Panetta Confirmation Hearing: Obama's CIA Pick Says No More "Extraordinary Rendition"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PAMELA HESS | February 5, 2009 07:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Central Intelligence Agency Director nominee Leon Panetta testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on his nomination. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — CIA Director nominee Leon Panetta assured senators Thursday that the Obama administration will not send prisoners to countries for torture or other treatment that violates U.S. values as he contended had occurred during the Bush presidency.

Panetta, testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee, later acknowledged that he does not know specifically what happened in the secret program allowing so-called "extraordinary rendition." CIA Director Michael Hayden has said that the Bush administration moved secret prisoners between countries for interrogation and incarceration, separate from the judicial system, fewer than 100 times.

Panetta said that President Barack Obama forbids what Panetta called "that kind of extraordinary rendition _ when we send someone for the purpose of torture or actions by another country that violate our human values."

"What happened I can't tell you specifically," he said later, "but clearly steps were taken that prompted this president to say those things ought not to happen again."

Rendition has been used by U.S. presidents for several decades; Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., said the Clinton administration used it 80 times. However, Panetta said the difference is whether the prisoner is transferred to another government for prosecution in its judicial system or for secret interrogations that may lead to torture.

Bush administration officials have said no prisoners were transferred without credible assurances from the host governments that the prisoners would not be tortured or treated in a way that violates international law.

Panetta said he considers appropriate those renditions that send individuals to other countries to face prosecution.

"Having said that, if we capture a high-value prisoner, I believe we have the right to hold that individual temporarily, to debrief that individual and to make sure that individual is properly incarcerated so we can maintain control over that individual," he said.

Story continues below
advertisement

While the Obama administration is turning its back on some Bush administration practices, Panetta said there is no intention to hold CIA officers responsible for the policies they were told to carry out. CIA interrogators who used waterboarding or other harsh techniques against prisoners with the permission of the White House should not be prosecuted, he said.

The Bush White House approved CIA waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning, for three prisoners in 2002 and 2003. The CIA banned the practice internally in 2006. Obama has prohibited harsh interrogation techniques going forward.

But Panetta said if interrogators went beyond the methods they were told were legal, they should be investigated.

"We can protect this country, we can get the information we need, we can provide for the security of the American people and we can abide by the law. I'm absolutely convinced that we can do that," he said.

Panetta said he would come to the job with a list of questions he wants the CIA to be able to answer, including the location of Osama bin Laden and when and where al-Qaida will next try to attack the U.S. He also said he wants to increase intelligence gathering and analyses on potential problems with Russia, China, Africa and Latin America, as well as the effects of the unfolding economic crisis.

"Our first responsibility is to prevent surprise," he said.

The former White House chief of staff under President Clinton and ex-congressman from California has extensive experience in government but little in intelligence gathering or analysis. He told the committee that he has asked former CIA chiefs_ notably former President George H.W. Bush _ how to compensate for that shortcoming.

"They all told me to listen carefully to the professionals at the agency but also to stay closely engaged with Congress," Panetta said. "I am a creature of Congress."

Panetta acknowledged that he has little professional intelligence experience. But, he added: "I know Washington. I know how it works. I think I also know why it fails to work."

For intelligence expertise, he said, he would retain the top four officials now at the CIA, including Deputy Director Steven Kappes. He promised not to meddle in day-to-day intelligence operations.

"I anticipate focusing primarily on ensuring policy and procedure is handled correctly, rather than intervening personally in the details of operational planning or the production of individual pieces of analysis," he said. "But let me assure you, the decisions at the CIA will be mine."

He promised to root out any "yes men," saying: "I would encourage dissent. I always have."

Panetta also told the committee that he would brief the entire House and Senate intelligence committees as much as possible, rather than just its top members. He said the Bush administration abused that practice.

"Too often critical issues were kept from this committee," he said.

One of those issues, according to the senators, was the information that the CIA last October recalled its top spy in Algeria because he allegedly raped two women. The committee only learned of the action from news reports this week.

Panetta said Congress should have been informed last fall, and he said the CIA officer should not only have been called back to Washington but fired immediately.

WASHINGTON — CIA Director nominee Leon Panetta assured senators Thursday that the Obama administration will not send prisoners to countries for torture or other treatment that violates U.S. valu...
WASHINGTON — CIA Director nominee Leon Panetta assured senators Thursday that the Obama administration will not send prisoners to countries for torture or other treatment that violates U.S. valu...
 
Comments
142
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

WTF...he just retracted this...do these people have a spine....Reality must s.u.c.k. once in power

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 02/06/2009
photo

George Washington was right; abrogating the citizens' essential liberties does not make us safer, and those who would accept such an exchange are fools who deserve neither liberty nor security.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/06/2009
photo

great. now how about "regular" rendition?

I dont care how long it's been done and how many Presidents have done it. Kidnapping is kidnapping is kidnapping.

Imagine the uproar if the Russians or Chinese or Iranians snatched Americans off of American streets and spirited them away in the night. It matters not one bit if torture is involved or not, it's still a criminal act we have no business participating in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 02/06/2009

Panetta says, "we will not conduct "extra ordin ary ren dition", and, if you believe that, we also has a large bridge for sale in San Francisco and a needle shaped building for sale in Seattle".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 02/06/2009

Looks like 2012 is shaping for Change II- for the republicans. They'll have to overturn all these irresponsible- knee jerk policy decisions being made by a bunch of rookies learning on the job. scary . Hey Leon take some of that $800,000 you lined your pockets with nd buy some freakin books on anti-terrorism. Learn about the bad guys first- open mouth second.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 AM on 02/06/2009
photo

The rookies were Bush, Ashcroft, Chertoff, Rice, and the rest of the losers we fired last year, and they never did learn, on the job or anywhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 02/06/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 66 fans permalink

One word is missing from this statement of ending rendition.

The word IMMEDIATELY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 AM on 02/06/2009

And then there's this:

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/38662prs20090204.html

Obama Endorses Bush Secrecy On Torture And Rendition (2/4/2009)

NEW YORK – After the British High Court ruled that evidence of British resident Binyam Mohamed's extraordinary rendition and torture at Guantánamo Bay must remain secret because of threats made by the Bush administration to halt intelligence sharing, the Obama administration told the BBC today in a written statement: "The United States thanks the UK government for its continued commitment to protect sensitive national security information and preserve the long-standing intelligence sharing relationship that enables both countries to protect their citizens."

The following can be attributed to Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union:

"Hope is flickering. The Obama administration's position is not change. It is more of the same. This represents a complete turn-around and undermining of the restoration of the rule of law. The new American administration shouldn't be complicit in hiding the abuses of its predecessors."

When the ACLU learned of the High Court's ruling earlier today, it sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton urging her to clarify the Obama administration's position relating to the Mohamed case and calling on her to reject the Bush administration's policy of using false claims of national security to avoid judicial review of controversial programs.

The ACLU's letter to Secretary of State Clinton is available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/general/38660leg20090204.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 02/06/2009
photo

Strange that they would say all that, then end the letter this way:

"The claims made by the British justices that the United States continues to
oppose publication of the judgment in the Binyam Mohamed case--to the point of threatening the future of U.S.-British intelligence cooperation--seems completely at odds with both the anti-torture and transparency executive orders signed by the President. We strongly urge you to clarify the position of the United States and remove any threat related to the publication of the court’s full judgment. "

Sounds to me like we should wait for an answer of clarification before stating it as fact, since what the British justices said don't match the executive orders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 AM on 02/06/2009
photo

I concur. The ACLU is very aggressive, as they must be to do their vital work. But as a result, going off half-cocked based on a preliminary ACLU request for more information, and assuming the worst-case scenario about all the missing information, is a good way to make oneself look foolish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 02/06/2009
- newshawk14 I'm a Fan of newshawk14 8 fans permalink

I completely agree with Leon Panetta, I only ask that he delay his decision until a couple of foreign
operatives have nabbed Bush and Cheney, to have them tried in an international war crimes court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 PM on 02/05/2009
- GrainOSand I'm a Fan of GrainOSand 269 fans permalink
photo

(-:

The icon cannot do justice to how much your comment made me laugh.

Sadness also surfaces in reading your comment. Who would have ever thought that an American President would be worthy of such a remark? It is surreal to think about the implications of the validity of your comment.

Regards of the highest sort

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 02/05/2009
- newshawk14 I'm a Fan of newshawk14 8 fans permalink

Thank you for your kind remarks. I have come to believe that by glossing over
what are in reality crimes, we end up perpetuating them. Ronald Reagan was
cleared of the October surprise, and Bush Sr. was cleared of perjury, with the
help of Lee Hamilton, who felt the American people couldn't handle the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 02/06/2009
- lthuedk 1 I'm a Fan of lthuedk 1 47 fans permalink
photo

Run Neo Con. Run.

When America discovers what the shadow government was up to they are going to spew. It has been too long since the People ran things. Time for change.

This never was a game, Neo Cons. We the People were never going to allow you to attack us from within. Our representatives were never going to allow it. What made you think your bizarre totalitarian deception would fly?

http://www.light-to-dark.com/a_retrospective.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 02/05/2009
- GrainOSand I'm a Fan of GrainOSand 269 fans permalink
photo

Mr. Bond is a study in smug hypocrisy. When Mr. Panetta suggested the U.S. had engage in torture via black sites, he stated something like, "that's news to me". He knew he was obfuscating when he said that.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/12/14/bashmilah/

I am all for bringing murderers to justice. I am all for extracting valuable intelligence from people who are aware of pending murderous intent against America or any nation. I am not for becoming a beast to slay a beast. Yes, I understand that the enemy is committed and will not just spill the beans when caught. Torturing someone to get them to talk as policy becomes American sons and daughters justifiably tortured in future times. Plausible deniability is being able to say we do not torture -- period. You cannot promote democracy in the daylight and torture under the cover of darkness.

I am a pacifist. That does not mean I am soft on crime or soft on retaliation for evil. It means that in order for me to become a violent beast all would truly have to be lost. The way Bush acted via policy, he seemed to be saying all was truly lost so we have to abandon what makes us America. I continue to reject Bush’s analysis, no matter his (then) access to sensitive information, for if all were truly lost, he should have said so, and then I might have considered barbarism as a valid approach.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 PM on 02/05/2009
- zius I'm a Fan of zius 74 fans permalink
photo

we are taking baby steps ...moving from a fascist administration...to a more fair and balanced one ....have patience people....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 02/05/2009
- sandpiper1 I'm a Fan of sandpiper1 13 fans permalink



Rendition to foreign countries is wrong. It was done to a Canadian, Mr. Mahar who was visiting his inlaws and returning home to Canada. He was and is not a terrorist but was renditioned at a US airport and sent to another country where he was tortured for many months. His wife and young children didn't even know what had happened to him until months later. I can't imagine what he must have gone through.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 02/05/2009
photo

That by definition is not rendition. It's Bush's "extraordinary rendition".
Rendition would've been handing him back to Canada's jurisdiction, not to some other foreign country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 02/06/2009
photo

oh, dang !
I was hoping, that since I can't afford a vacation or health care, that I could utter something and be extraordinarily rendited to like, the Cayman Islands for some nice waterboarding followed by a shrimp dinner and maybe a visit to a not for profit greedy Doctor?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 02/05/2009
- Yermammy I'm a Fan of Yermammy 137 fans permalink
photo

Uummmm... Sarah has her own website now. Go drool over there :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 02/05/2009
- Yermammy I'm a Fan of Yermammy 137 fans permalink
photo

Although I like Panetta for bringing new blood into the corrupted and compromised CIA, he will be embarrassed when prosecutions begin of those that clearly and blatantly broke the law. The people (that are watching this) are not stupid, nor weak willed and investigations into the matter will continue until matters are clarified and understood completely. To say that CIA officers that committed torture under orders given by legal council could possibly render them innocent per the "Gestapo Defense" (Nuremburg Trials), but the OLC that invented new and illegal opinions contrary to precedent and against our treaties (Geneva Accords, United Nations Conference Treaty on Torture, etc.) is a clear violation of law and those that wrote said opinions and those that ordered the opinions to fit the actions desired are indeed culpable and complicit of War Crimes against the State. The world is watching, gentlemen. I strongly suggest action before it's thrust upon you, both domestically and internationally.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 02/05/2009
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

Renditioning also needs to be ended.

We have been kidnapping people off the streets in other countries and we either hold them in secret prisons or drop them off to other countries that do torture. The info put out by a guest on Rachel Maddow's show, that we get assurances that they won't be tortured (and then they aren't tortured) has been shown not to be true.

But even without the torture, it's unacceptable for a nation that purports to be adherents to rule of law to be kidnapping citizens of other nations in other nations. The example given was particularly offensive. Eichmann. Yes, he was a very bad criminal, but the answer wasn't for Israel to break the law, send agents to kidnap Eichmann off the streets of Argentina and smuggle him out of the country.

If you want a world where people respect law, you have to live within the laws.

Rendition of any kind must end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 02/05/2009

Good comment.

Do they seriously expect Americans to believe this spin? A "kinder gentler" rendition policy is an absurd idea.

Kidnapping is wrong. Simple.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 02/05/2009
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

Nor should we be renditioning anybody, but Obama has signed on to it.

Shameful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 02/05/2009

Nobody wants to rule it out in case of a major terror threat needs to be prevented. It's not a good thing but it is a necessary evil that maybe possibly needed in the future. It may be the only way to stop a WMD attack for example. But it should not be considered unless it truly is needed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 02/05/2009
photo

Sorry, Beninn, what distinction are you drawing? thx.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 02/05/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect