Obama Caps Executive Pay Tied To Bailout Money (SPEECH TRANSCRIPT)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

AP   |  JIM KUHNHENN   |   February 3, 2009 10:33 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama imposed a $500,000 pay cap on some senior executives whose firms receive government financial rescue money, a dramatic intervention into corporate governance in the midst of financial crisis.

Standing with his Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Obama said the United States doesn't disparage wealth nor does it begrudge those who succeed, but lavish bonuses for executives at companies seeking taxpayer dollars was unfair.


Read the President's remarks:


Thank you, Tim, for your hard work on this issue and on our economic recovery.


The economic crisis we face is unlike any we've seen in our lifetime. It's a crisis of falling confidence and rising debt. Of widely distributed risk and narrowly concentrated reward. A crisis written in the fine print of sub-prime mortgages, on the ledger lines of once-mighty financial institutions, and on the pink slips that have upended lives and cost the economy 2.6 million jobs last year alone.


We know that even if we do everything we should, this crisis was years in the making, and it will take more than weeks or months to turn things around.

But make no mistake:

Story continues below
advertisement

A failure to act, and act now, will turn crisis into a catastrophe and guarantee a longer recession, a less robust recovery, and a more uncertain future. Millions more jobs will be lost. More businesses will be shuttered. More dreams will be deferred.

That's why I feel such a sense of urgency about the Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Plan that is before Congress today. With it, we can save or create more than three million jobs, doing things that will strengthen our country for generations to come. It is not merely a prescription for short-term spending - it's a strategy for long-term economic growth in areas like renewable energy, health care, and education.

Now, in the past few days I've heard criticisms of this plan that echo the very same failed theories that helped lead us into this crisis - the notion that tax cuts alone will solve all our problems; that we can ignore fundamental challenges like energy independence and the high cost of health care and still expect our economy and our country to thrive.

I reject that theory, and so did the American people when they went to the polls in November and voted resoundingly for change. So I urge members of Congress to act without delay. No plan is perfect, and we should work to make it stronger. But let's not make the perfect the enemy of the essential. Let's show people all over our country who are looking for leadership in this difficult time that we are equal to the task.

At the same time, we know that this Recovery and Reinvestment plan is only the first part of what we need to do to restore prosperity and secure our future. We also need a strong and viable financial system to keep credit flowing to businesses and families alike. My administration will do what it takes to restore our financial system; our recovery depends upon it. And so next week, Secretary Geithner will release a new strategy to get credit moving again - a strategy that will reflect the lessons of past mistakes while laying a foundation for the future.

But in order to restore our financial system, we've got to restore trust. And in order to restore trust, we've got to make certain that taxpayer funds are not subsidizing excessive compensation packages on Wall Street.

We all need to take responsibility. And this includes executives at major financial firms who turned to the American people, hat in hand, when they were in trouble, even as they paid themselves their customary lavish bonuses. As I said last week, that's the height of irresponsibility. That's shameful. And that's exactly the kind of disregard for the costs and consequences of their actions that brought about this crisis: a culture of narrow self-interest and short-term gain at the expense of everything else.

This is America. We don't disparage wealth. We don't begrudge anybody for achieving success. And we believe that success should be rewarded. But what gets people upset - and rightfully so - are executives being rewarded for failure. Especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers.

For top executives to award themselves these kinds of compensation packages in the midst of this economic crisis is not only in bad taste - it's a bad strategy - and I will not tolerate it as President. We're going to be demanding some restraint in exchange for federal aid - so that when firms seek new federal dollars, we won't find them up to the same old tricks.

As part of the reforms we are announcing today, top executives at firms receiving extraordinary help from U.S. taxpayers will have their compensation capped at $500,000 - a fraction of the salaries that have been reported recently. And if these executives receive any additional compensation, it will come in the form of stock that can't be paid up until taxpayers are paid back for their assistance.

Companies receiving federal aid are going to have to disclose publicly all the perks and luxuries bestowed upon senior executives and provide an explanation to the taxpayers and to shareholders as to why these expenses are justified. And we're putting a stop to these kinds of massive severance packages we've all read about with disgust; we're taking the air out of the golden parachute.

We're asking these firms to take responsibility, to recognize the nature of this crisis and their role in it. We believe that what we've laid out should be viewed as fair and embraced as basic common sense.

Finally, these guidelines we're putting in place are only the beginning of a long-term effort. We're going to examine the ways in which the means and manner of executive compensation have contributed to a reckless culture and quarter-by-quarter mentality that in turn have wrought havoc in our financial system. We're going to be taking a look at broader reforms so that executives are compensated for sound risk management and rewarded for growth measured over years, not just days or weeks.

We've all got to pull together and take our share of responsibility. That's true here in Washington. That's true on Wall Street. The American people are carrying a huge burden as a result of this economic crisis: bearing the brunt of its effects as well as the costs of extraordinary measures we're taking to address it. The American people expect and demand that we pursue policies that reflect the reality of this crisis - and that will prevent these kinds of crises in the future.

Thank you.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama imposed a $500,000 pay cap on some senior executives whose firms receive government financial rescue money, a dramatic intervention into corporate governance ...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama imposed a $500,000 pay cap on some senior executives whose firms receive government financial rescue money, a dramatic intervention into corporate governance ...
 
Comments
4971
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (82 pages total)
- Shortyfuse I'm a Fan of Shortyfuse 4 fans permalink
photo

What not jail time? When I knowingly set out to destroy the economy of the world, PLEASE, give me a half a million bucks and a get out of jail free card.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 02/07/2009

Half a mill is a cap??? Posturing ..... Hey O you aint foolin me!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 02/07/2009

Righthandmand must be looking for an argument. Any argument will do. No one could be that duh-uh.
That 500,000 is a bonus for failing at what you are supposed to be really good at. That is not a base pay. I'm betting that any person who lost their job during this fiasco would be pleased as punch to only get a bonus of 500,000. Get real.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 02/06/2009
- teasley I'm a Fan of teasley 6 fans permalink

Speaking of duh, Diana68 $500,000 is not a bonus, read the story. $500,000 is a SALARY CAP . That means that is All they can make. Of course there are ways around it, such as stock options. However in the bill I saw they could only be exercised after the government was paid back. But, at that point the options would most likely be worth more than they would have been paid now. So as much as all you who suffer from class envy would like to see CEO's punished. They will still have the last laugh. By the way Silentknight65, the last I heard lynching was a racist term.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 02/06/2009

Yea, except doing this will make companies fail. Yaknow why? CEO's with jets, mansions, limos, staff, servants, chefs, and secretaries cannot live on 500,000 yearly. So do you know what's going to happen? They will leave the company they're in and go to another one where they can get ten million a year. Then the other company will die with nobody to lead it and the one they went to will prosper. Now generally there's nothing wrong with this except now it's the GOVERNMENT CAUSING IT! Obama is single-handedly destroying our economy. And since there was no pre-stated condition where the companies would have to limit their executive pay when they took the money, they shouldn't have to now. These companies have lawyers, I'm betting they're gonna use 'em. And I'll tell you something. They're going to win. There wasn't a contract or anything. And by the way, the government did not give companies money so they could boss them around. The government gave companies money so that they DON'T FAIL! What they do beyond that is of no concern as long as they stay alive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 02/06/2009
photo

ohboohoo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 02/06/2009

Let them go bankrupt then! These guys need the old "Marie Antoinette" treatment. A good lynching!

I'd like to see some folks with a terminal illness, who maybe lost their health insurance because of this, and who have nothing to lose, go out there and take some of these greedy a**wipes out. Can't put a dying man in prison....If the Unabomber had gone after CEOs, he'd be a national hero.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 02/06/2009

Placing caps on corporate salaries is politically appealing and righteous. Visit FDR. He place draconian progressive income taxes on salaries and benefits. Obama must do the same and other graduated taxation to bring back into balance the power of the many against the present concentrated wealth and power of the fraction of the people. It must be done to save the Republic from the perils of aristocracy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 02/05/2009
- teasley I'm a Fan of teasley 6 fans permalink

A serious question, I can agree with caps for CEO's taking tax payer money, and certainly agree that no one who runs any company into the ground should get any bonus. That said ,I am curious as to how many people on this site think that ALL CEO's should be capped at say the same $500,000?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 02/05/2009

and what about his own pay ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 02/05/2009

$400,000 a year. One hundred thousand LESS than the cap he is suggesting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 02/05/2009

Not to mention tax-exemption and all expenses covered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 02/06/2009

And what we have to think about, is this. Obama is cutting these exec's pay by about 70%. Thus he should cut his pay by 70% Oh and since sports teams use money from the city their pay should be cut 70% Let's see what the Dems think when all of our sports players move to Europe or China just like our Businessmen might.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 02/06/2009
- ckfan I'm a Fan of ckfan 89 fans permalink
photo

He's paid $400,000.

And the President - any president - is underpaid. It's not worth the headache.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 02/05/2009
photo

what about it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 02/06/2009
- Bristol I'm a Fan of Bristol 2 fans permalink

Let's not stop at Wall Street abusing taxpayers money....

California Democrat Nancy Pelosi, and she may be getting some more leg room. Pelosi reportedly is asking for a much bigger jet — a government version of the Boeing 757 that can make the trip between Washington and her San Francisco home without stopping to refuel.

The speaker's critics have dubbed it "Pelosi One." Military officials are said to be grumbling about it, and she finds herself on the defensive. Today, she insisted that size doesn't really matter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 02/05/2009
- amessenger I'm a Fan of amessenger 7 fans permalink
photo

"Sen Claire McCaskill D-Mo., thanks for this idea and to Pres. Obama for implementation". However, the only way to make it stick is to use the disbursement of TARP money they already have control of, so good luck.
Wait! There is the Justice Department and a suit for fraud on behalf of the American Citizenry, seizing or locking down all private assets of CEO's who are suspect of being complicit,...(that'd be all of 'em). Good luck on the show cause hearing there as well.
This is the first shot in the marbles game though, remembering that it took the new sherrif two years of campaigning to get his badge, it will take awhile to assemble and arm the posse, planning their round-up.
What would make more sense is to lock-in a period of five years or more, in which these investment firms and banks may NOT make a profit, until they have paid back the TARP. All their gains, other than their fixed overhead, would be turned back into TARP repayment.
We must demand an immediate accounting of why the TARP money was needed and where it was used. Justice can do this.
I'm sticking with Obama while he gets the lay of the land.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 02/05/2009

You're not going to believe what the whiners are coming up now with the excuses how this is a bad idea:

http://www.minyanville.com/articles/aig-wfc-salary-obama-caps/index/a/20982/from/yahoo

"Limiting executive pay and bonuses also would take a huge bite out of income-tax revenue for New York State and New York City, both suffering severe budget crunches after years of overspending during the boom years."

Seriously? We should give them HUGE bonuses with our taxes or else we'd suffer because we can't tax those bonuses?

This guy is giving me the giggles, if it weren't so serious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 02/05/2009

The makes the Goats feel better about something that will have no bearing in reality

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 02/05/2009

It's just a small gesture but one in the right direction...500k is still a bundle of money for a corp execs who will still get bonuses and perk. . If they need the USG to bail the them then they'll have to play by their rules..so hopefully the POTUS will form CACs..Corporate Action Committees to keep them honest and not them slip in extravagent trips and "rewards"..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 02/05/2009

President Obama what a bold move creating a wage ceiling for white men in America. I sure hope you're prayed up. Look, these godfather executives have run government (mobster style), traditionally, not visa-versa. Your boldness looks similar to St Peter's during the first Century Pentecostal period! I pray your strength in the LORD. You're "gonna" need HIM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 02/05/2009
- AmandaRuth I'm a Fan of AmandaRuth 7 fans permalink

what are the southern senators position on pay caps for the executives, after all they demanded that the auto workers take a pay cut for bailout money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 02/04/2009
- MrJoyboy I'm a Fan of MrJoyboy 31 fans permalink

This CEO pay cap is nothing but a symbolic bone thrown to the angry public, while the fat cats continue to gorge on prime rib at our expense. I hope Obama can do better than this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

At least it's a start. Those fat cats are enormously powerful(they BOUGHT the legislation that let them get away with all this in the first place)and they feel absolutely entitled. Now they will turn into snarling dogs who are not going to give up their bones easily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 02/05/2009
- Truthdude I'm a Fan of Truthdude 2 fans permalink
photo

They will snarl but they won't bite or they will be put down. All the money in the world can't protect you from an angry mob. Ask Louis XVI.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 02/06/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (82 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect