Leon Panetta: CIA Director

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |   January 5, 2009 02:47 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

UPDATE 1/06: Marc Ambinder reports that President-elect Obama is confident that Leon Panetta won't face serious opposition, despite Democratic Senators' grumblings.

"I think he's going to be fine," senior adviser David Axelrod said. Of concerns that Panetta might not have enough experience with the CIA's culture, Axelrod said Panetta "will do well. He's tough and smart."

..


Another Obama aide confirmed that the "hope was to roll it out later this week, which would obviously be after informing congress."

News networks are reporting that Leon Panetta, former congressman and White House chief of staff, will be President-elect Barack Obama's CIA Director.

The New York Times adds some background:

Mr. Panetta has a reputation in Washington as a competent manager with strong background in budget issues, but has little hands-on intelligence experience. If confirmed by the Senate, he will take control of the agency most directly responsible for hunting senior Al Qaeda leaders around the globe, but one that has been buffeted since the Sept. 11 attacks by leadership changes and morale problems. [...]


Given his background, Mr. Panetta is a somewhat unusual choice to lead the C.I.A., an agency that has been unwelcoming to previous directors perceived as outsiders, such as Stansfield M. Turner and John M. Deutch. But his selection points up the difficulty Mr. Obama had in finding a C.I.A. director with no connection to controversial counterterrorism programs of the Bush era.

The move came as a surprise, however, including to incoming Senate Intelligence Committee chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who is clearly not pleased. She gave the following statement to the Washington Independent:

"I was not informed about the selection of Leon Panetta to be the CIA Director. I know nothing about this, other than what I've read," said Senator Feinstein, who will chair the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in the 111th Congress.


"My position has consistently been that I believe the Agency is best-served by having an intelligence professional in charge at this time."

Story continues below

An aide to outgoing intel committee chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller echoed Feinstein: he "has tremendous respect for Leon Panetta [but] he believes the CIA director should go to someone who has significant intelligence experience and someone from outside the political world of Washington D.C."

David Corn at Mother Jones, however, says the pick is reason to celebrate:

Panetta is an even-tempered and highly regarded Washington player--kind of a Mr. Fixit in a nice suit. He is also a zero-tolerance critic of the use of torture, and he considers waterboarding--a tactic used by the CIA--to be torture.


A CIA director who has denounced torture, advocated intelligence cuts, and backed greater congressional control of covert operations--that would be....different. This appointment certainly has the potential to spark opposition from inside and outside the agency. But if Panetta manages to make it to Langley without much fuss, that would indeed signal real change in Washington.

Panetta spoke out against distortion of intelligence and use of torture in an editorial on "fear tactics" last March.

Fear exacts a terrible toll on our democracy. Five years ago, America went to war in Iraq over the false fear that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.


Even though we now know that there were intelligence officials who questioned the assertion, few leaders were willing to challenge this argument for war because they knew it might undermine public support for the president's decision to invade Iraq.

More recently, President Bush vetoed a law that would require the CIA and all the intelligence services to abide by the same rules on torture as contained in the U.S. Army Field Manual.

He also criticized Hillary Clinton's campaign last winter in a New York Observer interview, saying the wife of his former boss had underestimated Obama.

A biography of Panetta can be found on his own website.

UPDATE 1/06: Marc Ambinder reports that President-elect Obama is confident that Leon Panetta won't face serious opposition, despite Democratic Senators' grumblings. "I think he's going to be fine," s...
UPDATE 1/06: Marc Ambinder reports that President-elect Obama is confident that Leon Panetta won't face serious opposition, despite Democratic Senators' grumblings. "I think he's going to be fine," s...
 
Comments
1833
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (30 pages total)

It came out today on Oberman's show that Obama asked Richard Clarke but he turned down the post. Maybe he has had it after Bush and is making more money with less stress in his consultant firm. Boo Hoo! He would have been so good in the job but I also think Panetta is a good manager and a good second choice; also Westley Clark may have been a good choice too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 01/07/2009

Leon Panetta is the kind of person who knows how to connect the dots.
He is an inspired choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 01/06/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 726 fans permalink
photo

awesome pick. gets me fired back up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 01/06/2009
photo

I totally agree

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 01/06/2009

I second, third, fourth the notion that he is an inspired choice. Panetta was my Congressperson for 16 years. He is a WONDERFUL man of incredible integrity! A true "statesman quality" individual. A great sense of humor to boot. The real huge downside is that California is in very, very serious economic trouble and he has been pivotal in trying to bring the sides together. (The Republicans in the state senate have a pact of no new taxes no matter WHAT--and it is destroying our infrastructure: schools local governments, everything). The US will gain a great man but CA will find it hard to fill his shoes. ;-(

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 01/08/2009
- swan1 I'm a Fan of swan1 9 fans permalink

The hairspray is getting into Diane's brain. She has overstayed her welcome and California wil prove me right on this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 01/06/2009

This is a very good time to bring to the forefront the abomination that FEINSTEIN has been ever since she was a commissioner in San Francisco.

I hope she works against the Obama team because her creds will be revealed nationally and hopefully we can remove her from office in the next election. Let her go home and knit. She has supported BushCo regularly and often and her support of Muckasey finshed her with Dems in California.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 01/06/2009
- SPQR1052 I'm a Fan of SPQR1052 17 fans permalink
photo

My mother once told e as a child growing up that it's better to hire someone new for the job from the outside. That way they aren't corrupted by the old way of doing things - especially in thinking. I am all for Panetta because he has gravitas and although lacking in the intelligence credentials area he can square things away in the department the way his new boss wants to operate the shop.

Give the man the keys and let him do the job.

DiFi is upset? Not as much as I am about her ignoring my 1995 request for Veterans at La, Jolla, CALIFORNIA (San Diego) Veterans Medical Center!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 01/06/2009
- DuPageDem I'm a Fan of DuPageDem 23 fans permalink

And how much double-naught secret agent experience did George the First have before he was plunked into his CIA post?

They're scared of Panetta because he will clean house and. He might even reveal some of the illegal black ops conducted in the US, with the approval of Democratic hawks and other assorted traitors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 01/06/2009
photo

It will be historical this fight to clean up the CIA. Watch for accidents of people right before they are to testify or after saying something negative. This is their history. I believe, as many people say, that JFK was taken care of when he tried to dissolve this agency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 01/06/2009
- SailFree I'm a Fan of SailFree 29 fans permalink

1) GHWB had no formal intelligence operation training other than what incidental amount he may have had as a naval officer, ambassador to the United Nations (lots of covert spies around that place!), and envoy to China. He performed all of these tasks with distinction and in a year at the CIA was credited with cleaning up some problems and restoring agency morale.
2) It is not a prerequesite for the CIA director to have been an actual SPY, but some knowledge of intelligence-gathering and a knowledge of the enemy should be required.
3) A belief that the CIA is a legalistic lawyerly organization would be detrimental.

Leon Panetta is, as noted elsewhere on the web today, at least an adult, and one with a reasonable control over his own temper and behavior. This contrasts with some we've seen in Washington in recent years and more resembles those in the Bush administration than in the Clinton--and we'll see about Obama's people. He hasn't DONE anything yet. He has no AUTHORITY to do anything yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 01/06/2009

"Leon Panetta is, as noted elsewhere on the web today, at least an adult, and one with a reasonable control over his own temper and behavior. This contrasts with some we've seen in Washington in recent years and more resembles those in the Bush administration than in the Clinton"

Assuming I'm reading your post correctly, I'm tired now...

WHAT.

There are adults in the Bush administration? And not only that, but in contrast to the Clinton one too? Ah, republicans. Delusional doesn't even begin to describe you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 01/06/2009
- SenGovLuvr I'm a Fan of SenGovLuvr 3 fans permalink

Don't know what direction BHO is taking the CIA, but I find that if DiFi is upset about something, I usually am the opposite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 01/06/2009

Maybe it's the KGB.... but this guy looks like Peter Sellers...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 01/06/2009
- Pablo175 I'm a Fan of Pablo175 16 fans permalink

A 70 year old budget director. Obama has finally blown it.
He has started to play politics instead of being smart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 01/06/2009
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

Who would your choice have been? Feel free to reply.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 01/06/2009

The very fact that Obama's pick is pissing off so many people is exactly what I like about it. There is a big difference between running an agency and having intelligence experience. Leave the spying to subject matter experts but point the CIA in a new direction. Which means stop spying on American illegally.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 01/06/2009
photo

You tro//s were willing to vote for a 72 year old president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 01/06/2009
photo

LMAO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 01/06/2009

Thank you, KQ!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 01/06/2009
- SailFree I'm a Fan of SailFree 29 fans permalink

I deplore the age disparagement. One would rather have a 70-yr-old with some experience than a wet-behind-ears young whippersnapper, even if he were bright.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 01/06/2009

It has become all too evident that Obama doesn't give a rat's what the people who got him elected think. This guy is going to be a one term wonder - as in I wonder why I didn't get re-elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 01/06/2009
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

Yet he has an 83% approval rating? How do you square your comment with the facts?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 01/06/2009
- SailFree I'm a Fan of SailFree 29 fans permalink

His fans are not reacting to facts and logic. One notes that Fabian had swooning fans galore though he couldn't sing his way out of a tissue-paper bag.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 01/06/2009
- 1099 I'm a Fan of 1099 6 fans permalink

He's not President yet. Come back and comment in June after the honeymoon is over.

Squared.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 01/06/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 726 fans permalink
photo

bs. this is his best pick yet. he just gave progressives a big ol' bone, with a nice cut o' lean beef. mmmmmm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 01/06/2009

I SMELL .....WINGNUTZ!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 01/06/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 228 fans permalink

With a screen name like that, it's obvious. Tr0lls almost always name themselves the opposite of what they really are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 01/06/2009

...and you are who...what? You are absolutely on the wrong page.

We love Obama and he is doing EXACTLY what the "people who got him elected" want.

NEW LEADERSHIP
INTEGRITY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 01/06/2009
- zendem1 I'm a Fan of zendem1 116 fans permalink

Diane Fukstein showed her true colors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 01/06/2009
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

She's trying to cover her butt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 01/06/2009
- SailFree I'm a Fan of SailFree 29 fans permalink

"Let's give 'em somethin' to talk about..."
--Bonnie Raitt

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123120464870255997.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 01/06/2009

Are we any safer from ter0rism since 9 /11?.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 01/06/2009
photo

Less safe. The perpetrators are still in office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 01/06/2009

Sorry I didn't need a conspiracy w acko nu tjob to answer that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 01/06/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 228 fans permalink

Given that we have created more terrorists by blowing to bits a completely unrelated country, I cannot see how we possibly could be safer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 01/06/2009
- SailFree I'm a Fan of SailFree 29 fans permalink

Well, we HAVE suffered no attack here in nearly 8 years now. One would have to assume, logically, that we've been safer than we were on 9/11!~

I suspect we are safer in general, though not invulnerable. If we continue down Complacency Road, we'll be attacked again and probably in much worse a manner--probably with those WMDs that terrorists don't have...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 01/06/2009

Are we any safer from terr0rism since 9/11?.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 01/06/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (30 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect