iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bank Of America To Get Billions More In Bailout Funds From Treasury

01/14/09 11:57 PM ET   AP

Merrill Bank Of

NEW YORK — The U.S. government is nearing a deal to inject Bank of America Corp. with billions of dollars in more aid, The Wall Street Journal reported late Wednesday, citing people familiar with the situation.

The nation's biggest bank by assets acquired Merrill Lynch & Co. on Jan. 1. Bank of America received $25 billion from the government's $700 financial rescue fund, including $10 billion that would have gone to Merrill had it not been acquired.

Bank of America and the U.S. Treasury spokesmen declined to comment in response to inquiries made by The Associated Press.

The Journal, citing a person familiar with the talks, reported that the discussion between the government and Bank of America began in mid-December when the Charlotte, N.C., bank said it wasn't likely to go through with its acquisition of New York-based Merrill because the losses at the troubled company were larger than expected.

Treasury Department officials grew concerned that the stability of the U.S. financial markets would be at risk if the deal fell apart, the newspaper reported. Officials said they would work on "formulation of a plan" that includes new money from the government, the Journal said, citing the person familiar with the talks.

Details of a possible agreement, the Journal said, are likely to come out with the company's quarterly results, which are expected Tuesday.

The Journal reported that any possible plan could shield Bank of America from the bad assets on Merrill's books. One person familiar with the situation told the paper that there could be a limit to how much Bank of America might have to be liable for, with the government covering the remainder.

Banks are struggling to mend their balance sheets after bad bets on mortgages spread to other forms of debt. Some analysts and economist are saying the U.S. government will have to spend far more than the $700 billion it has already approved to aid the financial industry. Only the first half of the $700 billion has been allocated and Congress has not released the second half of the funds.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,420
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
07:08 PM on 01/15/2009
It's collapsing folks.
Be prepared people.
The m@ ni @c is not out of office yet.
He and the VP have one more big surprise up their sleeves for next week, after the inauguration.
Even C. Powell said so, very definitively, on Meet the Press. Look it up.
"There will be a crisis on January 21-22, we don't know what it is".
HUH?
He knows very well what it is.
Better get your food, cash, supplies, etc. whatever you need together now.
Just in case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:31 AM on 01/16/2009
Hey, no one can be as cynical as I am, but this is a bit of a stretch. On the other hand....;)
04:17 PM on 01/15/2009
Well, they are rumored to be the bank of the CIA. No wonder they'll keep getting bailed out.
03:02 PM on 01/15/2009
B of A market value is now just a little over $40 billion. They have taken $20 billion from the feds, and now want $10-15 billion more. WTF! This bank is in serious trouble..........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VJ2008
01:48 PM on 01/15/2009
NO!!!!!! NO!!!!!! Bank of America, NO!!!!!!!!!!!
Please do not give any more money to the banks. They just want to get bigger and they are too big already. Besides, I saw a report about how BOA didn't even get trapped in the sub-prime loans, so why did they need bailout money in the first place? Because they want to be so large that we'll continue to give them money because we BELIEVE they can never fail. Let them swim or drown, please!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tqjones44
Gotta put something into something to get somethin
01:45 PM on 01/15/2009
The bailout money needs to go to american consumers...the simple equation for job creation and to end the recession is - Bailout remaining homeowners = solvent consumer = increased demand = continued spending/savings = increased tax revenue = happy economy!
01:43 PM on 01/15/2009
Yet, along with every other bank, refuses to re- finance mortages.

I want my money back.
DontJustFollow
Ask not what your country can do for you...
01:31 PM on 01/15/2009
When government and Wall Street both agree that the only way to save the economy is to try and reinflate the housing bubble that caused all the problems in the first place - - - well it makes you wonder what is really going to happen in the next 4 years.

Does anyone know if Pelosi and Reid are going to be smiling and high fiving this time around?

I guess it really doesn't matter now, but what ever happened to the last $350 billion they said they needed by Friday?
01:30 PM on 01/15/2009
So, a bank run by people that were too stupid to know that they were giving out loans just to make their bonuses, bought a company that like wise did not know what they were doing and now wants the government to bail them out. Well, my wife did not know what she was doing and now owes money to everyone. We need a billion to bail us out. The country will go broke if we don't get our bailout.
Does that make any sense?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tqjones44
Gotta put something into something to get somethin
01:22 PM on 01/15/2009
I've got a good one for everyone! I was laid off from B of A back in June and have a $20K credit card balance with them...here is the funny part, they want me to continuing paying down on the balance and suggested I forgo one of my car or mortgage pymts so I can pay them and prevent the bal. from being written off. Are they fricken high??? Without my car I can't look for another job and without my house they will no longer have any where to mail my monthly stmts...lol

This bank is one of the main reasons for the down fall of our economy at this time...it is a symbol of the excesses and incompetence of our gov't. over the past eight years and an example of how the top 1% - 5% in this country continue to stuff their pockets on the backs of the poor and middle class...I know our country was founded on exploitation, but this is ridiculous.
01:09 PM on 01/15/2009
the best way to handle this is to order a credit card from B of A and then not use it. If millions of people did this, they would spend all their money servicing nonproducing accounts. They should close and give the business to banks that have operated correctly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDHutchinson
01:05 PM on 01/15/2009
Hey BofA,
About that money I owe on my Platinum Plus Visa, what do you say we just call it even. After all, I used that money to make a bad investment so by your business model, not only should my debt be excused, you should probably open up an additional $2,000 credit line for me. Feel free to set the interest rate at whatever you want because I have no intention of paying you back.
Oh, and next time you try to charge me a $35 overdraft fee when a Starbucks purchase overdraws my account by a buck fifty, I will round up those Isla Vista college kids from the 60's and set them loose on one your branches.
Love,
M
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
12:55 PM on 01/15/2009
No,no even a Dollar to Bank Of The Not America,why? lenders practices ,\consumer abuses,
and if you can not afford a business ,closed down,no more money to pay the chiefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BenMurphyNYC
NY State Young Dem LGBT Caucus Chair
12:53 PM on 01/15/2009
The Great American Bailout (1991), PBS Frontline:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/story/2008/10/buying-from-uncle-sam.html
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
12:39 PM on 01/15/2009
Houses in my area (Cape Coral) if you can sell one are now down 50% or more. 600K homes 3,000 sq ft built in 2006 going for 50K at auctions, so whats a house worth now.. almost nothing.

If you think this means getting a great buy.. yeah, but mostly for rich speculators who then turn once owners into renters... back to a feudal system... And when you see whats becoming of the neighbporhoods... with closed down rec centers, no repairs being done, yards unmowed... you would not want to live in them as crime soars as more become desparate.

There is no one whose mortgage is not more than what the property is worth. Almost anyone is better off walking away. What this means is B of A's assets are being written down every month this decline continues... just like your stock/retirment funds and your real estate..The same for all banks... thus in order to meet federal solvency requirments they must have greater reserves each month. And thus they must take 50K for a 300K house which then sets the value for all the other houses that come on the market...

If you do not stop this asset deflation, then no bank will survive. NONE

The governement should have insured all real estate back investments in the U.S. at 80% of face value. That would have stopped this.. 12 months ago we were talking about 2% defaults, now we are looking at 40% defaults...

regards
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BenMurphyNYC
NY State Young Dem LGBT Caucus Chair
01:12 PM on 01/15/2009
After reading your comment I went back and looked up this PBS story from 1991. I thought it would be of interest to you. I did a rough transcript, see below.

From PBS Frontline, The Great American Bailout (1991)

Joe Smith is a small time real estate speculator from Sacramento California, he says he has bought more than 300 bailout properties. “This is the first building that we paid $1750 for it.”

After their first successful deal Joe and his wife Milly started buying properties by the dozen. “We found approximately 38 of them, wrote offers on everything that we seen and didn’t expect to get any of them accepted…we didn’t write an offer for anything over $1200 and some as low as $50.”

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/story/2008/10/buying-from-uncle-sam.html
12:31 PM on 01/15/2009
I'm just speculating, but I think the rest of the stimulus package will not be given to people in foreclosure situations. That wouldn't be fair to those who have been fiscally responsible and are not in foreclosure situations. It will probably be given to new home buyers who have shown that they more than qualify for the loan. It would allow those new home buyers to buy up the properties in foreclosure. That's the only fair way to do it so that the frugal people don't end up paying for the not so frugal people. I fear that people who think they will be rescued from their financial sins will be sorely disappointed when the rest of the TARP money goes into the system. But this is all just speculation, I'm no expert.
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
12:44 PM on 01/15/2009
So, first the New home buyers get 1) much lower interst rates 2) property at 50% or more off...

Then you want to give them money on top of that???? tHE PROBLEM IS NOW NOT JUST GETTING NEW HOUSE INVENTORY DOWN.

The problem is how to keep the now 80% of home owners whose mortgages is more than their house is worth to stay in their house!!!... when if they walk, they can rent the same house or buy one like for LT half ( and maybe in a forclosure sale just 10%)+.

For most of America, owning real estate lowers your credit score now. Thats upside down!

Its existing home owners who need to have the mortge adjusted to the current house valuation..


Regards