Franken Up By 50 In Recount, For Now

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 30, 2008 10:53 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Al Franken has ended the unofficial Minnesota Senate election recount up 50 votes over Sen. Norm Coleman.

The margin is subject to change as the state and both campaigns considers what to do with roughly 1,350 wrongfully rejected absentee ballots. But the canvassing board's decision carries with it some political and symbolic importance.

The 50-vote margin represents the final voting total reached after the state recounted all 2.9 million ballots cast on Election Day and sifted through the approximately 1,500 ballots that were challenged during the recount process by both campaigns. Franken started the process down by roughly 215 votes, meaning that a shift of roughly 265 votes took place.

The next major step in the election process will come on January 5th or 6th, when both campaigns are expected to reintroduce a pool of absentee ballots that the State Supreme Court declared wrongfully rejected. Both campaigns must agree on which ballots to re-introduce, and Coleman threw a small wrench into the process by highlighting a scant 136 such ballots. The Franken campaign has held that all 1,346 ballots be resubmitted.

But Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, in a telephone conversation with the Huffington Post Monday evening, said he expected both candidates to come to an "amenable" agreement.

"The Coleman campaign has said in public that they expect these meetings to be amenable, we expect them to be amenable. We expect a portion of those ballots to end up in our office Friday," said Ritchie. "The [other] thing is that the State Supreme Court has said in very stern language that all parties will approach this in a very fair minded approach. So the Supreme Court can decide that ... if any of the parties are not approaching this in the right way, they can take action."

Should Franken emerge victorious after the issue of wrongfully rejected absentee ballots is solved, the Coleman campaign has suggested that they will legally appeal the result. That could drag on the process for weeks or months. And, as such, some Minnesota officials -- in particular Sen. Amy Klobuchar -- have suggested that the state seat the winner on a temporary basis until those lawsuits are settled.

UPDATE: The campaigns have, predictably, two very different responses to the canvass board ruling. Franken welcomed the news as evidence that he is "on track to win." Coleman, meanwhile, accused state officials of being in the bag for the Democratic candidate.

In a quickly convened press briefing following the board's decision, Coleman lawyer Tony Trimble singled out Deputy Secretary of State Jim Gelbmann's as being a biased force in the recount process.

"He's gone out and done their work," said Trimble. "He's gone out and advised county officials to simply count those [wrongfully rejected absentee ballots] the Franken campaign wants."

Meanwhile, in a statement issued in his own name, Franken writes:

"Today, the state canvassing board completed an important step in this process. I'm glad to be ahead, and as it appears that we're on track to win, I want Minnesotans to know that I'm ready to get to work for them in Washington on Day One. We still need to ensure that Minnesotans whose absentee ballots were improperly rejected aren't disenfranchised, but we are close to the finish line. And we should all be proud of our state's electoral process, and grateful for the dedication of our public servants, from the state canvassing board down to elections officials at the local level."

Al Franken has ended the unofficial Minnesota Senate election recount up 50 votes over Sen. Norm Coleman. The margin is subject to change as the state and both campaigns considers what to do with rou...
Al Franken has ended the unofficial Minnesota Senate election recount up 50 votes over Sen. Norm Coleman. The margin is subject to change as the state and both campaigns considers what to do with rou...
 
Comments
336
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
photo

Franken Wins Absentee Recount By Wide Margin.
Leads Coleman By 223 Votes.
Makes GOP's "Double-counted" Challenge Moot.
Nothing Left For Coleman to Challenge.
Look for Coleman to concede in time to get Franken to Session Opening.

Congratulations to Senator Al Coleman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 01/03/2009
photo

I meant to type: Congratulations Senator Al Franken ... but, you knew that ... right?

Just too excited about the Franken win to even say my own name straight!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 01/03/2009
photo

Election judge is dumbfounded her ballot was rejected
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/36907934.html?elr=KArks8c7PaP3E77K_3c::D3aDhUxWoW_oD:EaDUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiU

Can not image how Huffpost missed this one:
"Shirley Graham was astonished to learn that a lawyer from Norm Coleman's campaign on Tuesday blocked her absentee ballot from being added to the U.S. Senate recount.....A final irony: She voted for Coleman."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 01/02/2009

Karl Rove really had the nerve to say, I couldn't believe my ears....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 12/31/2008

"Franken started the process down by roughly 215 votes, meaning that a shift of roughly 265 votes took place."

So, 215 subtracted from 265 ROUGHLY equals 50? Who is writing this stuff?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

He's ahead by 49 or 50 depending on which count one uses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 AM on 01/02/2009
- mh01 I'm a Fan of mh01 permalink

From the Star Tribune:

A protracted court battle seemed more likely than ever Tuesday as the Coleman campaign attempted to have counties reconsider 654 absentee ballots that local officials have said were correctly rejected.

The Franken campaign, some counties and the (DEMOCRAT) secretary of state oppose that move, saying the absentee ballot review should focus instead on the 1,346 that county officials say were improperly rejected.

Those ballots come from precincts that mostly favored Franken in the Nov. 4 election, while the 654 came from areas more favorable to Coleman.

At a meeting Tuesday in Anoka, Coleman lawyer Chris Tiedeman said the 1,346 ballots that the counties say were improperly rejected shouldn't be counted unless the other 654 are reconsidered. Franken lawyer Steve Kaplan replied, "Let me cut to the chase. We're not going to agree to any of the 654. The 654 is from left field."


Count all the votes, right Al? Isn't that what you have been railing about for the past 5-6 weeks?

Sure, count them all, except those that come from areas that lean to Coleman.

Total hypocrite.

I can't wait to watch you all bend over backwards now to explain why these votes shouldn't be counted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

Wrong. There are four reasons that a county can reject an absentee ballot. In the case of the 654 they were CORRECTLY rejected. In the case of the 1,346 they were WRONGLY rejected.

In other words, the ballots that you are complaining about MET one or more of the four disqualifying factors, whereas the ones that WE are complaining about FAILED to meet even ONE of the disqualifying factors!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 12/31/2008

They are cheating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

Happy New Year, Al - and thanks for not giving up!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 12/31/2008

His tenacity bodes well for his holding office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 01/03/2009

bye coleman don't let the hit you on the way out

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 AM on 12/31/2008

Just because they are double counting votes for Franken doesn't mean anyone is biased.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

And your evidence for this assertion is.............? This has been an open, transparent, and fair process which has shown that more people seem to have voted for Al Franken than for Norm Coleman, unlike the recounts in FL which were closed, opaque, and illegally stopped by the Supreme Court of the United States.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 12/31/2008

Yeah Baby!

Senator Al Franken of Minnesota.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

Coleman - "You guys aren't playing fair.............I'm not ahead so I'm not playing anymore."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

Happy New Year Senator Al Franken !!

Did you ever think this is how this senate race would go??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

Norm Coleman does for Democracy what the Reverend Jim Jones did for kids drinks. Go Al!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 12/30/2008

Hellooo Senator Al Franken! It's time to send them no good GOPers packing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 12/30/2008

Let's quite wasting time on this subject. Al will win eventually. Enough on this subject. Let's discuss something really interesting -- Normy's wife's gorgeous bre_sts and what we would like to do with them. .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 12/30/2008

How about Normy's wife's gorgeous $75,000 in dubious business income from a Coleman corporate supporter?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 12/31/2008
- mh01 I'm a Fan of mh01 permalink

You mean that income that is alleged to have gone to her employer, which according to all parties involved, including investigators, never ended up in the hands of the coleman or his wife?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

Wow - that was inappropriate. Hitting the Holiday cheer a little early?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 12/31/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect