Failed IndyMac Sold For $13.9 Billion

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | January 2, 2009 05:58 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — A seven-member group of investors has teamed up to buy the remnants of failed lender IndyMac Bank, a symbol of the housing boom and bust, for $13.9 billion, federal regulators said Friday.

IndyMac, which specialized in loans made with little down payment or proof of assets, was seized by the government in July after a run on the bank as the U.S. housing market collapsed.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said a holding company led by Steven Mnuchin, co-chief executive of private equity firm Dune Capital Management, agreed to buy IndyMac in a deal reached Wednesday and expected to close by early next month.

The investors have formed a partnership, called IMB Management Holdings LP, that includes Dell Inc. founder Michael Dell's investment firm, MSD Capital.

Once the deal closes, the investment group would pour $1.3 billion in new capital into IndyMac and continue to operate the Pasadena, Calif-based bank, the FDIC says.

"We have assembled a group of experienced private investors in financial services to acquire the former IndyMac and operate it under new management with extensive banking experience," Mnuchin said in a statement. "We will inject significant private capital into IndyMac so that it can once again effectively serve its customers and communities."

Other investors in the partnership include five private equity firms or hedge funds: J.C. Flowers & Co.; Stone Point Capital; Paulson & Co.; a fund controlled by billionaire George Soros' Fund Management; and a fund controlled by Silar Advisors LP.

IndyMac has 33 bank branches in Southern California with about $6.5 billion in deposits, about half the company's total at the time of its failure. Other IndyMac assets include a $157.7 billion loan servicing business, which collects mortgages and distributes them to investors, and a reverse-mortgage company, known as Financial Freedom.

Story continues below
advertisement

As part of the deal, the FDIC agreed to assume losses on a portion of IndyMac's loans. The new investors would shoulder the first 20 percent of the bank's loan losses, with the FDIC taking on the majority of any losses thereafter. The FDIC used a similar loss-sharing agreement when Downey Savings and Loan Association failed in November.

In return, the IndyMac investors agreed to continue a closely watched home-loan modification program launched by FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair in August that has completed about 8,500 loan modifications so far.

The investors have received preliminary clearance from the federal Office of Thrift Supervision to run the bank as a federal savings association. A final decision is expected in the coming weeks.

Thrifts have been the most troubled regulated institutions during the financial crisis and among the most spectacular failures. By law, they must have at least 65 percent of their lending in mortgages and other consumer loans _ making them particularly vulnerable to the housing downturn.

FDIC officials noted that private equity firms have bought up failed institutions before. In the early 1990s, two failed banks _ Bank of New England and CrossLand Federal Savings Bank _ were sold to private equity firms.

Dune Capital was founded in 2004 by former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. partners Mnuchin and Daniel Niedich.

Flowers, who launched, then dropped, a bid to buy student lender Sallie Mae last year, also is a former Goldman Sachs partner. Paulson & Co. made billions in profits in recent years by betting on the failure of risky home loans.

The IndyMac deal comes as regulators have eased restrictions on such purchases. Previously, private-equity firms could not hold more than a 24.9 percent stake in a bank without becoming a bank-holding company.

The failure of IndyMac, which had $32 billion in assets, was the second-largest last year, trailing only the September failure of Washington Mutual Inc. Losses to the FDIC's bank insurance fund are expected to range between $8.5 billion and $9.4 billion.

The Seattle-based thrift was the biggest bank to collapse in U.S. history, with around $307 billion in assets. Washington Mutual was acquired by JPMorgan Chase & Co. for $1.9 billion.

A total of 25 U.S. bank failures in 2008 compare with three for all of 2007 and are far more than in the previous five years combined. Many more banks are expected to sink this year.

One unresolved issue is IndyMac's relationship with investors in mortgage-linked securities, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage finance titans.

Fannie, Freddie and other investors have the right to try to return IndyMac loans if they claim they violate the terms under which they buy mortgages. About $1 billion in loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae are in question.

Fannie Mae "is working constructively with the FDIC and IndyMac to reach a resolution that is in the best interests of all parties involved," Fannie spokesman Chuck Greener said Friday.

WASHINGTON — A seven-member group of investors has teamed up to buy the remnants of failed lender IndyMac Bank, a symbol of the housing boom and bust, for $13.9 billion, federal regulators said ...
WASHINGTON — A seven-member group of investors has teamed up to buy the remnants of failed lender IndyMac Bank, a symbol of the housing boom and bust, for $13.9 billion, federal regulators said ...
 
Comments
37
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

i dont see anything remotely alarming in the news yet the comments are like the world is ending !!

A bank holding company buying up remnants of a bank
It will be operated under the guidelines of the FDIC so goes on without saying needs to have a tier 1 capital ratio above the legally allowed limit.

when a bank goes under, it is sold off to some other bank. FDIC is not in the business of running banks. It has to be sold. they must have shown interest and fDIC chose to award them this one.

now if someone comes up with a story that someone else gave a better offer and FDIC still gave the bank to this holding company then you got something. till then there is no alarm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 01/05/2009

It's a good article to use to express the overall concerns and there's really not a way to tell what's actually happening. Recall that it took awhile for the media to reveal details on Wachovia deal. First the push to block the private buyout by Wells Fargo with a Citibank, FED endorsed buyout. Then eventually turning the Wells Fargo deal pretty much into the same deal as it would have been with a Citibank buyout. I say, guilty until proven innocent.

Note also this caveat..."The IndyMac deal comes as regulators have eased restrictions on such purchases. Previously, private-equity firms could not hold more than a 24.9 percent stake in a bank without becoming a bank-holding company."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 01/05/2009

Organized crime having a field day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 01/05/2009
- ndem I'm a Fan of ndem permalink

This should not be allowed. The rich are getting richer and have made money both on the collapse of the economy and now buying for next to nothing. This is the kind of thing that causes revolutions. We are over it or have they not figured that out yet?

Take your money out of any bank bought by a hedge fund! Bring back real mutuals!!!!!!!!!! Cooperative baking in which the profits are shared by the depositers­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!

And real regulations!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 AM on 01/05/2009

It's hard to believe that Paulson is unable to keep track of the $700 billion bail out money. The Federal Reserve must employ thousands of auditor and accountants with that kind of specialty.

Thank God, his time is ending. but it can't be soon enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 01/04/2009
photo

is it really hard to beleive? remember he wanted carte blanche precisely to dow what he wanted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 01/04/2009
- BillMyers I'm a Fan of BillMyers 2 fans permalink
photo

I want to see Americans investing into small American businesses again.

We're profitable.
We're hiring.
We're seeking expansion capital.

Bill Myers

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 01/04/2009
- Kaos911 I'm a Fan of Kaos911 5 fans permalink

After all of the drama, the rich keep getting opportunities to get richer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 01/04/2009
- murphy80 I'm a Fan of murphy80 9 fans permalink

these vultures will pick the bones of IndyMac and the bones of the homeowners that they send to bankruptcy­.........I­ndyMac will not exist five years from now, it will just be an empt;y hulk devoid of
assets with the liabilities passed on to the taxpayer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 01/04/2009
photo

"Paulson & Co. made billions in profits in recent years by betting on the failure of risky home loans."

This is crazy. And they pointed out the Goldman Sachs connection in these investors, too. How on earth do you have a treasury secretary taking money from the congress, to shore up HIS investments? Good god, why does Paulson still have a job? I'm sorry, but I agree with Walnuts McCain's first kneejerk reaction on the crisis - to fire Paulson immediately. Seemed silly and rash at the time, but does it now?

Betting on the failure of risky home loans. Say that over and over. Now we know why this was not prevented, why the regulators backed off, why Bush didn't do anything, and why the credit rating agencies went along and rated the loans AA. Because there was a fortune to be made. They made money going up the rollercoaster, and after the crash the affected companies were made available for purchase for a song. Along the way, tax laws were changed (Chase benefited when they bought Wa Mu) and rules changed (percentage ownership by Sachs).

We are witnessing a financial coup.

In a crisis, it's become obvious who the ruling class is, and they're not even trying to hide it. The most disturbing aspect is not even the buying itself, it's all the change in the rules that firms like Goldman Sachs previously had no power to alter, until now, when they're able to rewrite all of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 01/04/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 345 fans permalink
photo

I don't like this. Yet more private hedge funds cashing in on this "crisis". It's all been manufactured for their gain, our loss. Soros is a notorious vulture and market manipulator.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 01/04/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

yes so.........there is money to be made......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 01/04/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 345 fans permalink
photo

It's about consolidation by mega-corporations and banks and spoils to the filthy rich who are "insider trading". Do you think that's a good thing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 01/04/2009

Seems a little early in the collapse to be looking for bargains, unless you have too much cash burning a hole in your pockets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 01/03/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

collapse? blip more like......not everything is bad

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 01/04/2009
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 33 fans permalink

People like Soros are counting on the stupidity of people like CaptainSkippy. That's how it works. Make the sheeple believe things are better than they are on the way up and sell at an inflated price and make the same morons think things are worse than they are on the way down and buy for a song.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 01/04/2009

This is exactly what we need! People risking their OWN money to bail out an ailing financial institution.
Those who think this is anything but a great development are woefully ignorant of what we need to get this economy moving again. Kudos!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 01/03/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

i agree

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 01/04/2009
- Purobi I'm a Fan of Purobi 11 fans permalink

Yes. Think about the jobs that will be saved. The tellers, the regular people who worked for Indy Mac 40 hours a week....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 AM on 01/04/2009
photo

I read today in the Washington Post that Soros and Paulson personally made $1.7 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, last year, betting on real estate defaults. Today they are buying one of the banks they helped tank.

That's not good business, that’s corrupt business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 01/03/2009

Soros made much of his fortune shorting the British pound...so if you have a criticism, it should be against the practice of shorting any market. Good luck supporting that argument.

He has also played the long side, and is not exclusively a bearish speculator.

Soros has also been involved in various philanthropic and political activism causes. It is estimated that he has given away at least $6B dollars.

He has written about ideological excesses that fed the over-adoption of theories of self-regulating free markets, a key factor that has led to the current financial crisis.

It seems that you generalized your concern by taking a blind shot at "corrupt" business practices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 01/04/2009

Soros made much of his fortune shorting the British pound...so if you have a criticism, it should be against the practice of shorting any market. Good luck supporting that argument.

He has also played the long side, and is not exclusively a bearish speculator.

Soros has also been involved in various philanthropic and political activism causes. It is estimated that he has given away at least $6B dollars.

He has written about ideological excesses that fed the over-adoption of theories of self-regulating free markets, a key factor that has led to the current financial crisis.

It seems that you have generalized your concern by taking a blind shot at "corrupt" business practices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 01/04/2009

Soros made much of his fortune shorting the British pound...so if you have a criticism, it should be against the practice of

shorting any market. Good luck supporting that argument.

He has also played the long side, and is not exclusively a bearish speculator.

Soros has also been involved in various philanthropic and political activism causes. It is estimated that he has given away

at least $6B dollars.

He has written about ideological excesses that fed the over-adoption of theories of self-regulating free markets, a key

factor that has led to the current financial crisis.

It seems that you generalized your concern by taking a blind shot at "corrupt" business practices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 AM on 01/04/2009
- Melissa I'm a Fan of Melissa 19 fans permalink

George Soros? Be afraid, be very afraid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 01/04/2009
- Purobi I'm a Fan of Purobi 11 fans permalink

One should be afraid of ignorance like you are showing here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 AM on 01/04/2009

Just think of all the lnad these bankers will get after people go bankrupt. Remember money is just paper, houses and land are assets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 01/03/2009

More disaster capitalism. America's shadow banking system buys a real bank, all 100% of it and no buyers have to become bank holding companies.

Recall the unregulated firms and products led to our implosion. Now they're the answer? Bush corporafornicates to his last day. Evidence?

On December 23rd, Bush issued an executive order for the Transporation Department to provide insurance for airlines. Apparently our insurance industry wouldn't write policies or do so a reasonable rate. Not a peep anywhere in the media.

Our bad week in September came as the big money boys wouldn't loan at other than payday loan rates. Wall Street doesn't pay that kind of interest, it's for poor people. Airlines must be like Wall Street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 01/03/2009

What would Michael Dell find appealing in a mortgage institution? Money?

Or, is Dell going to network the partnership? Could it be he's looking for some kind of lending instrument for Dell and its constituency? Shareholders want to know.

Will the network be powered by Linux or Windows? I'm going with the Dell/Linux combo. The way Dell is losing lieutenants and hemorrhaging money right now, one would think he can't afford any more Microsoft licenses, or worse still, risk becoming a Windows apologist to his partners.

Assuming Michael wants a Dell-branded credit card that is backed by a lending institution, then one need only ask; will the product outlast the terms of credit?

Dell, who is in a race to the bottom in a price war with HP and Lenovo, is the wrong business model for long-term financing. If premature product failure doesn't threaten the livelihood of your financial (private equity assignment) officer, the support division will surely become a noticeable drain on the partner's resources. How many quarters will that last?

Or, it could be Dell has no technological interest whatsoever in this partnership and he subconsciously just wants to be part of anything that involves the word Mac?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 01/03/2009

I like the wit of your post. Good things to think about too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 01/05/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect