Krugman: Obama Relying Too Much On Tax Cuts?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Rachel Weiner   |   January 5, 2009 09:35 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

In a blog post, economist Paul Krugman worries that President-elect Barack Obama is relying too much on tax cuts in his stimulus plan in an effort to appease Republicans.

[T]here's a reasonable economic case for including a significant amount of tax cuts in the package, mainly in year one.

But the numbers being reported -- 40 percent of the whole, two-year plan -- sound high. And all the news reports say that the high tax-cut share is intended to assuage Republicans; what this presumably means is that this was the message the off-the-record Obamanauts were told to convey.


And that's bad news.


Politico reported Sunday night that 40 percent of the plan's cost will come from tax breaks.

"Obama strategists say he wants to get 80 or more votes in the 100-member Senate, and the emphasis on tax cuts is a way to defuse conservative criticism and enlist Republican support," Mike Allen relays.

The Wall Street Journal adds:

The Obama tax-cut proposals, if enacted, could pack more punch in two years than either of President George W. Bush's tax cuts did in their first two years. Mr. Bush's 10-year, $1.35 trillion tax cut of 2001, considered the largest in history, contained $174 billion of cuts during its first two full years, according to Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation. The second-largest tax cut -- the 10-year, $350 billion package engineered by Mr. Bush in 2003 -- contained $231 billion in 2004 and 2005.


The largest piece of tax relief in the new plan would involve cuts for people who pay income taxes or who claim the earned-income credit, a refund designed to lessen the impact of payroll taxes on low- and moderate-income workers. This component would serve as a down payment on the "Making Work Pay" proposal Mr. Obama outlined during his election campaign, giving a credit of $500 per individual or $1,000 per family.

Obama is expected to detail his economic vision in a meeting Monday with congressional leaders. While the president-elect was hoping to have a stimulus package on his desk by January 20, but now leaders on the Hill are saying it will take until at least mid-February. Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs calls a bill by inauguration "very, very unlikely."

Obama met with Speaker Nancy Pelosi Monday to work on his economic plan.

"The reason we are here today is because the people's business cannot wait," Obama said. "The speaker and her staff have been extraordinarily helpful in working with our team so we can shape an economic recovery plan and start putting people back to work."

In a blog post, economist Paul Krugman worries that President-elect Barack Obama is relying too much on tax cuts in his stimulus plan in an effort to appease Republicans. [T]here's a reasonable econ...
In a blog post, economist Paul Krugman worries that President-elect Barack Obama is relying too much on tax cuts in his stimulus plan in an effort to appease Republicans. [T]here's a reasonable econ...
 
Comments
1251
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)

Krugman is out of his Mind! I cannot believe that this whacko has a job, let alone a Pulitzer Prize and a position at Princeton! The World is Upside down...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 AM on 01/17/2009
photo

My theory is that tax cuts are a waste of time. Instead of making things better, they make things worse. If a government gives people tax cuts then that means that the government is loosing one of its major sources of income to pay off its debt. And what follows tax cuts are major under investment in public services like hospitals, schools, and infrastructure like we have seen in the Bush administration. With the economy being so weak, infrastructure being so under-invested in and the debt pile never being higher, than are tax cuts what America really needs? I don't think so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 01/09/2009
- bosunj I'm a Fan of bosunj 15 fans permalink
photo

BushCo cut taxes and increased spending at the same time. Look where that got us! Change? Hope?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 AM on 01/07/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 134 fans permalink
photo

Gotta love rethug supporters like Krugman. Tax breaks are good. Oh wait, Obama is doing it. Tax cuts are bad..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 01/06/2009
- Info08 I'm a Fan of Info08 3 fans permalink

and remember they also said that running deficits were good as well

how quickly the message changes

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 01/06/2009
- RevMetheus I'm a Fan of RevMetheus 8 fans permalink

I think thats the very first time I've heard PK called a rethug supporter. You should maybe find out who he is...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 01/06/2009

No kidding...this person obviously doesn't read the NYT...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 01/07/2009
- Info08 I'm a Fan of Info08 3 fans permalink

Obama ran on a platform of tax cuts and he's keeping his promise.

Just deal with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 01/06/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 297 fans permalink

I agree... the tax cuts should be in the form of tax credits for MFGing stuff here and buying stuff made in America and hiring people here... Tax cuts will not mean much to those w/o jobs.

THe deflation of housing muist be stopped or the numbers of those walking away will increase significantly more and increase the cost of the bailout.

The spending needs to be in research, infrastructure and etc... INVESTMENTs with long term affects and job creation...


Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 01/06/2009
- macrophone I'm a Fan of macrophone 5 fans permalink

I think Obama's plan is terrific. Middle class tax cuts will ensure that a stimulus reaches all corners of the nation - from the largest cities to the smallest towns. It will also lay the groundwork for a more dynamic recovery when things do finally turn around. Investment in infrastructure projects would do some good but only for those areas where the big projects exist to begin with. The government should absolutely invest in R & D for alternative energy but not in the name of stimulating the economy in the short term. Right now the economy needs a cash injection and a few positive signs to get people spending again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 01/06/2009
- Fernando I'm a Fan of Fernando 29 fans permalink
photo

Fortunately, Obama learned from Mondale in '84 and didn't promise to raise taxes during the campaign, because he'd not have been elected otherwise. Any responsible adult knows taxes HAVE to be raised if you are to have a working economy in the near future. I'm willing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt for now, force the Republicans to start the argument over more taxes to pay for the deficit (just like it happened during the '90s).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 01/06/2009

Well, I guess we now know why Krugman was not picked to be O's lead econ adviser. He thinks different.

Aren't we all a bit clear that the reason Bush ruined our country is BECAUSE he didn't listen to people with thoughts different from his own?

Didn't think so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 01/06/2009
- hapiguy I'm a Fan of hapiguy 15 fans permalink

Wealth Distribution,,just what is that,,,would it mean that,,,the other 95% get a chance at a livable income,,in the USA,,or remain slaves to the top 5%...please help me understand,,,thanks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 01/06/2009
- Gasparilla I'm a Fan of Gasparilla 32 fans permalink

Why doesn't Obama just let McCain take the oath of office. I can't see he's doing much different on tax policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 01/06/2009
- ChescoMom I'm a Fan of ChescoMom 2 fans permalink

Once again Republicans are willing to hold America hostage--not vote on a REAL economic stimulus plan-- for the sake of their big-money supporters and lobbyists--"gimme tax cuts or I'm gonna take my vote and go home! Waaah!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 01/06/2009
- vooter I'm a Fan of vooter 12 fans permalink

It's not bad for people like me who buy and take delivery on gold and silver bullion. Please--bring on the hyperinflation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 01/06/2009
- eremite I'm a Fan of eremite 5 fans permalink

I'm surprised Krugman is against the wealth distribution that obama has planned. I thought he was a card carrying marxist just like obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 01/06/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 30 fans permalink
photo

Well obvoiusly you were wrong. How about that. Perhaps you haven't a clue about anything. How's that navel gazing working for you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 01/06/2009
photo

Lemme guess--you voted for the card-carrying free-marketer who sent our country and the globe into a nearly immediate economic tailspin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 01/06/2009

>a card carrying marxist just like obama

And that is why Warren Buffet endorsed Obama back before the election?

Too much insipid right-wing ideological tripe sent the Republicans to the trashheap of history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 01/06/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Isn't it lovely how you believe what you are told without bothering to actually read what the guy writes.

Why don't you join the other lemmings and scoot into irrelevance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 AM on 01/07/2009
- kfdan I'm a Fan of kfdan 22 fans permalink
photo

Obviously, one way in which to have the government become solvent again is to acknowledge the underground economy, legalize it's nondestructive elements and tax the proceeds! I'm talking about marijuana here as one example ... think about it ! How much money gets moved around underground and how much of that money is involved in people's personal activities on the illegal market? I would say quite a lot and it's time to take action on changing the law with regards to personal drug use!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 01/06/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect