EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Bruce Jeffrey Pardo, Santa Gunman On Christmas Eve, Lost Job Wife Before Rampage

GILLIAN FLACCUS | December 27, 2008 11:02 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This undated photograph provided by the Covina, Calif. Police Department shows a device that suspect Bruce Pardo brought with him to the Knollcrest house where he allegedly shot and killed at least nine people. This photograph shows the tank from a compressor, below, where the actual compressor mechanism has been removed and replaced with a smaller tank. Police believe the smaller tank held high octane racing fuel and the larger of the two tanks held compressed air. Pardo is suspected in a Christmas Eve massacre where the recently divorced man dressed as Santa allegedly shot indiscriminately at partygoers and destroyed his former in-laws' house with a homemade device that sprayed flammable liquid. (AP Photo/Covina Police Department)
?>

MONTROSE, Calif. — Bruce and Sylvia Pardo started the new year in 2006 with all signs pointing to a bright future _ an upcoming marriage, a combined income of about $150,000, half-million-dollar home on a quiet cul-de-sac and a beloved dog, Saki.

But things quickly turned sour and divorce documents paint a bitter picture of Bruce Pardo's increasing desperation as he lost first his wife, then his job and finally the dog. By fall 2008, Pardo was asking a judge to have his ex-wife pay him support and cover his attorney's fees.

Pardo's downward slide ended Christmas Eve, when the 45-year-old electrical engineer donned a Santa suit and massacred nine people at his former in-laws' house in Covina, where a family Christmas party was under way. He then used a homemade device disguised as a present to spray racing fuel that quickly sent the home up in flames.

Pardo had planned to flee to Canada following the killing spree but suffered third-degree burns in the fire _ which melted part of the Santa suit to him _ and decided to kill himself instead, investigators said. His body, with a bullet wound to the head, was found at his brother's home about 40 miles away.

Police said Saturday that they are seeking a second, possibly boobytrapped car rented by Pardo. The rented compact car he had driven to his former in-laws house was rigged to set off 500 rounds of ammunition and later exploded outside his brother's home. No one was injured.

The slaughter came six days after Pardo and his ex-wife appeared in court to finalize their divorce. Police believe the dead included Sylvia Pardo, 43, and her parents, Joseph Ortega, 80, and his 70-year-old wife, Alicia. Other suspected victims were Sylvia Pardo's two brothers and their wives, her sister and a 17-year-old nephew.

Police listed the victims as unaccounted for because coroner's officials said the nine bodies were too badly charred for immediate identification.

Shocked friends said nothing indicated he was on the verge of a murderous rampage. Pardo had told one friend he planned to usher at the Christmas Eve midnight Mass at his church and told another to expect him for a visit in Iowa around the holidays. He had no previous criminal record.

"I can't believe I'm seeing my old boyfriend on TV and all the people he destroyed," said Carol Sanchez, who dated Pardo for four years, when both were 18-year-old high school students. "It's very heartbreaking."

"He was a very easygoing person, a very friendly guy," she said. "I would never in my right mind think that he would ever do anything like this."

Pardo had a 9-year-old son, Matthew, by another former girlfriend, Elena Lucano. He had not seen the child for years, but apparently was claiming him as a dependent for tax purposes. Lucano told the Los Angeles Times that she didn't know Pardo was claiming their son as a dependent.

The boy was left severely brain damaged as a toddler when he fell into a backyard swimming pool on Jan. 6, 2001 while Pardo was alone with him at his former home in Woodland Hills, according to attorney Jeffrey Alvirez, who represented Lucano in the resulting court case.

Medical costs reached $340,000. Lucano sued Pardo to obtain money from his $100,000 homeowner's insurance policy and about $36,000 was put into a trust fund for the boy, who requires constant care. Pardo never contributed any more money to the boy's care.

"He never spent a dime on his son," Alvirez said.

Alvirez said he would not be surprised if Pardo kept that part of his life a secret from his wife.

Court documents from the Pardos' nearly yearlong divorce proceeding reveal a marriage that faltered early and then descended into a bitter feud.

The couple married on Jan. 29, 2006, and moved into a home Pardo already owned in Montrose, about 15 miles north of Los Angeles. The house sits up the hill from the Holy Redeemer Catholic Church, where he volunteered as an usher at the children's Mass.

Two days after the shootings, Christmas lights still twinkled from the fence and the roof line and blue-green lights sparkled in an orange tree as two police officers searched the house.

Sylvia Pardo didn't bring much money to the marriage _ just $31,000 a year from a job at a flower-breeding company in El Monte _ but she brought a 5-year-old daughter from a previous relationship and almost all the furniture. By all accounts, Pardo was close to his wife's daughter.

Sylvia Pardo also had two other children from a previous marriage.

Bruce Pardo was making $122,000 a year as an electrical engineer at ITT Electronic Systems Radar Systems in Van Nuys, and together the couple built a nest egg of $88,500 in two years. He often puttered around the house or walked Saki, the couple's big, brown Akita, in a local park.

But by December 2007, Sylvia Pardo was sleeping in another room and spending weekends with her parents, according to court papers. Two months later she told him she wanted a divorce.

She filed court papers asking for attorney's fees and $3,166 in monthly spousal support. She claimed her husband had drawn down their $88,500 savings to $17,000 in two months and was transferring funds to a private account.

"The situation has become untenable, and continuing the marriage was not an option," she said in court documents.

In July, Pardo lost his job at ITT and soon was drowning in debt while scrambling to find work. He begged the court to grant him spousal support until he could find employment. He complained in a filing that he had monthly expenses of $8,900 and ran a monthly deficit of $2,678. He also had $31,000 in credit card debt and a $2,700 monthly mortgage payment.

"I was not given a severance package from my last employer at termination and I am not receiving any other income," wrote Pardo, who also was denied unemployment benefits. "I am desperately seeking work."

Instead, the court ordered Pardo to pay his ex-wife $1,785 a month in spousal support, plus $3,570 for past payments. When the divorce was settled, the court waived those payments and Bruce Pardo got the house _ but he also had to pay his ex-wife $10,000, return her valuable diamond wedding ring and give her custody of the dog.

Two days before the killings, he told his attorney he still was trying to come up with the money.

When Pardo's body was found, $17,000 was strapped to it, money he apparently planned to use to fund his escape to Canada. His mother, Nancy Windsor, told the Los Angeles Times that she wanted that money and any in her son's estate to be placed in a fund for the children of her former daughter-in-law.

"Anything that our family realized from Bruce's vehicle, from the money on him, whenever that's released, everything is going to my grandchildren," Windsor said.

______

Associated Press reporter Anthony McCartney contributed to this story.

Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:06 AM on 12/30/2008
His mother stated that the money they found on him and all other money would be going to her daughter in laws children. what about her own grandson that is now disabled due to her son's negligence­. Has the whole family forgotten about this poor child that needs medical care and the money would come in great help for the mother.
appears the mother is just as selfious as her son and how could anyone turn their back on their own flesh and blood especially a grandchild
08:21 PM on 12/28/2008
Mentally ill? I don't know if I believe it.

Sucked into the values of the day where he was required to fit a certain role to be respected in the circles he traveled. Yea...I believe that.

Sure...he made the bad choices and then at the end I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't on some drug to give him that kind of inhibition needed to act out.

He didn't seem to have a history of mental illness or violence.

The part of this story that hits close to home is, how many people live on the edge and given the right circumstan­ces could do this?
photo
brooklyncitizen
Quaerite primum regnum dei
10:03 AM on 12/28/2008
Too many men are really emotionall­y retarded..­. it is so common for them to view women and children as an extension of their ego and treat them as property. First he is a negligent parent with the first child who is now mentally handicappe­d as a result of ...?

Then he marries again and does this. Men are so fragile and women give these men too much benefit of the doubt. He was not mentally ill he was an emotional midget.
09:57 AM on 12/28/2008
All right, hufpo, what did I say at 9:55 AM to get me the 'comment pending'?
10:05 AM on 12/28/2008
do over, my comments didn't get approved until i broke up the word h.e.l.l.
08:03 AM on 12/28/2008
As a society, we do a lousy job of recognizin­g mental illness in friends and
relatives and getting them started on getting help.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phalanxman
Everything in Moderation
12:38 PM on 12/28/2008
This was not a case of mental illness, unless you define all anti-socia­l and aberration­al behavior as "mentally ill.' This was an act of revenge, pure and simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
youknowwhat
Conservatism is socialism for the rich and wealthy
03:25 AM on 12/28/2008
This headline almost seems as though it's providing an excuse for what he did. I don't think that's the reason, but it just seems like it.
03:02 AM on 12/28/2008
This is just the beginning of what's to come, I'll bet these type of crimes become more & more common place as the economy continues to tank. There are a lot of folks out there whose idea of their total self worth comes from their car, or truck, their house, clothes, ect, and those days are over for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
newworldman777
What would our future 7th generation think of us?
06:53 AM on 12/28/2008
I was thinking the same thing. We may not see people "jumping from windows" on Wall Street -- like the urban myth describes the 1929 crash (although it was just that: a myth) -- because the vogue thing to do in the modern era is to grab a gun and "go postal," as it were. When people get used to a certain lifestyle, they find it to be extremely difficult to give that up and settle for much less. For many, that is an unacceptab­le and intolerabl­e propositio­n, and they will resort to drastic measures to vent their anger. But then again, since we are living in a failing and declining capitalist society, incidents like this should not come as a surprise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phalanxman
Everything in Moderation
01:24 PM on 12/28/2008
The idea that these are "isolated" incidents is simply wrong. The "killing spree" has become a regular occurrence in American society, and is a feature of our culture. Andrew Kehoe wired a school with explosives in Bath, Michigan, in 1927, killing 42, wounding 61. Charles Whitman opens up on the University of Texas in 1966, killing 14, wounding 22. Richard Speck kills 8 student nurses in 1966. Richard Farley ills seven and wounds four in 1988 in a case of unrequited love. George Banks kills 13 in Wilkes-Bar­re in 1982, mostly his own family. George Hennard kills 22 at a Killeen, Texas, restaurant in 1991. James Oliver Huberty killed 22, wounded 19 at a McDonald's in San Ysidro in 1984. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold ill 12 and wound 23 at Columbine High in 1999. Patrick Purdy kills 5 school children and wounds 29 in Stockton in 1989. The list goes on and on. It's not so much a question of what is wrong with the killers. The question is, "Why does our society produce so many of them?"
02:33 AM on 12/28/2008
The whole "Santa costume" really makes this story that much more transcende­nt than just some disgruntle­d, violent guy. It should be a cautionary tale that underneath all the Pavlovian holiday behaviors and rituals---­the, at times, "in your face" mentality of family, religion and consumeris­m vis-a-vis relative wealth (I want to scream when I see those luxury car commercial­s with the $50,000 car with the red bow on it). For so many, this time of year is proof positive of one's perceived place in life, that it's a year long game of Musical Chairs, and for a few select days, the music stops and one's just left standing in a state of exclusion.
--
I don't condone what Pardo did for a nanosecond­, but there's a small part of me that remotely understand­s.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Quaerite primum regnum dei
09:58 AM on 12/28/2008
What I understand is that he was a controllin­g male and his ego was bruised. People need to care for themselves and their emotions before starting a relationsh­ip or family.He apprently was incapable of taking responsibi­lity.
photo
lovesholiday
Perpetual Peace is only found in the graveyard
10:13 AM on 12/28/2008
What are you talking about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mygirl
Retired Librarian
01:17 AM on 12/28/2008
May God bring peace !
photo
vincefango
Savior of Lost Kittens and Generally Thirsty
12:21 AM on 12/28/2008
This the saddest and most outrageous story I've ever heard. I hate to use the word "story" because it's so much more than that. All these posts trying to make religious points are so far off, it makes me wanna puke. This is not about religion, or divorce, or an analogy for why gay marriage should've remain legal (which I support)..­.this is about a broken person at the end of his line and killing nine people.

Reading some posts, it sinks in that we really are a desensitiz­ed society. For some people, this was nothing more that last weeks episode of CSI, or an argument for their cause. In all truth, it almost sounds like a movie, but if I saw this movie...an­d it was fiction...­my jaw would still be on the floor. So sad, in so many ways....in other ways, it makes me thankful for any and all of the good things in my life.

I can't imagine (even though I know what has been reported) the circumstan­ces that caused him to feel that this very elaborate, but seemingly last minute plan was his only viable path. So truly, truly sad...my heart goes out to all the survivors, the deceased and their relatives.­..and in some weird way, which I can't comprehend at the moment...B­ruce Pardo as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aznurse
09:46 AM on 12/28/2008
It seems to me Pardo was not a broken person at the end of his line, it was a vindictive person, wanting to start another lie/life somewhere else. I bet anything he was quite proud of himself.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Quaerite primum regnum dei
10:00 AM on 12/28/2008
agreed. very calculatin­g and premeditat­ed. to even contemplat­e a massacre is alarming but to execute it and have full plans on what comes next is simply being a cold blooded killer.
08:04 PM on 12/28/2008
I wonder if he had turned to drugs for "support" the last few months of his life.

Drugs can seriously impair ones reasoning and let you act out.

Curious what we're going to hear about that, if we ever do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zenaby56
Caring about our future!
11:42 PM on 12/27/2008
This story is a tragedy! Unfortunat­ely, one thing that often is never discussed is the history of power and control. I would expect that he exerted power and control in his relationsh­ip with his wife. A woman who leaves an abusive relationsh­ip is at highest risk for being killed. In may ways, this story is a common story. He probably decided that she was not going to be had by anyone else and had a belief that her family was partly responsibl­e for her leaving. There are many indicators for this kind of homicidal control and unfortunat­ely, our society often keeps this kind of power and control quiet. Financial woes make life harder, for sure. But, it alone does not lead to violence. It only aggravates an already abusive/vi­olent situation.

I would like to see the media explore domestic violence in this story. This is not a man who lost control. this is a man who had extreme control and acted in a way to exert the ultimate of control over his wife.
09:53 AM on 12/28/2008
That's funny--tha­t's an incredibly cold and inhuman assessment­. Of course he lost control--n­obody who has genuine control over anything goes on a shooting spree. I was thinking he might have been the one being controlled­, by malignant forces he was unable to do anything about. Mental illness, possibly--­bad relationsh­ip skills, abusive past, alchohol. There's nowhere near enough informatio­n in the article to figure it all out--but what was the nature of his marriage that lasted 8 or 9 months? Was he being abused or was he abusing? Was he a drinker? Was she a drinker? Was she belittling­, unsupporti­ve, and complainin­g? Was he controllin­g and angry? What exactly happened? Why did his first son fall into the pool? Was he on the phone? Drunk? Or was it a blameless accident? Why did the court pound those last few nails in the guy's head with the $1800/mont­h "spousal support" judgement? Why was he responsibl­e for his ex-wife's living expense? But I agree--the guy needed help and either no one noticed, or no one cared.
11:02 PM on 12/27/2008
Hey Mormons: here's your chance to create a Propositio­n To Ban Divorce! See, if Pardo hadn't been stuck through the wringer on his divorce maybe he wouldn't have snapped. Come on, Mormons, you believe in the "defense of marriage", don't you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
Mommy says the rich men need our food stamps.
01:22 AM on 12/28/2008
Doesn't seem like he was put 'through the wringer' as you say. He got the house. Support was waived.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachbreak
07:33 AM on 12/28/2008
but he lost his dog.
10:56 PM on 12/27/2008
There ought to be a tragedy-pr­evention program that would check on people who are recently fired and who show signs of deep depression and impending snap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
Mommy says the rich men need our food stamps.
01:23 AM on 12/28/2008
Should be able to cross reference weapons purchases with recent court proceeding­s and applicatio­ns for unemployme­nt to identify a potentiall­y troubled crowd.
08:56 PM on 12/27/2008
This guy definitely went off the deep end. His life had gone totally to sh;t and as a result he made some very unrational decisions. his guy probably had very little if any social support network he felt he could use. The fact the he fled the situation with his disabled son shows that he was unable to deal with it emotionall­y. It is a sign of our culture perhaps, we'll probably see more of this in the coming years.

I did find it interestin­g that the court still expected him to pay spousal support even when he had no income. Just what entitles someone to a lifetime of cash from a two year marriage even if the man you were married to no longer has an income to pay it?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MalloMel
09:18 PM on 12/27/2008
"Just what entitles someone to a lifetime of cash from a two year marriage even if the man you were married to no longer has an income to pay it?"

I know. That seems kind of cra.ppy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cinnamonape
09:55 PM on 12/27/2008
But the guy was clearly lying about his finances as well. He tried to imply that he was spending an exorbitant amount to sustain himself ~$8900/mon­th? The couple were actually putting away $40K a year from their joint incomes into their banks accounts.

And he had drawn down the $86K bank account? Clearly he also had lots of cash on him when he shot himself...­$17,000! I bet that more will be found in accounts under other names.

He actually got of rather easy when the divorce was finalized.­..$10K, the wedding ring, and the dog. He kept the half million dollar house. Nothing about cars...but it sounds as if the ex-wife was pretty much cutting out of the deal. I'm sure he took more than $10K of her money from the accounts.

And this guy was skimping out of any child support for his disabled kid...that he was largely responsibl­e for supervisin­g when the kid had his "accident"­.
12:25 AM on 12/28/2008
If the murderer also went through $70k from their joint savings in 2 months, and ran up $30k in credit card debt I would have zero sympathy for him. Add in the deadbeat factor with his disabled son, the dependant tax credit fraud, dishonesty with his ex, and this loser was seemingly never a sympatheti­c figure.
09:39 PM on 12/27/2008
I think the court does calculatio­ns based on "expected" income. So they expect that he will eventually find a job as an electrical engineer since he does have credential­s, a degree, etc. They assume that his situation is temporary and that he can eventually pay her the money.

You know some men intentiall­y loose their jobs so they don't have to pay child support or spousal support. Maybe this is in response to that trend.

The divorce rate is very high and IMO, the courts should offer post divorce counseling as a part of the settlement for the kids and parents. You just end up seeing a huge amount of emotional instabilit­y that can even carry over into adulthood for the children of divorced parents.
08:55 PM on 12/27/2008
ever notice every time the Bible is discussed
it's no discussion at all, it's preaching !!!!!!

Maybe it's time to intelligen­tly take a look at what their teaching, er preaching !!