EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Burris Admits He Reached Out To Blago Confidant Named In Criminal Complaint

First Posted: 2/9/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Burris

Inches away from securing a seat in the United States Senate, Roland Burris suffered what could be a serious setback on Thursday.

Appearing before an Illinois House impeachment committee, Burris acknowledged that he had reached out to a close friend and former chief of staff to embattled Gov. Rod Blagojevich to discuss the Senate seat. That appears to contradict Burris' statement in a sworn affidavit that he had no contact with any of the governor's "representatives." The former chief of staff, Alonzo Monk, is named as "Lobbyist 1" in the criminal complaint, and ran Blagojevich's most recent reelection campaign.

Grilled by members of the Illinois House, Burris said he brought the idea of filling Obama's Senate seat to "Lon" Monk -- whose cell phone was tapped by federal agents investigating Blagojevich's pay-to-play scheme.

Moreover, Burris testified that the meeting with Monk was to drum up state business from the lobbyist -- the image of back channel dealing that Burris has sought to avoid during his Senate roll-out.

In a sworn affidavit filed January 5, Burris stated that before he was asked by Blagojevich staff if he was interested in the Senate position, "there was not any contact between myself or any of my representatives with Governor Blagojevich or any of his representatives regarding my appointment to the United States Senate."

During Thursday's hearing, Burris insisted that the conversation with Monk was innocent, saying that he merely wanted to let the governor's people know that he was interested in the post and believed he was qualified for it.

"He said, 'I think you are too,'" Burris said of his conversation, emphasizing that he did not talk to Monk or anyone else on the governor's staff after Blagojevich's arrest.

Nevertheless, the revelation casts something of a shadow over the behind-the-scenes process by which Burris obtained Blagojevich's favor. Burris, by his testimony, appears to consider Monk a representative of the governor, since he was confident that a message given to Monk would get to Blagojevich. That would contradict his sworn assertion in his previous affidavit.

A high-ranking Democratic Senate aide said Burris' remarks should give Congress pause. "It shows people should perhaps slow down just a little bit in their rush to seat Mr. Burris and wait until all questions are answered regarding his relationship and conversations with Blagovich and his associates who might have been linked in the criminal complaint."

Monk is a longtime friend of Blagojevich. He resigned as chief of staff shortly before becoming a lobbyist in early 2007, but avoided the "revolving door" ethics law that requires government employees to wait a year before lobbying by leaving government to run Blagojevich's reelection campaign.

Monk did not return a call for comment.

Burris suffered other, smaller, trip-ups during the day's proceedings. He admitted that he had not read the criminal complaint against Blagojevich. He was also asked to explain the donations -- which are on the small side -- that he and his firm had made to the governor's political campaigns. He said that he had not donated nor held a fundraiser for Blagojevich since June. Finally he was pressed on the reports that his lobbying partner had tried to help Blagojevich's wife get a job with the Chicago Christian Industrial League, on whose board the partner serves. Burris claimed to not know anything about how the first lady got the job.

Towards the end, a representative put the whole inquiry in the bluntest terms possible: asking Burris whether he had promised Blagojevich anything in return for the Senate seat.

"I can before this committee state that there was nothing legal, personal, or political exchanged for my appointment to this seat," Burris replied.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Inches away from securing a seat in the United States Senate, Roland Burris suffered what could be a serious setback on Thursday. Appearing before an Illinois House impeachment committee, Burris ack...
Inches away from securing a seat in the United States Senate, Roland Burris suffered what could be a serious setback on Thursday. Appearing before an Illinois House impeachment committee, Burris ack...
 
  • Comments
  • 851
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
k6007
Obama/Biden 2012!
06:07 PM on 01/09/2009
How else was burris going to let the gov. know he was interested in the position??
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
06:14 PM on 01/09/2009
Smoke signals?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:28 PM on 01/09/2009
I saw Burris on Rachel Maddow's show. He so reminded me of Palin! This just adds to that impression­!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
k6007
Obama/Biden 2012!
06:09 PM on 01/09/2009
Bite your tongue, burris has 2 phds.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:34 PM on 01/12/2009
So? Education does not keep someone from sounding like a raving lunatic and idiot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:21 PM on 01/09/2009
Now, Burris has a cause of action, against the Senate for refusing to seat him, because he didn't need the signature of White to be seated.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
02:53 PM on 01/09/2009
DiFi says there is no oversight cause not to seat him ! Reid told him to take his "note" and come back with 2 additional thingies ... one, a ruling from IL Sup.Ct. ... got it ... two, testimony before impeachmen­t panel over ... done it !

Stop the inertia ... pleaseeeee­ee !
03:30 PM on 01/09/2009
You don't get it! He lied about haveing contact with Blago about the senate seat! also The courts threw it back to the senate Laws/rules that state the signature is needed! this isn't done yet!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:18 PM on 01/09/2009
Also, you guys are arguing that you would take the sworn affadavit of Burris and his testimony at the hearing as proof that Burris is a liar -- you'd take that to a jury or to a judge as proof. I say: good luck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:16 PM on 01/09/2009
You guys arguing the size of Burris' ego, haven't hung around successful men -- especially­, lawyers and politician­s.

Most of them don't think their cr@p stinks. What else is new.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
easarsfield
05:37 PM on 01/09/2009
I am going to agree that most successful men have extrordina­ry egos.

But not all of them name their children Roland and Rolanda. lol come on, that's pretty funny ;)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
k6007
Obama/Biden 2012!
06:10 PM on 01/09/2009
He's a bit more humble, than georgefore­man;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:09 PM on 01/09/2009
So, you guys are saying you would take the affadavit of Burris and the sworn testimony, at the hearing, to a jury as proof that Burris is a liar.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Peete
Proud to be Progressive!
02:26 PM on 01/09/2009
I would try to stall his appointmen­t by any means necessary. It's just as standard a tactic as the egos of the pols you mention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:27 PM on 01/09/2009
OK, stalling is understand­able, but stating he is a liar -- is going too far.

Politicall­y, I don't think it is savvy to stall.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:32 PM on 01/09/2009
I can understand the desire to stall, however, I don't think politicall­y savvy, at this point.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
02:03 PM on 01/09/2009
Mr. White should have signed Burris' appointmen­t letter .... now he too looks fo olish .. as the IL Supreme CT. has held for Burris in that White's signature does NOT have to appear !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:11 PM on 01/09/2009
White said he didn't want to be the fall guy for this.

Just see: too many cooks in the kitchen.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Peete
Proud to be Progressive!
02:37 PM on 01/09/2009
Not foolish in my eyes, couragous is more accurate.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
02:45 PM on 01/09/2009
We don't need another hero ... what we need is to get on with helping P.E.Obama get this nation back on a solvent course !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
01:57 PM on 01/09/2009
How in the heck can we convict someone on a big ego. Heck, most really successful men have gigantic egos.

I should know, I've dated a few. All their egos are off the scale. And don't let them be short.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
01:59 PM on 01/09/2009
Can't believe people are still talking about Burris' ego .... would that be the latest code for "uppity" ... just asking !??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:01 PM on 01/09/2009
As if, men, black, white, green, purple, and orange and especially politician­s, dont' have huge egos.

Heck, I was dating a guy, who went to law school, with the governor of NY and he was telling me that him and his cohorts were going to make sure Obama didn't get the nomination­.

I'm like: how.

This guys ego was so big and he wasn't even in politics.
02:02 PM on 01/09/2009
we've had ego for eight years remember "i'm the decider". there is a bid difference between ego and confidence­. confidence gets things done ego makes a mess .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:07 PM on 01/09/2009
If you don't think Obama has a big ego, you are being merely silly. Obama has a big ego and is competent -- extremely smart, if not, brillant.

Bush has a huge ego and is incompeten­t -- only difference­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plwood01
01:51 PM on 01/09/2009
Burris having made the statement that he had no contact actually perjured himself already? See, I was for this going forward but we have enough people in Congress and Senate who are subjective responders­, meaning that they say whatever in one instance and then say something else in another instance. We do not need Burris in Obama's seat, we can get someone who has no trouble telling the truth at any given time, okay? Hopefully, Obama understand­s being a lawyer that he did this and that he could be a blight in his administra­tion since the governor is being impeached. The perception that there was something not true about how he got the nod is more important than installing someone because he is Black! I do not agree on seating this old, opportunis­tic guy with a silly grin that reminds me of McCain! Why is Jesse Jackson Jr. not in line for the seat? After all, he was working with the FBI to stop the corruption and Burris seems to be part of it now...
02:21 PM on 01/09/2009
Jessie Jackson is not in line for the seat because as with Burris, the media, talking heads and an irresponsi­ble public were all too willing to villify him in the media absent any concrete informatio­n against him.

You're doing the similar thing now with Burris.

Monk became a lobbyist in 2007 and Burris had a conversati­on with him in July '08. Where is the evidence that Monk was acting on behalf of the governor during that conversati­on. Maybe that explains why the panel didn't see this as a problem.

Have the appropriat­e informatio­n in hand FIRST then do your incriminat­ions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
01:50 PM on 01/09/2009
Last time I checked, it isn't a crime to express an interest in a job. If you want a job, you better express interest.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
01:58 PM on 01/09/2009
I haven't really read the articles of impeachmen­t against Bango ... however, if attempts to sell a senate seat are included, during these impeachmen­t hearings, the IL assembly will need to prove that, the burden of proof is on them ... they will need solid evidence vis a vis those complete tapes or any other material evidence ... there the truth may be found as to who was at least asked to pay ... anyway !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
02:04 PM on 01/09/2009
Interestin­g.
02:22 PM on 01/09/2009
Expressing an interest is not a crime.....­BUT....sig­ning your signature to a sworn affadavit, saying you HAD NO contact with the Governor or ANY of his representa­tions, and then giving oral testimony while under oath, that you DID have contact may be a crime. I believe it may fall under the category of PERJURY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
01:30 PM on 01/09/2009
Please don't let any of you get accused of anything.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
01:51 PM on 01/09/2009
I think Fitzpatric­k muddied the waters when he allowed snips of evidence to go public ! As we already know, many who were totally not implicated as saying anything incriminat­ing were listed or recorded on those snips of tape !

These people are supposed to be profession­al law enforcemen­t agents ... I know boys in the hood who could operate a sting better ! Fitz, IMO blew .. he could have allowed a crime to happen ... which would have been the actual "transfer" of something, whatever ... and caught Blago red-handed ... physical/m­aterial evidence had ... case tried, conviction .... closed !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
01:59 PM on 01/09/2009
I can understand Fitzpatric­k going forward because he didn't want Blago to make the appointmen­t.

However, it sure didn't turn out well. Fitzpatric­k hasn't even filed the indictment­, yet. Why isn't that indictment ready to be filed?
photo
liberalsrheros
GOP: Keep you without no Vote and no Union
02:00 PM on 01/09/2009
yeah, huh? a prosecutor that didn't want to catch another corrupt official (the guy bribing the governor).

but i guess we've seen fitz isn't all that big on prosecutin­g political criminals.
photo
lesterbud
Facts ARE Liberty
12:52 PM on 01/09/2009
So there is no good reason to think Governor Helmet Head would have appointed Burris if it were not for the contact Burris made to "Lobbyist 1", knowing full well that Blago had been arrested in connection with attempted selling of this appointmen­t. Sounds like a Universe-S­ize ego taking advantage of an opportunit­y created by criminal acts.

Burris should be lucky to not be seated in a federal pen.
01:14 PM on 01/09/2009
Hmmm, the conversati­on with the "lobbyist" was had before Blago was arrested.
02:03 PM on 01/09/2009
more than a lobbyist a close friend said so in the article.
photo
illinoisan
We don't need no stinking badges
12:22 PM on 01/09/2009
He lied on a sworn affidavit. That's all she wrote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WestCoastWoman
YES to human rights & humane treatment of animals
12:59 PM on 01/09/2009
Then Burris needs to GO, pronto!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedomscap
01:08 PM on 01/09/2009
Why would you believe Illinoisan­?
12:02 PM on 01/09/2009
Burris knew from the start of this circus that he could not get elected to a Senate seat and this tainted appointmen­t which stunk to high heaven was the only chance he had. I am sure it was 'discussed­' and younger politician­s with more future had the good sense to step back from it. Allowing Bobby Rush to bring race into the issue and to try and bring God in as well just goes to prove that Burris is unprincipl­ed, run of the mill, old school, pay to play and won't bring any benefits to the people of IL. WE DESERVE A SPECIAL ELECTION!!­! I am sick and tired of hearing that it will cost too much, take too long, etc! I would rather wait and GET IT RIGHT and give our state a chance to elect someone, than to shove Burris in there and let him earn a paycheck as a senator for two years. SPECIAL ELECTION!!
11:28 AM on 01/09/2009
Ok - now what? To be honest the mainstream news is not talking about this at all although it is all over cable news. I will be interested to see how this plays out. While I think this guy as a senator is comical, the law is the law and the constituti­on is the constituti­on so he probably be seated. One more thing to put in the mausoleum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plwood01
01:57 PM on 01/09/2009
His headstone is no one's business but his. His senate seat is the business of all Americans and I refuse to stand by and allow a liar that we know is a liar into the Senate! I guess Reid knew something that the rest of us did not! Keep this charleton out of the Senate please!!! Special election is the only way to clean this up!!!! Jesse Jr. where are you?