More

AL-NASHIRI: Obama Likely To Order Charges Dropped Against Terrorist Suspect

LARA JAKES   02/ 5/09 11:31 PM ET   AP

Nashiri

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon's senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barack Obama's order to freeze military tribunals there. The charges against suspected al-Qaida bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri marked the last active Guantanamo war crimes case.

The legal move by Susan J. Crawford, the top legal authority for military trials at Guantanamo, brings all cases into compliance with Obama's Jan. 22 executive order to halt terrorist court proceedings at the U.S. Navy base in Cuba.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Crawford dismissed the charges against al-Nashiri without prejudice. That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being.

"It was her decision, but it reflects the fact that the president has issued an executive order which mandates that the military commissions be halted, pending the outcome of several reviews of our operations down at Guantanamo," Morrell said late Thursday night.

The ruling also gives the White House time to review the legal cases of all 245 terror suspects held there and decide whether they should be prosecuted in the U.S. or released to other nations.

Obama was expected to meet with families of Cole and 9/11 victims at the White House on Friday afternoon to announce the move.

Seventeen U.S. sailors died on Oct. 12, 2000, when al-Qaida suicide bombers steered an explosives-laden boat into the Cole, a guided-missile destroyer, as it sat in a Yemen port.

The Pentagon last summer charged al-Nashiri, a Saudi Arabian, with "organizing and directing" the bombing and planned to seek the death penalty in the case.

In his Jan. 22 order, Obama promised to shut down the Guantanamo prison within a year. The order also froze all Guantanamo detainee legal cases pending a three-month review as the Obama administration decides where _ or whether _ to prosecute the suspects who have been held there for years, most without charges.

Two military judges granted Obama's request for a delay in other cases.

But a third military judge, Army Col. James Pohl, defied Obama's order by scheduling a Feb. 9 arraignment for al-Nashiri at Guantanamo. That left the decision on whether to continue to Crawford, whose delay on announcing what she would do prompted widespread concern at the Pentagon that she would refuse to follow orders and allow the court process to continue.

Retired Navy Cmdr. Kirk S. Lippold, the commanding officer of the Cole when it was bombed in Yemen in October 2000, said he will be among family members of Cole and 9/11 victims who are meeting with Obama at the White House on Friday afternoon.

Groups representing victims' families were angered by Obama's order, charging they had waited too long already to see the alleged attackers brought to court.

"I was certainly disappointed with the decision to delay the military commissions process," Lippold, now a defense adviser to Military Families United, said in an interview Thursday night. "We have already waited eight years. Justice delayed is justice denied. We must allow the military commission process to go forward."

Crawford was appointed to her post in 2007 by then-President George W. Bush. She was in the news last month when she said interrogation methods used on one suspect at Guantanamo amounted to torture. The Bush administration had maintained it did not torture.

Last year, al-Nashiri said during a Guantanamo hearing that he confessed to helping plot the Cole bombing only because he was tortured by U.S. interrogators. The CIA has admitted he was among terrorist suspects subjected to waterboarding, which simulates drowning, in 2002 and 2003 while being interrogated in secret CIA prisons.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon's senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barack ...
WASHINGTON — The Pentagon's senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barack ...
Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
03:27 PM on 02/06/2009
Kenneth Eugene Clodfelter, 21, of Mechanicsville, Va.
Richard Costelow, 35, of Morrisville, Pa.
Lakeina Monique Francis, 19, of Woodleaf, N.C.
Timothy Lee Gauna, 21, of Rice, Texas
Cherone Louis Gunn, 22, of Rex, Ga.
James Rodrick McDaniels, 19, of Norfolk, Va.
Let us not forget these heroes who died at the hands of this evil person and pray that he gets his just due.

Marc Ian Nieto, 24, of Fond du Lac, Wis.
Ronald Scott Owens, 24, of Vero Beach, Fla.
Lakiba Nicole Palmer, 22, of San Diego, Calif.
Joshua Langdon Parlett, 19, of Churchville, Md.
Patrick Howard Roy, 19, of Cornwall on Hudson, N.Y.
Kevin Shawn Rux, 30, of Portland, N.D.
Ronchester Manangan Santiago, 22, Kingsville, Texas
Timothy Lamont Saunders, 32, of Ringgold, Va.
Gary Graham Swenchonis Jr., 26, Rockport, Texas
Andrew Triplett, 31, of Macon, Miss.
Craig Bryan Wibberley, 19, of Williamsport, Md.
01:55 PM on 02/06/2009
What do you tell the families of these young men and women who died on the USS Cole? I'm sorry, but the terrorists who killed your loved ones have rights too! Imagine the conversation around the terrorist camp fire tonight! They must be laughing their heads off at our gullibility!
ConcernedAmerican
I'm concerned my name isn't very clever.
01:49 PM on 02/06/2009
I looked for the part where Obama was likely to order the charges be dropped......lo and behold I saw no such thing.

As for the 9/11 and Cole families being mad at Obama for delaying justice.......talk about misdirected anger. The lack of justice falls squarely on Dick and W's shoulders. Period. End of story.
09:29 PM on 02/06/2009
No, this is all Sarah Palin's fault.
01:31 PM on 02/06/2009
Now that he is in office he does not have to pretend anymore! THANKS FOR PROVING ME RIGHT YOU P.O.S.!
proudcalib
I never said it was going to be easy
01:39 PM on 02/06/2009
Yeah, let's just incarcerate them indefinitely without charging them and with no access to legal counsel. That's the American way.
01:42 PM on 02/06/2009
awww.are we a humanitarian?? The terrorists have rights too??... NOT IN THIS COUNTRY THEY DON'T! That was a military ship....WITH PEOPLE ON IT!

DRILL BABY DRILL

AND

BURN BABY BURN!!!
photo
NETarrant
Excellent
01:24 PM on 02/06/2009
He's probably dropping the charges so he can appoint him to his staff. Nice going BO BO.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
12:39 PM on 02/06/2009
Why is the President going to wait untill after he meets with 9/11 & USS Cole families to have the charges dropped? Any of you wondering why he doesnt do it before and then go meet with the families? Anyways, according to some of the articles I have read about this the charges are to be dropped, however we are going to keep this guy locked up. Personally I don't care but from the time I have spent on this site it would seem that many of you would consider that a bad thing. So are you outraged? Why drop the charges on this guy if you plan to charge him again. Or maybe they are planning to let him go. The individual who planned the attack that killed US soldiers. Way to go. I hope this satisfies all you libs out there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 PM on 02/06/2009
Really makes you wonder why the Bush administration didn't bother to keep records that were adequate for a trial, doesn't it? This country will be paying for their incompetence for decades to come. All they had to do was keep decent records, and they couldn't even be bothered to do that.
04:36 PM on 02/06/2009
Change your info sources.

The charges are withdrawn, not dropped... the telltale clues are 1.) that they've stated keeping the option to refile later; 2.) that they're continuing to hold the person.

If charges were dropped / dismissed, those would not be possible.
12:36 PM on 02/06/2009
I cannot fully comprehend the cowardice thar has been America for the last eight years,a few hundred rabbid men has us recanting the freedom of over 300m people.
George bush and his mentally deranged group of cowards has destroyed our life style in the name of fighting terror.
Who came out the worst for all the changes that were made to the constitution,from the war on terror to the patriot act? WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAS SUFFERED THE MOST.
The over 4000 lives lost in iraq to the eroding of our freedom of movement,we are now people living in a cage. We can't travel like we use to,what are we, prisoners in our own country? We had an attack on the trade center in the ninety's,did we gave up our freedom?did we panic?
IT IS TIME FOR US TO GET OUR BALLS BACK!
No more giving up on the values we hold dearly,let's fight to secure our way of life by not letting the guys who perpetrate these acts of terror dictate our way of life.
A brave nation is not a nation of bullies,but one which stand up for justice and truth!
11:56 PM on 02/06/2009
Yeah, but in the attack in the 90s, the towers didn't fall and we didn't lose every worker in the building, every life on four airplanes, and we didn't lose thousands of firefighters and police officers either. Everyone was scared when 9/11 first happened.

The only thing I can say in response to this article: And so it begins...
12:19 PM on 02/06/2009
Dress him up as a wolf and release him in Alaska!
01:11 PM on 02/06/2009
one of the great all-time posts!
12:05 PM on 02/06/2009
The headlines on this are ridiculous and inflamatory... Yesterday it was reported that the Bush administration also "dropped the charges" on 6 top suspects and then re-instated them later (which is exactly what Obama did). This does not mean any of them will go free or "roam around our country." It just has to do with the court system and the way these suspects are processed. I can't believe people are still listening to Cheney and his threats --he's one of the main reasons we're in this situation!!
12:05 PM on 02/06/2009
this guy is the true reserection of jesus christ ... look at him --> he was on the toast last monday, and now i am hearing him tell me to send all my money to his cell at gitmo and i will be saved for eternity ...
he has also revealed to me that any of you sinners that dont believe he is jesus christ, the son of g*d, then you too will be thrown in the lake of fire
SEND ALL YOUR MONEY TO HIM NOW!
11:55 AM on 02/06/2009
The people on the Cole were serving their country. They were protecting their country's values, which were never what the Bush administration turned those values into. Those people joined to protect our rights and the land of the free and the brave. Not to protect the land of the sinister torturing cowards. They also joined the armed services with the notion that there could be danger and death involved and this is what makes them all hero's and worthy of our admiration. The men in the cold graves still on the beaches of Normandy and so many other places in Europe and around the globe are heros too. Their families still morn their death, but they have had to come to terms with the evils of war and that there is no single eye for eye retributions for them. Those families become hero's too because they share the sacrifice. The people who are left behind should hate WAR and never want to see a single individual put to death who is not beyond a shadow of a doubt guilty. Killing one innocent makes you nothing more than another ugly dog of war.
09:30 PM on 02/06/2009
This is all well and good. In an ideal society we would have no war! However they are millions of people out there who hate us because we do not have the same beliefs. Some of them are even willing to die to make sure that as many of us as possible are dead. They don't care about our race, age, sexual orientation or party affiliation. They want to exterminate us!

Do you remember the incident on october of 2005 in Iraq? The insurgents had track down 4 contractors who had gotten lost in Bagdad. Two of them were killed immediately but the other 2 were doused with gasoline and set afire! Do you remember that? I will never forget the sight of these "people" not just the insurgents but the rest of the population, laughing and celebration as they watch a human being burned alive.

Do you think that these savages inquired about the Geneva convention or checked their rights? Call me crazy but I do not want any of them in my backyard!
11:51 AM on 02/06/2009
More "pump the propaganda" instead of "report the news."

The actual news story is: Senior Judge Reverses Defiant Lower Judge.

The president ordered all cases put on hold pending review. Not unreasonable for a new C-in-C given the rat's nest clusterfork they've had going on down there.

But was it salute and "aye aye, Sir?" No. Lower Judge Col. James Pohl defied the order of the President (!!!) by scheduling the arraignment of al-Nashiri anyway.

Senior Judge Susan Crawford reversed the defiant Col. Pohl by withdrawing the charges, which unscheduled the arraignment and effectively cancelled the defiance.

The charges are withdrawn "without prejudice," leaving the door open to simply file them again in the future.

But here's the Corporate Media's so-called "news" putting a 'Hannitizing Spin' on things by hyping -- and misreporting -- the least important part of the situation in order to gin up criticism of the new administration.

Very few will read beyond the headline, and of those who do many will not understand the legal terminology. All that too many people will hear is "Obama's freeing the terrorists!!!"

Obama is trying to stop a crime in progress. The Corporate Media -- and some deranged citizens -- wants the crime to continue... and so the Corporate Media will continue selling the "necessity" of continuing the crime.

They're disgusting.
12:49 PM on 02/06/2009
I agree. The headline is ridiculously misleading!
02:03 PM on 02/06/2009
Thank You!
Finally someone puts this in real context
AND explains what this really means.
I agree, the Headline is misleading.

I just don't understand what article the people with comments above (stating there wont be a trial, and he'll be set free) read. It clearly says, and I quote :

"Crawford dismissed the charges against al-Nashiri without prejudice. That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being."

I suppose they just have no idea what that means.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 AM on 02/06/2009
So they are dropping the charges but holding him in prison. Hmmmmmmmm, where's the outrage?
02:17 PM on 02/06/2009
More than likely they are examining the actual, untainted evidence that remains outside of that which was obtained through torture, and recasting the charges appropriately so as to have a snowball's chance of winning a real conviction in a real court, instead of a sham "conviction" in a Kangaroo Kourt.
10:18 AM on 02/06/2009
Now the Pentagon has mind readers in it's staff that, 'thinking' they know what Obama is going to do.
Anyone else notice what has started to crawl out of the woodwork since shrubie has left office?
Might explain a lot of the problems we have now?
photo
Obamalicious
Obama's Kool-Aid is mm, mm, good.
10:17 AM on 02/06/2009
I have an idea. Release them all and send all the liberals there. They seem to like Cuba anyway...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
That Guy
11:12 AM on 02/06/2009
Yea, all 65,500,000 of us or so!