General Motors Seeks Up To $30B In Aid, Plans To Cut 47,000 Jobs

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM KRISHER and KEN THOMAS | February 17, 2009 08:14 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A truck drives under the pedestrian bridge at the General Motors Canada Oshawa Car Assembly Plant in Oshawa, Canada, on Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2009. General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, racing to finish restructuring plans to present to the U.S. government, are unlikely to complete deals with debtholders and union workers by the government-imposed deadline on Tuesday. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Nathan Denette)

DETROIT — General Motors Corp., presenting a dire outlook for the future, said Tuesday it may need $30 billion in total government financing to weather the economic downturn and would cut 47,000 jobs worldwide and shutter five more U.S. factories in a massive restructuring plan.

The job cuts, which would take place by the end of this year, include 10,000 salaried and 37,000 blue-collar positions, amounting to 19 percent of the company's current global work force.

GM is already surviving on $13.4 billion in federal loans and said in a 117-page plan submitted to the Treasury Department that it would seek an additional $16.6 billion if economic conditions worsen, but it could achieve profitability in two years and fully repay its loans by 2017.

The U.S. automaker presented its turnaround plan as it worked to win concessions from the United Auto Workers union and bondholders to dramatically resize the company. The UAW said it reached a tentative deal with GM, Chrysler LLC and Ford Motor Co. on contract changes, but discussions were still under way about how the companies would fund union-run trust funds that will take over the companies' retiree health care obligations starting next year.

GM said it was making progress but had not yet achieved all the concessions from union workers, lenders, dealers and suppliers that the Bush administration sought in the loan terms provided last December.

Chief Financial Officer Ray Young said the company hopes to exchange two-thirds of its roughly $28 billion in unsecured bond debt by the end of March in order to meet the loan terms.

Bondholders, he said, signed a letter saying that they were making progress with the company. The UAW also signed a similar letter saying progress had been made on the health care trust fund. The terms of the loan suggest that GM make half of the required $20 billion in payments to the fund as company stock instead of cash.

Young said the talks have reached a critical stage.

Story continues below
advertisement

"At this juncture we feel we can make progress" and meet requirements to finalize the deals by March 31, he said.

President Barack Obama's administration will review the plans from GM and Chrysler LLC but could pull the loans if they don't approve the turnaround plans by then. The review could be extended into April, but if the government demands the money back it would force the companies into bankruptcy.

Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner said the plan submitted Tuesday is more aggressive than the one presented to the government in December because besides U.S. sales plummeting to a 26-year low, the global economy and auto sales worldwide have deteriorated since then.

"Today's plan is significantly more aggressive because it has to be," Wagoner told reporters Tuesday night. "We have taken stronger actions, we needed to."

In December, GM said it might need a total of $18 billion in government financing but only got a commitment of $13.4 billion, including $4 billion that the automaker received Tuesday.

GM predicted it could run out of money next month and said it wants to receive an additional $2 billion in March and an additional $2.6 billion in April.

The company has a $4.5 billion revolving line of credit that must be refinanced in 2011 but now believes that private funding won't be available, so the automaker is asking the government to lend the money.

If market conditions deteriorate, GM says it may also need an additional $7.5 billion revolving line of credit to stay afloat, for a total potential request of $30 billion.

Chief Operating Officer Fritz Henderson said the company explored three bankruptcy scenarios, all of which would cost the government more than $30 billion.

The government, he said, is the only place the company could get financing for a Chapter 11 reorganization, because the credit markets are frozen. The worst-case bankruptcy scenario would cost the government $100 billion, Henderson said, because revenue would severely drop.

He said there is not a lot of research about whether people would buy cars from an automaker in bankruptcy protection, but "that which is there suggests that sales fall off a cliff."

GM's plan details extensive cuts. Of the 47,000 jobs to be slashed, 26,000 will be outside the U.S. The new plan has the U.S. work force declining from about 92,000 hourly and salaried employees at the end 2008 to 72,000 by 2012.

In its Dec. 2 plan to the Bush administration, GM said it would cut the number of plants from 47 in 2008 to 38 by 2012. But the new blueprint goes further, cutting an additional five plants by 2012 to a total of 33 facilities. GM didn't identify which plants will be closed.

GM would further reduce the number of vehicle models. The plan envisions a reduction in nameplates from 48 in 2008 to 36 by 2012. That's four fewer models than in the December plan.

GM said all of its major U.S. vehicle launches from 2009 to 2014 would be high-mileage cars and crossovers.

GM's eight brands would be reduced to four core lines _ Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac and GMC _ as the automaker said in December. But the company said Pontiac also would remain as "a highly focused niche brand."

GM, which has been reviewing the Saab brand and offered it for sale, said the Swedish unit could file for bankruptcy later this month. GM said it is requesting support from the Swedish government prior to any sale, and the company has developed a proposal that would cap GM's financial support with Saab's operations becoming an independent business by January 2010.

Wagoner said the company is still talking to potential buyers for the Hummer brand.

"We're going to try to draw that to a conclusion one way or another by the end of March," he said.

The Saturn brand, meanwhile, will remain in operation through the end of 2011. GM said it's open to the possibility of a plan from retailers or investors that would allow a spin-off or sale of Saturn.

GM would significantly accelerate the number of gas-electric hybrids and plug-in hybrid cars. It plans to offer 14 hybrids and plug-ins by 2012 and 26 by 2014, when alternative-fuel vehicles are expected to account for 65 percent of sales.

Included in the projection is the plug-in Chevrolet Volt, due in showrooms by late 2010, and two additional vehicles sharing the Volt's extended-range electric vehicle technology.

GM, however, is scaling back its anticipated fuel economy gains, a metric closely watched by environmentalists in Congress. GM said it will meet federal fuel efficiency standards through the 2015 model years, but the progress will be slower.

The Dec. 2 plan said its car fleet average would reach 37.3 miles per gallon by 2012 compared with 31.6 in 2008. But GM now predicts its car fleet will reach 33.7 mpg by 2012 and not surpass 38 mpg until 2014.

___

Associated Press Writer Ken Thomas reported from Washington.

___

On the Net:

Treasury Department Web site with automaker restructuring plans: http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/eesa/

DETROIT — General Motors Corp., presenting a dire outlook for the future, said Tuesday it may need $30 billion in total government financing to weather the economic downturn and would cut 47,000...
DETROIT — General Motors Corp., presenting a dire outlook for the future, said Tuesday it may need $30 billion in total government financing to weather the economic downturn and would cut 47,000...
 
Comments
580
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)

Don't give them a single dollar. What a shame they look for help from European governments!

Let them die!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 02/19/2009
- G-guy I'm a Fan of G-guy 26 fans permalink
photo

Bailouts for these auto-makers is like handing a fortune in bucks to a foolish, impulsive,
big-time gambler who was worth a fortune for years, until he finally was exhausting the last of his
once enormous bank account at the casino, after abandoning his family, and all who depended
on him in the world. Then he can continue this self-indulgence and high-rolling ways, until he gambles
away the new fortune you handed him.

That's why they will lay of thousands of hard-workers so they can keep 5 clueless big-shot execs,
who do nothing but play pocket pool in their luxury high-rise offices, just thinking of ways to blow a couple more million next weekend. Pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 02/18/2009
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 192 fans permalink

Exactly why should we bail out the auto makers if they are going to cut 47,000 jobs? If we are going to bail out the auto makers, part of the bail out should include that they have to move every last job that they have outsourced to plants in Mexico and abroad to the United States and move the equipment back to plants here. IF WE HELP THEM CONTINUE TO EXIST, THEN THE JOBS MOVE HERE, PERIOD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 02/18/2009

alright lets talk about this for a minute. we just bailed them out and now those ignorant unreliable cars dealers are asking form more money. Do you not realize the first time we gave GM money for bailout their CEO's went on spa vacations.
1. GM does not deserve another chance
2. We could always create jobs otherways building roads, bridges etc
3. The money can go to something more important such as tax cuts or benefits for the middle and low class

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 03/01/2009

The main argument of the VIPs who run our home grown Auto Industry is the fact that Bailout money not forthcoming will result in Bankruptcy and less demand for American cars. The logic is just not there...th­e reason that there has been no improvement in sales to date and wont be in the future is the very fact that the Auto Industry has failed badly and is crying for Federal support. Their greed and mismanagement has led to a much less creditable Industry..­..one that is going down for the third time and needs a Federal life preserver because they never learned how to swim. That mismanagement and subsequent distrust is the main factor keeping people from buying American..­.going into chapter 11 will only add to hasten the downward spiral. Has anyone seen any attempt at change? The current Auto Industry adds on TV, magazines etc.. are not only pushing the big cars, SUV,s and Pickups but are still building muscle cars and promoting horsepower. So far no elimination of Brand models like Saturn or Pontiac etc..have taken place. You may see a hybrid here and there but the exposure is small. It seems to be business as usual except now they're doing it with taxpayers money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 02/18/2009
- G-guy I'm a Fan of G-guy 26 fans permalink
photo

The big 3 American auto makers have been churning out plenty of lemons
in the last 10 years.
They are paying the price for the downgrade of the quality of american cars.
Now they're looking for the "lemon-aid".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 02/18/2009
- SFkid I'm a Fan of SFkid 4 fans permalink

No more $$ for these car companies, they should either merge like everyone else in order to survive or shut down. I don't see the Gov. bailing out local businesses. Jobs are jobs why should we keep one and not the other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 02/18/2009
- Enid I'm a Fan of Enid 9 fans permalink

Retrain these workers as car salesman the Big3 will need then to sell all those cars needed too be made and sold too pay back the loans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 02/18/2009

Profitable in 2017? Heck, that's a long time down the road, and reminds me: "I'll gladlyt pay you tomorrow for a hamburger today". This company needs to go into bankruptcy and be replaced by a lean and progressive one. One that can deliver cars for the future, at a price that the average person can afford. GM/Ford won't be able to do this. Let's cut them lose and take our losses.
P.S. The CEO and top brass of GM, what are they giving up themselves?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 02/18/2009

Hmm, reading can be fun! If you actually read the article, you would see that GM will be profitable in two years. 2017 is the year that all debts will be paid back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 02/18/2009

People fly planes of bankrupt companies so why wouldn't they drive their cars? Then again, I wouldn't drive an American car anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 02/18/2009
- emily00011 I'm a Fan of emily00011 33 fans permalink

that's the whole problem: making cars that no one really wants. Throwing all the money in the world at them won't help until that's fixed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 02/18/2009
- nivek I'm a Fan of nivek 4 fans permalink
photo

Proud Pontiac abandoned? Why not that puking Buick?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 02/18/2009
- Deepblu I'm a Fan of Deepblu 2 fans permalink

So, if people aren't buying cars.. what are they going to pay the employees to do at this point. Stay home and play Xbox?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 02/18/2009
- ranch111 I'm a Fan of ranch111 7 fans permalink
photo

Stick a fork in GM. They are done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 02/18/2009
- Norge I'm a Fan of Norge 22 fans permalink

Chrysler did a goverment bailout routine in the 70s also claiming bankrupture and of course got all they wanted. Their tear jerk story was just about the same and it was during the time when the people at boeing in Seattle were turning off the lights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 02/18/2009
- TheArtisan I'm a Fan of TheArtisan 3 fans permalink

I suspect they'll be running out of employees to lay off soon.

Talk about adding insult to injury...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 02/18/2009
- kelo I'm a Fan of kelo permalink

All I want is a car that will give me 40 miles per gallon is not low to the ground and has soft seats.
Why is the pruis around 25k and the chey volt going to be about 45k I donot get the mentality of auto executives especially the one who made the morning talk shows today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 02/18/2009

Because the Prius and the Volt are two different technologies. The Volt is a plug-in hybrid and can go 40 miles without the use of any gasoline. The prius is unable to do this. The estimated mileage for the Volt will be in the 100-150mpg range (depending on how the EPA chooses to rate this new style vehicle). This ability to run solely on electricity for 40 miles necessitates a large, sophisticated, and expensive Li-ion battery, which can be found in most new laptop computers. And the car will cost about 40k and will then likely be offered with tax breaks, bringing the total cost to about 30k.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 02/18/2009
- Enid I'm a Fan of Enid 9 fans permalink

These batteries are made in a CHINA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 02/18/2009
- onalimb I'm a Fan of onalimb 5 fans permalink

Yes - I agree.
We need an Afordable hybrid.
A peoples car - with real bumpers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 02/18/2009
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 192 fans permalink

I read a report on Car & Driver, yes women read Car & Driver, which compared the Ford Fusion hybrid to the Prius, the Camry hybrid, and two others. The Ford Fusion was larger, roomier, handled well, was well appointed and could go 47 miles per hour before the gas engine clicked in and attained excellent mileage. It did cost around $3,000 more than the higher of the others.

However, if US auto makers are going to turn out hybrids and stay in business because of bailout money, THE MONEY SHOULD COME WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE CARS HAVE TO BE ASSEMBLED IN THE GOOD OLD US OF A, AND THE BATTERIES SHOULD BE MANUFACTURED HERE, AS WELL.

I do not want our money being spent on an automaker which buys CHINESE BATTERIES AND ASSEMBLES IN MEXICO AND SLAPS A US MANUFACTURER NAME ON IT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 02/18/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect