iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hillary Clinton Hearing: Live Updates From Senate (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post/AP   First Posted: 02/13/09 05:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:00 PM ET

Sen. Hillary Clinton appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today for a hearing on her nomination as Secretary of State.

Clinton fielded an array of non-contentious, often friendly, questions from Democrats as well as Republicans, signaling the likelihood that she will be confirmed swiftly.

Highlights from the hearing:

The New York Observer points out Iran's prominence in the hearing. Clinton said that when it came to preventing a nuclear Iran, all options are "on the table":

Judging from the order of questions Hillary Clinton received at today's confirmation hearings, it is clear that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee thinks the gravest concern facing the United States is Iran's apparent pursuit of nuclear weapons.


In his first question to Clinton, Kerry asked what carrots and sticks the Obama administration was thinking of with respect to Iran's nuclear program. Clinton said that she couldn't get too specific, because she didn't want to take the country's allies by surprise, but that she would use all of the nation's instruments to keep Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

She said she and Obama "have no illusions" that their new administration's effort to engage Iran would yield immediate results and that all options were "on the table." She stressed that the administration would make the case to the world that "a nuclear-armed Iran is in no one's interests."

Read the full text of Clinton's prepared statement here.

Clinton expressed sympathy for Palestinians in her confirmation hearing, a rare and tricky move for American politicians. "The suffering of Palestinian and Israeli civilians," Clinton said, "... must only increase our determination to seek a just and lasing peace agreement."

Questioned on her history of poor management skills, Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that she won't actually run the State Department -- deputies will.

"This is to me one of the most important questions," she replied. "I decided to fill a position that had not been filled although it had been created ten years ago, and that was the deputy for resources and management."


As secretary, Clinton said, "you get consumed by the crisis of the moment." Even "with the best intentions to deal with management," she said, the secretary routinely spends her time on more immediate concerns, "on Gaza, or Iran, or on Russia and the Ukraine pipeline."

Clinton said she had called on Jack Lew, a former director of the Office of Management and Budget, to fill the position. James Steinberg, she said, had agreed to leave the deanship of the Lyndon Baines Johnson public policy school in Austin, Texas, to help manage the department as well.

Addressing her Senate confirmation hearing, Clinton also promised to push for stronger U.S. alliances around the globe.

"We must build a world with more partners and fewer adversaries," said the woman that President-elect Barack Obama took for his administration's leading diplomatic job.

"America cannot solve the most pressing problems on our own," Clinton said, "and the world cannot solve them without America."

Borrowing a phrase meant to signal a move away from the militarization of U.S. foreign policy, Clinton said, "We must use what has been called `smart power,' the full range of tools at our disposal," she said. "With `smart power,' diplomacy will be the vanguard of foreign policy."

She credited Secretary of Defense Robert Gates with stimulating debate about the role of diplomacy and other civilian institutions' role in fighting the global war on terror, endorsing his call for providing the State Department with more resources and a bigger budget.

She assured the committee that if confirmed, the State Department "will be firing on all cylinders" -- applying pressure when needed and looking for opportunities to advancing U.S. interests.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the committee, said in opening the hearing that he welcomed Clinton's nomination, calling her "extraordinarily capable and smart."

In his opening remarks, Sen. Richard Lugar, the panel's ranking Republican, praised Clinton, calling her "the epitome of a big leaguer" who is fully qualified for the job and whose presence at the State Department could open new opportunities for American diplomacy, including the possibility of improving the United States' image in the world.

But Lugar also raised questions about the issue of Bill Clinton's fundraising work and its relation to her wife's new post. Lugar said that the only way for Clinton to avoid a potential conflict of interest due to her husband's charity is to forswear any new foreign contributions. The Indiana senator said the situation poses a "unique complication" that requires "great care and transparency."

The Washington Independent's Spencer Ackerman is liveblogging the hearing.

In remarks prepared for delivery, Clinton promised to use "smart power" and push for more U.S. partnerships around the globe.

"America cannot solve the most pressing problems on our own, and the world cannot solve them without America," she said. "I believe American leadership has been wanting, but is still wanted."

Borrowing a phrase meant to signal a move away from the militarization of U.S. foreign policy, Clinton said, "We must use what has been called `smart power,' the full range of tools at our disposal. With `smart power,' diplomacy will be the vanguard of foreign policy.

A team of roughly ten advisers helped Clinton prepare for the hearing, from deputy designates Jim Steinberg and Jack Lew, Wendy Sherman, and campaign policy aide Jake Sullivan to her Senate foreign policy staffer, Andrew Shapiro.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Sen. Hillary Clinton appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today for a hearing on her nomination as Secretary of State. Clinton fielded an array of non-contentious, often friendly, q...
Sen. Hillary Clinton appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today for a hearing on her nomination as Secretary of State. Clinton fielded an array of non-contentious, often friendly, q...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,448
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
09:06 PM on 01/13/2009
I simply cannot believe all of the divisive rhetoric I am reading on this blog. If I didn't know better, I would assume I was watching a formal hearing on Capitol Hill. Our political leadership has so divided this country (intentionally) it is impossible to achieve a clear majority on either side of any issue. It is time we the electorate wake up and realize we must focus on the big picture. The big picture is literally the survival of this country. Our economy is tanking, Americans are literally dying from the lack of healthcare, Unemployment is at a 16 year high with 500,000 more unemployed each month, more and more of our war veterans are becoming homeless, the Alt-A and Option ARM crisis is building strength and headed straight for our pocketbooks with a potential liability of $1.2 TRILLION dollars, the Israeli/Hamas fighting may draw in regional powers and ultimately us, the Afghan and Iraq wars, the auto industry crisis, etc., etc.. And most people want to continue to repeat the divisive and polarizing rhetoric generated each day on Capitol Hill and eagerly fed to us each day by the main stream media. There will be no change in Washington until we realize we are Americans first and democrats, republicans, and independents somewhere down life's sub-priority list.
08:53 PM on 01/13/2009
Senator Vitter was snotty but the Republicans are right to push for transparency. We need more of it, all the time, for everybody. James Baker III was still working for the Carlye Group (investing in weapons and reconstruction companies) when he led the Iraq Study Group.

This doesn't mean he did anything wrong, but shouldn't we have cared what investments he was making in Iraq? Might they influenced his decisions or at least created that impression in interested parties? Do you think that he was approached by any such interested parties? Of course, he was - all the time and probably still is - just as Bill Clinton is and George Bush is about to be.

There is everything right with transparency as long as we apply it to everybody equally - and the more the better. This is a unique opportunity to create new expectations of ex-Presidents and White House staffers. They don't retire anymore but often work for many long years. Ex-Pres' stay on the payroll and we protect them, so we should know what they are up to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djgonebad
07:54 PM on 01/13/2009
What about GAZA?!!! Both sides seem content on letting this go on; putting the burden on some sort of- HAMAS TURNAROUND- to trigger an end to the killing.

I would've hoped more pressure was placed on both sides, to come-up with a ceasefire, so serious talks could begin.

Right now the score is, 1,000 to 20, and we don't even see half-time yet.
09:54 PM on 01/13/2009
Good point. I wish we could hear more on the issue and the true hillary's (which now means Obama) position about it
07:50 PM on 01/13/2009
I saw most of the confirmation hearing of Ms. Clinton and I thought she did an excellent job; the questions were neutral, the atmosphere was jovial, and her answers were crisp. The irony of the cordialness from the GOP was that for so many years Ms. Clinton was radioactive to conservatives... now as SOS, her confirmation is a formality, with many republicans breathing a sigh of relief that it will be Ms. Clinton who will take over the reins at state as opposed to some inexperienced/progressive politician. So far Ms. Clinton has quietly done a good job of assembling an efficacious team; she has left many of the same Bureau chiefs which shows her understanding of the department. I was also happy to hear that she choose the dean of my alma mater to head an important section. I think one of her first bureaucratic challenges for Ms. Clinton will be how to handle Susan Rice; Ambassador Rice has quietly been re-elevated by President Elect to a cabinet level billet, which I think Ms. Clinton was rather disconsolate about. This has the potential to foment clashes when important resolutions go to vote in the UN, or when crafting language for drafts. For example, I could imagine that an internal debate over the Gaza situation could be an inauspicious occasion. In the end I think Obama has a solid team at State... I just hope the president makes strong decisions and doesn’t let the careerists cannibalize his foreign policy.
12:37 AM on 01/14/2009
You're trying too hard, dear. Give the thesaurus a rest and write in plain English. You can still use interesting vocabulary, just not so much of it that any point is completely lost.

I have read no credible reporting that Secretary of State-designate Clinton is "disconsolate" about the UN Ambassadorship being (again) made a Cabinet level post. Do you have a source that cites her discontent with this arrangement?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
siney
attitude of gratitude...
01:05 AM on 01/14/2009
c'mon, be fair.....if you got lost, perhaps it is you who should consult a dictionary...whether i agree with the content or not, i found the post completely coherent...had no problem following along...
02:38 AM on 01/14/2009
evidence of Ms. Clinton’s “disconsolateness”…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/08/cracks-appear-in-obama-fo_n_149486.html
rixter1965
I'll respect your beliefs, but at least be consist
07:32 PM on 01/13/2009
Since every elected US President goes on after winning the election to appoint Cabinet and other officials (who need Senate approval) and White House staff (who do not), is not support of him/her as a primary and general-election candidate and as President-Elect to make those choices!?! There can be disagreement about direction and or specifics, but filling all these slots is part -- one of the first parts -- of the job. I was a Hillary supporter, but happily voted for P-E Obama in the general election. Maybe he is, in contrast to outgoing "W," truly a "uniter, not a divider," and appointing Hillary as Secretary of State a way to bring unity to the Democratic Party and demonstrate his commitment to a "team of rivals" -- hate using a phrase so associated with that hack/plagiarist D. K. Goodwin, but.... A lot of folks voted for Hillary -- and what she represented -- and more, of course, voted for P-E Obama, and here is where we are. I'm not dogging Obama on the specifics, because I'm actually hopeful he is the right individual for the job at this moment in time. And, if he chose Hillary, well... we will see how it goes.
06:39 PM on 01/13/2009
What about the Clintons' past connection (to criminals) like Ya Lin Charlie Trie (Immediately after Trie's donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should U.S. intervention continue), Norman Hsu (criminal that fled to China and friend of the Clintons), James Riady, John Huang, and Johnny Chung (convicted of bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law) and the Clinton's poor judgement in promoting them, sponsoring them, having them to the White House many times, creating potential national security risks, possible conflict of interest (with China) and campaign finance ethics. Why is the Senate Confirmation Committee only concerned with President Bill Clinton's conflict of interest in his Charity Donors and not re Hillary and Bill Clinton's past political donors, obligations to China, and other obligations that may be a conflict to our national security? Read details @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy
06:53 PM on 01/13/2009
These are Bill's connections, not hers.
07:45 PM on 01/13/2009
they are married into politics together, they are her connections as well!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 AM on 01/16/2009
Hi Cord,

You're right, but keep in mind that ever since Hillary's win in the New Hampshire primary, the Left has mined the right's smears of both Clintons from the nineties, and the obam-media began an all out assault on Bill in order to take down Hillary. And so it continues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:36 PM on 01/13/2009
Are you bringing up the smears from the right wing trashing of the Clintons during their years in the White House that the Left mined so well to assault her during the primary? And what is your motive? Is it just your psychotic Hillary-hating rising up within you again?
09:15 PM on 01/13/2009
Oh the hate mongering Obama supporters are at it again. Less than2 weeks before President-Elect Obama's inauguration, and they still can't stop their hate obsession over Hillary and BILL cLINTON.

yeah, change you can despise with.

CREEPS
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 PM on 01/13/2009
>>>Borrowing a phrase meant to signal a move away from the militarization of U.S. foreign policy, Clinton said, "We must use what has been called `smart power,' the full range of tools at our disposal. With `smart power,' diplomacy will be the vanguard of foreign policy.
............................. repeated twice along with typing mistakes ..................
A litel pruf reding wud b nis
photo
pmag88
water and carbon and a bunch of other stuff
05:47 PM on 01/13/2009
When bush came into office the republicans pushed for faith based and other organizations which relied more on donations because they felt they were much better at uniting communities and resolving issues than governments. They felt this so strongly that they wanted to go beyond tax exemptions and decided that it was not out of line to take out tax dollars to fund these institutions directly. And now comes Dick Lugar saying the Clintons Global Foundation presents a conflict of interest. WOW! Can you say MASSIVE HPYOCRITE ?

In light of what the Clintons and others have already done to prove the value of the organization, and make the inner workings as transparent as possible, Lugar and the other republicans going down this path are only making themselves look pathetic. It almost seems as if the old school republicans are hell bent on totally destroying any foundations on which the new bloods could possibly re-build their party. Maybe they can only stand change when they are controlling the agenda ?
06:17 PM on 01/13/2009
I wish the clintons would release all of their donors.
06:54 PM on 01/13/2009
Release all their donors? That would require transparentcy, something we will not see in politics, regardless of which party is in power.
05:44 PM on 01/13/2009
It is so strange to me that Vitter wants so much transparency, when he tried to hide his dealing with the ladies of the night in New Orleans and Washington. He was to use campaign funds to help with is legal case if he had to go to court in Washington with the DC Madamn case. But the DC madmn conventionally committed suicide. Now does anyone beleive this women committed suicide. If you do I have a bridge in Washington I would like to sell you.
05:40 PM on 01/13/2009
Basically it seems that Hillary is saying we are going to abandon all the mistakes we made in the nineties when we Clinton's were in charge. The Islamic bomb became a reality during Clinton's second term when they did nothing about Indian nukes which led to Pakistan's nukes which now makes an Iranian nuke inevitable notwithstanding all the grandstanding by Clinton. You made your bed now go lie in it, Hillary.

All Hillary's deputies are the people who brought us 9/11 by way of the intifada. Now they are going to use "soft" power? I wan't born yesterday.

Biden is now in Afghanistan and Iraq. Biden has never solved anything in his entire life. His existence on the stage is owing entirely to the media worship of serial yapping that come out of Capitol Hill which is mistaken for actual achievement. Obama needs to get Biden out of that area of the world with all due despatch before he does irreversible damage.

This whole hearing is a train wreck in progress.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:02 PM on 01/13/2009
Golly gee, we should have elected republicans ... bitter republicans - there are evidently no fresh ones ... only bitter and rotten obstructionists with panties in wads. yup yup
06:58 PM on 01/13/2009
JiminNC, Sometime it would be nice to have an adult conversation with others. We don't need high school dribble.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leonhardsr
Navy Vet
05:26 PM on 01/13/2009
Hillary is going to visit Mark Wood when she is appointed Secretary OF State . Maybe he can kick in some more cash to pay off her campaign debt. When she was co president . Mark wood paid the clintons millions for his pardon/ Even though he enbezzeled a hundred millions. The clintons prove crime dose pay.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boycottrightwingthings
END WAR on women vote Dem 2014!
06:33 PM on 01/13/2009
No, the Bushes prove that crime does pay. You prove that you aren't too sm .art. You can't even spell does.
05:25 PM on 01/13/2009
Hillary hit it out of the ballpark on every single question.
She demonstrated to all non-bigoted people her massive qualifications for the job.

For those who bash everything Clinton....as Tina Fey says....$uck it.

If you voted for Obama, support him.
If you didn't vote for him, the man is fixing this country for you too.

In either case... help or get out of the way.
07:01 PM on 01/13/2009
Well said by someone with a bigoted (should have said biased) attitude. Bravo for the BethA's of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wltdnfaded
09:39 PM on 01/13/2009
What did she say that was biased? Seems to me she was praising both sides.
07:08 PM on 01/13/2009
Hillary hit what out of the ballpark? Bill's foreign contributions, or his girlfriends? Have to be more clear. She, Hill, needs to get her botox back on.
02:27 PM on 01/14/2009
You need to get your facts back.
Hillary had NOTHING to do with Bill's girlfriends GEESH. You guys just keep blaming her for his transgressions. That's just stupid. When your spouse cheats on you, then it must be YOUR fault? Right...

As for the foundation, read the facts.
This foundation has helped millions of innocent people worldwide.
Hillary made Bill go above and beyond on disclosure...get over it.

Yeah, I know you Clinton haters will never stop. So when she helps all Americans, I expect YOU to go and refuse the help, go over to the Middle East and step on a land mine. After all you don't like her so you must not want her help.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kmswriter
This mean we can't be friends?
05:02 PM on 01/13/2009
Vitter - why is he still there??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:02 PM on 01/13/2009
There are still prostitutes to conquer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
04:49 PM on 01/13/2009
Okay everyone. I'm done with Hillary today. I hope they bug her and I hope that she does a good job. This was a farce. Didn't Hillary loan Barack a plan e and didn't it almost c rash in some bizarre problem-- like Ronny Brown had-- right after losing to Barack and after making the comment about... "look at what happened to Robert Kennedy."? Good luck Barack. I tried to warn you.
04:51 PM on 01/13/2009
Woo!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
06:03 PM on 01/13/2009
boring x 2.
You must be a HIllary wanna be to have your posts contain nothing but garbage that only Ann Coulter cares about.
Jealous?
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
04:31 PM on 01/13/2009
Very interesting hearings.

I told yall she was a great choice for SoS.
.