Clinton Senate Seat: New York Republicans Want To Force Vote

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL GORMLEY | January 13, 2009 07:14 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

ALBANY, N.Y. — Republicans in New York's Legislature are pushing for a special election to fill the expected vacancy in the U.S. Senate instead of allowing Democratic Gov. David Paterson to make a unilateral appointment through a secretive process.

The efforts, however, are by traditionally powerless minority conferences of the Assembly and Senate and face a near impossible timetable to even get the bills to floor debates before Paterson chooses Hillary Rodham Clinton's successor from a field of Democrats including Caroline Kennedy and Andrew Cuomo.

Assembly Minority Leader James Tedisco, a Schenectady Republican, warned that filling vacancies without an election is "diminishing democracy."

"If you start to diminish democracy, you start going to totalitarianism," Tedisco said.

He noted that Kennedy, the perceived front-runner, has no record in elected office and her positions on public policy are largely unknown.

"We need an election _ not a coronation _ to ensure our next U.S. senator reflects the will of the people," Tedisco said.

In a press conference, Tedisco distributed an Associated Press story released Monday in which New York's expert on open government and others criticized the secrecy with which Paterson is vetting candidates.

Tedisco also noted the scandal in Illinois, where Gov. Rod Blagojevich is accused of trying to sell his appointment for the Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama. After a failed effort by legislators to force a special election for the Senate job, Blagojevich appointed Roland Burris, who is not accused of wrongdoing and is expected to be accepted by the Senate this week.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I'm not equating our governor with the governor of Illinois ... but you can see what happens," Tedisco said.

The Assembly's Democratic majority will send Tedisco's bill through its committee system, where it could stay long after Paterson makes his choice.

Republican Sen. Joseph Griffo of Oneida County submitted a bill similar to Tedisco's in the Senate Tuesday, but Democratic Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith has no plans to take it up.

"Sen. Smith has total confidence in the governor making the decision on the U.S. Senate seat which serves the needs of all New Yorkers," said Smith spokesman Austin Shafran. "Any legislation that seeks to diminish the governor's authority is unnecessary and unwarranted."

The U.S. Constitution allows state legislatures to give the appointment power to governors, but the bodies aren't required to do so and could rescind the authority.

Paterson spokeswoman Erin Duggan said the governor will consider any legislation passed by both chambers. Typically, that takes several weeks.

Paterson is continuing private meetings with as many as 15 people he said are in the running for the Senate seat. He has refused to release all their names but Kennedy and Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi are among those he already has met. He's also reviewing lengthy questionnaires _ also secret _ that he asked all hopefuls to submit.

Paterson expects to announce his decision within days, once Clinton is confirmed as secretary of state.

Tedisco argued that if the next senator is appointed, that will mean New York will have an unelected governor, comptroller, and U.S. senator. And the lieutenant governor's office vacancy _ open since Paterson rose to governor _ can't be filled by law until the 2010 election.

State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is considered among the top contenders for the Senate appointment. Were he to get it, Sen. Charles Schumer would be the only official in statewide elected office who was actually elected.

ALBANY, N.Y. — Republicans in New York's Legislature are pushing for a special election to fill the expected vacancy in the U.S. Senate instead of allowing Democratic Gov. David Paterson to make...
ALBANY, N.Y. — Republicans in New York's Legislature are pushing for a special election to fill the expected vacancy in the U.S. Senate instead of allowing Democratic Gov. David Paterson to make...
 
Comments
42
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I think with the possibility of putting an idiot like Caroline in...it's just too much for them to handle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 01/14/2009
photo

Memo to republicant's

You lost it all! We have ...

1. The white house
2. The Senate
3. The House
4. The Supreme Court

5. And...the majority in Albany NY

So...just keep the noise down...we'll handle this!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 AM on 01/14/2009

"So...just keep the noise down...we'll handle this!"

WE????? yeah, right...obama got a frog in his pocket with your name on it? what's your new position-secretary of online worship from the sidelines? minister of dreaming? get back to work-those donuts won't bake themselves

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 AM on 01/14/2009

Your so right...I love it when people say "we" like their a player..That "we" is no longer needed..they gave up their vote..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 01/14/2009

you you idiot, you lost it! This is a democracy or better yet a republic, not Zimbabwe, and even them elect their officials, even if its just a show for the public.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 01/14/2009
photo

They will have their chance in 2 years ..

So where's the beef ? ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 01/14/2009

This is a standard reply from the republicans...they want a special election each and every time it concerns a democrat and never when the seat is republican.
Come on....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 01/13/2009

I don't see how the Constitution can be changed to allow an election. I'm a Democrat and frankly I don't think Caroline Kennedy could even make it through a Democratic primary. Patterson needs to be politically smart and resist pressure from out of state influences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 01/13/2009

The US Constitution allows the individual states to make their own rules about filling senate seats in circumstances like this one. New York long ago chose to have the Governor appoint somebody to complete the term.

The New York State legislature could change that law, but there isn't time to change the law AND hold a special election now. That would take months.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 01/13/2009

who's the out of state influence?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 01/13/2009

Ted Kennedy, those in the Democratic party in his sphere of influence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 01/14/2009

Frankly Obama is somewhat beholden to Ms. Kennedy following her speech at the Democratic Convention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 01/14/2009

Boy you gotta give it to Blago, he may be corrupt, but at least he can make a brilliant decision in a timely manner. I wish I could say the same about the NY Gov.. I think he is definitly going to have a tough time with his own election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 01/13/2009

How is Blago's decision "timely?" Obama resigned from the Senate two months ago, and Blago has only picked a successor in the past week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 01/13/2009

Huh ? Obama resigned two months ago. Clinton hasn't even resigned yet. I would say Paterson is just being sensible. Please do your homework next time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 AM on 01/14/2009


Although I am a Democrat, I agree with the Republicans on this issue.

I think if we really want to reduce some of the corruption that exists in our political system then we need to give the power back to the people.

Senate Vacancies should be filled through the election process, this would guarantee the seat would be filled by the people and not a corrupt system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 01/13/2009

I agree and so does Governor Paterson. But changing the law is something that will take a bit of time. So it's out of the question as far as the present situation is concerned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 01/13/2009

That's not overly logical, as the vast majority of the officials in this system you see as corrupt were elected. One more election won't change a thing.

The reasoning the Republicans have given here (which anti-Kennedy and anti-Cuomo Democrats echo) is just window dressing. They just don't want Gov. Paterson to appoint Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg or Andrew Cuomo. The Republicans don't want that because, despite elections in 2010 and 2012, the Republicans' chances of reclaiming a New York seat in the U.S. Senate would then be minimal. If you, also, don't want CKS or Cuomo in the Senate, that would explain your position. Otherwise, please rethink the matter: Please don't fall for the Republicans' tricks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 AM on 01/14/2009
photo

I think the republicans are both right and wrong. They are wrong in that changing the law to fill a special election is semi anti-democratic; you don't change the rules as you go only because it would benefit your side at that particular point in time (I'm assuming the republicans think they could field a strong candidate ala Giuliani and win the seat). But they are right in that a special eleciton would be the most democratic and transparent manner way to fill federal vacancy... it would enfranchize state residents, reduce the image of cronyim, and help alleviate the problem of shady quid pro quos. Ideally, an immediate special election would be held to fill any vacancy sans interim appointment... you could hold a special election within 60 days; it is common in some democracies which hold snap parliamentary/congressional elections after the legislative branch is dissolved by the chief executive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

continued... In terms of cost, it could be a wash because the special election would only come earlier than programed 2010 date. The democrats estimate that it would cost their candidate 35 million to compete in 2010, and I'm not convinced that the figure would rise significantly if the special election was moved up. The main argument for having a temporary appointment is so that the incumbent party can get a head start in fundraising and exert the advantages of incumbency; which is why Gov. Patterson is unlikely to appoint an interim successor who would agree to not run in 2010. Again, this special election law should have been in place before this vacancy occurred... thus, the repubicans are right to push a bill, but wrong to want to have it implemented now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

I live in NY and the minority GOPers are whining as loud as Palin. They have nothing and they know it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 01/13/2009

I wish it were possible.

We'd win and it wouldnt be Caroline.

But it isnt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 01/13/2009

Hey loser Republicans: You are the minority party, and carry little clout.
Sit down, and shut-up: The adults are in charge now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 01/13/2009

Special elections are just like special prosecutors - when you're out of power they seem incredibly appealing and when you're in power it seems incredibly appealing for the other party. It would be a great idea to institute them, and mark my words they never will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 01/13/2009

Governor Paterson has said that he would personally prefer it, if this seat were filled via a special election. So if a bill mandating special elections in instances such as this one found its way to his desk, he might very well sign it. If that happened, it would still be too late to affect the disposition of Clinton's senate seat, however.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 01/13/2009

That is what I have been telling you for weeks, GLL. So why does the hub bub continue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 01/13/2009

Beats me. Because reporters have to fill column inches maybe. Electing people is a lot more fair than appointing them. And I'm sure Governor Paterson would love to be let off the hook. I don't blame him a bit. I don't think that the move to change the process in NY is strictly a GOP impulse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

LOL, what a joke the repubs are... let them win an election once in awhile, and then they can try to make rules. LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 01/13/2009

GOP always wants everything to steer to them.
If we had a GOP Governor, they would fight the concept of an election.
When they want to spend money its good, if a democrat proposes suddenly they want to balance the budget?

When the GOP opposes its fine, when a democrat mentions it, they want to remove the filabuster.
When they the GOP are out of power the first thing they do is filabuster!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 01/13/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect