Blagojevich, Rachel Maddow Interview: "I'm The Anti-Nixon" (UPDATED WITH FULL VIDEO)

***UPDATED WITH FULL VIDEO, SCROLL DOWN***

Embattled Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich defended himself against corruption charges on the Rachel Maddow Show tonight. The interview was wide-ranging and covered topics including Roland Burris and Blagojevich's legal strategy. According to a transcript sent out by the Maddow show, Blagojevich vehemently denied that he was in effect selling Obama's senate seat to the highest bidder. During the grilling by Maddow, Blagojevich called himself the "anti-Nixon" because he wants every tape to be played in court as a full airing of the wiretaps will prove his innocence:

I want every tape. Every one of them. Every taped conversation to be heard so the whole story can be heard in the full context. Conversations, ideas, thoughts, potential senators here, potential senators there. How do we get results for people? All those conversations would be, in my judgment, ought to be heard so that everybody hears the right story. I consider myself the anti-Nixon. Remember, during Watergate, Richard Nixon fought every step of the way to keep his tapes from being heard. And then, finally, he ran out of-- roadblocks, the Supreme Court ruled he had to release those tapes, and there was one that showed that he had obstructed justice.

This is just the latest stop on Blagojevich's whirlwind media tour. Yesterday Blago visited by "The View" where he refused a request to do an impression of Richard Nixon's famous line, "I'm not a crook!" For complete coverage of all things Blagojevich, visit HuffPost's Rod Blagojevich BigNews Page.

Watch the full interview courtesy of MSNBC.

Part 1

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Part 2

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Part 3

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Part 4

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Story continues below

advertisement

The transcript of the interview is below.

RACHEL MADDOW: Gov. Blagojevich, thank you for being here. It's nice of you to take the time.

BLAGOJEVICH:
Thank you.

RACHEL MADDOW:
You have handled this ordeal with a lot of political skill-- so far. The-- this-- this media tour that you have done in New York has really effectively overshadowed a lot of what's going on in the Illinois state senate right now. I would also say that your appointment of Roland Burris to the senate seat-- it-- it was accepted by the senate, which was a big embarrassment to the US senators who said that they would not accept him. Those are politically skillful moves. Do you feel like-- weirdly, in-- in a way, that you're sort of winning? That there's a chance you might, politically, survive this ordeal?

BLAGOJEVICH:
No, I don't. I-- I-- I think-- the fix is into the state senate. Unless they change their rules and give me a chance to defend myself. And-- most importantly, give the people of Illinois, who've elected me twice to office, a chance to bring all the evidence that's relevant to show that I've done nothing wrong. Every taped conversation. Witnesses from Rahm Emmanuel to Dick Durbin to Harry Reid to Senator Menendez to Valerie Jarett. Every single witness who-- might testify-- in-- in-- at a criminal case, bring them all in now. Because I'd like the whole truth to come out sooner rather than later. And let that senate impeachment process-- take-- what it's doing and honestly-- and objectively determine whether or not there was anything done that was wrong. And once they hear the whole story they'll find out that I didn't do anything wrong, and I did a lot of things right.

* * *

RACHEL MADDOW:
Well, are-- do you see it as a good thing or a bad thing that we actually got the audio tapes of some of the wiretapped conversations played today in the senate? That is something new. It just happened today. Are you happy that those tapes were played? Do you want more of them to be played?

BLAGOJEVICH:
I want every tape. Every one of them. Every taped conversation to be heard so the whole story can be heard in the full context. Conversations, ideas, thoughts, potential senators here, potential senators there. How do we get results for people? All those conversations would be, in my judgment, ought to be heard so that everybody hears the right story. I consider myself the anti-Nixon. Remember, during Watergate, Richard Nixon fought every step of the way to keep his tapes from being heard. And then, finally, he ran out of-- roadblocks, the Supreme Court ruled he had to release those tapes, and there was one that showed that he had obstructed justice.

I want just the opposite. I want them all heard, now, right away, so the (NOISE) whole story can be heard. Because I know, I know that I-- I-- I-- I never had a conversation where intended to violate any law. And I know that I didn't break any law. And so what I'd like is a chance to be able to get that done sooner rather than later. And before those senators throw out a governor who was elected twice by the people they ought to give the people's governor, who was elected by them, a fair opportunity to do what every citizen has the right to do, and that is to confront witnesses, and be able to show that if someone said you did something wrong you didn't do something wrong.

* * *

RACHEL MADDOW:
I-- I-- do you agree that it would be-- it would be wrong, it would be criminal-- for you to try to exchange Barack Obama's US senate seat, that appointment, for something that would be of value to you. You agree that that would be wrong.

BLAGOJEVICH:
Oh, absolutely.

RACHEL MADDOW:
Yeah. Did--

BLAGOJEVICH:
A personal-- you know, one for the other personal gain?

RACHEL MADDOW:
Yeah.

BLAGOJEVICH:
Absolutely.

RACHEL MADDOW:
And you didn't do that?

BLAGOJEVICH:
Absolutely not.

RACHEL MADDOW:
Well, on the wiretaps, you're quoted saying, "It's a bleeping valuable thing. You don't just give it away for nothing. If they're not going to offer anything of value I might just take it. I've got this thing and it's bleeping golden. I'm not just giving it up for bleeping nothing." In what possible context could you say-- say things like that if you weren't trying to exchange something of value for the senate seat? What-- what other context would make--

(OVERTALK)

BLAGOJEVICH:
Well, let me answer that two ways. First, I can't comment specifically on that, 'cause I haven't heard those tapes. But assuming that's what it is, if you hear all the tapes, and you hear the whole thing in its context, if I feared that that was something sinister or onerous would I want all those tapes heard? And, in addition to that, just playing devil's advocate, I'm not-- not acknowledging that that's-- actually were on the tapes, 'cause we haven't had a chance to hear it. But playing the devil's advocate in assuming it was. Why can't the construction of that be I want them to help me pass a public works program, a jobs program, that the Democratic speaker, Mr. Madigan, has been blocking. I want them to help me help 45,000 working people get healthcare that the Democratic speaker in the house has been blocking. I want them to help me have a law that requires insurance companies to cover people with preexisting medical conditions that the Democratic speaker has been blocking. In--

RACHEL MADDOW:
Even if you want-- even if you wanted food for the hungry, I-- I mean, even if you wanted justice itself in exchange for the senate seat, you're not supposed to exchange anything for the senate seat.

(OVERTALK)

BLAGOJEVICH:
Well, I don't-- I don't-- I don't disagree that one for the other isn't. But there's-- there are-- political negotiations and leveraging-- which is all very much part of the process. And, again, if those tapes were all heard you'd hear discussions-- that I had with people from-- five senior senators-- Senator Dick Durban about facilitating-- Senator Menendez. Harry Reid and I discussed the senate seat. Heck of a lot of other people. And I-- I would like every one of them to be able to testify under oath, sworn testimony, in that impeachment trial about the context and nature of those conversations.

RACHEL MADDOW:
Are you saying, though, that they would testify as to what you were trying to get in exchange for the appointment?

BLAGOJEVICH:
I-- I'm simply saying, if-- if they told the truth, they'd be part of a big story and a larger story, that would, I think, show-- you know, that there were a lot of ideas talked about. That we explored different options. We looked and tried to think outside the box, like Oprah Winfrey, for example. Some ideas were good. Some were stupid. Some you can't do. Just natural discussions when you're trying to-- get a results that ultimately leads to the place that's right for people. And when this whole story's told it's gonna show the decisions and all the rest, ultimately, we're about putting people to work, expanding healthcare, and holding the line on taxes for middle class families.

RACHEL MADDOW:
When-- when you-- again, this is from the wiretapped calls, and I realize you're not gonna testify to their veracity. But they are out there, and the transcripts are there, and some of them were played today in the senate. Speaking about Barack Obama's advisors, "They're not willing to give me anything but appreciation in exchange for the senate seat. Bleep them." What would you want other than appreciation? What-- what could be kosher to exchange for a senate seat?

BLAGOJEVICH:
Well, how about helping us pass healthcare and a jobs bill? And helping the people of Illinois. Don't just leave Illinois now. And--

RACHEL MADDOW:
I will appoint person X instead of person Y unless you do this (UNINTEL) favor for me?

BLAGOJEVICH:
No, no, the-- no, the one-- for the other is not-- that-- that's not what I'm saying. I'm simply saying-- I'm in a political business. When Barack Obama agrees to raise $10 million for Hillary Clinton to get out of the race that's the natural political sort of thing that happens in this business. It's appropriate. Nothing that you-- improper about it. Again, in the full context, discussions and the explorations of ideas and thoughts and whether you could or couldn't do something-- you-- you should be able to do that in a free country that guarantees the right of free speech. Especially when you're doing it in what you think is the sanctity of your home, and you want to do it out of your home phone, because you don't want any interconnection with the government's lines, so somebody thinks you're talking politics on a government phone. Again, when the whole story is-- is heard, and put in the proper context, I think you'll see a process that ultimately-- ultimately would-- would lead in the right place.

* * *

RACHEL MADDOW:
You-- have become a national figure in a way that I'm sure was not the way that you wanted to become a national figure. Are you mad?

BLAGOJEVICH:
I-- I'm not mad. I-- I'm philosophical about it. Dr. King had a quote. Said that, "In the end, you remember not the words of your enemies, but the silence of your friends." And when something like this happens to you it's-- it becomes very lonely. And people who were in your office just the day before, people who were calling constantly 'cause they had needs and wants, and were excessively obsequious, and if this was a private conversation I'd have another way to say it. Kissing-- you know, once this happened, you know, they're nowhere to be found. And-- and-- and if you try to call them they wouldn't call back, so you know you don't even bother calling them. But I-- that's kind of part of this business. And I-- I-- I understand a lot of it. That's why Harry Truman said if, in Washington it applied to politics, and if you want a friend get a dog. And that's why you-- you find comfort with your family. And, for us, my wife and I, the most difficult part is, our two daughters. Our little girls. And my-- our 12 year old especially, who is a lot more aware of what's happening. And our little five year old. And-- and that's another reason why, you know, I'm simply not gonna-- I'm not gonna acknowledge things that aren't true, or say that I did something wrong when I didn't. Because I don't want to shame my children. And-- much better for their father to fight to the very end for principles that are bigger than him, and this one is the office of the governor. And the right to be able to show he didn't do anything wrong (UNINTEL) taken away from the people of Illinois than to simply accept something and-- and somehow look like you did something wrong when you didn't. So-- you know, the chances are I'll be looking for work in the next several days. But we'll get on. And I'll vindicate myself. The truth will come out.

RACHEL MADDOW:
You'll be working fulltime on your criminal defense, after this.

BLAGOJEVICH:
I-- I--

RACHEL MADDOW:
If--

BLAGOJEVICH:
I need to find some, you know, I'll have to find some employment in some place. And-- and-- and-- and I'll-- I'll-- I'll do that. We'll rebuild our lives. And we're not unlike the tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people across America who, unfortunately, are losing their jobs, because this economy is so bad. And, like them, we'll get back to basics and-- we'll begin this process of rebuilding our lives.

Comments

[scottymac11]

She grilled him like a cheese sandwich.

[protagonia]

Throw Blago to the gators, and sell tickets for it to bump up the economy.

THEN, let us get back to America's ACTUAL problems.

[northcan]

Rachel Maddow is first rate, excellent and straight forward. I hardly miss a night and last night was very telling. He loves hearing his own voice, so I do think Illinois should let him speak tomorrow right into Fitzgerald's hands. I see a lot of anger behind those eyes.

[TheKidd]

I 've said it before and i'll say it again, he's trying to pull a "Clay Davis" from The Wire. And i'm ashamed to say that i'm starting to like the guy...

[jimrs6]

sheeeeeeeet

[Clare53]

He's a mentally ill ewok.

[RTIII]

I finally listened - days late, I know.

However two things struck me, one surprised, the other not.

First and foremost: Rachel is a first rate: Journalist, interviewer, progressive, person ... I could go on.

Second, I expected something else from Blagojevich; he was remarkably reasonable and likable. He even made a lot of sense.

Additionally, if he's right about the impeachment process in IL, it needs fixing - what an embarrassment for Illinois.

Finally, he's right about the loss of the presumption of innocence. The prosecution _broke_the_law_ in outing the tapes, by the way, folks. They are evidence for a criminal proceeding... The prosecution probably can't use whatever it is they've published. Hence, even if he is guilty, from a criminal perspective, he will likely walk. So, then, it's all about the politics. And on that score, he's doing a great job defending himself in the body of public opinion....

Time will tell.

For me, it's just entertainment. This is _not_ an issue of national concern, thankfully.
.

[one4obama]

You must not be from Illinois.

[RTIII]

You are correct. ...What gave me away, my New Orleanian accent?
.

[ElkoJohn]

better to have a crooked Gov.
who advocates for seniors buying their expensive meds from Canada
than a ''straight'' Gov.
in the pocket of the large pharmaceuticals

[cdsister]

I think the Gov. is talking his way into the very corner he thought he could talk his way out of. He has obviously never watched Rachael's show! He would have never gone on if he had seen her interviews with other people in politics. It is becoming more apparent that he has lost touch with reality and thinks his old tried and true methods can save him.
To the comment that Rachael should not have interviewed him and that she is gloating over the Obama win...snap out of it! She only gloated a little, otherwise she has covered the topics of the day with professional ease. The interview with Blagojevich is totally timely and to point! The man is being impeached, daaaa! I think she got him to say things he never thought he would. She looked mildly sympathetic and she never fawned.

[rmetz74]

I am amazed at the number of people defending this guy (and criticizing Maddow for doing the kind of journalism we've been screaming for for a decade.)

As she points out, there is no rational possible context for the things he said on those tapes... (And as for his claim that he hasn't heard them, obviously he was doing the talking, so unless he was deaf or insane at the time, he's heard the content of the tapes at least once.)

There is nothing noble about his wanting the tapes to be made public. He knows perfectly well that's not possible, because they're evidence in a pending criminal trial - he says himself he can't talk about the specifics of the case. So why is he doing it? Because it's a cheap way to sound innocent with no danger of having his bluff called. Why is he boycotting his own impeachment trial? As a politician and former prosecutor, he knows he's not entited to a jury, because impeachment trials are different than criminal trials. As Rachel points out, he could make statements in his defense - yet he refuses. Why? Because he's counting on the public not to know the difference between criminal and impeachment trials. He's decided to try to clear his name in a public forum, where there's no penalty for lying.

Personally, I think the man is a sociopath, and that Rachel did exactly what more journalists should do - ask the substantive questions everyone wants asked.

[loislane88]

And with his crazed media frenzy this week, he may be trying to ensure that he can't get a fair trial because now EVERYONE thinks he's guilty.

[rmetz74]

Exactly. I have no doubt that's his goal.

[RonNYC]

if rachel wears that grey jacket with the white piping one more time, i am going to scream.
can't she afford clothes??

[bog]

you make it sound like it matters. men when the same basic thing every day, nobody complains. she there for her intelligence and humour not her fashion sense or hairstyle.

[blaharumph]

eactly. she has mentioned in interviews that she keeps it simple and wants people to focus on the broadcast as she is not a talking head.

[cougarsrus]

I second this. I love it that she's not all about the clothes and hair.

[one4obama]

Shallow is a word that suits you to a "T"!

[gotborked]

...a battle for worst coiffure on tv.

[one4obama]

You are "Shallow" #2.

[jimrs6]

Blago finally found a show where he won the hair battle.

[classc 1]

Are people falling for Blago's nonsense? Has anyone looked at the counts of the Articles of Impeachement other than the one dealing with the attempted sale of Obama's seat? He is accused of far-reaching corruption over the course of several years. This man is a crook. Does anyone really believe that he was bartering Obama's seat to get services for his constituents? If so, please name one service for his constituents that he tried to get in exchange for Obama's seat. The truth is what he said when he thought that no one was listening, not what he says after the fact to escape criminal liability. Rachel asked the RIGHT questions of this criminal.

[joewalters]

Everyone knows he's guilty. At least in IL, his home state.

[JustLeftOfRight]

Don't give me this malarky that Blago hasn't been dealt with fairly and is being tried by the media. Certainly Blago may not be guilty of any crime as far as the letter of the law goes. Saying things in phone conversations is one thing, demonstrating proof that he acted on them, accepted money, etc are another. Still, the phone conversations are enough to demonstrate he's morally and ethically bankrupt. Some of you may believe that ALL politicians act this way, but I like believe there are some still with both morals and ethics. If he were my governor I would be happy to say adios to him.

[classc 1]

Are people falling for Blago's nonsense? Has anyone looked at the counts of the Articles of Impeachement other than the one dealing with the attempted sale of Obama's seat? This was just the tip of the iceberg. This man is a crook. He was bartering Obama's seat to get services for his constituents? Are you kidding me? Have we forgotten the allegations that on the tape wanted a position in Obama's cabinent? That he wanted his wife to get a seat on a major board. As he said, he was not giving away the seat for nothing. Please...to the defenders of this liar, name one service for his constituents that he tried to get in exchange for Obama's seat?

[harriettubman]

The governor wouldn't want me grilling him because I'd have tons of questions that needed answering:
1) Why didn't the state have enough money to cut the interstate grass last summer?
2) Why were health dept. workers laid off and some had to end up driving 2 hrs to work after being transferred?
3) Why haven't Medicaid bills been paid to pharmacies, doctors and hospitals?
4) Why hasn't state funding gone to state daycare programs?
5) Why did your wife receive a $150,000 state business contract?
6) Why was a guy who worked for the Dept of Natural Resources overlooked in promotion and a non-experienced son of a friend hired? The man sued and won.
7) Why have so many of your unqualified friends received positions that were not advertised?
I could go on and on and on.....Well, why Governor?

[Jacqueline3]

Was this media blitz at taxpayers expense? This is all I want to know, anything else is irrevelant!