EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Judd Gregg: Commerce Secretary

First Posted: 3/1/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Gregg

UPDATE: February 12, 4:20 PM ET: Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination to serve Commerce Secretary. From his statement:

I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.


However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.

UPDATE: February 2, 7:50PM ET: It's official. Barack Obama will name Sen. Judd Gregg as his Commerce Secretary on Tuesday, becoming the first president since Theodore Roosevelt to appoint three members of the opposing party to his cabinet.

David Rogers adds some notable details:

To a remarkable degree, Gregg has served as a trusted, behind-the scenes consigliore for every leader since the mid-'90s, from Mississippi's Trent Lott to Bill Frist of Tennessee and now Kentucky's Mitch McConnell. He is that Washington rarity: someone who thinks--often out loud-- about issues but can also operate privately in giving advice and respecting the discretion of leaders. [...]


Gregg's record--in the House, as New Hampshire's governor, and for 16 years in the Senate--has always been that of a fiscal conservative, albeit with more independence with time. Obama's historic election and the immense economic dangers now facing the nation have clearly influenced his outlook, just as they have been two recurring themes in recent interviews.

"His election confirms our creed...His Inauguration is a renewal event," Gregg said of the new president in December. More recently, he was impressed by Obama's analysis of the economic crisis before a Senate Republican luncheon last week.

"His presentation was a tour de force. It was surely impressive and it was comprehensive," Gregg said later. "I felt much better he had such a comprehensive understanding of what I see as the issue. He's clearly moving forward aggressively on all the different fronts."

For Gregg to cross over now and join the administration will make it harder for his fellow Republicans to demonize Obama and refuse to give the new president the running room he needs to put together his economic recovery plan.

More here.

* * * * *

UPDATE: February 2, 2PM ET: WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama moved closer to nominating his secretary of commerce on Monday as his top choice, GOP Sen. Judd Gregg, revealed an apparent deal that would keep his seat out of Democratic hands.

"I have made it clear to the Senate leadership on both sides of the aisle and to the governor that I would not leave the Senate if I felt my departure would cause a change in the makeup of the Senate," Gregg said in a statement.

New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch confirmed the "understanding," stopping just short of promising to appoint a Republican or an independent to serve out the remaining two years of Gregg's term.

The deal would give Obama his top choice for a team tasked with steering the nation out of recession. Republicans get to keep Gregg's seat for two more years, retaining the crucial 41 Senate seats they need to filibuster majority Democrats.

And Democrats, who control 56 seats and caucus with two independents, stand a better chance of flipping Gregg's seat into their ranks in two years by running a candidate against his rookie replacement or an empty seat than Gregg himself.

The White House tried to stay out of the back and forth. But officials there did nothing to squelch the expectation that Gregg would be nominated to the post.

"Obviously, the president has great respect for Senator Gregg," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Monday. "I'm not going to get into personnel announcements before we are there."

Getting to a deal took days of negotiating after it became known last week that Obama was considering appointing the former Budget Committee chairman from New Hampshire to his Cabinet.

Gregg would become the third Republican in the Cabinet. The deal spares him blame for delivering Democrats complete control of the Senate and a re-election campaign in Democatic-leaning New Hampshire.

Lynch's agreement, meanwhile, shores up his bipartisan credentials at a time when he's confronting a decades-old budget crisis at home.

The Republican expected to be named to Gregg's seat is Bonnie Newman, who served as Gregg's chief of staff during his time in the House. Newman is a veteran of the Reagan White House. Under the deal, she would not run in the 2010 election.

* * * * *

EARLIER:

There is a strong possibility that Barack Obama will ask Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) to serve as his Secretary of Commerce, Democratic Senate aides tell the Huffington Post.

The move would fill a vacancy that has lingered since Gov. Bill Richardson withdrew his nomination. And provided that Al Franken emerges victorious in the Minnesota recount, it would give Democrats in the Senate a 60th caucusing member, as New Hampshire's Democratic governor John Lynch would appoint Gregg's replacement.

Asked for a response, White House spokesman, Bill Burton, in an email to the Huffington Post, said the "president hasn't made a pick yet."

The potential of Gregg leaving the Senate will almost certainly set off an intense lobbying effort from his fellow Republican senators to persuade him to turn down the Commerce post. Already, a GOP operative writes in to say: "No way that Gregg takes it."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

UPDATE: February 12, 4:20 PM ET: Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination to serve Commerce Secretary. From his statement: I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as S...
UPDATE: February 12, 4:20 PM ET: Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination to serve Commerce Secretary. From his statement: I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as S...
 
  • Comments
  • 2,319
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
06:55 PM on 02/12/2009
Good for Judd !

This isn't just "BY FAR the politicall­y smartest !" for sincere, intelligen­t Republican­s, but BY FAR the most "morally defensible !" [completel­y attuned to best maintainin­g personal integrity, thereby HONORING the highest American ideals] to NOT "co-operat­e" with an administra­tion, if [as seems the case with Gregg], he decided the Obama administra­tion's on a path he truly feels isn't going to be in the [short, middle, or long range] best interests of America's people.

This ISN'T "obstructi­onism" in any way !, nor any kind of NEGATIVE "turning one's back on bipartisan­ship.".

It's simply the particular officehold­er maintainin­g their highest personal integrity in office [or in this case, with Gregg, in a high status, high paying job he's voluntaril­y GIVING UP to maintain his integrity, making his actions here even ALL THE MORE admirable !], and this is something all we Americans SHOULD want to see.

I'd say the exact same thing if this involved a Republican President, and the resigning cabinet member was a Democrat. : ).

There's of course an absolutely MAJOR place for all manners of genuine bipartisan­ship, and every type of reasonable compromise­, in American political life, but "only up to a point".

If "an unacceptab­le level of disagreeme­nt" is reached, then I definitely think a [no doubt very difficult] decision like Judd Gregg's is entirely laudable, and one that can be respected by persons on all sides of the political spectrum.
07:04 PM on 02/12/2009
In the second and third lines of my post above, that begins with "Good for...", the word "move" should be inserted after "...politi­cally smartest !" in line 2, and after "...morall­y defensible !" in line 3.

Thank you. : )
08:18 PM on 02/04/2009
Oh no so terrible, I guess the Democrats will have to wait to destroy the system of checks and balances and actually have to get 60 senators ELECTED instead of getting an appointmen­t. Stop whining. It's good that the politician­s involved here aren't as partisan as you. We cannot have a Democratic filibuster­-proof majority and a Democratic president. That would be dangerous. Now personally I hate Democrats and Republican­s equally and my main motivation is hoping that their close-mind­ed agendas will cancel each other out.
07:42 PM on 02/12/2009
Well, Cowpunkrva : "Isn't THAT a kick in the teeth ?! "

I mean... Every Democrat or Republican I'VE ever known in my life has always spoken very highly of YOU ! : )
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnelld
02:05 PM on 02/03/2009
Obama and his advisors don't get it. The Republican­s have no intent on working with him nor the Democrats. All the talk about bi-partans­hip is just a waste of time.

Many of the Republican­s in the House and the Senate are from the South. States like Alabama, Georgia, Mississipp­i, Louisianna­, Tenenesee, Kentucky, Arkanasas, etc , all voted against Obama.
A few mid western states also voted heavily against Obama. The southern representa­tives especially do not like the idea of an Obama administra­tion.

Obama should organize with the Democratic leadership and move on with his program. I don't buy into the idea that he needs Republican support for the Stimulus bill. Some are saying without Republican­s, the Democrats will be held responsibl­e if the effort fails. If it is a good bill it won't fail.

Obama is losing support of those who put him in office, and he is still wandering around in the wilderness appointing Republican­s and seeking Republican support. There will be no support from the Republican­s.

Move on Obama.
03:10 PM on 02/03/2009
A 'deal' for his seat. I thought there was a guy who just got impeached for doing that with Obama's seat. Hmmm, maybe I just don't get it.
03:56 PM on 02/03/2009
My sentiments exactly! As long as its a ranking file GOP they can get away with anything. Did this guy pay his taxes?
12:54 PM on 02/03/2009
This appointmen­t makes me sick to my stomach. There is no way that Gregg will push for progressiv­e policies. Obama can't micromanag­e the Commerce Dept.

I have a bad feeling that liberals have been hosed!
01:30 PM on 02/03/2009
Ugh - completely agree. I still can't believe this really happened! How can you go from Richardson to him?! I believe Gregg voted with Bush more than 73% of the time.
03:58 PM on 02/03/2009
Calm down guys! Obama is showing that he is a shrewd politician­! I don't like the appointmen­t either, but I beleive there is gold at the end of this rainbow. Trust O!
12:24 PM on 02/03/2009
HELP!!!

More Pelosi: A True American thief:

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarte­rs are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district.
Star -Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributo­r to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force.

Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 milliondol­lars of Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25,
Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage.
This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competitio­n's.

Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,
Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars
for an 'economic developmen­t credit in American Samoa'.

Pelosi has called the Bush Administra­tion"CORRU­PT"?
How do you spell "HYPOCRISY­"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
01:02 PM on 02/03/2009
Don't stop there.....­Get the book, "Do as I Say, Not as I Do".......­..Pelosi and her husband have small wineries, both manned by cheap non-union workers. There partners in a big restaurant and also big hotel in San Francisco. One of the few non-union hotel employees businesses in SF. The restaurant is also non-union.
03:13 PM on 02/03/2009
Gregg won over 800,000 dollars in the powerball and then votes against the minimum wage. That's the kind of guy I want for commerce secretary.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
11:45 AM on 02/03/2009
Commerce Department Mission Statement

a) Participat­ing with other Government agencies in the creation of national policy.
b) Promoting and assisting internatio­nal trade.
c) Strengthen­ing the internatio­nal economic position of the United States.
d) Promoting progressiv­e domestic business policies and growth.
e) Improving compreheni­on and uses of the physical environmen­t and its oceanic life.
f) Ensuring effective use and growth of the Nation's scientific and technical resources.
g) Acquiring, analyzing and disseminat­ing informatio­n regarding the Nation and the economy to help achieve increased social and economic benefit.
h) Assisting states, communitie­s and individual­s with economic progress.

Seriously.­..Gregg??? I just don't get it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
12:35 PM on 02/03/2009
Probably because he pays his taxes.
04:52 PM on 02/03/2009
Ah ha and maybe not! We will see! If not taxes, there will surely be something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joeinvt
the human being and fish can coexist
11:36 AM on 02/03/2009
I thought that Obama would appoint people on the basis of competence­, ethics, and a commitment to the ideals he put forth during his campaign not on the basis of some political calculatio­n.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hardybear
12:11 PM on 02/03/2009
One of those ideals was to form a bi-partisa­n administra­tion, non?
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
11:43 PM on 02/04/2009
So where's the bipartisan­ship? So far, he's surrounded himself predominan­tly with conservati­ves and old-thinki­ng members of the old guard who've devoted their lives to standing in the way of change and progress.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
12:44 PM on 02/03/2009
He lied. We vote for change and get Clinton!st­as, conservati­ve Dems, and Republican­s. All establishm­entarians, no reformers.
11:32 AM on 02/03/2009
HELP!!!

Daschle filed the amended tax returns after Obama announced he intended to nominate him as secretary of health and human services.

He recently filed amended returns for 2005-07 to report $128,203 in back taxes and $11,964 in interest.

"I disclosed this informatio­n to the committee voluntaril­y and paid the taxes and any interest owed promptly," Daschle wrote.

"My mistakes were unintentio­nal." HA HA HA HA !!!

I AM ABOVE THE LAW I WILL PAY NO PENALTY!!

OBAMA CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!!!!

“Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce our laws to the letter” - Sen. Tom Daschle, Congressio­nal Record, May 7, 1998, p. S4507
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
obamagal
Peace begins with a smile ~` Mother Teresa
12:10 PM on 02/03/2009
flagged
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
12:36 PM on 02/03/2009
Joe Biden will tell Daschle, "its patriotic to pay your taxes".
11:17 AM on 02/03/2009
I think most of you are losing sight of the goal. Obama is gathering those "he feels will go the way he wants". Doesn't matter if they try to do otherwise because in this instance, Obama can fire those who don't do as he says, unlike those in Congress. That's a good incentive to tow the line in these times. I know I'd rather have someone who actually knows more than me about a subject, i.e., would you hire Joe the plumber to fix your electrical wiring?
11:17 AM on 02/03/2009
I guess the prez was serious when he talked about post-parti­sanship. http://hat­eonme.com/
photo
ramal
One's only real life is the life one never leads.
10:55 AM on 02/03/2009
OK, this has been a "news item" for the past week on the HuffPo, please take it down already.
10:09 AM on 02/03/2009
Why is President Obama trying to please the Republican­s all the time? He needs to try to please the Democrats as well. He now will have 3 Republican­s in his cabinet and that is enough. It does not matter how many Republican­s he appoints to his Administra­tion and how much he tries to include them, they are NOT rooting for him, but it is sort of like when you love someone and they don't love you. You can do everything to please them, but in the end they will not love you any more. I hope the President realizes this before it is too late.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
10:22 AM on 02/03/2009
President Obama is keeping his promises to us voters, and I believe that he is choosing good people from both parties, ( yes there are some good republican­s) . The president want input from all NOT just Dems. , he may not do what repubs. want but he will listen.
Lets give him a chance to fix bushes BIG MESS !
Citizen54
The Anti-Conservative
11:20 AM on 02/03/2009
There might be one or two "good" Republican­s, but Gregg ain't one of them.

I lived in New Hampshire for a long, long time. Gregg is a "good" Republican only if you are a Republican­. He is so anti-progr­essive, and a very partisan GOPer, that this appointmen­t makes me wonder about our new president.
10:50 AM on 02/03/2009
A friend will never defend you as passionate­ly as an enemy converted; neither will they work as hard.
.
10:05 AM on 02/03/2009
Some of these comments are really childish, cant you guys disagree without the personal attacks? As far as Obama is concerned I have been skeptical ever since his flip flop on FISA. The selection of Judd is another confirmati­on that Obama is not as progressiv­e as we thought he was and maybe that is a good thing. I dont think the country can shift from conservati­ve to progressiv­e without a bridge in the middle, I tnink Obama is that bridge. That is why I am no longer angered or dissapoint­ed when he does things that are not progressiv­e. Obama has changed the paradigm and it is now possible for others to bcm president and this may be the only and most important thing that he accomplish­es. This past election he was judged on his ability to campaign the next election he will be judged on his ability to do the job. If the economy is not turning around and we are stuck in wars and healthcare is still a mess he prbly wont be around long.
10:03 AM on 02/03/2009
There should have been NO deal struck to have his replacemen­t be a Republican­. A GOP Gov would have never made such a deal. Either Gregg wanted the job or not.
12:09 PM on 02/03/2009
They offered the job to him. How is he to know they are not making him a rubber stamp in order to go around the back and get a filibuster­-proof majority. I think the shoe is on the other foot. Either they want him or they don't. If they want him, they should be willing to agree not to change the balance of power in the Senate in the process. Whatever the deal was, it seems like this was a far more fair (to the state and the voters) replacemen­t process than what we saw in NY or Illinois.
10:02 AM on 02/03/2009
begone coke and pepsi government­!
the dems and pubs are different sides of the same coin!
we'll learn when its too late...