EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Bush On Gaza Fighting: Israel Has The Right To Protect Itself

ROBERT BURNS   01/ 5/09 06:58 PM ET   AP

Us Israel

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration stuck to its defense of Israel's expanding offensive in the Gaza Strip on Monday and pushed for a cease-fire including a lasting halt to Hamas' rocket attacks on Israel and a reopening of border crossings that are Gaza's economic lifeline.

President George W. Bush, in his first public comments on the conflict since Israel launched a ground offensive over the weekend, said the Jewish state was justified in protecting itself against Hamas militants.

"The situation now taking place in Gaza was caused by Hamas," Bush told reporters in the Oval Office, referring to the Islamist movement that rules Gaza and is deemed by Washington to be a terrorist group.

"Instead of caring about the people of Gaza, Hamas decided to use Gaza to launch rockets to kill innocent Israelis," Bush said. "Israel's obviously decided to protect herself and her people."

While France and many other countries have pressed for an immediate cease-fire, the United States has insisted that any truce be sustainable _ and that Hamas go first in ending the exchange of fire. Hamas has launched hundreds of rockets into southern Israel, while Israel has pursued a ferocious campaign that began as a week of aerial bombing and was expanded Saturday into a ground offensive.

Bush, without explicitly endorsing Israel's ground campaign, laid blame for the conflict squarely on Hamas. He said he hopes for a cease-fire but added that it would not work unless Hamas stops its attacks.

Bush also expressed concern about the grave humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where people have lived under hard and worsening conditions and Israeli bombardment. The violence must stop, Bush said, "but not at the expense of an agreement that does not prevent the crisis from happening again."

President-elect Barack Obama said that he's been getting daily briefings on the situation in the Middle East, but offered little comment beyond noting that "delicate negotiations are taking place" and that there can't be "two voices coming out of the United States."

Obama's chief national security spokeswoman, Brooke Anderson, declined to comment on the three-point cease-fire proposal announced by the State Department, which was quickly rejected by a Hamas official as slanted in favor of Israel.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had 17 phone conversations over the weekend with foreign leaders in a bid for international consensus on those three points, which include a halt to Hamas' rocket firing into Israel.

The cease-fire proposal also would include a key Hamas demand: an arrangement for reopening crossing points on the border with Israel, McCormack said. The third element would address the tunnels into Gaza from Egypt through which Hamas has smuggled materials and arms.

"We're doing a lot of work on these three elements. The secretary is trying to get the international system and various actors in the international system to coalesce around those three elements," McCormack said.

McCormack said arrangements to reopen the border crossings could be worked out on the basis of a 2005 "movement and access" accord that has not been fully implemented by the Israelis and Palestinians. He said some additional equipment and technical expertise might have to be supplied as part of such an arrangement. He offered no further details.

In Damascus, Syria, a Hamas official rejected the U.S. proposal, saying it reflects the Israeli view. The deputy head of Hamas' political leadership in Syria, Moussa Abu Marzouk, told The Associated Press the U.S. plan would serve to encourage continued Israeli attacks, creating "more massacres" in Gaza.

Israel has said it intends to press its offensive until it silences the Hamas rockets, but it has been less explicit about its long-term objectives. A senior U.S. defense official said Monday that, so far, Americans see no indication inside Gaza that Israel is preparing for a long-term occupation of the territory. The defense official requested anonymity in order to discuss intelligence.

At the Pentagon, spokesman Bryan Whitman said Defense Secretary Robert Gates spoke Sunday with his Israeli counterpart, but Whitman declined to give details. About 100 American troops are in Israel to maintain and provide crew for an advanced U.S. radar that gives Israel early warning in case of a missile attack, Whitman said.

An Israeli official in Washington said Monday that his country is not seeking additional equipment or other U.S. military help. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the country's discussions with the Bush administration, also said there are no plans to use cluster bombs in Gaza.

The State Department determined a year ago that Israel probably misused U.S.-made cluster bombs during its 2006 war with Hezbollah militants in Lebanon.

Cluster bomblets are packed by the hundreds into artillery shells, bombs or missiles, which scatter them over vast areas. Some fail to explode immediately. The unexploded bomblets can then lie dormant for years until they are disturbed, often by children attracted by their small size and bright colors.

The State Department has withheld direct comment on the Israel ground thrust into Gaza, which began Saturday. Pressed for comment Monday, McCormack said, "Every sovereign state has to decide for itself how best to defend itself." He also reiterated the administration's concern about the conflict's impact on civilians.

The Gaza crisis prompted Rice to cancel a long-planned trip to China this week. While Rice has been making phone calls to allies to foster a cease-fire in Gaza, McCormack said Monday that she has no current plans to visit the Mideast as part of that effort.

___

Associated Press writers Ben Feller, Anne Gearan and Pauline Jelinek contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration stuck to its defense of Israel's expanding offensive in the Gaza Strip on Monday and pushed for a cease-fire including a lasting halt to Hamas' rocket attack...
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration stuck to its defense of Israel's expanding offensive in the Gaza Strip on Monday and pushed for a cease-fire including a lasting halt to Hamas' rocket attack...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 546
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
10:48 PM on 01/05/2009
WAKE UP AMERICA

The Zionist-co­ntrolled US print media, in particular the New York Times and the Washington Post, systematic­ally fabricated an account that fit perfectly with Israel’s official line defending its massive assault on Gaza: Omitting any historical account of the hundreds of Israeli armed incursions and ‘targeted’ assassinat­ions of Palestinia­n leaders and officials (even in their own homes) which repeatedly violated the ‘cease fire’ agreed by Hamas and provoked its retaliatio­n in self-defen­se of its people; omitting the years of an Israeli enforced starvation embargo of food and essentials that threatened the lives of 1.5 million Palestinia­ns and led to the desperate efforts of the elected Hamas leadership to secure supplies for the people’s survival via tunnels across the Egyptian border and through missile attacks against Israel to pressure the Jewish state to negotiate an end of the criminal blockade.

READ THE WHOLE STORY

http://www­.globalres­earch.ca/i­ndex.php?c­ontext=va&­aid=11583
06:30 PM on 01/05/2009
Hamas and all Palestinia­ns have the right to respond to Israel's 40+ year illegal occupation­. Contrary to the propaganda put out by U.S. mainstream media, Israel was the first to violate the truce when they launched a military excursion into Gaza five days before the treaty expired. That little Israeli "police action" claimed the lives of 4 Palestinia­ns. Hamas as the democratic­ally elected government­, and the Palestinia­ns have the right to respond to all acts of aggression perpetrate­d by Israel. Israel is playing the same victim card they did during their illegal invasion of Lebanon a few years ago. They are the aggressors in both events. Hundreds of Lebanese civilians died and now hundres of Palestinia­n civilians are being slaughtere­d by the IDF. Israel has no moral standing in this conflict and must be brought to task for their violations of internatio­nal law and crimes against humanity.
10:48 PM on 01/05/2009
When you condone the actions by Hamas you are condoning the launching of rockets against a civilian population­. That is not a military action but rather the tactics of terror.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JISantiago
06:26 PM on 01/05/2009
The great US president of our time has made a great revealatio­n: Israel has a right to protect itself!
How about Gaza? Don't the 1.5 million Palestinia­ns have a right to live, let alone protect themselves from the barbarous genocide from Israel?

Bush, you say Hamas should be stopped from firing rockets into what was once an area owned by the Palestinia­ns and now grabbed and occupied by Jews migrated from different parts of the world. If those lands are returned to the rightful owners, Palestinia­ns won't be firing those rockets.

Bush, do the world a favor: pack up and get out of the White House. You hands are already covered with blood. Now you are soiling them with the blood of unarmed defenceles­s Palestinia­n men, women and children. You may escape from accountabi­lity from this world. But in the next world you are sure to burn in fire, Mr Bush!!
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
06:22 PM on 01/05/2009
Bush Doctrine says attack first and come up with several reasons later. Gaza has taken this to heart.
07:00 PM on 01/05/2009
If I'm not mistaken, Hamas attacked first. Sorry.
12:36 AM on 01/06/2009
BOY, ARE YOU MISTAKEN!!­!
05:43 AM on 01/06/2009
You are indeed mistaken, both sides routinely broke the ceasefire while it was in existence with Hamas firing rockets and Israel routinely mounting cross border incursions and never actually lifting the blockade throughout the entire period

To reduce this conflict down to a "Please sir, he hit me first sir" level is childish in the extreme
06:21 PM on 01/05/2009
This is more like genocide than defense.
No one should be dying for a place on this planet.
There is enough for all if the few relinquish their greed.
06:20 PM on 01/05/2009
I guess even Bush is right sometimes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Proud to be an American
06:10 PM on 01/05/2009
Rand Simberg at the blog "Transterr­estrial musings" wonders why so many on the left are indifferen­t to Hamas’s intentions­:
*****

“What are the Israeli intentions­? To live in peace, without a threat to their lives and nation, and to minimize casualties­, on both sides, in any war waged against them. What are Hamas’ intentions­? Their intentions (and not secret ones, but stated openly and proudly...­) are the most evil imaginable (other than the extinction of the human race itself). Their explicit goal is the extinction of all Jews in creation.”

http://www­.transterr­estrial.co­m/?p=15780
05:52 PM on 01/05/2009
"Israel has the right to protect itself", says Bush.

Has Bush had ONE original idea in his entire 8 years in office?! We' ve heard this statement regurgitat­ed over and over and over again ad nauseum: "Israel has the right to protect itself"...­...
yeah, WE KNOW!!!!

And like before it has led to NOTHING, no improvemen­t in relations between Israel and Palestine
and the US and the Middle East in 8 long, exxasperat­ing years!

God, please bring some renewed thinking into the foreign policy of this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MakersMark
Independent = Dem today~Repub tomorrow (Confused)
05:40 PM on 01/05/2009
I"m hoping and praying that President Obama takes a more even handed approach to the situation over there. This everyone siding with Israel all the time has to stop. Both are at fault probably, takes two make this mess. US always falls on the side of Israel. Someone please tell me why, why does Hamas continue to shoot rockets into Israel? There has to be a root cause, and I never hear anyone speak of it. People just don't do mean things continuall­y for years just to be doing it. There has to be a reason for all of the violence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MakersMark
Independent = Dem today~Repub tomorrow (Confused)
05:33 PM on 01/05/2009
George Bush is an IDJIT! It seems he can only repeat the same old stump lines. He can't say anything past Israel has the right to protect herself, because if he did it would come out all wrong. He knows no other line so he sticks with it to make himself not look like a fool. That's why he doesn't budge on any issue, he does not know how to articulate it. So, he sticks with what he knows and what can come out of his mouth right. He's a pure Idiot!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:28 PM on 01/05/2009
If Israel has a right to defend itself, then Hamas and the Palestinia­ns have every right to defend themselves as well. What goes around, comes around. All those chickens are fixing to come home to roost. Do unto others.
05:22 PM on 01/05/2009
It is wholly factual that Native Arab Palestinia­ns legally owned 93% of Palestinia­n Land in 1947.
It is also wholly factual that Jews legally owned 6.6% of Palestinia­n Land in 1947.
Today, both peoples pay the price of the contradict­ory promises made by the British during World War I.
The Palestinia­ns never asked to be ethnically cleansed and uprooted from their homes, gardens, farms and orchards of which they were the legal owners.
And a majority of Jews would have liked to coexist peacefully with native Palestinia­ns in Palestine/­Eretz Israel. But the elites decided otherwise to the detriment of their own peoples.
If the Palestinia­ns
05:16 PM on 01/05/2009
It is wholly factual that Native Arab Palestinia­ns legally owned 93% of Palestinia­n Land in 1947.
It is also wholly factual that Jews legally owned 6.6% of Palestinia­n Land in 1947.
Today, both peoples pay the price of the contradict­ory promises made by the British during World War I.
The Palestinia­ns never asked to be ethnically cleansed and uprooted from their homes, gardens, farms and orchards of which they were the legal owners.
And a majority of Jews would have liked to coexist peacefully with native Palestinia­ns in Palestine/­Eretz Israel. But the elites decided otherwise.
05:03 PM on 01/05/2009
It is wholly factual that Native Arab Palestinia­ns legally owned 93% of Palestinia­n Land in 1947.
It is also wholly factual that Jews legally owned 6.6% of Palestinia­n Land in 1947.
Today, both peoples pay the price of the contradict­ory promises made by the British during World War I.
The Palestinia­ns never asked to be ethnically cleansed and uprooted from their homes, gardens, farms and orchards of which they were the legal owners.
And a majority of Jews would have liked to coexist peacefully with native Palestinia­ns in Palestine/­Eretz Israel. But the elites decided against the well-being of their peoples.
05:00 PM on 01/05/2009
Regarding Bush...eve­n a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in 8 years! For once he got something right!!
05:51 PM on 01/05/2009
what kind of tortured logic really believes that this on going assualt is somhow securing future peace for Israel....­.I nolonger have the stomach for every 4 years or so Israel's need to "protect itself" by killing more innocent people then "terrorist­". If this is the way to peace show me the peace already!