iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Saab Bankruptcy Filing

KARL RITTER   02/20/09 12:47 PM ET   AP

Saab

STOCKHOLM — General Motors Corp.'s Swedish-based subsidiary Saab went into court protection from creditors Friday so the unit can be spun off or sold by its struggling U.S. parent, officials said.

The move is a last-ditch effort to get Saab in order for sale, but the danger of a collapse still hovers over the ailing brand because neither GM nor the Swedish government appears ready to provide enough money to keep it going as a freestanding entity.

An application to reorganize the brand was filed at a district court in Vanersborg, in southwestern Sweden, Saab spokeswoman Margareta Hogstrom said. It was approved later Friday.

GM, which is seeking help from the U.S. government to avoid bankruptcy at home, hopes the three-month reorganization process will put the Swedish brand into shape for a sale, GM spokesman Chris Preuss said. "We fully intend to be out of Saab by the end of the year," he said.

Preuss said $1 billion was needed to keep the company running, of which GM was ready to pay $400 million. The U.S. automaker had asked the Swedish government to guarantee the rest, but "the guarantees have not materialized," he added.

The Swedish government, which insists that Saab's survival is GM's responsibility, rejected the request because GM's business plan wasn't "realistic," Industry Minister Maud Olofsson told The Associated Press on Friday.

"I spoke to GM today and told them that 'you have to go through this and present a credible and sustainable alternative,'" she said after a news conference in Stockholm. "For that, more capital is needed. GM or someone else needs to provide that capital."

Managing Director Jan Ake Jonsson, said Saab Automobile would be recreated as an independent unit, adding it wouldn't be easy.

"Many have already suffered considerably as a result of the crisis in the automobile industry and sacrifices will be a part of our future, but after a period of tough decisions we will have laid the foundations for a new beginning," he said in a statement.

The move would give Saab protection from creditors while it restructures in a process somewhat similar to Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Under Swedish law, a company that files for reorganization is protected from bankruptcy during the process and cannot pay debt acquired before the filing.

GM said in a statement that Saab would continue operating normally. Detroit-based GM said it would make sure suppliers are paid so they keep shipping. "GM is fully committed to maintaining a viable and successful local and global supplier base during the Saab reorganization," Bo Andersson, GM group vice president for purchasing, said in a statement.

Saab said it would seek funding "from both public and private sources" to keep the company afloat. With three new models ready for launch in the next 18 months _ the 9-5, 9-3X and 9-4X _ managing director Jonsson said Saab has "an excellent foundation" to grow, assuming it can get funding for engineering, tooling and launch costs.

"Reorganization will give us time and means that help these products to market while minimizing the liquidity impact of Saab on GM," Jonsson said.

In its own restructuring plan, GM said Tuesday it would need up to $30 billion from the U.S. Treasury Department, up from a previous estimate of $18 billion and including $13.4 billion it has already received. It also said it would need to cut 47,000 jobs worldwide and close five more U.S. factories. GM said it needed about $6 billion in support from the governments of Canada, Germany, Britain, Sweden and Thailand to provide liquidity for its overseas operations in those countries.

Saab has around 4,500 workers, mostly in Sweden.

Analysts said Saab was too small to survive on its own in the beleaguered auto market. If the reorganization is successful, potential buyers could include Chinese automakers like FAW Group Corp., Shanghai Automotive Industry and Dongfeng Motor Corp., said Matts Carlsson, of Goteborg Management Institute.

Stephen Pope, chief global markets strategist for Cantor Fitzgerald, said the brand had suffered under GM's ownership.

"The really sad thing about Saab is that in the 1980s when yuppies were looking for a flashy, fast and stylish ride, Saab was mentioned in the same breath as BMW and Mercedes Benz," he said. "There's nothing special about them anymore."

Originally an aircraft maker, Saab started manufacturing cars after World War II. General Motors bought a 50 percent stake and management control of Saab Automobile in 1989 and gained full ownership in 2000. The aircraft division remains a different company.

GM's other European brands are Opel in Germany and Vauxhall in Britain. GM also markets its Chevrolet brand in Europe.

German officials have indicated that they are willing to help keep open Opel plants, but are insisting that the company outline a long-term plan for the division first.

Economy Ministry spokesman Steffen Moritz said in Berlin Friday that the automaker is expected to produce that concept "by the end of next week."

___

Associated Press Writers Louise Nordstrom and Stephan Nasstrom in Stockholm and Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

STOCKHOLM — General Motors Corp.'s Swedish-based subsidiary Saab went into court protection from creditors Friday so the unit can be spun off or sold by its struggling U.S. parent, officials sai...
STOCKHOLM — General Motors Corp.'s Swedish-based subsidiary Saab went into court protection from creditors Friday so the unit can be spun off or sold by its struggling U.S. parent, officials sai...
Filed by Julie Satow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:05 AM on 03/02/2009
Congat Saab your bad customer service and no parts avalable is your demise I owned a Saab for 3 weeks but could not drive it because you had no parts avalable I was told It could take a year before the part is avalable So i had to sell it for a hefty loss Be carefull the waranty of Sabb is useless as they dont seem to care to honour it NO WONDER YOU ARE GOING BANKRUPT The general public is not stupid and stocking no parts for waranty work is bad business I hope you go broke You deserve it
07:46 PM on 02/21/2009
They were doing fine 'till GM bought them up.

I think I see a pattern here.
02:26 PM on 02/21/2009
Saab makes great cars. I have had ten of them, driven over 1,000,000 miles total. Excellent performance, they handle like a car should (and as most wished they could). Sad fact is Saab is bankrupt not because their product failed, but because Management failied both at Saab and GM. The management focused on manufacturing at which they excelled...failed at marketing, miserably!

Their dealers were pitiful (I have dealt with several nation wide). Saab's customer hotline people were so bad, that to talk with them once was to decide never to buy another Saab. I kept buying because the product was so great, I couldn't be without.

But finally Saab's attitude and dealers incompetence and thievery drove even ardent fans like me away. (I still have two saab's which I will keep as souveniers).
What a sad ending to a great company. GM should be proud of destroying everything they touched.
ssj. Reno
02:29 PM on 02/21/2009
Saab was a mess. That's why GM was able to buy them in the first place.
01:29 AM on 02/21/2009
Who are the people who are saying SAAB is all that great (or even good) ???

dont be comparing SAAB to hyundai or toyota or honda even. compare within its price range.

compare SAAB to BMW, Mercedes, Lexus etc.

Overpriced garbage. thats what SAAB is. at best a niche product.
11:12 AM on 02/21/2009
GM Saab, your statement is true.

Pre-GM Saab, your statement is false.
02:29 PM on 02/21/2009
obviously you never owned a saab...I have had ten. the japanese and german cars cannot perform even close to a saab.. I am one who says Saab's are great, way past good...and outclass japanese cars hands down. ssj reno.
08:54 PM on 02/20/2009
I was happy when GM bought SAAB, so as Saab could have a secure source drive trains and chassis platforms.
With GM's continuing demise in market share, I think it had to of pulled Saab down. I hate to admit this, but I would rather see the Saab brand quietly disappear than be bought by some interest group from India or China, as appears the case which is happening with Volvo.
A couple of years ago at the Detroit auto show as I was strolling through the Volvo display, I was talking to one of the Swedish models, which Ford always managed to send over for the show. I was checking out the C30 coupe when the knowledgeable model informed me about the car. After mentioning that I liked the car but drove the competition, she inquired what that might be, and I replied a 9-3, she took my hand and thanked me for supporting Sweden.
Does the world need another vehicle like the overweight 9-4X? I really like the 9-1, so perhaps Saab should introduce lightness. Show the world smaller and lighter, instead of the trend of larger and heavier then supplemented with hybrid technology.
Bring on the new 9-5, but if and when a 9-3 replacement comes out, make it the size of a Cobalt. Keep it under 3,000 lbs. put in good quality parts and shoot for 50 mpg.
Best luck Saab.
08:47 PM on 02/20/2009
When a company fails, the fault often lies with management.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:22 PM on 02/20/2009
I have driven Saabs since 1969 and I cried when GM got into their picture. Saab has always been an innovator and a damned good car. Instead of taking the best parts of the Saab brand and incorporating them into GM, they took what's not so good with GM and incorporated it into the Saab. I fear for the future of Saab, if, in fact, there is a future. They will, more than likely, either perish or get swallowed up by another company that will market the name, but not promote the innovation that is, and always has been, Saab.
11:16 AM on 02/21/2009
Yep. My '93 9000 CSE was the BEST, most reliable, most gorgeous car I ever owned, and I'd still be driving it today had someone not rear-ended me.

My '99 9.3 is stereotypical American car: tinny, cheap interior, plastic everywhere, random junk falling apart inside, noisy blower fans, etc etc etc. And more expensive to repair than my old one.

I'm trolling ebay for another 9000/pre-GM Saab to drive into the sunset.

Oh, and my mechanic doesn't mind working on Saabs and he's a neighborhood guy who I trust. Keep my $ local!
02:32 PM on 02/21/2009
well said plzchuteme....I too went sad...I have had 10 saab's ...loved them all. Had several disappointing experiences with saab co. and dealers..never had dissapointement with cars.
ssj. reno.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 PM on 02/22/2009
I never had any disappointments with Saab or their dealers, but then my expectations were are are exceedingly low when it comes to dealing with anyone in the automobile industry. I certainly have been disappointed, over the years, in dealing with domestic manufacturers and especially their dealers. It's sad when it is the rule rather than the exception.
06:32 PM on 02/20/2009
I have three SAABs:

1990 900 SPG - 141,000 miles
2003 9-5 Aero Sedan - 175,000 miles
2004 9-5 Arc Wagon - 80,000 miles

I love them all equally, for different reasons. If these are the last SAABs I own, I will be very sad. What other wagon has as much space as a 9-5, has 260hp and yet gets 30mpg on the highway fully loaded?

SAAB has continued to innovate over the years and their concept models (the Aero-X, AIR and BioHybrid) have all gotten raves from fans and press. Don't even get me started about the plugin hybrid GM made the company GLUE SHUT at a recent auto show because it wanted the Volt to be the favored child. The 9-5, SAAB's flagship, is a design from the 90s. SAAB's only new product through GM in the past ten years has been the rebadged Trailblazer and Impreza. Ten years and no new SAABS? How much did they think the brand could take?

Hopefully someone comes along and rescues SAAB. Reports say selling 120K cars to be profitable. With the new 9-5 out in 2010 and the 9-4X which will probably sell very well in America (not to mention the new Outback-killer 9-3X), I think a new buyer would be off to a good start and give the company time to get back to creating true innovative niche products that people are excited about and want to buy...
06:10 PM on 02/20/2009
Poor SAAB's.
05:45 AM on 02/21/2009
Yeah, what a Saab story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AsISaid
05:36 PM on 02/20/2009
Saab is a great car. I'm on my fourth...the first three each went well over 200,000 miles and still ran well. I sold them to upgrade to newer Saabs each time. Solid, fast, well equipped - Saabs always hold their resale value in comparison with other similar models. I've had two BMW's in the past and they just don't compare with the Saab in terms of value and quality.

GM did a poor job marketing this car in the US and it suffered as a result. I hope the company survives the bankruptcy - I'll be looking for my fifth Saab in a couple of years
photo
helgathewitch
aREALhockeymom
05:30 PM on 02/20/2009
Eversince GM has had their hand in SAAB the car has not been the same. Can I say cheep. Used to love SAABs and owned one.Test drove one a couple years ago it was like sitting in a box. Also started to look American! not a good thing for a car that used to be so distinct.
04:27 PM on 02/20/2009
This is good news. GM killed Saab. Hopefully it'll be resurrected.
03:31 PM on 02/20/2009
There you go. That's the spirit. GM and Chrysler need to listen up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
02:29 PM on 02/20/2009
Another sad news...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:26 PM on 02/20/2009
The problem: GM bought it. They can run anything down the cra.pper.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mogamboguru
I am a liar. Don't believe me.
02:32 PM on 02/20/2009
This amount of incapability doesn't come naturally.

One must study hard to achieve an MBA in the finest american universities, to achieve the required level of incompetence neccessary to run a company down like this!
08:55 PM on 02/20/2009
So funny! Yet so sadly true...