Japan Launches Satellite, Ibuki, To Monitor Global Greenhouse Gases

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERIC TALMADGE | January 23, 2009 02:16 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
An H2A rocket, carrying the world's first greenhouse-gas monitoring satellite, takes off from the Tanegashima Space Center, southern Japan, Friday, Jan. 23, 2009. (AP Photo/Kyodo News)

TOKYO — Japan on Friday launched the first satellite to monitor greenhouse gases worldwide, a tool to help scientists better judge where global warming emissions are coming from, and how much is being absorbed by the oceans and forests.

The orbiter, together with a similar U.S. satellite to be launched next month, will represent an enormous leap in available data on carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere, now drawn from scattered ground stations.

"I'm saying Christmas is here," said an enthusiastic Inez Fung, an atmospheric scientist at the University of California, Berkeley. "Now we get about 100 observations every two weeks. With the satellite we'll get a million."

The satellite _ named "Ibuki," which means "breath" _ was sent into orbit along with seven other piggyback probes on a Japanese H2A rocket. Japan's space agency, JAXA, said the launch was a success, and officials said they were monitoring the satellites to ensure they entered orbit properly.

Ibuki, which will circle the globe every 100 minutes, is equipped with optical sensors that measure reflected light from the Earth to determine the density of the two gases.

Carbon dioxide, the biggest contributor to global warming, is emitted by the burning of fossil fuels by power plants, motor vehicles and other sources. Methane has a variety of sources, including livestock manure and rice cultivation.

International science agencies report that carbon dioxide emissions rose 3 percent worldwide from 2006 to 2007. If emissions are not reined in, a U.N. scientific panel says, average global temperatures will increase by 4 to 11 degrees Fahrenheit (2.4 to 6.3 degrees Celsius) by the year 2100, causing damaging disruptions to the climate.

"Global warming is one of the most pressing issues facing the international community, and Japan is fully committed to reducing CO2," said Yasushi Tadami, an official working on the project for Japan's Environment Ministry. "The advantage of Ibuki is that it can monitor the density of CO2 and methane gas anywhere in the world."

Story continues below
advertisement

Scientists currently depend on 282 land-based stations _ and scattered instrumented aircraft flights _ to monitor carbon dioxide at low altitudes. Ibuki, orbiting at an altitude of about 415 miles (670 kilometers), will be able to check gas levels in entire columns of atmosphere at 56,000 locations.

With the current ground-level network, "due to the relatively small number of locations, only large-scale regional averages could be determined" for greenhouse-gas emissions, said Swiss climatologist Fortunat Joos, of the University of Bern.

With satellite readings, he said, "one would perhaps be able to discriminate carbon emissions from different countries."

Such data could help negotiators in ongoing global climate talks to determine more precisely who would need to reduce emissions by how much to protect the climate.

"Basically, we're sort of doing detective work," said Fung. "We may be able to see fossil fuel emission hotspots."

The scientists said readings from space should also enable them to better understand carbon's movement through the atmosphere, and its inadequately understood absorption by oceans and forests, crucial to keeping warming from growing even worse than predicted.

The upcoming NASA satellite, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, will have more precise measurements because it will check only one gas, carbon dioxide, said David Crisp, that project's chief scientist. And its smaller observational target area will mean less chance of clouds contaminating sample results.

Having two satellites will allow researchers to double-check results, Crisp said.

"We need to understand what processes are controlling the amount of carbon dioxide today so that we can understand how fast CO2 will build up in the future," he said.

The launch of the piggyback satellites, from Tanegashima, a remote island about 600 miles (970 kilometers) southwest of Tokyo, was also seen as crucial to Japan's efforts to demonstrate that its domestically developed H2A rocket can compete in the global commercial launching business.

Japan has long been a leading space-faring nation, having launched its first satellite in 1970, but in recent years it has struggled to get out from under China's shadow and gain a hold in the global rocket-launching industry, which is dominated by Russia, the U.S. and Europe's Arianespace.

Earlier this month, Japan got its first commercial order, from South Korea, to launch a satellite on an H2A. Liftoff is scheduled after April 2011.

___

Associated Press writers Charles J. Hanley in New York and Shino Yuasa in Tokyo contributed to this report.

TOKYO — Japan on Friday launched the first satellite to monitor greenhouse gases worldwide, a tool to help scientists better judge where global warming emissions are coming from, and how much is...
TOKYO — Japan on Friday launched the first satellite to monitor greenhouse gases worldwide, a tool to help scientists better judge where global warming emissions are coming from, and how much is...
 
Comments
60
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- xabi I'm a Fan of xabi permalink

i guess they could start by self-monitoring their own gas exhaust from the rockets...for god's shake!

Ecofriendly search http://www.blackoogle.us

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 01/26/2009

The US mines 1.16 million short tons of coal each year. That's 1.05 billion kg. Which means that the country consumes about 120 tons of coal per hour.

In comparison the H-II rocket weighs 260 tons. So that means that if the H-II rocket were made of pure carbon, it would produce as much CO2 as 2.5 hours of our own coal use.

And if you care to think about it, you can easily figure out why me comparison is off the mark by an order of magnitude both ways...

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 01/26/2009
- xabi I'm a Fan of xabi permalink

thanks for your reply, i was just making a funny but not-really-serious remark, considering the picture used to illustrate the article ;) I obviously forsee the potential return of these missions in terms of applied scientific knowledge and enviromental research

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 01/26/2009
- MGhamma I'm a Fan of MGhamma 15 fans permalink

It won't be long before the denier crowd starts accusing the satellite of conspiring with the great socialist scientific conspiricy to RULE THE WORLD!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 01/25/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 161 fans permalink

The satellites are part of the conspiracy. They were programmed by Dr. Evil!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 01/25/2009
- KataVideo I'm a Fan of KataVideo 48 fans permalink
photo

could be worse. could run on diesel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 01/24/2009
- Clem2 I'm a Fan of Clem2 9 fans permalink

Uh, shouldn't launching satellites something you NOT do if you don't want greenhouse gases? Everytime I read about the military sending up the space shuttle I wonder how much damage that does to the atmosphere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 01/24/2009

Not much compared to civil aviation. The liquid propellants produce water vapor and the solid boosters make Aluminum oxide, N2, NOx and some CO and CO2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 01/24/2009

Ooops, forget the chlorine from the perchlorate and iron form the iron oxide. So you also get Aluminum chloride and probably some iron chlorides and oxides. Overall nothing one should breath in, but the heavy stuff washes out of the atmosphere quickly, leaving only the NOx and CO as major toxic components.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 01/24/2009
- daedelus I'm a Fan of daedelus 36 fans permalink
photo

How can scientific research hope to compete with barstool blather?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 01/23/2009

Does it have to? Can't we just keep researching while the rest of mankind works hard on removing their brain chemically?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 01/24/2009
- camper65 I'm a Fan of camper65 7 fans permalink

What an incredible waste of a perfectly good satellite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 01/23/2009

What would you have done with it? Use as a door stopper?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 01/23/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 27 fans permalink

Meanwhile, DSCOVER, NASA's Deep Space Climate Observatory,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triana_(satellite)
remains grounded in storage at a cost of $1 million a year, where it has languished since 2001, another legacy of B ush the Younger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 01/23/2009
- jake106 I'm a Fan of jake106 4 fans permalink

And Clinton, of course. I mean...I'd hate to attach another name to your hatred other than Bush, but there it is. A rather glaring and obvious problem with your "logic".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 01/23/2009
- msjimmied I'm a Fan of msjimmied 53 fans permalink
photo

I would suggest we stop the blame and just send the darn thing into space so we can see for ourselves the damage we are doing. Stem cell research, climate change and lord knows what else we have put on the back burner while the world moves forward.

To the Japanese..."Domo Arigato"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 01/24/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 27 fans permalink

Oh, I see, so it was Clinton in office since Triana/DSCOVER was completed and ready to launch in 2001.

Guess "logic" is not quite what you think it is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 01/24/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 161 fans permalink

Question - slightly off subject. When scientists point out that our present warming is not due to solar activity like in the article below, are they talking about the 12 year solar cycle with the sun spots or the Milankovic cycles or both?

http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/30/study-suns-contribution-to-recent-warming-is-negligible/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 AM on 01/25/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 27 fans permalink

Both, RP.

The three Milankovic cycles operate on very long time spans of 10s of thousands of years. For the current interglacial they peaked around 6000 years ago, so they are actually leading into a long, slow cooling. But *not* to another glacial staid, apparently, as the current cycle configuration mirrors the one 400,000 years ago with an exceptionally long interglacial of around 40,000 years. The next glacial staid won't happen until the next low in the cycle in around 30,000 years.

Re the nominal 11 year sun spot cycle (it ranges from near 10 to near 12 years), look at the third graph in that Climate Progress article showing solar irradiance. Note the difference in watts per square meter between the peak and trough of the last three sun spot cycles: it has ranged between around 1365.5 to around 1367 w/m^2, a difference of around 1.5 w/m^2, while the rise in the mean since 1900 has been less than 1 w/m^2. But note that there has been no significant increase over the last three cycles (aprox 30 years).

Meanwhile, greenhouse gas increases have accelerated over those last three sun spot cycles. Over the same time the added forcing from the increase in all greenhouse gases has been around 2.6 w/m^2, with has been offset by about 1 w/m^2 of negative forcing from aerosols. continued....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 01/25/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 27 fans permalink

...continued

There is a third factor: a very slow increase in the solar constant, but it is measured in millions of years, so it has near zero effect on decade and even century timescales.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 01/25/2009
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 151 fans permalink

I like the idea that this satellite may enable by direct observation the determination of which countries are emitting how much green house gases. The better our oberservations, the better our ability to predict the future, and to assign responsibility.

Scientists have recently declared that China has surpassed the United States as a greenhouse gas emitter. Perhaps the data from this satellite will help convince their leaders to take greater corrective action.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 01/23/2009

The Chinese know exactly how much coal, natural gas and oil they burn. So that's not the problem. Monitoring methane and other gases is not quite so straight forward. But I don't think science data alone will convince the Chinese to use less energy. They have no real choice because per capita energy use is relatively low.

Where they do have choices is to let us help them to clean up their environment. But that, of course, requires that we are willing to talk to them about the problem as one country that burns too much to another country that also burns too much. Cooperation is the key.

Saving face and, even better, looking good in the process, those are the important things that we need to offer them in the right way. I hope the Obama administration has experts on the Chinese psyche and they will listen to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 01/23/2009
- Exusian I'm a Fan of Exusian 27 fans permalink

Except that a large portion of China's greenhouse gas emissions are actually outsourced US greenhouse gas emissions:
http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/22/us-carbon-dioxide-emissions-growth-bush-china-co2/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 01/23/2009

It's about time Japan picked up the tab for space exploration. The U.S. will be glad to hand it over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 01/23/2009

Not even close. The Japanese have been trying quite hard, but they had their fair share of bad luck with it. It will be interesting to see if their space program will manage to stabilize. One can only hope so because the more players there are, the more interesting science one can expect. But space is a very cruel engineering problem, utterly unforgiving, and it takes a lot of effort to make it work. I wish them good luck!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 01/23/2009
- 11907281 I'm a Fan of 11907281 15 fans permalink
photo

Your comment makes no sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

You're right! I like logic, but whoa! This one got me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 01/23/2009
- Ajita I'm a Fan of Ajita 92 fans permalink
photo

This is the kind of illiterate nationalism that bothers the rest of the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 01/23/2009

All the same, lets hope that Japan is, at least, collaborating with the U.S. on a marine-based, anti-missile system which could deter NORTH KOREAN--and, perhaps, PRC--geopolitical coersion(sp?)....!!!

Whether nationalism is irksome or not, Japan's "quirky" neighbours require the exercise of cautious self-interest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 AM on 01/24/2009
- Takae I'm a Fan of Takae 10 fans permalink

...this is a joke, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 01/24/2009
- Kula I'm a Fan of Kula permalink

I'm sure the taxpayers of Japan will be pleased their hard earned dollars are being wasted on this colossal waste of time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 01/23/2009
- crablover I'm a Fan of crablover 21 fans permalink

Still doubt global warming despite the scientific evidence? You'd better move inland and fast.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 01/23/2009
- camper65 I'm a Fan of camper65 7 fans permalink

Sucker!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 01/23/2009

And your theory about global warming is...?

PPFF

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 01/23/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 611 fans permalink
photo

Most of the global warming/evolution/round-earth "theory" deniers are in the US. I bet most Japanese are more than happy their country is actually doing something to protect the environment...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 01/23/2009
- 11907281 I'm a Fan of 11907281 15 fans permalink
photo

Japan is not in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 01/23/2009

Who is John Galt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 01/23/2009

Ultimately, there will be carbon footprint limitations, international laws and, finally, harsh consequences for those who "step" over the carbon footprint line. The spy-in-the-sky thing worries me though. I mean, we all know how satellites are used to discern and then send missle-laden drones to deal with those in Pakistan who are plotting harm to U.S. citizens. I'd hate to think that on a really hot summer day, if I was drinking a very large glass of orange juice whose carbon footprint was over the limit, that that glass of OJ could be my last...

Pass the seltzer, pleeeze.
Plot Plot Fizz Fizz

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

Add vodka and you will not have to worry about a thing...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 01/23/2009

Good one, OneVoice ;-)
...But now you've got me worried about the carbon footprint of POTATOES! (Spuds are used in making vodka, right...?) It all gives new meaning to the old "duck and cover" drills. Duck and...cover your drink! PPFF

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

TOKYO — Japan on Friday launched the first satellite to monitor greenhouse gases worldwide, a tool to help scientists better judge where global warming emissions are coming from, and how much is being absorbed by the oceans and forests.

The orbiter, which relased 1,000 billion metric tons of CO2, or ten billion year's worth of a family of four's carbon footprint, is a real step forward, according to authorities.

"I'm saying Christmas is here," said an enthusiastic Inez Fung, an atmospheric scientist at the University of California, Berkeley. "Who cares if we're responsible for the end of the world? We got $20 million in grant money from the U.S. last year."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 01/23/2009

"The orbiter, which relased 1,000 billion metric tons of CO2, or ten billion year's worth of a family of four's carbon footprint, is a real step forward, according to authorities. "

HUH????

Just cuz you bookend an absurd statement with two quotes from the article doesn't make it so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

You all need to lighten up. Really, it must be terrible to be so serious all the time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 01/23/2009
- JamesSB I'm a Fan of JamesSB 3 fans permalink

"1,000 billion metric tons of CO2?"

Huh? You think the rocket runs on a combustion engine? A bunch of Ford F-150 engines powering the rocket? Its nitrogen, you fool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 01/23/2009

Good to see another non-math-challenged comment.

1000 Billion = 1 Trillion metric tons. According to http://oto2.wustl.edu/bbears/trajcom/carbon3.htm

The TOTAL amount of carbon (as CO2) in the atmosphere is about 720 billion tons.

So this rocket single-handedly more than doubled the CO2 in the entire atmosphere? I'm guessing that there were probably solid rocket motors that release some CO2, but nowhere near the figure stated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 01/23/2009

Another person who announces publicly that they have failed math class. Give Beachrunner a good cheer boys!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 01/23/2009
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 151 fans permalink

It is likely that the boosters pictured on the sides of the main rocket were solid fuel, which might have produced some CO2, depending on the actual fuel used.

The Japanese H2A main engine is liquid fueled, and uses liquid oxygen (O2) and liquid hydrogen (H2), the combusting of which does not yield CO2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 01/23/2009

Thanks for that info. I'm sure the solid rockets produce stuff you wouldn't necessarily like to breath, plus the CO2.

I'm no chemistry genius, but I know you can't mix H and O and end up with C.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

Pray tell, what is your point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 01/23/2009

Have the satellite spend a lot of time over China.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 01/23/2009
- myna I'm a Fan of myna 17 fans permalink

Among the emissions the Ibuki sensors and records will be its own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 01/23/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect