"Angel At The Fence" Cancellation Prompts Anger, Outrage

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - "Angel At The Fence" Cancellation Prompts Anger, Outrage stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HILLEL ITALIE | December 28, 2008 11:36 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Sept. 25, 2008 file photo, Herman and Roma Rosenblat pose for a photo in their North Miami Beach, Fla. home. Rosenblat's "Angel at the Fence" had been scheduled to come out in February, but Berkley Books, an imprint of Penguin Group (USA), withdrew the memoir following allegations by scholars, friends and family members that his tale was untrue. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter, File)

NEW YORK — It's the latest story that touched, and betrayed, the world.

"Herman Rosenblat and his wife are the most gentle, loving, beautiful people," literary agent Andrea Hurst said Sunday, anguishing over why she, and so many others, were taken by Rosenblat's story of love born on opposite sides of a barbed-wire fence at a concentration camp.

"I question why I never questioned it. I believed it; it was an incredible, hope-filled story."

On Saturday, Berkley Books canceled Rosenblat's memoir, "Angel at the Fence," after he acknowledged that he and his wife did not meet, as they had said for years, at a sub-camp of Buchenwald, where she allegedly sneaked him apples and bread. The book was supposed to come out in February.

Rosenblat, 79, has been married to the former Roma Radzicky for 50 years, since meeting her on a blind date in New York. In a statement issued Saturday through his agent, he described himself as an advocate of love and tolerance who falsified his past to better spread his message.

"I wanted to bring happiness to people," said Rosenblat, who now lives in the Miami area. "I brought hope to a lot of people. My motivation was to make good in this world."

Rosenblat's believers included not only his agent and his publisher, but Oprah Winfrey, film producers, journalists, family members, school children and strangers online who ignored, or didn't know about, the warnings from scholars and skeptics that his story didn't make sense.

Other Holocaust memoirists have devised greater fantasies. Misha Defonseca, author of "Misha: A Memoire of the Holocaust Years," pretended she was a Jewish girl who lived with wolves during the war, when she was actually a non-Jew who lived, without wolves, in Belgium.

Story continues below
advertisement

Historical records prove Rosenblat was indeed at Buchenwald and other camps.

"How sad that he felt he had to embellish a life of surviving the Holocaust and of being married for half a century," said Holocaust scholar Michael Berenbaum.

The damage is broad. Publishing, the most trusting of industries, has again been burned by a memoir that fact-checking might have prevented. Berkley is an imprint of Penguin Group (USA), which in March pulled Margaret B. Jones' "Love and Consequences" after the author acknowledged she had invented her story of gang life in Los Angeles. Winfrey fell, as she did with James Frey, for a narrative of suffering and redemption better suited for television than for history.

"If I ever take on another memoir, they're going to have to prove everything, every line," Hurst says. "From now on, I may just stick to basic fiction and nonfiction."

The damage is deep. Scholars and fellow survivors fear that Rosenblat's fabrications will only encourage doubts about the Holocaust.

"I am very worried because many of us speak to thousands of students each year," says Sidney Finkel, a longtime friend of Rosenblat's and a fellow survivor. "We go before audiences. We tell them a story and now some people will question what I experienced."

"This was not Holocaust education but miseducation," Ken Waltzer, director of Jewish Studies at Michigan State University, said in a statement.

"Holocaust experience is not heartwarming, it is heart rending. All this shows something about the broad unwillingness in our culture to confront the difficult knowledge of the Holocaust," Waltzer said. "All the more important then to have real memoirs that tell of real experience in the camps."

Among the fooled, at least the partially fooled, was Berenbaum, former director of the United States Holocaust Research Institute at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. Berenbaum had been asked to read the manuscript by film producer Harris Salomon, who still plans an adaptation of the book.

Berenbaum's tentative support _ "Crazier things have happened," he told The Associated Press last fall _ was cited by the publisher as it initially defended the book. Berenbaum now says he saw factual errors, including Rosenblat's description of Theresienstadt, the camp from which he was eventually liberated, but didn't think of challenging the love story.

"There's a limit to what I can verify, because I was not there," he says. "I can verify the general historical narrative, but in my research I rely upon the survivors to present the specifics of their existence with integrity. When they don't, they destroy so much and they ruin so much, and that's terrible."

"I was burned," he added. "And I have to read books more skeptically because I was burned."

NEW YORK — It's the latest story that touched, and betrayed, the world. "Herman Rosenblat and his wife are the most gentle, loving, beautiful people," literary agent Andrea Hurst said Sunday, a...
NEW YORK — It's the latest story that touched, and betrayed, the world. "Herman Rosenblat and his wife are the most gentle, loving, beautiful people," literary agent Andrea Hurst said Sunday, a...
Filed by Danny Shea  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
111
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- voter42 I'm a Fan of voter42 7 fans permalink

His story could have been true, but the one about living with the wolves should have sent off huge red flags.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 12/31/2008

This is nothing but a con job. I feel no sympathy for a man who intended to fool people for profit. He signed a book deal and a movie deal and wanted money for a lie. The whole " I wanted to bring hope to survivors" is nothing but BS. His entire family knew the truth and sat idle while he gathered sympathy, attention and money from the people he was conning. He and his entire family are fraud's and deserve nothing but scorn ... not sympathy. Same with James Frey or anyone else who intentionally make up lies and try to sell them as truth for profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 12/31/2008

If he wanted to spread a positive message, he still could have by positioning the book as fiction. It still would've been a great inspirational story. Since when did fictitious stories stop inspiring people? I personally resent the fact that he felt he needed to lie to the public. We are adults, not children. We don't need his Santa Claus effect.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 12/30/2008
- Big0725 I'm a Fan of Big0725 23 fans permalink
photo

Well said. I couldn't agree with you more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 12/30/2008
- yearlin I'm a Fan of yearlin 4 fans permalink

didn't anybody think to check their wrists?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

The author is a verified survivor of a concentration camp. He embellished his story by including tales of meeting his future wife at the camp fence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 PM on 12/30/2008
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 486 fans permalink
photo

Have you had an brain scan lately? Don't bother, there's nothing to scan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 12/31/2008
- qxav949 I'm a Fan of qxav949 10 fans permalink

WOW! This was a spectacular hoax. The reason so many were fooled is it would be indecent (in the least) or even downright anti-semitic (at the most) to question a survivor on the veracity of their recollection regading one of the most horrific events in history.

This couple preyed on such public sentiment and extorted many. But I most confess, I did get a good laugh 'cause I wasn't one of these folks.

Take heart, at least it wasn't like Madoff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 12/30/2008
- MyLowell I'm a Fan of MyLowell 5 fans permalink
photo

agree with your first paragraph. who would want to question such a story?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 12/31/2008
- Giada I'm a Fan of Giada 18 fans permalink
photo

Oprah's entertainment and ratings ... A Million Little Pieces, (beyond a memoir, horrible read), count Running with Scissors, both film and book. The penultimate was, The Secret, in which the author promptly went into hiding.

Sad because I'm certain she's reccommended a few good books, but has lessened credibility due to the above. I have a number of healthy sources for reading material, I simply don't count on O as among them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 12/30/2008

She reads books she truly enjoys. Maya Angelou even said she doesn't agree with some of Oprah's choices but hey, if you like reading them and the publisher says they're legit to your producers, what's a girl to do?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 AM on 01/02/2009
- hamchunk I'm a Fan of hamchunk 19 fans permalink

Lord forbid anything is said against anything concerning Jews and the Holocaust. I know this man suffered greatly, as did untold numbers of others during this time. But if this memoir was written by a gypsy, Jehovah Witness or Soviet prisoner confined to a concentration camp, the literary work would have been scrutinized much more and found to be a fabrication much sooner. No one seems to question anything concerning the Holocaust, mainly, for fear of being labeled an anti-semite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 12/30/2008
- claptrapa I'm a Fan of claptrapa 7 fans permalink
photo

Quite right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 12/30/2008
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 486 fans permalink
photo

You better hope there is not a god, because I would hate to be you on that fateful day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 12/31/2008
- OKSunny I'm a Fan of OKSunny 12 fans permalink

just publish the book as fiction....
as a Library & Information Studies student,a book that the majority of the story is made up is not a memoir, it is fiction...who cares what genre you publish it under

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 12/30/2008
- calluna I'm a Fan of calluna 2 fans permalink

Who cares what genre you publish it under??

As an LIS student, are they not teaching you that there is a bond of trust between author and audience? That if you portray something as a true story or a memoir, the reader brings a openness, a mindset, that is very different than they bring to fiction? To touch someone with a "true" story that turns out to be false is a betrayal of the reader. It's a manipulation of the emotions of others, a swindle, and it's requires more than just changing it from "921 Rosenblatt" to "F Rosenblatt" in a bibliographic record.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 12/31/2008


So, the question is posed....

Is it a good book? Is it a good read? Does it move you in some way?

Does it expose some layer of humanity that has resonance and relevance for some?

Are the characterizations good? Does the prose entertain you?

Well then....if you answered, "yeah, we're good" to any of those....then for god's sake, publish the gosh-darned book!

I'm willing to bet that on average, up to 50% of all "history" books (50% of EACH book) is blatant fabrication and out-of-context misrepresentation.

In a "memoir" you pick and choose the moments and experiences that feed your narrative. You don't include all the dross and dreary slog of every day's routine. Is that, then, "lying"?

Let's take an example. Automobile tycoon/magnate Mr. F, publishes a memoir. It is filled with moments and experiences and vignettes that cast Mr. F in a good light. A hagiography. All the "facts" are verifiable. However, you can hardly find a past associate of Mr. F who wouldn't spit on his grave. So, the memoir is "the truth" but it is also a LIE, isn't it?

There is no way to write "truth". All you can write is "your idea of the truth". You can, however, write a compelling narrative.

lexicon

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 12/30/2008
- toocoldout I'm a Fan of toocoldout 18 fans permalink

Excellent post. The most significant part of the story was that this man survived the Holocaust and that was 100% true. What is confirmed about his life story is so compelling (living in concentration camps, losing both parents at a young age, losing his son) that I see no reason for him to lie about a FREAKING apple being tossed over a fence. Maybe he made a mistake (these events were more more than half a century ago & he had the mind of traumatized child at the time) or maybe those questioning the narrative are mistaken or have an agenda. I think the New Republic should be ashamed of themselves for supposedly exposing this story as a fraud. They're just embarrassed that they got duped by Stephen Glass so now they want the same embarrassment for others. If the media showed this much interest in discrediting untruths that actually matter, the world would be in far better shape.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

He admitted he lied, his friends and family say he lied, his agent and publisher say he lied......­..........­...

Is there anything you will not defend in the name of your heritage?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 12/30/2008
- ZimboChick I'm a Fan of ZimboChick 86 fans permalink
photo

boo hoo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 12/30/2008


Exactly.

Suppose I had a wonderful, resonant, seminal experience as a young person in the city...a love story/relationship that had as it's central premise, chance meetings on the morning subway ride.

I call this memoir, "Tuesday Evening Express Trolley".

Well, the fact-checker (or, counter of occurrences of the letter "M" in the bible) goes back and checks the train schedules, and finds that the express was on WEDNESDAY evening that year, NOT tuesday. So I'm "bagged". "busted". "a FRAUD". I changed the day because I liked the alliteration in the title...the word "tuesday" fit better than the word "wednesday". It was catchier.

Now....have I violated the sacred tenets of truth?

HAVE I?????????­??????????

Same with this story we're discussing. Did she really throw an apple over the fence? or perhaps just a glance? was she one of a group of girls, and someone ELSE tossed the food? was there no tossing at all?

I DON"T CARE....those details are irrelevant to the narrative.

lexicon

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

WOW! The defenders and deniers of the truth are astounding - and to what end?

Memoirs are not equivalent to intentionally fabricated lies.

What kind of value system were you raised with?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 12/30/2008


I was raised with a value system that included the ability to gauge the relevant and the irrelevant.

To expect that ANY book, PARTICULARLY books that profess to be factual documentaries, to actually put forth "the truth" is a sad little self-deception.

ALL TRUTH IS RELATIVE.

Memoirs especially so, because they give a single point of view, often into complex situations.

Why the outrage over this? Is it because the fictionalized moments of the book dared to profess that occasionally, tiny whisps of humanity and faith and courage and love managed to sneak forth, during the horrors of the internments during the holocaust?

I am not Jewish, and have no Jewish ancestry. The only personal ancestral tie I have to holocaust-like ethnic cleansing is from my fairly thin Mohawk ancestry...and those wounds aren't really fresh at all.

The Holocaust is a story of depraved desecration and cultural victimhood...but it is also a story of strength and perseverance. Look today at Israel...A shining pearl of hope and symbol of renewal that rose from the very nadir of oppression and despair.

There's a simple fact (not truth...fact) that the winners write the history books, and the survivors write the memoirs. To expect truth to enter into any of it is naive.

lexicon

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

So when he says he met his future wife when she passed him food through the fence of a concentration camp, and then he admitted that this did not really happen and he really met his wife much later under different circumstances - that this is a "memoir" of his life?

......and I remember when I climbed Mount Kilimanjaro only to find a great white unicorn at the summit, and we flew off together to live happily ever after. Who's to say it's a lie - it's MY memoir!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 12/30/2008
- ZimboChick I'm a Fan of ZimboChick 86 fans permalink
photo

lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 12/30/2008



Whatever you and your unicorn do in the privacy of your happily ever after is perfectly alright by me, and I'll thank you to not tell me about it. TMI

lexicon

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

.....and call it FICTION.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 12/30/2008

"There is no way to write the "truth"". Without stirring up the whole perception vs "reality" debate, the bottomline is, if it didn't happen, then it's fiction. He should market it as such. Calling it a memoir is misleading.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 12/30/2008

It's a shame really. This couple has children and grandchildren and I cannot imagine the shame that they are feeling today.

Next time, call it a novel - not a memoir.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 12/30/2008
- toocoldout I'm a Fan of toocoldout 18 fans permalink

Do we even know if this story is false? I know a lot of people want it to be false because they are offended that even one nice thing may have happened during the holocaust thus they studied the maps of the camp & concluded that no one could have come near the fence. They then repeatedly told the author that it was impossible until they finally convinced him that he must have dreamed the whole experience. But perhaps these scholars are giving the Nazis too much credit for having 100% perfect security at all time. Perhaps they are so invested in the official narrative that they forced this man to deny his own story. I see no reason he would lie. His life story is compelling enough without these added details. In any event, a memoir does not have to be truth; the important point is that the author is making an honest effort to remember to the best of his ability & a medicated brain trying to remember a traumatic period in childhood could make honest mistakes. Scholars & skeptics also make mistakes so the story might still be factual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 12/30/2008
- DCCommuter I'm a Fan of DCCommuter 7 fans permalink

"a memoir does not have to be truth" -- memoirs are marketed to the public as truth. That is the basis of their appeal. The problem was not that he embellished the story; it was that the CORE of the story was a lie.

The main people against this book were people who are his fellow survivors and Holocaust scholars. I agree that if you are going to write a book that is marketed as a "true story" about such an important subject matter, it should be true. Not everything should be given the "Disney" treatment (heartwarming story that could not happen). If given such a treatment, label it "a novel".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 AM on 12/30/2008
- toocoldout I'm a Fan of toocoldout 18 fans permalink

We really don't know whether the story is true or not. If enough people tell the author his story is impossible he will start to doubt his own childhood memories. And if the story is NOT true, we still don't know if it's a lie, but rather a mistake or an incorrect memory from a traumatized child's brain. Every memoir ever written has contained major errors. Human memory is never 100% accurate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 12/30/2008
photo

If it was that good, why didn't they just bill it as fiction instead, but based on a true story!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 12/30/2008
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

Holocaust fantasies cheapen the experience of many who dealt with sheer terror and horror...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 12/30/2008
- yorkville7 I'm a Fan of yorkville7 3 fans permalink

prove there was any sheer terror and horror......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

The trouble with publishers: They think non-fiction sells better than fiction. I wrote a (sort of) autobiography, but my publisher kept pushing me into selling it as non-fiction. Literary Memoir, they called it. I flat out refused. It was finally pushed as a novel, and I coyly said that it was all fiction all the time. Reviewers at the time questioned how much of the story was me, and how much was not. Well, it was not enough for me to call the book anything but fiction, because, frankly, only about 75 percent of it was true. I had twisted facts around to suit the plot, killed off characters that were based on real people. Angel at the Fence sounds like a sweet story, but I wonder who was doing the marketing hype, and what they were telling the author to do with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 PM on 12/29/2008
photo

"Plato is my friend. But Truth is a geater friend."

--Aristotle

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 12/29/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect