Obama Executive Order Would Close Guantanamo Bay In A Year, AP Reports

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LARA JAKES and DAVID ESPO | January 21, 2009 10:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this photo reviewed by the U.S. Military, a guard talks to a Guantanamo detainee in the open yard in Camp 4 detention center on the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2009. The Obama administration will close the Guantanamo Bay detention center within a year and halt U.S. military trials of terror suspects held there under a draft order obtained Wednesday. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, Pool)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will begin overhauling U.S. national security policy Thursday with orders to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center, review military trials of terror suspects and end harsh interrogations, two government officials said.

Together, the three executive orders and a presidential directive will reshape how the United States prosecutes and questions al-Qaida, Taliban or other foreign fighters who pose a threat to Americans.

A senior Obama administration official said the president would sign an order Thursday to shutter the Guantanamo prison within one year, fulfilling his campaign promise to close a facility that critics around the world say violates domestic and international detainee rights. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because the order has not yet been issued.

A draft copy of the order, obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, notes that "in view of significant concerns raised by these detentions, both within the United States and internationally, prompt and appropriate disposition of the individuals currently detained at Guantanamo and closure of the facility would further the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice."

An estimated 245 men are being held at the U.S. naval base in Cuba, most of whom have been detained for years without being charged with a crime. The administration already has received permission to suspend the trials at Guantanamo for 120 days pending a review of the military tribunals.

Two other executive orders and a presidential directive also are expected Thursday, according to the administration official and an aide to a House Republican lawmaker who was briefed on the plans Wednesday by White House counsel Greg Craig. They include:

_An executive order creating a task force that would have 30 days to recommend policies on handling terror suspects who are detained in the future. Specifically, the group would look at where those detainees should be housed since Guantanamo is closing.

_An executive order to require all U.S. personnel to follow the U.S. Army Field Manual while interrogating detainees. The manual explicitly prohibits threats, coercion, physical abuse and waterboarding, a technique that creates the sensation of drowning and has been termed a form of torture by critics. However, the administration also is planning a study of more aggressive interrogation methods that could be added to the Army manual, a second Capitol Hill aide said.

Story continues below
advertisement

_A presidential directive for the Justice Department to review the case of Qatar native Ali al-Marri, who is the only enemy combatant currently being held on U.S. soil. The review will look at whether al-Marri has the right to sue the government for his freedom, a right the Supreme Court already has given to Guantanamo detainees. The directive will ask the high court for a stay in al-Marri's appeals case while the review is ongoing. The government says al-Marri is an al-Qaida sleeper agent.

The House Republican aide was not authorized to discuss the plans publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity.

Where the detainees would be housed if not at Guantanamo has become a point of contention for Obama as he grapples with the already thorny legal issue.

The White House late Wednesday said Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will host Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and national security adviser James Jones at the State Department on Thursday in a closed-door meeting to be followed by an address by Obama and Clinton to department employees.

The Guantanamo draft obtained by the AP requires a review of each detainees' case to decide whether they should be returned to their home countries, released, transferred elsewhere or sent to another U.S. prison.

At least three military prisons _ at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., Camp Pendleton, Calif., and Charleston, S.C. _ could house some of the Guantanamo detainees, according to a second senior administration official who also spoke on condition of anonymity.

Also under consideration, the official said, is the Supermax prison in Florence, Colo., which houses convicted 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui and Olympic bomber Eric Rudolph.

House Republican leader John Boehner said he's open to options, "but most local communities around America don't want dangerous terrorists imported into their neighborhoods, and I can't blame them."

"The key question is where do you put these terrorists," Boehner said Wednesday. "Do you bring them inside our borders? Do you release them back into the battlefield? If there is a better solution, we're open to hearing it."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has long contended the U.S. can handle relocating the detainees "just as it has handled the worst criminals and other terrorists before," spokesman David Carle said.

Between 60 and 120 Guantanamo prisoners may be considered low-threat detainees and transferred to other countries, either for rehabilitation or release, the second administration official said. Only Portugal so far has agreed to take some of those detainees, the official said, although diplomatic discussions are ongoing. A State Department spokesman did not immediately know which nations had been asked to accept some prisoners.

It's also unclear how the detainees would be prosecuted. The Guantanamo order would halt ongoing military commission trials and lawsuits filed by detainees seeking their release, pending a review.

Obama's advisers are looking at whether the terror suspects should be tried in federal courts under long-standing military or civilian criminal law. It's possible the administration could call for a new national security court system _ a hybrid of the two _ although the official described that as "a last resort."

John D. Altenburg Jr., a retired Army general who oversaw the military commissions until November 2006, says Guantanamo should stay open and the tribunals should continue.

Trying detainees in federal courts is problematic, he says, because the evidence was collected "on a battlefield" and may be inadmissible outside the commissions, although "it doesn't mean the evidence is tainted."

But public interest and human rights groups that long have wanted the facility shuttered were quick to urge Obama to be more aggressive than the draft order's proposals.

"It only took days to put these men in Guantanamo," said Vincent Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. "It shouldn't take a year to get them out."

___

Associated Press writers Jennifer Loven, Richard Lardner and Pamela Hess contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will begin overhauling U.S. national security policy Thursday with orders to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center, review military trials of terror suspe...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will begin overhauling U.S. national security policy Thursday with orders to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center, review military trials of terror suspe...
 
Comments
56
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- JohnnyKong I'm a Fan of JohnnyKong 5 fans permalink
photo

Many of them have been locked up on hearsay evidence. No substantial evidence, no eyewitnesses. Only the truly ignorant would deem them all 'terror suspects' simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 01/21/2009

I'm am very surprised to find this out, but apparently John Boehner is unaware that the U.S. justice system has two important standards that are being ignored when he says "where are we going to put these terrorists?". The primary rule of our system is that a person is innocent until proven guilty. Since the detainees have not been tried, they can not be assumed to be terrorists. This leads to the next big standard of our system, which is that the accused has a right to face his accusers, hear the charges that are made against him and defend himself in a fair and speedy trial. The notion that it's different because it's war is bogus. Boehner asks "do you release (the detainees) back into the battlefield?", ignoring that many of the detainees were not captured in battle but snatched off the street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 01/21/2009
- Alvarask I'm a Fan of Alvarask 11 fans permalink

Because of the stupidity of the American government and the American military, many innocent people, including young teenagers, were locked up in Gitmo. The place is unfit for even the most hardened criminal, but to have kept innocent people locked up there away from their homes and families for so long is a great crime against humanity. It would be my hope that the US will pay restitution to all those innocents who were locked up there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 01/21/2009

careful Al, that would be the same stupid American government and American military that have given millions of their lives to make sure you can post stupid statements like your and not have to be afraid of a midnight knock on the door.

of course make that statement at a military funeral and maybe your "rights" will also get a little trampled on - - -

Where does HP find people like you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 01/21/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

iran

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 01/21/2009

If they fought for the right to say stuff, then why would they prevent someone from exercising their rights? I'm sick of people pretending it's unpatriotic to criticise and question. It more than patriotic, it should be neccesary. Otherwise you stop living in a democracy and start living in a fundamentalist state.

No one is attacking the military - only the government who condoned torture, which is wrong and unconstitutional, which makes it less patriotic than being critical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 01/21/2009
- lthuedk 1 I'm a Fan of lthuedk 1 45 fans permalink
photo

These are suspects, my right wing friends. When was the last time you took the time to look at, then comprehend, the U.S. Constitution? Creating new classifications for suspects so they can be incarcerated without open trial is nothing less than undiluted totalitarian strategy.

Its what fascism does.

http://www.light-to-dark.com/i_feel_your_pain.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 01/21/2009

I bet the POW's in Vietnam and every other war wish they could have had an open trial --- get a fancy lawyer - - - and then get paid! LOL

I say we release all these poor victims with a check in their pocket into your town. It will be our little economic stimulas present -

Enjoy teaching them about the constitution. I bet they have a few lessons to teach you about I.E.D.'s and boom boom vests -

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 01/21/2009

Hey Follow I bet the POWs in Vietnam wish all of that too. What does that have to do with the subject at hand? I'll try annd say this clear enough so you understand: We cannot criticize any other country, government or organization for doing things that we ourselves do. If we torture, we can't complain when they torture. When we grab people off the street and hold them with no charges, no trial and no access to lawyers or family, we can't complain when other's kidnap.

For the record, when you are putting an "s" after a word or acronym to make it plural, you don't use an apostrophe. "Boom boom vests"- is that a technical term?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 01/21/2009
- hopefullee I'm a Fan of hopefullee 2 fans permalink
photo

DontJustFollow-

Your posts suggest that you believe that the end justifies the means and that that Constitutional rights should only be followed when it's convenient.

I wonder if you would feel the same way if the government suddenly found YOUR Constitutional rights "inconvenient".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 01/21/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 25 fans permalink

The government admits that many of them are not even suspects. Those individuals are being held only because their home country will not take them, or worse, they will be subject to mistreatment or worse if sent back to their home country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 01/21/2009
photo

So we have suspended the trials of the individuals who confessed to being part of the 9/11 attacks? Again I want to stress the CONFESSED part. We should just release individuals who killed American soldiers so they can get back into the fight? Not surprised that you Obamunist would actually support a policy that would further danger our troops on the field of battle. If you libs are so against Club Gitmo then why don't you lobby your senators and congressman to take the terrorist into prisons in your own districts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 01/21/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 25 fans permalink

Has anyone suggested that the individuals who have confessed to being part of the 9/11 attacks should be released, or are you just putting words in everyone's collective mouth?

All that has been suggested is that a properly constituted legal system be used to deal with them. And if it finds that those confessions were obtained through torture you had better hope that there is other evidence on which to convict them. Otherwise you are no better than them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 01/21/2009

Apparently many of the prisoner's' confessions came about as a result of being TORTURED. Any such confession will be thrown out as evidence, as is the case in our DEMOCRACY. Likewise, any case proved to involve torture will be dismissed and the prisoner will be released. If an enemy combatant, those that tortured are responsible for the combatant's return to the "battlefield" See how torture BACKFIRES?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 01/22/2009
- murphy80 I'm a Fan of murphy80 9 fans permalink

a one year delay is pathetic..­..........­.......

sounds like a surge is planned............

bamboozelled by the generals already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 01/21/2009
- johnnyjust I'm a Fan of johnnyjust 6 fans permalink

Let 'em all go...they're all innocent, doncha' know?

Just ask them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 01/21/2009

No, some of them want to plead guilty, be executed and have their 27 virgins.

We can dispose of these in any court in the US, but instead of executing them, confine them for the rest of their lives with a bunch of non-virgins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 01/21/2009
photo

One year? That is pathetic!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 01/21/2009

"...no later then..."

Here is your basic Gitmo problem: if it is done poorly, it leaves the doors open for a repeat under another administration. I am pretty sure the Obama team has more in mind than to just close Gitmo. They want to construct a legal precedent that will eliminate this from happening again. Moreover, they have to be very careful. Some of the people in there are a real threat. They do have to be processed in such a way that we are both SAFE AND JUST or this will politically backfire in more than just one way.

The failure of the previous administration was to decapitate justice to achieve relative safety. That failure can not be undone by Obama, it can, at best, be repaired to some extent. If they take three months or six to do a good job about it, so be it. We had a six year long hack job already.

What I hope to see is that all cases will be stayed. It would show the world that the military justices are willing to err on the side of justice and not on the side of revenge. That this starts with a request, rather than an order, might be a professional move, politically as well as legally. Always use the smallest of your guns first, something we haven't seen in eight years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 01/21/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

wow you could shine gravel with that bs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 01/21/2009
- jdlund I'm a Fan of jdlund 7 fans permalink

Do you have any idea the logistical concerns that will have to go into closing the G-tmo prison facility? A year is pretty ambitious. Prisoner's files have to be reviewed, internal governmental and military issues must be addressed. You can't simply close the place down in a day. The point is the trials are halted and a dead line has been established. You simply have no clue as to how things work if you honestly think a year is pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 01/21/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

gwb could, but he is a war criminal for not

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 01/21/2009
- sanywhere I'm a Fan of sanywhere 2 fans permalink
photo

he is not a genie, he can not blink and have it all situated. how about you applaud that fact it is closing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 01/21/2009

They can't just close it tomorrow. These things take time. Chill out and be glad it's happening at all. Trials are halted in the meanwhile.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 01/21/2009

If the administration moves so slow in closing Guantanamo, imagine the footdraging that will accompany Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 01/22/2009
- NCRedhead I'm a Fan of NCRedhead 8 fans permalink
photo

Change is here! Something will be figured out...may not be perfect, but hey, day one and headed in the right direction. UN courts for those who are not US citizens could be an idea to consider. For those are clearly bad character but we have limited evidence.....maybe they could be confined to special facility for a few weeks where they must watch Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity all day! They may well kill themselves.....I sure would. Just dreaming as that clearly be considered torture under the Geneva Convention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 01/21/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

weird

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 01/21/2009
- RSU I'm a Fan of RSU 88 fans permalink
photo

Obama should just give them citizenship and $1 mill each and let them pick the state they wish to live in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 01/21/2009
- Jeff1958 I'm a Fan of Jeff1958 38 fans permalink
photo

After reading the article, that was the best you could come up with? Pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 01/21/2009
- anothermba I'm a Fan of anothermba 11 fans permalink
photo

How about swapping their citizenship for yours for making stupid pathetic remarks like this?
Have you heard of the writ of Habeas Corpus?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 01/21/2009

The problem with that is that few if any states will take some of these people. They might end up asking for political asylum in the US.

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 01/21/2009
- JanP I'm a Fan of JanP 25 fans permalink

John Murtha welcoems the "detainees" into jail in his county in Pennsylvania.

I suspect that Federal subsidies to hold them are what is on his mind...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 01/22/2009
- gfs5541 I'm a Fan of gfs5541 26 fans permalink
photo

Hey! The Gitmo "closeout" sale has begun!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 01/21/2009
- Lemmy I'm a Fan of Lemmy 19 fans permalink

Closing Club Gitmo? Three squares a day, prayer rugs, prayer oils, a nice, crisp fresh Koran. Send them back to thier home countries and let the decapitations begin . . at least for ther ones who don't make it back on to the battlefiled to kill Americans. At least Europe will like us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 01/21/2009
- sonofdy1 I'm a Fan of sonofdy1 3 fans permalink

Who is saying that they want these guys locked up or released in thier state?

Not in Utah thanks. Let them loose in New York City.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 01/21/2009
photo

Every State has maximum security prisons that handle people just as vicious as these are alleged to be. If the State prisons aren't sufficient to deal with the Guantanamo prisoners they aren't sufficient to deal with serial and mass murderers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 01/21/2009
- Lemmy I'm a Fan of Lemmy 19 fans permalink

Put them in the general pop. They'll see what torture actually is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 01/21/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

weird

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 01/21/2009

evidently you haven't riden in a cab in Manhattan, most of their cousins are already here collecting money for more martyrs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 01/21/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

is that you joe

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 01/21/2009
- bmermaid I'm a Fan of bmermaid 18 fans permalink
photo

I don't understand why they can't be put in the super max prison if they are so dangerous.
If they are demons on earth, put them on trial, then lock them up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 01/21/2009
- nethead I'm a Fan of nethead 4 fans permalink
photo

Because some of the cases have been tainted by torture and therefor we may not be able to convict them under current US law. It's a sticky mess that Bush left us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 01/21/2009
- RSU I'm a Fan of RSU 88 fans permalink
photo

Only three people have been water-boarded, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

Look them up . . . their really nice guys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 01/21/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect