iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Exxon Mobil Reports Record $45.2 Billion Profit For 2008

JOHN PORRETTO   01/30/09 02:21 PM ET   AP

Exxon

HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil Corp. on Friday reported a profit of $45.2 billion for 2008, breaking its own record for a U.S. company, even as its fourth-quarter earnings fell 33 percent from a year ago.

The previous record for annual profit was $40.6 billion, which the world's largest publicly traded oil company set in 2007.

The extraordinary full-year profit wasn't a surprise given crude's triple-digit price for much of 2008, peaking near an unheard of $150 a barrel in July. Since then, however, prices have fallen roughly 70 percent amid a deepening global economic crisis.

In the fourth quarter alone crude tumbled 60 percent, prompting spending and job cuts in an industry that was reporting robust, often record, profits as recently as last summer.

With piles of cash and diversified operations, the majors like Exxon Mobil have fared better than many smaller oil and gas companies, but Friday's results show no one is completely insulated from the ongoing malaise.

Irving, Texas-based Exxon said net income slid sharply to $7.8 billion, or $1.55 a share, in the October-December period. That compared with $11.7 billion, or $2.13 a share, in the same period a year ago, when Exxon set a U.S. record for quarterly profit. It has since topped that mark twice, first in last year's second quarter and then with earnings of $14.83 billion in the third quarter.

Revenue in the most-recent quarter fell 27 percent to $84.7 billion.

Both the per-share and revenue results topped Wall Street forecasts. On average, analysts expected the company to earn $1.45 a share in the latest quarter on revenue of $69.1 billion, according to Thomson Reuters.

Shares rose $1.52, or 2 percent, to $78.52 in early trading.

The nation's second largest oil company, Chevron Corp., reported profits of $4.9 billion for the fourth quarter, though revenues slid 26 percent with oil prices in sharp decline.

It earned $2.44 per share in the three months ended Dec. 31. Like Exxon, Chevron easily beat expectations of analysts, who were looking for profits of $1.81 per share.

The industry went into retrenchment toward the end of the year with demand falling.

As expected, Exxon Mobil's bottom line took a beating from its exploration and production, or upstream, arm, where net income fell 31 percent to $5.6 billion. The culprit: lower crude prices, which the company said decreased earnings by $3.2 billion in the fourth quarter alone.

The company, which produces about 3 percent of the world's oil, said overall output fell 3 percent in the most-recent period, a troubling trend in previous quarters. Exxon, which generates more than two-thirds of its earnings from oil and gas production, said production-sharing contracts and OPEC quotas contributed to its lower output.

Results were better at its refining and marketing unit, where earnings rose 6 percent to $2.4 billion as higher margins overcame costs related to last summer's hurricanes and other factors.

The company's chemical division also took a hit, posting net income of $155 million versus $1.1 billion a year ago. Results were hurt by lower volumes and margins and hurricane-repair costs.

Exxon Mobil said it bought 119 million shares of its common stock in the quarter at a cost of $8.8 billion. Roughly $8 billion of that amount was dedicated to reducing the number of shares outstanding; the balance was used to offset shares issued as part of the company's benefit plans.

Exxon said it spent $26.1 billion on capital and exploration projects last year, up 25 percent from 2007. Its earnings release provided no information about its planned spending for 2009.

For the full year, Exxon Mobil's massive profit amounted to $8.69 a share, versus $7.28 a share a year ago.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Danny Shea  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 644
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
12:17 PM on 02/04/2009
If you do your research, you will find that Exxon also paid 32.8 billion in taxes as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ipanemagirl
progressive
10:45 PM on 02/02/2009
Why not ask Exxon to help out the banks . economy by forking out some of their profits???
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
09:29 AM on 02/01/2009
That is a 10% profit rate... in the last quarter.... 8.4 billion on 84billion in revenues...that is after minor adjustment for HAVE MORE compensation in pensions and healthcare and corporate jets and country club fees...

EACH AND EVERY TIME you fill up, look at the price and say to your self that 10% is going to the shareholders...That profit is about $200 per year per person and the brunt of that is on the working class that HAS to commute to work....so figure that they have to pay about $600 every year in profits to EXXON. That is PROFITS, not the expense of the gasoline....
10:25 AM on 02/02/2009
Are you saying that a 10% profit is to high ? Most rich dems like Pelosi and Corzine would have a cow if they only got a 10% return. As far as the profit all going to exxon, who should it go to, Shell ?
The money actually goes to shareholders like myself and big retirement funds. Maybe Exxon should listen to Obama, now is not the time to profit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bpeirce
11:16 PM on 01/31/2009
Looks like Georgie and Dickless "Did a Heck of a Job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
123dee
The best is yet to come...
03:48 PM on 01/31/2009
Let's see if they invest in America, with 45 billion they could easily start up
an alternative energy program.
08:13 PM on 01/31/2009
who the hell are you to tell them what they should invest in or not? if all companies had the vision and discipline to be like them, we would be all better off.

Exxon walks away from an otherwise profitable project, just because it will dilute their existing ROI, even though on a standalone basis its profitable. which company has the discipline to do that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
commentsareus
02:02 PM on 02/01/2009
Well sweetie, not all industries have a V.P. tucked neatly into a front pocket either... Discipline or Corruption? I choose the latter.
10:29 AM on 02/02/2009
Is that the new standard in America, if you do something well you should stop and do something you don't know much about. Maybe Exxon is waiting for Obama and his smart friends to lead the way and invent the new energy source we have been waiting on. Until then, lets not bash a company for doing something right.
03:44 PM on 01/31/2009
Next time the Auto Companies need a bail out..this is who they should ask.
11:26 AM on 01/31/2009
Lets see, they got all the money and everybody else is broke, can anyone one see whats going to happen? If I spelled it out I wouldn't get posted. But this is now world wide, even the people at Davos are scared. I see a revolution on our banks and oil companies.
11:15 AM on 01/31/2009
I m just curious to know how much taxes they are really going to pay on this huge
profit...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lj9283
Why is "Carried Interest" not taxed as Income?
02:27 PM on 01/31/2009
I asked the same question:

They paid over 40% in taxes on $70 Billion in profit, leaving them the 45.2 Billion

So it was $70 Billion in pre-tax profit.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=XOM&annual
02:55 PM on 01/31/2009
They paid about 8% of income as taxes, and made about 10% as profit.
10:04 AM on 01/31/2009
The Republicans are right! We should lower Exxon's taxes to create good paying American jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
07:49 AM on 01/31/2009
They'll become so irrelevant it'll make Bob Woodward look like a modern day Nostradamus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
07:48 AM on 01/31/2009
These oil companies and OPEC should enjoy this while the getting is good. Within a few years they'll be begging for mercy from ultra-capacitor tech firms and renewables. Their days are numbered.
01:06 PM on 01/31/2009
look at their balance sheet !! A few of those renewable energy firms will be working under these same oil companies !!
11:13 PM on 01/31/2009
If that's true, then we can expect to see no real exploration of alternative fuels any time soon. Why would they bother, when oil is making them this rich even when the economy is falling apart?
05:58 AM on 01/31/2009
so the posters here want us to nationalize this company because theyre making too much money, and nationalize the banks because theyre not making any money. oh nationalize the auto companies because theyre demise would cause too many jobs to disappear.

anything else? maybe nationalize the media to make sure only the right message gets out? nationalize starbucks so they dont charge you $4 for a latte anymore? maybe nationalize your insurance company so your premiums go down? what about the networks? should we nationalize them so we can get American Idol off the air?
photo
PoliticalRockChick
Sick of the bible & hypocrites
05:45 AM on 01/31/2009
greedy sons of b*tches
10:30 AM on 02/02/2009
Greedy for making a ten percent return ?
photo
MarkBoston
it's gonna take more than lipstick
02:22 AM on 01/31/2009
This is the art of pure gluttony ... How much of this will the American public take before revolt happens ?
02:37 AM on 01/31/2009
As long as they can get gasoline for their Hummers, they will take a lot more. They will start revolting the very day they can't get gas at any price.

:-)
01:25 AM on 01/31/2009
How about a gasoline tax based on price instead of quantity? That way the government can share in the success.
01:08 PM on 01/31/2009
How about the price of gas just goes up to accomodate that extra payout. Oil tax increases are by far one of the easiest to pass along to customers. read up on elasticity of demand !!