Burris Admits He Reached Out To Blago Confidant Named In Criminal Complaint

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

January 8, 2009 05:46 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Inches away from securing a seat in the United States Senate, Roland Burris suffered what could be a serious setback on Thursday.

Appearing before an Illinois House impeachment committee, Burris acknowledged that he had reached out to a close friend and former chief of staff to embattled Gov. Rod Blagojevich to discuss the Senate seat. That appears to contradict Burris' statement in a sworn affidavit that he had no contact with any of the governor's "representatives." The former chief of staff, Alonzo Monk, is named as "Lobbyist 1" in the criminal complaint, and ran Blagojevich's most recent reelection campaign.

Grilled by members of the Illinois House, Burris said he brought the idea of filling Obama's Senate seat to "Lon" Monk -- whose cell phone was tapped by federal agents investigating Blagojevich's pay-to-play scheme.

Moreover, Burris testified that the meeting with Monk was to drum up state business from the lobbyist -- the image of back channel dealing that Burris has sought to avoid during his Senate roll-out.

In a sworn affidavit filed January 5, Burris stated that before he was asked by Blagojevich staff if he was interested in the Senate position, "there was not any contact between myself or any of my representatives with Governor Blagojevich or any of his representatives regarding my appointment to the United States Senate."

During Thursday's hearing, Burris insisted that the conversation with Monk was innocent, saying that he merely wanted to let the governor's people know that he was interested in the post and believed he was qualified for it.

"He said, 'I think you are too,'" Burris said of his conversation, emphasizing that he did not talk to Monk or anyone else on the governor's staff after Blagojevich's arrest.

Nevertheless, the revelation casts something of a shadow over the behind-the-scenes process by which Burris obtained Blagojevich's favor. Burris, by his testimony, appears to consider Monk a representative of the governor, since he was confident that a message given to Monk would get to Blagojevich. That would contradict his sworn assertion in his previous affidavit.

Story continues below
advertisement

A high-ranking Democratic Senate aide said Burris' remarks should give Congress pause. "It shows people should perhaps slow down just a little bit in their rush to seat Mr. Burris and wait until all questions are answered regarding his relationship and conversations with Blagovich and his associates who might have been linked in the criminal complaint."

Monk is a longtime friend of Blagojevich. He resigned as chief of staff shortly before becoming a lobbyist in early 2007, but avoided the "revolving door" ethics law that requires government employees to wait a year before lobbying by leaving government to run Blagojevich's reelection campaign.

Monk did not return a call for comment.

Burris suffered other, smaller, trip-ups during the day's proceedings. He admitted that he had not read the criminal complaint against Blagojevich. He was also asked to explain the donations -- which are on the small side -- that he and his firm had made to the governor's political campaigns. He said that he had not donated nor held a fundraiser for Blagojevich since June. Finally he was pressed on the reports that his lobbying partner had tried to help Blagojevich's wife get a job with the Chicago Christian Industrial League, on whose board the partner serves. Burris claimed to not know anything about how the first lady got the job.

Towards the end, a representative put the whole inquiry in the bluntest terms possible: asking Burris whether he had promised Blagojevich anything in return for the Senate seat.

"I can before this committee state that there was nothing legal, personal, or political exchanged for my appointment to this seat," Burris replied.

Inches away from securing a seat in the United States Senate, Roland Burris suffered what could be a serious setback on Thursday. Appearing before an Illinois House impeachment committee, Burris ack...
Inches away from securing a seat in the United States Senate, Roland Burris suffered what could be a serious setback on Thursday. Appearing before an Illinois House impeachment committee, Burris ack...
 
Comments
851
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 227 fans permalink
photo

How else was burris going to let the gov. know he was interested in the position??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 01/09/2009
- StillIRise I'm a Fan of StillIRise 511 fans permalink
photo

Smoke signals?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

I saw Burris on Rachel Maddow's show. He so reminded me of Palin! This just adds to that impression!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 01/09/2009
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 227 fans permalink
photo

Bite your tongue, burris has 2 phds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

So? Education does not keep someone from sounding like a raving lunatic and idiot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 01/12/2009
photo

Now, Burris has a cause of action, against the Senate for refusing to seat him, because he didn't need the signature of White to be seated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 01/09/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 208 fans permalink

DiFi says there is no oversight cause not to seat him ! Reid told him to take his "note" and come back with 2 additional thingies ... one, a ruling from IL Sup.Ct. ... got it ... two, testimony before impeachment panel over ... done it !

Stop the inertia ... pleaseeeeeee !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 01/09/2009
- Margary I'm a Fan of Margary 3 fans permalink

You don't get it! He lied about haveing contact with Blago about the senate seat! also The courts threw it back to the senate Laws/rules that state the signature is needed! this isn't done yet!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Also, you guys are arguing that you would take the sworn affadavit of Burris and his testimony at the hearing as proof that Burris is a liar -- you'd take that to a jury or to a judge as proof. I say: good luck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

You guys arguing the size of Burris' ego, haven't hung around successful men -- especially, lawyers and politicians.

Most of them don't think their cr@p stinks. What else is new.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

I am going to agree that most successful men have extrordinary egos.

But not all of them name their children Roland and Rolanda. lol come on, that's pretty funny ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 01/09/2009
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 227 fans permalink
photo

He's a bit more humble, than georgeforeman;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

So, you guys are saying you would take the affadavit of Burris and the sworn testimony, at the hearing, to a jury as proof that Burris is a liar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 01/09/2009
- Paul Peete - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Paul Peete 396 fans permalink

I would try to stall his appointment by any means necessary. It's just as standard a tactic as the egos of the pols you mention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

OK, stalling is understandable, but stating he is a liar -- is going too far.

Politically, I don't think it is savvy to stall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

I can understand the desire to stall, however, I don't think politically savvy, at this point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 01/09/2009

that may explain why you are a blogger and not a politician.

The politicians now realize the foolishness of their ways and are backtracking because of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

so in order to achieve your goals you are willing to push aside innocent until proven guilty and willing to expand the definition of representative to include friends and past employees of any given person?

willing to smear by association? well you picked up a new skill from the gop this fall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 01/09/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 208 fans permalink

Mr. White should have signed Burris' appointment letter .... now he too looks fo olish .. as the IL Supreme CT. has held for Burris in that White's signature does NOT have to appear !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

White said he didn't want to be the fall guy for this.

Just see: too many cooks in the kitchen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 01/09/2009
- Paul Peete - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Paul Peete 396 fans permalink

Not foolish in my eyes, couragous is more accurate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 01/09/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 208 fans permalink

We don't need another hero ... what we need is to get on with helping P.E.Obama get this nation back on a solvent course !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 01/09/2009
- StillIRise I'm a Fan of StillIRise 511 fans permalink
photo

Jesse White, who has a stellar reputation in Illinois, is probably the only one of these actors who is being constitutionally prudent. While everyone else is making up their own rules or changing or ignoring the rules, White is the only one following the rules. He's simply adhering to the constitutional mandate of his responsibility as Secretary of State. He's probably also aware that his signature is not required for Burris to take the seat, but the Illinois Constitution does not supersede the Senate rules, which DO require a signature, although they can change that rule if they want to. I don't think White looks foolish, but I do think he feels that he's being used.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

How in the heck can we convict someone on a big ego. Heck, most really successful men have gigantic egos.

I should know, I've dated a few. All their egos are off the scale. And don't let them be short.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 01/09/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 208 fans permalink

Can't believe people are still talking about Burris' ego .... would that be the latest code for "uppity" ... just asking !??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

As if, men, black, white, green, purple, and orange and especially politicians, dont' have huge egos.

Heck, I was dating a guy, who went to law school, with the governor of NY and he was telling me that him and his cohorts were going to make sure Obama didn't get the nomination.

I'm like: how.

This guys ego was so big and he wasn't even in politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 01/09/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 43 fans permalink
photo

we've had ego for eight years remember "i'm the decider". there is a bid difference between ego and confidence. confidence gets things done ego makes a mess .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

If you don't think Obama has a big ego, you are being merely silly. Obama has a big ego and is competent -- extremely smart, if not, brillant.

Bush has a huge ego and is incompetent -- only difference.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 01/09/2009
- plwood01 I'm a Fan of plwood01 13 fans permalink

Burris having made the statement that he had no contact actually perjured himself already? See, I was for this going forward but we have enough people in Congress and Senate who are subjective responders, meaning that they say whatever in one instance and then say something else in another instance. We do not need Burris in Obama's seat, we can get someone who has no trouble telling the truth at any given time, okay? Hopefully, Obama understands being a lawyer that he did this and that he could be a blight in his administration since the governor is being impeached. The perception that there was something not true about how he got the nod is more important than installing someone because he is Black! I do not agree on seating this old, opportunistic guy with a silly grin that reminds me of McCain! Why is Jesse Jackson Jr. not in line for the seat? After all, he was working with the FBI to stop the corruption and Burris seems to be part of it now...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 01/09/2009

Jessie Jackson is not in line for the seat because as with Burris, the media, talking heads and an irresponsible public were all too willing to villify him in the media absent any concrete information against him.

You're doing the similar thing now with Burris.

Monk became a lobbyist in 2007 and Burris had a conversation with him in July '08. Where is the evidence that Monk was acting on behalf of the governor during that conversation. Maybe that explains why the panel didn't see this as a problem.

Have the appropriate information in hand FIRST then do your incriminations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Last time I checked, it isn't a crime to express an interest in a job. If you want a job, you better express interest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 01/09/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 208 fans permalink

I haven't really read the articles of impeachment against Bango ... however, if attempts to sell a senate seat are included, during these impeachment hearings, the IL assembly will need to prove that, the burden of proof is on them ... they will need solid evidence vis a vis those complete tapes or any other material evidence ... there the truth may be found as to who was at least asked to pay ... anyway !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Interesting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 01/09/2009

Expressing an interest is not a crime.....­BUT....sig­ning your signature to a sworn affadavit, saying you HAD NO contact with the Governor or ANY of his representations, and then giving oral testimony while under oath, that you DID have contact may be a crime. I believe it may fall under the category of PERJURY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Please don't let any of you get accused of anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 01/09/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 208 fans permalink

I think Fitzpatrick muddied the waters when he allowed snips of evidence to go public ! As we already know, many who were totally not implicated as saying anything incriminating were listed or recorded on those snips of tape !

These people are supposed to be professional law enforcement agents ... I know boys in the hood who could operate a sting better ! Fitz, IMO blew .. he could have allowed a crime to happen ... which would have been the actual "transfer" of something, whatever ... and caught Blago red-handed ... physical/material evidence had ... case tried, conviction .... closed !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

I can understand Fitzpatrick going forward because he didn't want Blago to make the appointment.

However, it sure didn't turn out well. Fitzpatrick hasn't even filed the indictment, yet. Why isn't that indictment ready to be filed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

yeah, huh? a prosecutor that didn't want to catch another corrupt official (the guy bribing the governor).

but i guess we've seen fitz isn't all that big on prosecuting political criminals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 01/09/2009
- lesterbud I'm a Fan of lesterbud 79 fans permalink
photo

So there is no good reason to think Governor Helmet Head would have appointed Burris if it were not for the contact Burris made to "Lobbyist 1", knowing full well that Blago had been arrested in connection with attempted selling of this appointment. Sounds like a Universe-Size ego taking advantage of an opportunity created by criminal acts.

Burris should be lucky to not be seated in a federal pen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 01/09/2009

Hmmm, the conversation with the "lobbyist" was had before Blago was arrested.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 01/09/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 43 fans permalink
photo

more than a lobbyist a close friend said so in the article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 01/09/2009
- illinoisan I'm a Fan of illinoisan 21 fans permalink
photo

He lied on a sworn affidavit. That's all she wrote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Then Burris needs to GO, pronto!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Why would you believe Illinoisan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

Burris knew from the start of this circus that he could not get elected to a Senate seat and this tainted appointment which stunk to high heaven was the only chance he had. I am sure it was 'discussed' and younger politicians with more future had the good sense to step back from it. Allowing Bobby Rush to bring race into the issue and to try and bring God in as well just goes to prove that Burris is unprincipled, run of the mill, old school, pay to play and won't bring any benefits to the people of IL. WE DESERVE A SPECIAL ELECTION!!! I am sick and tired of hearing that it will cost too much, take too long, etc! I would rather wait and GET IT RIGHT and give our state a chance to elect someone, than to shove Burris in there and let him earn a paycheck as a senator for two years. SPECIAL ELECTION!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 01/09/2009

Ok - now what? To be honest the mainstream news is not talking about this at all although it is all over cable news. I will be interested to see how this plays out. While I think this guy as a senator is comical, the law is the law and the constitution is the constitution so he probably be seated. One more thing to put in the mausoleum.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 01/09/2009
- plwood01 I'm a Fan of plwood01 13 fans permalink

His headstone is no one's business but his. His senate seat is the business of all Americans and I refuse to stand by and allow a liar that we know is a liar into the Senate! I guess Reid knew something that the rest of us did not! Keep this charleton out of the Senate please!!! Special election is the only way to clean this up!!!! Jesse Jr. where are you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 01/09/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect