Activists Call Offshore Drilling "Flirting With Disaster"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

H. JOSEF HEBERT | February 11, 2009 05:04 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Mary Steenburgen, right, with husband Ted Danson, left, founder of Oceana, an ocean advocacy group, is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2009, as Danson testified before the House Natural Resources Committee hearing about offshore drilling. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)

WASHINGTON — Environmental advocates urged Congress on Wednesday to reinstate the broad moratorium on offshore oil drilling, but a key congressman said on that issue "the ship may have already sailed."

Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, said the political reality is that the broad moratorium across 85 percent of the country's Outer Continental Shelf _ lifted by Congress last fall _ is unlikely to be reimposed.

But Rahall, who opened the first of three hearings on offshore drilling, said Congress may need to establish protective buffer areas and place certain regions _ including some waters off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts _ off limits.

"If we are going to start drilling in new areas offshore we're going to have to be aware of what the trade-offs are ... that it can be done safely," said Rahall. He argued that the "vast majority" of Outer Continental Shelf oil resources are already in federal waters, available for leasing.

The hearing came a day after Interior Secretary Ken Salazar ordered a review of offshore oil and gas development, scrapping a sweeping blueprint for expanded offshore drilling proposed in the Bush administration's final days.

While not ruling out expansion of some offshore drilling, Salazar promised to pursue a new direction in energy development, with greater emphasis on using coastal waters to generate energy from wind, the sun and waves.

At a House hearing, Philippe Cousteau, grandson of legendary ocean explorer Jacques Cousteau, urged Congress to reinstate the offshore drilling bans that until last fall had been in effect for 25 years in Atlantic and Pacific coastal waters.

"It's absolutely critical for the health of the oceans," said Cousteau, a board member of the advocacy group Ocean Conservancy. "Oil spills still occur."

Story continues below
advertisement

Actor Ted Danson, a founder and board member of Oceana, an ocean advocacy group, said offshore drilling is "flirting with disaster" because of potential oil spills not only at drilling rigs, but in transporting the oil produced.

Danson said the country should be moving away from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources such as offshore wind and energy from tidal waves because of the threats of climate change, which he said is another threat to ocean health.

Tourism and fishing industry spokesmen from North Carolina, Florida and California said they are worried offshore drilling would impact billions of dollars a year fishing and tourism industries.

"We cannot afford any kind of spill. ... We can't take the risk," D.T. Minich, executive director of the St. Petersburg/Clearwater, Fla. visitor's bureau, told the House panel.

W.F. "Zeek" Grader Jr., executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Association, said he's not so worried about spills, but that exploratory seismic activities and drilling rigs would "kill fish... scare fish and make it impossible for fishing operations to be held."

But Jefferson Angers, president of the Center for Coastal Conservation in Louisiana said: "The fishing and oil and gas industries have coexisted in Louisiana for half a century and they've worked well together."

On restoring the broad moratorium, "it may be the ship has already sailed," said Rahall, adding that the issue is, "do we need buffer areas, do we need certain areas off limits?"

Rep. Doc Hastings of Washington, the House Resources Committee's top Republican, countered that expanded offshore drilling is "about creating good American jobs" and reducing the nation's dependence on foreign oil and the OPEC oil cartel.

But energy experts acknowledge that any new offshore oil development would do little to spur short-term job creation and that it would take years for new leases to be issued and another 5 to 7 years before oil would begin to flow from any new discoveries.

The Interior Department estimates there are at least 18 billion barrels of oil in offshore waters that until recently were off limits, about half of that off California.

The oil industry contends that modern drilling technologies allow environmentally safe offshore oil and gas development and cite the absence of any significant spills from oil rigs during hurricanes Katrina, Gustav and Ike in recent years.

WASHINGTON — Environmental advocates urged Congress on Wednesday to reinstate the broad moratorium on offshore oil drilling, but a key congressman said on that issue "the ship may have already s...
WASHINGTON — Environmental advocates urged Congress on Wednesday to reinstate the broad moratorium on offshore oil drilling, but a key congressman said on that issue "the ship may have already s...
 
Comments
17
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

The noted expert Ted Danson? Made a good bartender on cheers, a great bad guy on Damages, but an expert on our Energy needs and the risks associated with Offshore Drilling? I don't think so. Perhaps we should drill where the oil is likely to be and not worry so much about the actors and politicos think. The federal lands do belong to the nation, not California. Has $4 gasoline been forgotten?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 02/13/2009

$4 gasoline has not been forgotten. And I am sure if we continue to count on it as our major source of energy, and make the value of oil worth that of gold, the oil companies will manage to get the price back up to $4 again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 02/13/2009
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

I agree gasoline will again rise to $4 but it will be on account of world demand and inaction or stupid action on the part of our politicians. The current administraation has a great opportunity to lessen oil's grip on our economy through the Pickens plan and the use of natural gas and they have done nothing (not even given it lip service) but they have postponed the current 5 year plan and Salazar rejected the Utah leases. Not a good start.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 02/14/2009

Ted Danson? Seriously? Did he pick up his political stripes talking his way out of entanglement by the Gallaputians in his TV adaption of Gulliver's Travels or serving beer behind a fake bar?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 02/12/2009
photo

Yes, seriously. Why would you make fun of an actor who cares about important subjects like this?

People like you are have graduated from getting in our way to really annoying.

Sarcasm, especially low-grade stuff like this, is really a problem in this country. That, and it's not funny at all. Go away, please. And stay there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 AM on 02/13/2009

Why not? Relax a bit man . . . I'm sure his success has afforded him the time to formulate some constructive opinions on this issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 02/13/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 147 fans permalink
photo

Space based Solar power is the way to go, and then transmit it to earth as Tesla devised and foresaw...

We can then sell energy all over the world to the rest of the world...

Don't go to Mars, design build and launch space based solar collectors that transmit the power to earth...

Also we can just start growing Industrial Hemp which is easy cheap environmentally friendly eats CO2 like crazy for fuel both bio diesel and cellulose ethanol for far less cost and effort and it will create more than off shore drilling..

Why drill when we can just grow a weed that renews every four months...and it does not get you high..so why not grow in all over America it is so simple..?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 02/12/2009
- ccairnes I'm a Fan of ccairnes 3 fans permalink

Why indeed. Just add up the cost of having hemp be illegal and think about the money that would be saved as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 02/12/2009

Mars, moon or space based solar power, they all need a lower cost way to get into space. Fortunately there are two ways that came out this year that look to get the cost under $100/kg. That's 200 times less than what it costs now, but more than 600 times below the theory minimum.

Both methods are discussed here: http://htyp.org/Hundred_dollars_a_kg

Keith Henson

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 02/12/2009

What happens when an earthquake hits the West coast?
Millions of gallons of oil get purged into the Pacific and Malibu's beaches.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 02/12/2009
- NCRDIBULL I'm a Fan of NCRDIBULL 7 fans permalink

hopefully , California will fall in the ocean

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 02/12/2009
photo

Ah the optimist amongst us speaks up.

I ask you , what would the US be w/out CA?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 02/12/2009

How? The US Government would not permit facilities to be installed off the West Coast that do not have some sort of protection against damage from Earthquakes engineered into them.

The same holds true for skyscrapers in San Francisco and LA. You don't just build buildings that will fall over. You don't just build oil production facilities that catastrophically fail either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 02/14/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect