Vicki Iseman Suing New York Times Over McCain Affair Story

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DENA POTTER | December 30, 2008 05:44 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

RICHMOND, Va. — A Washington lobbyist sued The New York Times for $27 million Tuesday over an article that she says gave the false impression she had an affair with Sen. John McCain in 1999.

The newspaper stood by the story.

Vicki L. Iseman filed the defamation suit in U.S. District Court in Richmond. It also names as defendants the Times' executive editor, its Washington bureau chief and four reporters.

Iseman represented telecommunications companies before the Senate Commerce Committee, which McCain chaired. In February, as McCain was seeking the Republican presidential nomination, the Times reported that McCain aides once worried the relationship between Iseman and McCain had turned romantic.

The article said that both McCain and Iseman denied any romantic relationship, but the lawsuit says most readers would find that obligatory.

"That The New York Times would make such aggressive and sensational allegations and insinuations in the face of on-the-record denials by Ms. Iseman and Senator McCain only reinforced the message to readers that The New York Times in fact believed that Ms. Iseman and Senator McCain had indeed engaged in an `inappropriate relationship,' a relationship that was romantic, unethical, and a conflict of interest," the lawsuit says. "Otherwise, reasonable readers would conclude, The New York Times would never have printed the story at all."

The Times maintained its defense of the story in a statement Tuesday.

"We fully stand behind the article. We continue to believe it to be true and accurate, and that we will prevail," the statement said. "As we said at the time, it was an important piece that raised questions about a presidential contender and the perception that he had been engaged in conflicts of interest."

Story continues below
advertisement

Richmond lawyer W. Coleman Allen Jr., who represents Iseman, said she waited until after the presidential election to file the suit because she didn't want it to become a distraction.

The lawsuit claims that other media outlets were investigating McCain's ties with Iseman and that the Times was so concerned about being scooped that it printed a story "to pack the maximum sensational impact with the minimum factual support." The lawsuit contends she suffered an "avalanche of scorn, derision, and ridicule" that damaged her health.

The lawsuit cites accounts from other media, political pundits and the Times' public editor, Clark Hoyt, that interpreted the article as meaning that McCain and Iseman had an affair.

In what the lawsuit calls the most damaging passage, the article said two former McCain associates had warned him that he was risking his career, and that he "acknowledged behaving inappropriately" and "pledged to keep his distance" from Iseman.

The story also pointed to a fundraiser that Iseman and McCain attended in Miami in 1999, when they flew back to Washington along with a campaign aide on the corporate jet of one of her clients.

"Ms. Iseman's relationship with Senator McCain was entirely professional, ethical, and appropriate," the lawsuit states, adding that it "was not different in kind from the cordial yet professional relationship that hundreds of lobbyists have with hundreds of members of Congress."

Keith Werhan, a constitutional law professor at Tulane University, said key to Iseman's case will be how the court defines her _ as a public figure or a private figure. Public figures have to meet a higher standard of proof, and show malice by a news outlet.

Werhan also said the Times could be protected if it accurately quoted McCain's former aides about their perceptions of his relationship with Iseman.

"If all those statements are true, then it seems to me the Times is not at fault for reporting that," Werhan said.

"It's essentially hard to win a defamation suit," Werhan added. "The idea is the First Amendment has its thumb on the press' side of scales."

Iseman's lawsuit was first reported by Virginia Lawyers Weekly.

___

Associated Press Writer Steve Szkotak contributed to this story.

RICHMOND, Va. — A Washington lobbyist sued The New York Times for $27 million Tuesday over an article that she says gave the false impression she had an affair with Sen. John McCain in 1999. Th...
RICHMOND, Va. — A Washington lobbyist sued The New York Times for $27 million Tuesday over an article that she says gave the false impression she had an affair with Sen. John McCain in 1999. Th...
 
Comments
392
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

lobbyist sued The New York Times for $27 million

I guess she can't make money on her back anymore - no one will touch her after the Maverick has been there! Heeheehee

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 01/02/2009


Theres aways a job going for a working girl.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 01/02/2009

After seeing the pick for VP, I think that skirts not shirts, ruled the day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 AM on 01/02/2009
- isis I'm a Fan of isis permalink
photo

Why would you sue when nobody cared or made an issue of it? I think she wants attention so she can write a book or something.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Two peas in a pod

A secretary from a 4th tier college

and

The guy who graduated in the bottom 1% of his class at the NA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 12/31/2008

Most people -- even smart people -- don't get the opportunity to graduate from a name brand college.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 12/31/2008

he was not hit/in/g books. he was st/up-p/ing s-l.u/ts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 12/31/2008

Don't give Vicki credit for having the skills/experience to be a secretary. She was hired as a pretty blonde receptionist, as in "Good afternoon!" I'll tell Mr. Alcade's secretary you're here."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

She wants an out of court settlement (...millions...).

Good for the NYT for holding their ground. The story was well-researched and carefully written. There's no libel.

She will lose (and she's not doing McCain any favors either--unless she's hoping AZ Republicans will pay her to drop it)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 12/31/2008

she on/ly want s/it on h/i/s f/a.c-e

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 12/31/2008

Exactly. Everyone shamelessly wants to cash in nowdays. I hope she gets zilch, unless the NYT is actually wrong, which I doubt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

NYT wrong? Never. LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

She will lose. She has already lost. It is simply the righteous indignation ploy. Me think thou doth protest too much.
A jury will not have much sympathy for a Lobbyist for the telecom industry. As long as they don't settle I think this will go away quietly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 PM on 12/31/2008

Good luck, Vicki!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 12/31/2008

Oscar Wilde sued the Marquess of Queensbury, his lover's father, for calling the divind Oscar some very salacious things, most of which were true, if not all that scandalous. Oscar lost big time, in a case that will resonate for the ages. Sometimes, it's best not to open up that particular can of worms. I hope Vicki knows what she's doing. By the way, I knew Oscar Wilde. I worked with Oscar Wilde. Oscar Wilde was my friend, and Vicki Iseman is no Oscar Wilde.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 12/31/2008

That should have been "the divine Oscar." Forgive me Oscar, wherever you are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 12/31/2008

Sure, and there's a lovely, larger-than-lifesize statue of him in Merrion Square park in Dublin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Good comparison. Methinks she don't want the Times digging into her past too much, though all they have to do is show they had sources for what they said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 12/31/2008

Having sources for what they said is not enough. Sources can be mendacious -- and malicious. If you will look at the various successful libel cases -- you can Google some of them -- you will see that all the allegations that were judged to be libelous had sources.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 12/31/2008

Unless you are a whole lot older than 108 there is no way you could have known Oscar Wilde because he died on November 30, 1900.

I agree though that Iseman is no Oscar Wilde and I have a feeling that if there is much poking going on it will come out that she and McCain did indeed have an affair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 12/31/2008

Dude, he's riffing on Lloyd Bentsen's slam of Dan Quayle for comparing himself to Jack Kennedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 01/01/2009

Not only did he lose, but when the truth came out it's what led to the criminal sodomy charges that caused him to be sentenced to two years hard labor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 01/01/2009

If McCain had won, she'd never have sued, because the lobbying firms would have been lined up at her door with lucrative offers. Do not forget that the only things this woman ever had going for her were her seductive style and blonde good looks. She got a degree in elementary ed from Indiana U. of Pennsylvania - a 4th rate state teachers' college. At this very easy school, there is no easier major. However, she never taught a day.
Within months of graduation, Iseman joined a friend in Washington, D.C. and initially got a job as a receptionist at Alcalde & Fay. After a few months, she approached the president of Alcalde & Fay and said "I"m a college graduate and I"d like you to consider me for a secretarial or an administrative position." The president agreed to a three-month trial and within a year she became his special assistant.
From this position, Iseman learned about lobbying from the firm's president, and soon became a lobbyist in her own right. Eight years later, she became the youngest partner in the history of Alcalde & Fay."
So she became the firm's president's "special assistant", and then the youngest partner in history with ZIP education or experience in the field. Sounds more like a "special friend" than a "special assistant". I'd love to have her former boss get on the stand and explain what her special skills were, and how many other receptionists went on to become partner in the firm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 12/31/2008

Lots of college- and even high-school dropouts have gone on to have very successful careers. Some of them have been quite good looking. I hope you don't think that all of them h * m p e d their way to the top.

What colleges offer majors in "lobbying?"

And since when is "elementary education" a gut course?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 12/31/2008

I just reviewed the bios of every lobbyist at Alcalde & Fay, and can tell you that Vicki is far and away at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to both education AND pre-employment experience. All the experience she lists there she got AFTER she became the firm's president's "special assistant". My god - he even had to create a unique job title for her. All of the other lobbyists came from impressive careers as high level staff on Capitol Hill, in corporations or banks, with international professional connections and/or with relevant degrees in marketing, governmental affairs, political science, etc. Many of them also have law degrees, including one of my former law students.
I repeat, what other receptionists have been promoted to partner at this firm, not to mention the youngest partner in the firm's history?
As to how easy an elementary ed major is, name me any major which is easier.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 12/31/2008

I would like to add that some universities have outstanding programs in elementary education. I believe University of Pennsylvania is ranked right at the top. Boston University, Ohio State, Univ. of Maryland at College Park, Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Washington U. at St. Louis, Vanderbilt, Univ. of Michigan at Ann Arbor - are also very well ranked. However, IUP, Vicki's alma mater is a 4th tier school.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 12/31/2008

I hope she wins the law-suit. The NYT has been printing fiction for years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

She will lose - you can bet on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

She will lose and cause great embarrassment to many GOP hypocrites...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 12/31/2008

Actually, the NY Times article said that McCain's aides were concerned that she was having too much access and it was providing an unsavory appearance. Is her claim that they did not think that, or that she did not have a good deal of access. My reading of those stories never claimed that they were lovers. The stories stated that his campaign was trying to head off problems by limiting her access. She can make her case that she did not have that much access, by submitting in discovery all of her contacts with McCain during that time frame. In this one, she will need to do more than claim they were not lovers. She will need to show she had the same access as other lobbyists. The main reason this story has legs is because John McCain has fooled around on a spouse in the past. That is how the current Mrs. McCain became Mrs. McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 12/31/2008

"The main reason this story has legs is because John McCain has fooled around on a spouse in the past."

Would the story had been printed if he hadn't? Not likely. So what was the actual purpose of the story?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 AM on 01/02/2009
photo

Dicey game for Iseman here. I think she has much more to lose than gain. If I were the NYT attorney I would spend a couple of months detailing the exact nature of her work and clients. I know McCain and the GOP would like that....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

"i did not have romance with that woman" sounds familiar!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 12/31/2008

Wossa mattuh? Can't she find a job?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 12/31/2008

Usually a smile is a good body image...this one is so fixed and phoney which is also fine, except when the question/subject is tragic....she still has that smurk!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 12/31/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect