 12/26/2008
- julia23 I'm a Fan of julia23 27 fans permalink
photo

i lost my coffee over the line "used freezer, scored for free off Craigslist, that drops to 80 degrees below zero, the temperature needed to keep many kinds of bacteria alive."

I think the freezers are used to STORE things. Not keep things alive.

(my pet peeve, reporters who write about science when they obviously don't even understand basic high school biology)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 12/26/2008

I agree, the article contains some glaring mis-statements. Most science articles in the popular press are riddled with errors.

However: bacteria stored in deep freeze are in fact alive, even if they are rendered temporarily inanimate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 12/26/2008
- drkazmd65 I'm a Fan of drkazmd65 51 fans permalink
photo

Excellent point julia23 - I had noticed the "-80 degree' bit as well.

I really, really wish that there was some requirement that reporters writing 'science' articles actually run the text past a science professional before the 'crap' hits mainstream print.

I would be happy to volunteer my services (for a truely nominal fee) part-time if some news organization wanted it,... just to keep some of the 'crap' out of the mainstream.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 12/29/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect