William Lynn, Obama's First Ethics Exception, Causing Massive Headaches

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - William Lynn, Obama's First Ethics Exception, Causing Massive Headaches stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 01-23-09 08:14 PM   |   Updated: 05-21-09 02:11 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Bo

With reporting by Stuart Whatley

The nomination of William Lynn as Deputy Secretary of Defense has placed Barack Obama under the burn of political heat just days into the presidency.

Having lobbied the government on behalf of the defense industry giant Raytheon, Lynn's appointment violates the newly-instituted ethics guidelines that the president applied to his staff shortly after taking office. Questioned about the transgression, the White House said Lynn was being granted a waiver.

But there is a second layer to the Lynn issue that also is leaving a bad taste in the mouths of Democrats, good government groups and Republicans eager to cry hypocrisy. Raytheon is no mom-and-pop defense contractor shop. It is the type of industry behemoth that protesters of the Iraq invasion bemoaned for profiting off of the war and encouraging militarization. And as the man who led "the company's strategic planning and [oversaw] the government relations activity," Lynn was intimately involved.

A former employee of DFI International -- a D.C. consulting firm -- Lynn joined Raytheon in August 2002 and was elected an officer in May 2005. The firm and its subsidiaries are a major force on Capitol Hill, having spent more than $14.5 million on federal lobbying activities during the six years Lynn was working there, according to a review of lobbying records. Raytheon worked to lobby the House, Senate, DARPA, Defense Department, Energy Department, Treasury Department, State Department, and others on issues ranging from long-range guided munitions, sea based missile defense and joint standoff weapon systems.

The government outreach efforts seemed to pay dividends. Raytheon Company received more than $54 billion in contracts from the federal government during that time period, according to fedspending.org, a project of OMB Watch. This doesn't include the potentially billions more that the company was awarded as a subcontractor or part of a group contract.

During the time period, Raytheon provided a myriad of important services in US war zones. However, it was not immune to its share of controversy, some of it involving allegations of improper billing practices, some focused on the work the company did for foreign governments. The Project on Government Oversight has documented at least 17 instances of fraud on Raytheon's part that cost the company more than $475 million in settlements.

Lynn, who on Friday pledged to drop his stock holdings in the company should he end up at Defense, was an advocate for more transparency when it came to accounting practices. He told the Defense News in January 2003 that putting defense contracts online would allow the Pentagon to provide "a measure of your quality of information."

Story continues below
advertisement

"It is an internal test of your information system and reassurance to the public that taxpayer dollars are being spent well," he said.

And yet, for Democrats and good government groups alike, his nomination represents the very pitfall that Obama's ethics policy was meant to avoid. Moreover, they ask, if Obama were going to make an exception, why choose such a high-powered lobbyist whose government work overlaps significantly with the interests of his former firm.

"If that is the policy you are going to announce you have to actually live with it," said one incredulous Democrat, "and for your first exception to be a defense contractor from Raytheon?"

Added Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics In Washington: "I feel this is inconsistent and inappropriate and I think they need to pull Bill Lynn. And, again, it is not personal thing. It is the standard being set. Hold yourself to the standard. If you can't live with it than change it."

Already some have begun questioning whether the Lynn nomination will survive congressional scrutiny, and wondering why Obama chose him in the first place. Raytheon, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, donated slightly more than $100,000 to the president's campaign and the DNC -- a pittance both for the company and the campaign.

Lynn was not, prior to this week, a widely known political figure. But his background, outside of Raytheon, is extensive and impressive. He served for four years as the Under Secretary of Defense, was the director of program analysis in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and was awarded three DoD medals for distinguished public service. In addition, he has extensive history on Capitol Hill, having served for six years under Sen. Ted Kennedy.

On Thursday, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called him a "uniquely qualified" individual who shouldn't be precluded from serving "the public interest in these critical times." On Friday, Gibbs added that the waivers like the one granted to Lynn to serve in the Obama White House would be "limited" in their number.

With reporting by Stuart Whatley The nomination of William Lynn as Deputy Secretary of Defense has placed Barack Obama under the burn of political heat just days into the presidency. Having lobbied...
With reporting by Stuart Whatley The nomination of William Lynn as Deputy Secretary of Defense has placed Barack Obama under the burn of political heat just days into the presidency. Having lobbied...
 
Comments
1086
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (21 pages total)

I truly don't get it. One of the biggest forces driving us into war was the corporate profiteering. Business allies of President Bush made a killing (literally) with our incursion into Iraq.

What kind of message does President Obama, who I vigorously supported, send with an appointment like this? There was nobody better?

I am trying not to be disappointed this early into the presidency, but there are some serious mis-steps occurring within the administration.

This is yet another one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 02/02/2009
- dagdavid I'm a Fan of dagdavid 10 fans permalink
photo

Don' t just give Obama or any other politician a pass. I did what I could to help Obama get elected and I am thrilled he is our president, but there can BE NO COMPROMISE when it comes to ethics, especially where lobbying is concerned. A waiver here and a waiver there and - you guessed it - BUSH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 01/26/2009

Obama's not much of a "chess thinker is he?". A president making a move like this is a political "checkmate".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 AM on 01/26/2009
- senorlou I'm a Fan of senorlou 106 fans permalink

OK. I've been against this pick all weekend, just like a whole lot of people on this site. Obama is not dumb. I haven't heard him personally explain this pick yet - if anybody has a link of him doing so, link it now. If he really thinks this guy is so important he would give him a pass on his own rule - the first rule he makes - to get away from lobbyists and then to pick one who made millions in the criminal War in Iraq - he must have a damn good reason. I'd love to hear it. Until I do, I'm hoping he doesn't pick this guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 01/25/2009
- Dameocrat I'm a Fan of Dameocrat 2 fans permalink

Our press, likes a strongman, whether it Democrat or a Republican. It doesn't matter. The only time the report on their foibles is if they have sex with someone. They don't care about honesty, or good governance or propriety or democracy, just the "dear leader!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 01/25/2009
- senorlou I'm a Fan of senorlou 106 fans permalink

A lot of people didn't see this kind of thing coming. I'm not part of the press, but it surprised me, that's for sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 01/25/2009

I respectfully beg do differ. I'd wager the 60 million people (including me) who did not vote for Obama saw this coming from a mile away. It suprises me not at all that Obama is just another politician. His exceptionalism lies in his charisma, not in anything he has done.

There is the world in which we'd like to live in and the world in which we do. Candidate Obama was able to govern in that world in which we'd all like to live. President Obama must govern in the world in which we live. In doing so, he'll alienate a lot of people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 01/28/2009
- Dameocrat I'm a Fan of Dameocrat 2 fans permalink

He shouldn't have made the rule against hiring lobbyists if he was going to do this. That is just hypocrisy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 01/25/2009
- Dameocrat I'm a Fan of Dameocrat 2 fans permalink

Is anyone concerned that these people aren't just rivals. They are actually bloodsocked enemies of progressive values.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 01/25/2009
photo

Can you say hypocrite? It will be interesting to see how long the millions of people who voted for Barack Obama, and the media who did not bother to hold him to any accountability, will continue "the Barack Obama love syndrome" -- maintaining an infatuation for their ideal of Obama rather than the reality of who he is and will become now that he is in power. Already it seems he is a President who believes that as President he can bend the rules when it comes to his Presidential decisions. Sound familiar? Well, it should. His decision to appoint a lobbyist as one of the most powerful people in Washington is no change at all. When Obama is willing to put ethics aside as one of his first decisions as President of the United States it tells us a great deal about his own ethics. Frankly, it saddens me for America and the people who put their trust in him. Apparently, the "Yes We Can" is more of "Yes I Can" because I am the President. Where is the ethics of leadership he promised the American people?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 01/25/2009
- senorlou I'm a Fan of senorlou 106 fans permalink

It does sound familiar, and it is very disappointing. The honeymoon is over for me now. Was nice while it lasted - 3 or 4 days. I'm still glad he won.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 01/25/2009
- conniedogs I'm a Fan of conniedogs 13 fans permalink

Totally, totally agree!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 01/26/2009

You said just about everything I wanted to say --- thanks for saving me the effort in coming up with these very words!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 AM on 01/26/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

It was a stretch anyways to apply ethics to what goes on in the Pentagon. Rumsfeld, Feith, Perle. Ethics? They need fumigation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 01/25/2009
photo

Oh Puhleeze.

Lobbyists are not evil and BO is starting to see that. The problem is that there is no way to run a campaign (unless you're phenomena like BO or have campaign finance reform) without their money. Lobbyists are actually good for our country. They educate and provide information on specific industry or interest needs--nothing wrong with that. Unions have them, artists have them even the environmental groups have them.

BO is starting to grow out of the mantra that lobbyists are evil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 01/25/2009
- senorlou I'm a Fan of senorlou 106 fans permalink

You mentioned artists and environmentalists. We're talking about a lobbyist for Raytheon who worked there from 2002-2008, all Bush years, majority of them during the Iraq War. He was given stock in the company, which as I'm sure you can guess went way up. Raytheon made $54 billion in government contracts when Lynn was there. Lynn just sold the stock to join Obama, where he will continue to work with Raytheon, and will be having a say in major government defense contracts. It's hard to understand how anyone against the Iraq War could be happy about this pick. I'm sure Obama has his reasons, but he should explain why he is doing this. It looks really bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 01/25/2009

While I find it a little difficult to believe Lynn is th eonly person to handle this job, and I'm disappointed that Obama made an exception to his ethic's guidelines, I trust also Robert Gates knows what he is doing by asking for Lynn and will do a good job under Obama as he continues in the office of Secretary of Defense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 01/25/2009
- zanbama I'm a Fan of zanbama 13 fans permalink
photo

Who cares what LYnn did at Raytheon. Can he work for us and follow through on what want.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 AM on 01/25/2009

Meet the new boss...same as the old boss.


Suckers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 AM on 01/25/2009
- protagonia I'm a Fan of protagonia 77 fans permalink

Too soon to tell and you know it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 01/25/2009

For some. For others,not caught up in the cult of personality that is Obama,it is just further confirmation of our misgivings concerning your messiah. He will continue to disappoint,just wait and see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 01/25/2009
- senorlou I'm a Fan of senorlou 106 fans permalink

From the Article

- - Having lobbied the government on behalf of the defense industry giant Raytheon, Lynn's appointment violates the newly-instituted ethics guidelines that the president applied to his staff shortly after taking office. Questioned about the transgression, the White House said Lynn was being granted a waiver. - -

THe article says the appointment would VIOLATE THE NEWLY INSTITUTED ETHICS GUIDELINES.

- - A former employee of DFI International -- a D.C. consulting firm -- Lynn joined Raytheon in August 2002 and was elected an officer in May 2005. The firm and its subsidiaries are a major force on Capitol Hill, having spent more than $14.5 million on federal lobbying activities during the six years Lynn was working there, according to a review of lobbying records - -

He was working for Raytheon DURING THE IRAQ WAR 2002-2008

- - The government outreach efforts seemed to pay dividends. Raytheon Company received more than $54 billion in contracts from the federal government during that time period, according to fedspending.org, a project of OMB Watch. This doesn't include the potentially billions more that the company was awarded as a subcontractor or part of a group contract. - -

$14.5 mil in bribery money to get well over $54 bil in contracts during Bush's criminal war. The article doesn't bother to say how much his salary was - how much total paid over the 6 years he worked there 2002-2008, nor how much many shares and the value of his STOCK

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 01/25/2009
photo

This is definitely a hiccup in an amazing week otherwise, though the stimulus needs less tax breaks and more infrastructure investment. If Obama wants to avoid the same freshman mistakes Clinton had he'll pull Lynn. He's shown that he's in command and decisive right now, but obstinance in the face of mounting criticism that he's a hyprocite when it comes to living up to his own espoused principles is not a smart move.

It's smarter to admit this appointment is misguided. One of Bush's most annoying qualities was his inability to ever admit he was wrong. Obama has the political capital and confidence now where he should know he'll come out of this looking good if the mistake is admitted and Lynn moves on. Wonder when he'll pull himself from consideration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 01/25/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (21 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect