iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Stimulus Speech: "Time For Action Is Now" (VIDEO)

Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/19/09 02:44 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:05 PM ET

Obama Speech

UPDATE 2/5 at 7:00PM:

Despite reports of tension between Obama and congressional Democrats, Nancy Pelosi emphasized that they remain the president's "most enthusiastic supporters."

Politico reports:

As whispers of tension between the White House and congressional Democrats cloud negotiations over the stimulus, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) reassured her rank and file Thursday that they remain President Barack Obama's "most enthusiastic supporters."


"We have his back," Pelosi told a roomful of Democrats at the party's annual retreat at the Kingsmill Resort and Spa, according to people in the room.

From the AP:

President Barack Obama says the time for talk on an economic recovery package is over and "the time for action is now."


Speaking at the Energy Department, Obama made a fresh plea for the stimulus plan that the Senate is debating. He cited the latest bad economic news of jobless claims as another reason for quick action.

He said: "The time for talk is over, the time for action is now."

He also launched a shot at critics while talking about energy, questioning, "are these folks serious?"

Now, I read the other day that critics of this plan ridiculed our notion that we should use part of the money to modernize the entire fleet of federal vehicles to take advantage of state of the art fuel efficiency. This is what they call pork. You know the truth. It will not only save the government significant money over time, it will not only create manufacturing jobs for folks who are making these cars, it will set a standard for private industry to match. And so when you hear these attacks deriding something of such obvious importance as this, you have to ask yourself -- are these folks serious? Is it any wonder that we haven't had a real energy policy in this country?

For the last few years, I've talked about these issues with Americans from one end of this country to another. And Washington may not be ready to get serious about energy independence, but I am. And so are you. And so are the American people.

During his speech Obama also issued a strong critique of the GOP's economic policies, even though he didn't utter the party's name. He told the audience that:

In the last few days, we've seen proposals arise from some in Congress that you may not have read but you'd be very familiar with because you've been hearing them for the last 10 years, maybe longer. They're rooted in the idea that tax cuts alone can solve all our problems; that government doesn't have a role to play; that half-measures and tinkering are somehow enough; that we can afford to ignore our most fundamental economic challenges -- the crushing cost of health care, the inadequate state of so many of our schools, our dangerous dependence on foreign oil.


So let me be clear: Those ideas have been tested, and they have failed. They've taken us from surpluses to an annual deficit of over a trillion dollars, and they've brought our economy to a halt. And that's precisely what the election we just had was all about. The American people have rendered their judgment. And now is the time to move forward, not back. Now is the time for action.

Watch the speech:


TRANSCRIPT:

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STAFF

U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, D.C.

12:12 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you so much. Well, it is a thrill to be here. Thank you, Secretary Chu, for bringing your experience and expertise to this new role. And thanks to all of you who have done so much on behalf of the country each and every day here at the department. You know, your mission is so important, and it's only going to grow as we transform the ways we produce energy and use energy for the sake of our environment, for the sake of our security, and for the sake of our economy.

As we are meeting, in the halls of Congress just down the street from here, there's a debate going on about the plan I've proposed, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.

This isn't some abstract debate. Last week, we learned that many of America's largest corporations are planning to lay off tens of thousands of workers. Today we learned that last week, the number of new unemployment claims jumped to 626,000. Tomorrow, we're expecting another dismal jobs report on top of the 2.6 million jobs that we lost last year. We've lost half a million jobs each month for the last two months.

Now, I believe that legislation of such magnitude as has been proposed deserves the scrutiny that it has received over the last month. I think that's a good thing. That's the way democracy is supposed to work. But these numbers that we're seeing are sending an unmistakable message -- and so are the American people. The time for talk is over. The time for action is now, because we know that if we do not act, a bad situation will become dramatically worse. Crisis could turn into catastrophe for families and businesses across the country.

And I refuse to let that happen. We can't delay and we can't go back to the same worn-out ideas that led us here in the first place. In the last few days, we've seen proposals arise from some in Congress that you may not have read but you'd be very familiar with because you've been hearing them for the last 10 years, maybe longer. They're rooted in the idea that tax cuts alone can solve all our problems; that government doesn't have a role to play; that half-measures and tinkering are somehow enough; that we can afford to ignore our most fundamental economic challenges -- the crushing cost of health care, the inadequate state of so many of our schools, our dangerous dependence on foreign oil.

So let me be clear: Those ideas have been tested, and they have failed. They've taken us from surpluses to an annual deficit of over a trillion dollars, and they've brought our economy to a halt. And that's precisely what the election we just had was all about. The American people have rendered their judgment. And now is the time to move forward, not back. Now is the time for action.

Just as past generations of Americans have done in trying times, we can and we must turn this moment of challenge into one of opportunity. The plan I've proposed has at its core a simple idea: Let's put Americans to work doing the work that America needs to be done.

This plan will save or create over 3 million jobs -- almost all of them in the private sector.

This plan will put people to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, our dangerous -- dangerously deficient dams and levees.

This plan will put people to work modernizing our health care system, not only saving us billions of dollars, but countless lives.

This plan will put people to work renovating more than 10,000 schools, giving millions of children the chance to learn in 21st century classrooms, libraries and labs -- and to all the scientists in the room today, you know what that means for America's future.

This plan will provide sensible tax relief for the struggling middle class, unemployment insurance and continuing health care coverage for those who've lost their jobs, and it will help prevent our states and local communities from laying off firefighters and teachers and police.

And finally, this plan will begin to end the tyranny of oil in our time.

After decades of dragging our feet, this plan will finally spark the creation of a clean energy industry that will create hundreds of thousands of jobs over the next few years, manufacturing wind turbines and solar cells, for example -- millions more after that. These jobs and these investments will double our capacity to generate renewable energy over the next few years.

We'll fund a better, smarter electricity grid and train workers to build it -- a grid that will help us ship wind and solar power from one end of this country to another. Think about it. The grid that powers the tools of modern life -- computers, appliances, even BlackBerrys -- (laughter) -- looks largely the same as it did half a century ago. Just these first steps towards modernizing the way we distribute electricity could reduce consumption by 2 to 4 percent.

We'll also lead a revolution in energy efficiency, modernizing more than 75 percent of federal buildings and improving the efficiency of more than 2 million American homes. This will not only create jobs, it will cut the federal energy bill by a third and save taxpayers $2 billion each year and save Americans billions of dollars more on their utility bills.

In fact, as part of this effort, today I've signed a presidential memorandum requesting that the Department of Energy set new efficiency standards for common household appliances. This will save consumers money, this will spur innovation, and this will conserve tremendous amounts of energy. We'll save through these simple steps over the next 30 years the amount of energy produced over a two-year period by all the coal-fired power plants in America.

And through investments in our mass transit system to boost capacity, in our roads to reduce congestion, and in technologies that will accelerate the development of innovations like plug-in hybrid vehicles, we'll be making a significant down payment on a cleaner and more energy independent future.

Now, I read the other day that critics of this plan ridiculed our notion that we should use part of the money to modernize the entire fleet of federal vehicles to take advantage of state of the art fuel efficiency. This is what they call pork. You know the truth. It will not only save the government significant money over time, it will not only create manufacturing jobs for folks who are making these cars, it will set a standard for private industry to match. And so when you hear these attacks deriding something of such obvious importance as this, you have to ask yourself -- are these folks serious? Is it any wonder that we haven't had a real energy policy in this country?

For the last few years, I've talked about these issues with Americans from one end of this country to another. And Washington may not be ready to get serious about energy independence, but I am. And so are you. And so are the American people.

Inaction is not an option that is acceptable to me and it's certainly not acceptable to the American people -- not on energy, not on the economy, not at this critical moment.

So I am calling on all the members of Congress -- Democrats and Republicans, House and Senate -- to rise to this moment. No plan is perfect. There have been constructive changes made to this one over the last several weeks. I would love to see additional improvements today. But the scale and the scope of this plan is the right one. Our approach to energy is the right one. It's what America needs right now, and we need to move forward today. We can't keep on having the same old arguments over and over again that lead us to the exact same spot -- where we are wasting previous energy, we're not creating jobs, we're failing to compete in the global economy, and we end up bickering at a time when the economy urgently needs action.

I thank all of you for being here, and I'm eager to work with Secretary Chu and all of you as we stand up to meet the challenges of this new century. That's what the American people are looking for. That's what I expect out of Congress. That's what I believe we can deliver to our children and our grandchildren in their future.

Thank you so much, everybody. I appreciate it. Thank you. (Applause.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

UPDATE 2/5 at 7:00PM: Despite reports of tension between Obama and congressional Democrats, Nancy Pelosi emphasized that they remain the president's "most enthusiastic supporters." Politico reports:...
UPDATE 2/5 at 7:00PM: Despite reports of tension between Obama and congressional Democrats, Nancy Pelosi emphasized that they remain the president's "most enthusiastic supporters." Politico reports:...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,416
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (91 total)
05:16 PM on 02/15/2009
I think Obama was right when he said the important thing is that the stimulus plan be spent wisely.

The republicans say that government can't choose winners and losers but the fact is that we need some government spending to supplant the contraction in the GDP in the private sector so we are forced to choose something to spend on.

I live in Gainesville Florida which is a 3 high school town in need of a fourth. Politics (location of the school) and economics have blocked a new building so far. The location probably is set, tho, and it would be in an area of growing population of fairly well to do people who could vote repub or dem. The problem is that for a town this size the expense (adding 25% capacity) is a lumpsum that is hard to swallow. When all is said and done with the stimulus package and right wingers ranting and raving, Obama would be smart to have a new public high school he can point to and say "forget the blather, there is your stimulus".

If FDR's reconstruction projects did not work, as repub revisionists say, how come he was reelected 3 times?
07:39 PM on 02/10/2009
Invest in Americans.

Or face depression then world war.

Fear mongering?

Or the historical truth?

BushCo lied to us.

This is not a lie.
04:51 PM on 02/09/2009
Hope over fear. Well that didn't last long did it.

Bush used fear to do all his bad moves and now...........here we have it again.
11:13 PM on 02/07/2009
GO OBAMA GO!
WE SUPPORT YOU ONE MILLION PERCENT!

STOP DRAGGING THE TRAIN TO CHANGE REPUNKS AND NEOCONS!!!!
STOP IT, AND LET THIS PASS!!!
10:54 AM on 02/10/2009
HEY--the election is OVER.

This is not about obama.
This is not about 2 parties.

This is about OUR COUNTRY.

Remember that & Think for yourself, for gwaud saykes!
09:23 PM on 02/07/2009
Who is the Fear Monger now?
Another name called the former president that has been taken by the new president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
12:02 AM on 02/08/2009
Answer to the question: Dick Cheney.

Fear Monger: One who invents imaginary evils in order to influence people's actions and beliefs.

Leader: One who shows people reality in order to influence their actions and beliefs.
11:17 AM on 02/09/2009
WHOO HOO, OWNED....... A fear monger... who hasn't got the message yet that he lost, and needs to let it go..... we don't need his rhetoric any more. GOOD RIDDANCE!!!
11:18 AM on 02/09/2009
old age and wretchedness = bitterness!
06:34 PM on 02/07/2009
This was very well done. There is talk that he took too long to do this, but it seems to me he was on shows before this. He did his job pushing the stimulus.
05:52 PM on 02/07/2009
I love Obama. Every time I am uneasy, every time I doubt him, he sticks to his principles and comes through for us.
11:12 AM on 02/10/2009
Growup and THINK for yourself, first.
05:19 PM on 02/07/2009
Obama might be hating life
http://hateonme.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ie37ciAOOQ0
03:47 PM on 02/07/2009
The right criticizes Bush for not really having been a conservative. There are at least two things wrong with their argument:

1. They could have said,"No." They apparently know how to do that now.
2. Do they really believe that U.S. still believes the old wisdom of 1980? Look at the folks who sold the salmonella-infested peanute butter. Maybe they would not have done so if the FDA's inspection program had not been gutted by successive Republican administrations. Most people are beginning to believe that government does have a role to play.

If you think about it, who benefits from a government that stays out of it all? Let's see.

1. People with cars who can drive out of Katrina-deluged New Orleans. (Most people could do that.)
2. People who don't need any help with health care if they lose a job.
3. People who want to send their children to private schools anyway, and who would prefer to fund publics schools as little as possible, or maybe not at all, if they can finally push the voucher program through.
4. People who are quite sure they will never need any assistance from the government.

A lot of us don't fit any of those categories, and, especially now, people want help from the government. Tax cuts should have already created a booming economy if that is all that was needed.
03:38 PM on 02/07/2009
The GOP is betting on failure. It's the only chance they have in '10 and '12 . They know it will be approved with or without them. The only one's who will vote "yes" are those in "blue" states. If Obama's plan works, they won't have a chance, so they are hoping for failure, even at the expense of the economy. They are hoping for a big "i told you so".
11:19 AM on 02/07/2009
All of you bashing Bush for ruining the economy with his conservatism need to realize that none of his economic policies were conservative. His massive spending on the war, huge expansion of medicare (prescription drug benefits) and feeble attempts to spend our way out of the crisis (TARP=epic failure)
are why we are in this situation. Obama's plan to spend even more will not fix things. Those of you attempting to re-write history will not change the fact that tax cuts on businesses will create jobs. No one that continually demonizes businesses and corporations has ever been offered a job by a poor person. George Bush was responsible for enormous government growth. looks like Obama will continue that policy.
02:19 PM on 02/07/2009
Society dead weight and toxic ideas. Sad, some among us just can't learn and have to be carried by the intelligent.
03:29 PM on 02/07/2009
Are you an economist? Didn't think so.
06:07 AM on 02/07/2009
Looks like the bus has broken down and needs a major overhaul. A new bus driver with all his excellent driving records ain't gonna do a bit of good. The bus cannot be driven from its break down point, it needs a breakdown service to pick it up and take it to the garage for a major overhaul service.
There is no bipartisan plan in this so called pork barrelled stimulus package.It looks more and more like a bully rail road administration. Republicans should not associate themselves with this unilateral drafted "stimulus package".
It will be better that there is no package at all than this hastily badly drafted pork package.... sorry so called "stimulus package..".
07:31 AM on 02/07/2009
Man runs into brick wall, awakens hours later blabbing inchoherently...witness states that man was blabbing right before running into wall...
03:31 PM on 02/07/2009
See "Great Depression" - how we came out of it? Stimulus package by FDR. Economy began to turn around in 1933. Tax cuts don't work - trickle down doesn't work. America voted for change - get over it.
10:11 AM on 02/08/2009
You want change, you got it . . . unfortunately it's what's left in the bottom of your pocket!
10:27 AM on 02/09/2009
Sorry to burst your bubble but we still had 19% unemployment as late as 1938, five years after FDR started the New Deal. Obama's economic guru, Christina Romer, wrote a paper detailing how the massive growth in the money supply (M1) was actually a greater factor in at least not making the 25% unemployment of the early 1930's worse. WWII and the several million soldiers going to war got us back to full employment, not the New Deal.
01:39 AM on 02/07/2009
I'm glad the this is the man in our White House he is taking control and because there are a few things people don't like they say he doing a horrible job. Well for only being in the House for 100 days is doing more then Bush ever thought about doing. He is concerned about the people and the things that we have it is about time. More jobs means more money going back to the government and less people on welfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:05 PM on 02/06/2009
Jane, Obama has been nearly the only responsible adult in this drama, and for that, you're laying all the blame on him. I understand, he's the only one in whom you've had much hope, but it is not his fault that you're disappointed, it's the fault of Ben Nelson, Susan Collins, and of course Jim DeMint, Lindsey Gramm, David Vitter and their horrid fellow southern delegates.

quote:
Rather than define the bill by its substance and make its opponents attack jobs creation, the strategy was to talk about process -- how everyone's ideas on both sides of the aisle would be welcome and that this bill would represent the best bipartisan thinking about how to face the current economic crisis. That left the door wide open for Republicans to step through and caterwaul that their ideas weren't being respected ...
/quote

It left the door equally wide open for Republicans to step through, admit that stimulus means spending, and help find more good spending options. They chose to eliminate the most efficient form of stimulus, food stamps, and reduce another very efficient form, infrastructure. It is Republicans' and fiscally foolish Democrats' faults, not the Democratic majority and absolutely not President Obama's fault. He gave them every opportunity to do the right thing and they forfeited the benefit of the doubt. By the time conservative constituents figure out any of this, they'll all be unemployed and it will be much too late for them.
04:58 PM on 02/09/2009
WHat? "They chose to eliminate the most efficient form of stimulus, food stamps,"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joel Ford
Whose truth?
07:18 PM on 02/06/2009
The people criticizing the plan sound like people who aren't reading the bill as a whole, and are criticizing a part of it they they have labeled long ago as "a bad way to spend money." It's like a knee-jerk reaction, or like a stoned teenager calling a fusion band "gay", even if he hasn't heard their record, because he knows all fusion music is "gay". It's a form of vanity, a deranged and arrogant kind of self-preservation that needs to be examined and heavily ridiculed.