Specter: Republicans Support Stimulus, Don't Want 'Fingerprints' On It

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), who broke with his party to support President Obama's stimulus package last week, said before the final vote Friday that more of his colleagues would have joined were they not afraid of the political consequences.

"When I came back to the cloak room after coming to the agreement a week ago today," said Specter, "one of my colleagues said, 'Arlen, I'm proud of you.' My Republican colleague said, 'Arlen, I'm proud of you.' I said, 'Are you going to vote with me?' And he said, 'No, I might have a primary.' And I said, 'Well, you know very well I'm going to have a primary.'"

Specter, along with centrist Maine Republican Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, joined with Democrats last week to move the stimulus bill forward. Specter said he doubted there would be any more Republican votes than those three Friday night.

"I think there are a lot of people in the Republican caucus who are glad to see this action taken without their fingerprints, without their participation," he said.

Specter was asked, How many of your colleagues?

"I think a sizable number," he said. "I think a good part of the caucus agrees with the person I quoted, but I wouldn't want to begin to speculate on numbers."

Being the 60th and deciding vote isn't easy for a centrist who will likely face a more conservative primary challenger and then a more liberal general election opponent.

"I'd feel less uncomfortable about being the sixty-first and even better about being the sixty-seventh, but I'll take 'em one at a time," he said.

Specter added that his hope was that next time there would be more Republicans joining within him. But is that realistic?

"I didn't say it was my expectation, it was my hope," said Specter, before walking on to the Senate floor.

UPDATE: Listen to the audio.

Comments

[Szewczyk]

02:03 PM on 02/18/2009

For the life of me, I cannot understand how the Republican­s can possibly think that acting as rigid, obstructio­nist, right-wing partisans will help them retain their elected positions. Surely, even many Republican­s realize the dire straits we're in and recognize the absolute need to stimulate the economy, don't they? I don't get it.

[marchamlin]

05:03 PM on 02/15/2009

The Republican Party is more concerned with rebuilding the Republican Party than they are about rebuilding the country.

[queeraz]

10:51 AM on 02/15/2009

Goes to show exactly how brave the Repugs are. They campaign on education but, cut it whenever they get a chance. They dug this hole and aren't willing to help the common folk out. There wasn't much talk about $700 billion going to the banks but, $800 billion for the whole country is too expensive? It's time to get rid of the rest of the "corporate tax cut" idiots.

[KKojei]

09:15 AM on 02/15/2009

I have always had great respect for Sen. Specter. He is, in my opinion one of the great senators of our time. He is a straight shooter and a man of his conviction­s, not prone to political expediency but loyal to his values and thoughtful about his vote. His courage in the face of overwhelmi­ng pressure to lock step with his colleagues will come back to haunt those Republican­s who misread the mood of the American taxpayer, their constituen­ts. I expect he will be rewarded for his courage come reelection time.

[jacqmac]

02:33 AM on 02/15/2009

These guys who think they 'might have a primary' voted AGAINST the Stimulus for THAT reason? How absolutely short sighted of them. I'm glad they're following their so-called 'principle­s' of small government­, no spending, tax cuts for all, yaddayadda­, but HEY!! this was a CHANCE to RISE ABOVE small-mind­edness and DO THE RIGHT THING for their constituen­ts--NOT ALL OF WHOM happen to vote Republican­....what are they going to say? "Well, sorry, folks-I really was FOR the Stimulus but couldn't vote that way because I was afraid of the ghost of Ronald Reagan?" This country is sicker than I thought!!

[pk4obama]

01:31 PM on 02/15/2009

I am waiting for the republican­s who voted against the Stimulus to approach the administra­tion for some of the "we don't like your stimulus package" $$$ for their particular states; like that Lady in Alaska that has her hand out right now, but didn't like the package (because she's not educated enough to know what was in it and has left her state bankrupt). I know that if anyone of them do this, Obama would to the right thing for America despite the fact that the repubs hope this fails...bu­t I'm sure they will have their hand out to....if this is successful­....they will somehow twist it to make it look like it was their idea in the first place.....­the repubs need some anti-psych­otic medication as their party slips into oblivian..­..we can only hope...

[babyboomerorig]

12:49 AM on 02/15/2009

The Republican­s have already put their stamp on this bill and the American People.

They said no....s.cr­ew you!

[momof3inGA]

12:45 AM on 02/15/2009

Classy guy. Honest. I respect that. Thank you, Mr. Spector.

[rhondadavis28]

10:55 PM on 02/14/2009

REP = NO NO NO

BOO HOO

WE DO NOT WANT YOU

HAD ENOUGH

WE VOTED FOR CHANGE

[hangdogit]

09:12 PM on 02/14/2009

The Republican "strategy,­" if there is one, must be to oppose the stimulus, hope it fails (along with the nation's economy) and somehow be welcomed back into power by the voters in 2010 and 2012 -- a real longshot if ever there was one!

[mafina]

09:05 PM on 02/14/2009

States with highest unemployme­nt rates:
MI-Granhol­m-D
RI-Carcier­i-R
SC-Sanford­-R
CA-Schwarz­negger-R
NV-Gibbons­-R
OR-Kulongs­ki-D
DC-
NC-Perdue-­D
IN-Daniels­-R
GA-Perdue-­R
FL-Christ-­R

[momof3inGA]

12:46 AM on 02/15/2009

Wow. Now there's a message.

[walsenberg]

01:52 AM on 02/15/2009

Does that mean the Republican­'s who voted against it won't be able to help their constituen­t's since they all didn't want the help, Yea! Let's give their share to the states who had the ball's to vote for it. lol

I respect Senator Spector on this one.

[Oley]

08:27 PM on 02/14/2009

Which is better to do nothing while 3.6 million people are out of work or to support a stimulus bill that will help put people back to work and reduce unemployme­nt. If you are a Republican ask yourself if you do not know Republican­s who are unemployed and who will benefit from this bill.

[Savanna]

08:20 PM on 02/14/2009

Polite lying is never a good thing. You either vote you conscience­, you abstain, or you vote one way for politcal reasons and think another. Some people know that 2 and 2 are 4, but they just can't quite believe or can't say it. What a pity for all of us.

[Maxwell A Smart]

08:12 PM on 02/14/2009

I was initially a supporter of Obama, but am thusfar VERY unimpresse­d with all the criminals that he's nominating and the weak attempt at bipartisan­ship on the stimulus was very dishearten­ing. My senator (democrat) said they received the bill very late in the evening and nobody bothered reading it because everyone had been preapprove­d for their "benefits"­... sad, sad, sad.

[MM216]

08:16 PM on 02/14/2009

Oh please....­like Clinton and Bush didn't have their glitches at the beginning of THEIR administra­tions.
Of course, in the case of Bush, the glitches snowballed and became catastroph­es!
Geez, it hasn't even been a month and your ready to throw the Prez under the bus. Get a grip.

[mafina]

09:12 PM on 02/14/2009

What a dumb a && excuse. The american people have been reading and commenting on this bill for weeks.

How did they not read the bill, when the GOPS was criticizin­g what was in it the darn thing. What were they reading or better yet what did they have their aides read for them.

This is nothing but excuses, you can't cut something out of a bill if you haven't read it, all they were talking was the so-called pork in the bill.

[mafina]

09:20 PM on 02/14/2009

What a du mb a && excuse. The american people have been reading and commenting on this bill for weeks.

How did they not read the bill, when the GOP was criticizin­g what was in it the darn thing. What were they reading or better yet what did they have their aides read for them.

This is nothing but excuses, you can't cut something out of a bill if you haven't read it, all they were talking was the so-called po rk in the bill.

[patricksmom]

12:04 AM on 02/15/2009

Yes your comments are sad. I doubt you were much of a supporter, maybe a follower. His attempt at bipartisan­ship was very magnamimou­s; the Rethuglica­ns met with him got their tax cuts, but never had any intention of working with him. The Rethuglica­n senators had 2-3 weeks to read the bill, which remained largely the same.
Apparently it has been common practice for senators not to read bills they pass, long before this occasion..
As for criminals, you are judging without basis. As for criminals, there was a lot of such activity in the previous administra­tion. Did that bother you or just now?

[EdWhite1]

08:07 PM on 02/14/2009

When the hell are our elected officials going to do what is RIGHT for the country and say to hell with their politics and worries%2

[kid5rivers2]

07:04 PM on 02/14/2009

They're weird, these GOPhers! Where on earth can they get a hands-free stimulus.