iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Judd Gregg Withdraws Commerce Secretary Nomination (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/15/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:05 PM ET

New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination to serve as President Obama's Commerce Secretary. Gregg cited "irresolvable conflicts" involving the stimulus package and the Census.

Gregg held a press conference Thursday night to announce his withdrawal. The move has sparked new concerns about Obama's vetting process, as sources close to the White House say the president's team was not fully aware of Gregg's position on the census prior to his being nominated to the Commerce post.

White House officials were "blindsided" by the news, Politico reports.

"I couldn't be Judd Gregg and serve in the Cabinet. I should have faced up to the reality of that earlier," Gregg said. "I've been my own person and I began to wonder if I could be an effective team player. The president deserves someone who can block for his policies. As a practical matter I can contribute to his agenda better--where we agree--as a senator and I hope to do that."


"The fault lies with me," Gregg said in an interview with Politico, refusing to discuss any conversations he has had with Obama himself. Asked if he felt the decision would be an embarrassment for the president, Gregg said, "I may have embarrassed myself but hopefully not him."

Obama said that he was surprised by Gregg's withdrawal in an interview with the State Journal-Register:

"It comes as something of a surprise, because the truth, you know, Mr. Gregg approached us with interest and seemed enthusiastic.'


"But ultimately, I think, we're going to just keep on making efforts to build the kind of bipartisan concensus around important issues that I think the American people are looking for."

LISTEN to Obama's comments to the State Journal-Register here.

NBC News' John Yang added that when he contacted the White House Press Office, Gregg's withdrawal "was news to them" and they seemed "a little surprised by this ... You have to wonder how much advance warning" they had.

In a statement, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs confirmed that Gregg's lack of support on key policies made his nomination untenable.

"Senator Gregg reached out to the President and offered his name for Secretary of Commerce. He was very clear throughout the interviewing process that despite past disagreements about policies, he would support, embrace, and move forward with the President's agenda. Once it became clear after his nomination that Senator Gregg was not going to be supporting some of President Obama's key economic priorities, it became necessary for Senator Gregg and the Obama administration to part ways. We regret that he has had a change of heart."

Republican Congressional leaders were pleased with Gregg's withdrawal.

The Hill reports:

Asked for his reaction to Gregg's withdrawal as a candidate, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) responded simply: "Wonderful."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was equally gleeful, telling Politico: "It's great to have him back."

Earlier on Thursday, Republicans criticized the White House for taking some control of the Census away from the Commerce Secretary in light of concerns about Gregg from black and Latino elected officials.

"If President Obama doesn't trust Sen. Gregg to oversee a fair and accurate census, he should withdraw the nomination," said GOP Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana.

As chairman of the Senate panel overseeing the Census Bureau budget, Gregg frequently sought to cut funding that critics believe led to an undercounting of minorities.

Gregg was also under fire for refusing to vote on the stimulus package, leaving both voters at home and officials in Washington confused about his stance.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson withdrew several weeks ago from consideration for the same post in the wake of a grand jury investigation into into how one of his political donors landed a lucrative state contract. He has not been implicated personally in the scandal.

Gregg's full statement:

I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.


However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.

Obviously the President requires a team that is fully supportive of all his initiatives.

I greatly admire President Obama and know our country will benefit from his leadership, but at this time I must withdraw my name from consideration for this position.

As we move forward, I expect there will be many issues and initiatives where I can and will work to assure the success of the President's proposals. This will certainly be a goal of mine.

Kathy and I also want to specifically thank Governor Lynch and Bonnie Newman for their friendship and assistance during this period. In addition we wish to thank all the people, especially in New Hampshire, who have been so kind and generous in their supportive comments.

As a further matter of clarification, nothing about the vetting process played any role in this decision. I will continue to represent the people of New Hampshire in the United States Senate.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination to serve as President Obama's Commerce Secretary. Gregg cited "irresolvable conflicts" involving the stimulus package and the Census. Gre...
New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination to serve as President Obama's Commerce Secretary. Gregg cited "irresolvable conflicts" involving the stimulus package and the Census. Gre...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,664
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (150 total)
12:34 PM on 02/15/2009
The solution? LOU DOBBS AND NANCY GRACE TO HEAD COMMERCE DEPARTMENT. Breaking news, at http://humoristonloan.squarespace.com/
12:16 PM on 02/15/2009
Judd Gregg was very gracious and principled in his withdrawal, but this is another lesson in "bipartisanship" for Obama: the lesson is, the GOP can't be reasoned with. It is the Party of Nope. So Obama, stop sucking up and selling out. Stop making deals with the devil. Do what needs to be done and be the progressive president America is finally ready for.
05:09 PM on 02/14/2009
Having watched C-SPAN a lot, I was dumbfounded by Gregg's appointment in the first place. He's one of the most rabid fiscal conservatives in the Congress, and putting him in a Cabinet post was trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. That was NEVER going to work. Maybe he thought he could be a mole and undermine whatever Obama set out to do and then decided any such attempt would be futile. There's more here than a simple and sudden recognition of his own predilections.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AZ AF VET
Old lefty.
03:30 PM on 02/14/2009
Glad he's gone. He will probably not run again. Bye Bye!
08:30 PM on 02/13/2009
To see that the GoP suddenly seems principled, seems extremely ironic at best. I expect its numbers to continue to generally dwindle, except perhaps for in the likes of pockets of back-woods sheltered and isolated Wyoming, Alaska. Even West Virginia is turning blue as of late.

With the GoP constantly opting out of any reformist measures, and then not being able to effect any influence on the outcome anyhow may only serve to render them irrelevant in the eyes of the electorate.

Caveat preemptor: Too much power in the hands of even the most benevolent kings may corrupt, if not the king upon whom it is bestowed, it may be the king that follows.

Will there be a political party sound, cohesive and capable enough to rise to the occasion of filling the deep gap the GoP is leaving as it whittles itself into oblivion?
08:28 PM on 02/13/2009
I know that the GoP has done much soul-searching as of late and wants to return to its roots of less spending and smaller government.

Nevertheless, I get this strong suspicion that the GoP will be seen as the obstructionist party in times of dire need, a need that exploded, a need that of denial was neglected. Let us hope that the world public not easily nor quickly forget that the spending that took place was under the GoP watch was unprecedented, plus the unprecedented debt came from what was originally a very lavish surplus. This very lavish surplus was one the GoP inherited from its previous Democratic administration. These moneys were squandered while untraceable moneys were gained by the likes of Halliburton, Bechtel, Fluor, etc., through no-bid contracts on endeavors that, frankly, reminded me of Bridge Over River Kwai: Nation blow-up, nation-rebuilding, nation-blow-up, nation-rebuilding, nation-blow-up-nation-rebuilding... While moneys were deposited in numbered accounts, never to trickle back homeward for a war that was inhumane, senseless and extremely poorly managed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:05 PM on 02/13/2009
What a loser.

So much for Dems "reaching across the aisle". It only works if the other side grabs your hand. The republicans are so bent on keeping partisanship alive. I suppose it's the only power they have left and are grasping wildly at whatever they can.

What a loser.
05:07 PM on 02/13/2009
It is the ultimate in hypocrisy of what the Republican Party is doing. They can give tax deductions to the top 1% of our population, but to give the middle class a tax break it is a NO NO for them. When they can't steal the money they won't cooperate with this administration. This is not the party of Lincoln or Eisenhower or Teddy Roosevelt. If they can not control this country, they will try to disrupt any effort to help this economy grow and get us out of this mess that started with the Reagan administration. They are out to destroy the middle class at any cost to our nation. Remember we are at war in Iraq because George Bush wanted to avenge the supposed attach on his father. Remember the Bush family has been in business with the Bin Laden family for many years.
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
07:29 PM on 02/13/2009
Exactly. TPM had some IRS number showing that the top 400 people earned 1 milllion EACH AND EVERY WORKING DAY and paid 17% in TAXES....So much for progressivity...So much for FAIR TAXES....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:23 PM on 02/13/2009
funny how the Republicans passed so easily the Patriot Act, all the tax cuts for the super rich and corporations, the no bid gazillions in contracts for the wars?
And now they whine and fight domestic stimulus?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
03:52 PM on 02/13/2009
Agree. That's them in a frame !
08:34 PM on 02/13/2009
The GoP is now dead and irrelevant. But, who, what party will rise to fill the deep gap it has left? As trail-blazing as change may be happening, even if for the better, I'm affraid of the one-party system.

Absolute power corrupts, if not the most benevolent of monarchs, the one that follows...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:19 PM on 02/13/2009
Mr Gregg apparently wanted some free media attention. It seems he volunteered himself and then makes a big show of backing out. I wonder what personal gain he seeks? We will see.
03:07 PM on 02/13/2009
It is hard to blame Gregg for not wanting to be attached at the hip to the giant stinking pile of garbage left behind by the last president. It is immensely saddening that despite having an opportunity to implement new ideas and solutions for the American people, that he chose instead to follow the same tired, worn, and failed path of every other republican that puts ideology first, and our country last. This is a serious blow to our economy, and is a vote of no confidence in our markets that has damaged our country as a result of his flippant insincerity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:18 PM on 02/13/2009
agree Rove part of problem, not solution- Mr. Gregg.
04:42 PM on 02/13/2009
VERY WELL SAID, ROVE!
02:54 PM on 02/13/2009
REPUBLICANS' MOTTO: "OUR WAY OR NO WAY." THEY ARE NOT ONE BIT INTERESTED IN THE WELFARE OF THE UNITED STATES ! I CAN'T STAND THEM !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:21 PM on 02/13/2009
agree again! Alab! Remember when they whined all through their majority in Senate, House and W House that Dems were "obstructionists" and told them to go **** themselves?
02:38 PM on 02/13/2009
time for obama to realize that bipartisanship cut both ways. he can't accomplish that goal without outreach from the other side. stop the marketing and move on. your agenda should be your priority. you only have 2 good years to make it happen.
02:12 PM on 02/13/2009
i hope his constituants remember what a jerk they put in office and throw him out next election
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:24 PM on 02/13/2009
let's hope that all people in the USA that can spell constituent vote for Obama again
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
07:31 PM on 02/13/2009
people who can spell...
01:34 PM on 02/13/2009
Very little is being said about the underlying story here.
Yes, Judd ASKED to be in the cabinet--probably because he wanted the tight reign on the census.
But what is getting little attention is that this a GOOD THING for any eco-minded person.
Check out "Gregg does Obama, humanity, next 50 generations huge favor and withdraws"
http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/13judd-gregg-commerce-withdrawal-global-warming/

We should be happy the guy is gone--and so what if Obabma's vetting process is tainted. I'll take that when you consider that the guy was a Bushie and really would have had no positive contributions to this administration except to be a detractor and a nay-sayer.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MossyOak
03:00 PM on 02/13/2009
Could it be Gregg was a Republican plant sent into manipulate the census? How else could the Thugs win in the next election unless they cheated with redistrict manipulation? Obama preempted and threw a monkey wrench in their plan. I'm glad we elected the smart guy.
08:40 PM on 02/13/2009
Forgive me if I sin with my mind, but... ...Attempted gerrymandering by the desperate GoP comes to mind.