More

Britain's David Miliband Calls War On Terror 'Mistaken'

RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM   01/15/09 12:39 PM ET   AP

David Miliband

MUMBAI, India — Britain's foreign secretary suggested the U.S.-led war on terror may have "done more harm than good" as he issued a sharp rebuke Thursday to the outgoing Bush administration and it's approach to fighting extremism.

David Miliband's speech at the Taj Mahal hotel in Mumbai was among the first public remarks from a senior British official criticizing how the battle against terrorism has been conducted since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The Taj was one of several sites in India's financial hub that was attacked by militants in a November siege that left 164 dead.

Although the early years of the war on terror saw Britain as the most reliable ally of the United States, Miliband sought to turn the page, saying Britain's government "has used neither the idea nor the phrase 'war on terror'" since 2006.

"Ultimately, the notion is misleading and mistaken," he said. "Historians will judge whether it has done more harm than good. But we need to move on to meet the challenges we face."

Miliband has denied suggestions that he timed his remarks to coincide with President George W. Bush's final days in office.

British opposition Liberal Democrat Party lawmaker Edward Davey said Miliband's criticism of the Bush administration was too little, too late.

"If the British foreign secretary had said this to President Bush many months, if not years ago, then it would have deserved some credit," Davey said Thursday in a statement. "Mimicking President-elect Obama's lines days before his inauguration does not show leadership."

Miliband has sought to align himself with Obama, who will be sworn in Tuesday, and has praised incoming U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her pledges to use a "smart power" mix of military might and diplomacy.

"The new administration has a set of values that fit very well with the values and priorities I am talking about," Miliband was quoted as telling The Guardian.

On Thursday, he restated his commitment to diplomacy and challenged the West to lead by example.

"If we want to promote the politics of consent instead of terror and of democratic opportunity rather than fear and oppression, we must up hold our commitments to human rights and civil liberties both at home and abroad," he said.

"Democracies must respond to terrorism by championing the rule of law, not subordinating it," he added.

Miliband had met India's prime minister and other senior leaders earlier in the week to discuss the investigation into the Mumbai attacks. Miliband told reporters he agreed with India's claims that the Pakistani-based militant group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, carried out the attack.

"When I visit Islamabad later this week, I will underline that there must be zero tolerance for such organizations," he said.

But he made clear that he did not back India's claims that the Pakistani state could have been involved in the attack, allegations that have raised tensions between the nuclear-armed rivals.

___

Associated Press writers David Stringer in London and Sam Dolnick in New Delhi contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MUMBAI, India — Britain's foreign secretary suggested the U.S.-led war on terror may have "done more harm than good" as he issued a sharp rebuke Thursday to the outgoing Bush administration and ...
MUMBAI, India — Britain's foreign secretary suggested the U.S.-led war on terror may have "done more harm than good" as he issued a sharp rebuke Thursday to the outgoing Bush administration and ...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:51 PM on 01/16/2009
War on drugs, war on terror; who's winning?
05:00 PM on 01/15/2009
David Miliband, a hawk just a couple of years ago, is now talking diplomacy. I can see through your political positioning, Mr. Milk-banned! I hope you never get into Downing Street that you have been eying at for this past couple of years.
12:03 PM on 01/16/2009
totally agree with you Deparis . . . he seems to be modelling himself very closely on bliar . . . DM gives me the creeps . . . I really dislike watching him on news interviews . . . . he seems to speak with "forked-tongue" all the time
04:36 PM on 01/15/2009
What is there left to say about the Bush administration's admirable achievements?!! They're out there for everybody to see! Look! Look!! Oh Oh, missed them. Damn!
04:33 PM on 01/15/2009
In 2003 during the lead up to the War in Iraq I remember well as I was out-of-country in Mumbai, India. Sitting in the Club Room I said to my husband it looks like Bush is going to WAR! My comment was: "Bush is opening Pandora's Box".

Well, "Pandora's Box" is open, folks! And, this "War on Terror" has certainly escalated. Just look where we are! Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Gaza, Iran, Syria, North Korea! The conflicts have widened. And, this rhetoric has to STOP.

It's time for other countries to use DIPLOMACY. Britain & the U.S. have lost CREDIBILITY! This has gone on for far too long!
03:50 PM on 01/15/2009
I submit that most of the actions taken by the Bush Administration have been mistakes!
05:45 PM on 01/15/2009
I'll second that.
02:35 PM on 01/15/2009
Perhaps he should wait to see whom is attacked AFTER the war on terror is called off...
05:23 PM on 01/15/2009
In other words, "Be afraid! Be very afraid!"

Don't you have anything better than that?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hirnlego
06:14 PM on 01/15/2009
So you think constant warfare to prevent blowbacks are a good idea?

Read the Rand Corp study on terrorism..
02:35 PM on 01/15/2009
Everybody's got an opinion...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:01 PM on 01/15/2009
Those Brits are certainly brave and upfront. It's only taken them eight years to speak up.

Five days left in the bush administration.
02:41 PM on 01/15/2009
Yes, five short days! How can we, as a people, hope to get by without his firm hand on the tiller? It's just such a shattering thought. Who else but Bush, ignoring the advice of his military and intelligence agencies, would go after Saddam’s massive stockpiles of WMD? Not many, I’d say. So thanks to Mr. Bush they’ll be no Iraqi mushroom clouds forming over Des Moines - or any other American city. We salute you, Sir!
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
04:02 PM on 01/15/2009
Exactly; they change the tune according to the music, and the music for now is "multilateral efforts". A Bpolitician with a mind of his/her own would be nice for a change.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
04:10 PM on 01/15/2009
I meant British...
02:01 PM on 01/15/2009
Too bad the American press was so good at keeping world opinion from reaching the ears of the American people while this war on terror was being waged. Some of us who were hearing opinions such as these were trying to report them, but had no support, so we sounded crazy and unpatriotic. Then there was the effective propaganda that put the USA into a fiercely "we -are -above- criticism" mode and the heck with what the rest of the world thinks. I have always wondered about the oil factor and if many people thought , well if we get cheaper prices at the pump.... then what the heck. Then I must wonder what it was that we have accomplished after 8 years besides a destroyed economy, destroyed credibility and reputation. So this is the legacy of the war on terror and the outgoing president. Will this all be written up and put in the Bush library, which I can not help liken to the temples that were built to the Roman Emperors after they went out of office. I can't wait for January 21st and a new beginning. This time is really dragging.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
obamagal
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself~FDR
02:03 AM on 01/16/2009
Excellent comment.