|
||
"My Name is Earl" star Jaime Pressly shows off her hard-won body in the March issue of Shape magazine. Pressly is mom to Dezi, 20 months, and professes to strenuous work outs to regain her figure.
"I've always exercises really hard," Pressly tells the magazine. "I'm into the no pain, no gain thing."
PHOTOS:
She also shared some at-home workout secrets:
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I can't believe this article is still here. Did she pay Huffpost to help her promote her 'exercise video that fixes post-baby body just like plastic surgery'?
Well she may work HARD for the Bod, BUT, the Breasts are FAKE!!!
Does anyone other than jealous women really care if a beautiful woman has fake breasts?
She's great as Joyce in "My name is Earl"
She is HILARIOUS and the only reason I watch "Earl" - if she was off the show I would delete it from the DVR immediately. She just kills me.
However these magazine pictures are so airbrushed and tampered with. Who knows what she really looks like. It's all manipulation.
I'm sure she looks good but these pics mean nothing.
To be honest, once they dye their hair blonde and get a tan, they start to look alike. I can't tell the Hef girls apart, either.
I never though I'd see the day I said this, but....
This woman looks better as white tras.h than she does glammed up. Go back to looking like you came out of a tr.ailer park, please.
I love Jamie Pressley and think she's a talented actress. I don't really care if she looks hot or not, though I think she's quite attractive in these photographs.
However........these photographs are certainly photoshop edited. The top and bottom photos have large white space in the crook of her right arm, where they should be showing blue water.
In fact, this is a very crappy photoshop job.
I
Ugh, in the center photo(shop) picture, look at her left shoulder (blurry), inside left arm.. overdone shadowing, and the slant of shadow in the water and shadow on her body in pics 1 and 3 don't match at all.
I want to apply for a job at Shape magazine.. surely they can afford a better Photoshop "artist".
I wish they would just post natural and realistic pictures instead of performing so-called "perfection" pieces.
There was water in the shot? I guess I was too busy looking at the incredibly hot chick to care.
Too much airbrushing. Her arms look blurry.
If you are going to airbrush,
have a delicate hand at it. Don't get carried away. This way, everyone looks stupid.
It's the woman's right to have cosmetic surgery if she wants to. She works in a looks-obsessed industry and it will be viewed as a good investment for her career-wise. I'm not knocking her for doing what she needs to do to get work or feel good about herself. I'm sure she has 'good genes' and I know that she is a health nut but you can't have the body of a 15 year old after having a baby without some help, no matter how good your genes are or how much you work out. That's the sneaky lie perpetuated by images like these. Why is it only women who are rich and can afford cosmetic surgery and an army of 'fixers' who look like this mere weeks after giving birth? They can't all have 'good genes' and they're not all olympic athletes but somehow they manage to consistently defy the rules of nature? I have seen a few celebrities up close while out and about and it never ceases to amaze me how normal and decidedly 'average' most of them look up close. They are like us. Their bodies react to childbirth just like everyone else's. The difference is that they can have everything put back where it was. Money gives you those kinds of choices. And it wouldn't be a good investment if the untrained eye could spot it immediately would it? A good surgeon will make you look like you've never given birth.
If she had a tummy tuck she would have a huge scar hip to hip and would have to wear a very high bikini.
I have seen the scar from someone I know who had a tummy tuck and trust me, it is a huge disfigurement. Unless someone had a huge amount of skin like a deflated balloon that was all saggy and creased it would not be worth it.
Yes, but that's the difference between an 'ok' consmetic surgeon and the ones celebrities go to. Those top surgeons are like alchemists. They make magic happen! Have you ever seen someone who's had a boob job and it's so obvious as to be pointless? How about someone who admits to having had a boob job and you keep thinking "really? It looks so natural!". Every tummy tuck does not result in a huge scar from hip to hip, especially if the person was not that overweight to begin with. It depends on how much loose skin needs to be trimmed away. Some people have a little and some a huge amount. This lady was tall, very slender and in great shape to begin with. Less cutting needed, and a much small, neater scar. As it happens, that bikini covers the area from one hip to the other. I've seen very neat c-section scars and huge, horrible ones too. I know what I'm talking about. This isn't personal.
Boob job and airbrush or Photoshop. Next, please.
Jaime Pressley has always looked like that. And you're kidding if you think those are implants.
Nope.
Sadly, people used confuse her and Tara Reid.
No more.
I'm glad she finally got a chance to show off her acting chops on "Earl".
her work or her plastic surgeon's work?
If you go to this link, you can see her obviously being all grown up, but pre-implants.
http://www.oceleb.com/jaime-pressly/pics-00.html
The fake blonde hair thing is getting old too.
I think she would look so much more beautiful with her natural coloring.
But I'd help her out of a jam.
Very boneable.
Hit it 2 times
...and wake up with it in your hand.
Not judging, just sayin'...
|
||
Loading comments…
Shape | February 3, 2009 11:39 AM