Japan: Recession Spurs "Work-Sharing" To Avoid Layoffs

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

YURI KAGEYAMA | February 20, 2009 05:22 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Sadao Nagakura, executive of ASKK Ltd., Japan's precision machinery maker, speaks during an interview at his company in Hirakata, western Japan, Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2009. His company joined the growing ranks of Japanese companies, like Toyota Motor Corp., Mazda Motor Corp., Toshiba Corp. and Fujitsu Inc., adopting "work-sharing" to ride out the global slump. Proponents say it's a good way to avoid American-style layoffs in a society that has long fostered lifetime employment. (AP Photo/Yuri Kageyama)

HIRAKATA, Japan — Yasuo Igarashi spends a lot of time these days on the jungle gym with his daughter, after his employer joined the growing ranks of Japanese companies adopting "work-sharing" to ride out the global slump.

Common in parts of Europe, work-sharing means slashing employees' pay and hours instead of firing people outright. Two or three people might share what previously was one person's job.

The idea is that employees are required to share the pain of coping with hard times while everyone gets to keep their jobs _ even if they're paid less.

Work-sharing is the latest buzzword in Japan Inc. Proponents say it's a good way to avoid American-style layoffs in a society that has long fostered lifetime employment. Toyota Motor Corp., Mazda Motor Corp., Toshiba Corp. and Fujitsu Inc., have all taken up some kind of work-sharing. Nissan Motor Co. and others are considering it.

Although critics say it's merely a fancy way to disguise wage cuts, the practice is winning powerful supporters here, including Fujio Mitarai, the head of the major business lobby Keidanren.

The government is now considering earmarking public money for companies that take up work-sharing to curb surging joblessness as the world's second-largest economy slides into what authorities are calling Japan's worst recession since World War II.

Companies big and small are expecting losses or drastically dwindling profits. Thousands of job cuts have been announced in recent weeks.

At ASKK Ltd., a precision machinery maker in Hirakata, central Japan, with 50 employees, that counts Panasonic Corp., Sharp Corp. and Toyota affiliates among its clients, no one has lost their job.

Story continues below
advertisement

But Igarashi, a 30-year-old employee there, says his monthly pay has dropped by about 60,000 yen ($640) from the 270,000 yen ($2,900) he earned before work-sharing kicked in earlier this year.

Like many Japanese, Igarashi used to work six days a week and racked up a couple of hours overtime every day. Now he works only four days a week.

"It can't be helped," he said with a smile and a shrug as he toiled by his whirring machine. "I try to find things to do that don't cost money."

Igarashi has cut back on buying new clothes, and his wife looks for discount coupons for groceries. On the upside, he spends more time with his family, including going to the playground with his 3-year-old daughter.

A handful of Japanese companies experimented with work-sharing during a slowdown a decade ago, but this time more are adopting the practice than ever before as a way to survive the far more serious recession.

Work-sharing is catching on here for cultural, legal and practical reasons.

Many Japanese companies maintain the tradition of lifetime employment so work-sharing is a way to avoid firing regular workers. So far, most of the layoffs have involved contract workers, whose use became legal in recent years to skirt the regulations protecting full-time, salaried workers.

Labor laws tend to defend lifetime employment, usually requiring companies to provide hefty severance packages or risk facing lawsuits. If a company is in bankruptcy or losing money, it becomes easier legally to lay off workers.

At the same time, work-sharing allows companies to keep trained workers _ and bring them back up to full-time quickly, once a recovery comes.

Work-sharing is routine in nations such as Germany and Switzerland, where the government provides unemployment benefits to make up for the income fall from lost hours, said Jenny Hunt, economics professor at McGill University in Montreal, Canada.

She said the practice is unlikely to be popular in the U.S., where companies prefer to "concentrate the misery in a few people," and simply reduce workers.

"The income loss is spread over more people, and fewer people suffer the depression associated with unemployment," Hunt said. "The economic advantage is that firms retain their workers who are experienced on the job."

Work-sharing is taking various forms in Japan, and some companies aren't even calling it that.

At Tourism Essentials Tokyo, a job-referral company, two flight attendants sent to an airline were asked to share one job, and one person's pay, to avoid one of them getting fired.

At Fujitsu's computer chip unit, the shifts at the 24-hour-running plants were increased from two shifts of 12 hours each to three 8-hour shifts so each worker had their hours and pay reduced by a third.

At auto plants across Japan, including Suzuki Motor Corp. and Mazda, assembly lines are grinding to a halt on some days, resulting in a type of work-sharing. Toyota Motor Corp. has announced it will carry out work-sharing at its U.S. plants but has not expanded that to Japan.

A recent survey by the Yomiuri newspaper found about half of its respondents, a nationwide sample of 1,077 people, support the idea of work-sharing, although they also expressed fears about lower pay.

Work-sharing is also finding acceptance in nearby South Korea.

A group of labor, management, civic groups and the government to tackle the financial crisis is preparing to soon announce measures that will include work-sharing as a key element, said Kim Soo-gon, a Ministry of Labor official.

The government plans subsidies for companies that maintain employment by sending workers on paid vacations and training programs, he said.

Work-sharing has created some problems, says Sadao Nagakura, an executive at ASKK, the precision equipment maker.

Accustomed to working long hours, some employees found that cutting back undermined their morale. Another obstacle was that wives of male employees complained that they didn't want their spouses at home, he said.

Side jobs are allowed, he said, and at least one worker has already starting working at a convenience store on Saturdays to supplement his income.

Nagakura, who has made a point of ending his work day at 3 p.m. lately, sees work-sharing as the best way to cope with a drop in orders that has erased about two-thirds of ASKK's profit over the last year.

"There's no work for them to do even if they show up," he said. "I tell them to go on walks with their wives, holding hands."

But Nagakura also sees the downturn as an economic opportunity to get ahead. He expects most rivals to go bankrupt in the next year or two before a recovery comes while his company rides out the recession in good shape.

"We are going to survive, and we are going to win," he said.

___

Associated Press Writer ShinWoo Kang in Seoul contributed to this report.

HIRAKATA, Japan — Yasuo Igarashi spends a lot of time these days on the jungle gym with his daughter, after his employer joined the growing ranks of Japanese companies adopting "work-sharing" to...
HIRAKATA, Japan — Yasuo Igarashi spends a lot of time these days on the jungle gym with his daughter, after his employer joined the growing ranks of Japanese companies adopting "work-sharing" to...
 
Comments
5
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

That will never fly here as people think it is SOCIALIST to share in the cost of providing everyone health care (through single payer health care ) through taxes.

Besides, how else will banks find a way to skim people's money like in these debit card programs for unemployment benefits:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090220/ap_on_bi_ge/bank_fees_jobless_benefits;_ylt=AvMgdRDaiIo.ds8P8xsTaDXZn414

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 02/20/2009

What I've taken from this idea is that these workers are willing to help each other as best they can by taking pay cuts. Even more, they are sharing the hours they would have worked themselves with their fellow co-workers so that nobody has to lose their job and they can all make some money. I think this is a great deed being done by each person to sacrifice so that they can help their man/woman.

However, this doesn't speak well for the companies or the government. My understanding of this article is also that the government is rewarding companies with financial compensation (in the form of the public's money) to pay their employees less, because that is somehow better than a company laying off workers, which just looks... bad. The issue here is, why should public money be spent like this? Why should companies be rewarded for a sacrifice by their workers? Why shouldn't all of this money the government is giving to subsidize these companies go to the employees to help cover the loss in wages?

If this turned out to be nothing more than government helping industry while the worker suffers, I wouldn't be surprised. Give it any explanation they want, the people will hurt while companies are propped up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 02/20/2009

Bravo for the Japanese.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 02/20/2009
photo

Sharing the suffering works in places where the people look at themselves as a unified whole, but in places where "individualism" reigns, getting people to believe in that concept is a hard sell.

I loved the line about Japanese housewifes objecting to having their husbands at home more, though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 02/20/2009

what a novel idea - "The income loss is spread over more people, and fewer people suffer the depression associated with unemployment," Hunt said. "The economic advantage is that firms retain their workers who are experienced on the job."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 02/20/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect