More

US: 13 Civilians Killed In Afghanistan Strike

JASON STRAZIUSO   02/21/09 01:27 PM ET   AP

Afghanistan Troops

KABUL — An operation the American military at first described as a "precision strike" instead killed 13 Afghan civilians and only three militants, the U.S. said Saturday, three days after sending a general to the site to investigate.

Civilian casualties have been a huge source of friction between the U.S. and Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has stepped up demands that U.S. and NATO operations kill no civilians and that Afghan soldiers take part in missions to help prevent unwanted deaths.

A U.S. military statement said the decision to dispatch a general to the western province of Herat to investigate shows how seriously the U.S. takes civilian casualties. The U.S. rarely releases the findings of civilian casualty investigations, and the disclosure this time could show the effect of Karzai's criticisms.

The U.S. military originally said 15 militants were killed Tuesday in a coalition operation in the Gozara district of Herat province, but Afghan officials said six women and two children were among the dead, casting doubt on the U.S. claim.

Afghan officials say the group targeted in the airstrikes were living in two tents in a remote area. An ethnic group of Afghans known as Kuchis travel the countryside with livestock and live in tents. Photographs obtained by The Associated Press from the site showed the body of a dead young boy _ bloodied and dirtied.

In response, Brig. Gen. Michael Ryan traveled to the site to meet with Afghan elders. Investigators found weapons and ammunition, but concluded that 13 civilians were killed along with three militants, the U.S. said.

An expert on civilian casualties said she was "cautiously optimistic" the U.S. is taking a new approach in dealing with civilian casualties. Sarah Holewinski, the executive director of The Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict, said more high-ranking military officials are visiting gravesites and apologizing.

In recent weeks, she said, Defense Secretary Robert Gates "turned the old way of doing things on its head."

"Instead of immediately denying civilian deaths, which deeply angers Afghans and with good reason, he said the U.S. will instead immediately investigate, make apologies and provide amends where appropriate," she said.

The U.S. on Saturday released photos of Ryan talking with Afghan elders and embracing a mourning man.

"We expressed our deepest condolences to the survivors of the noncombatants who were killed during this operation," Ryan said in a statement. "Our inquiry in Herat demonstrates how seriously we take our responsibility in conducting operations against militant targets and the occurrence of noncombatant casualties.

"Our concern is for the security of the Afghan people. To this end, we continually evaluate the operations we conduct during the course of our mission in Afghanistan and have agreed to coordinate our efforts jointly," Ryan said.

Holewinski said an upfront apology is what "U.S. and allied troops should have been doing from the beginning."

"Avoid harm, investigate when it occurs, apologize and provide compensation or other amends," she said.

After increasingly angry demands by Karzai for more U.S.-Afghan military cooperation, the American and Afghan militaries announced plans this month to increase the number of Afghans who will take part in U.S. operations.

The Afghan Defense Ministry condemned the civilian deaths in a statement Wednesday but noted it would take more time to implement the agreement. It also urged U.S. forces to "be very careful during their operations."

The investigative team's trip to Herat came one day after the U.N. released a report saying 2,118 civilians died in the Afghan war last year, a 40 percent increase over 2007 and the most in any year since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001 that ousted the Taliban's hard-line Islamist regime.

The report said U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians, or 39 percent of the 2008 total. Of those, 552 deaths were blamed on airstrikes. Militants were blamed for 55 percent of the deaths, or 1,160.

President Barack Obama this week announced the deployment of 17,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan to bolster the 38,000 already in the country to fight an increasingly violent Taliban insurgency. A higher number of troops in the country also means that civilian casualties could increase.

In Kabul, meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met with Karzai for talks about the ongoing American strategic review of the U.S. mission in Afghanistan, the president's office said.

Pelosi, D-Calif., arrived in Afghanistan on Friday to meet with Afghan officials and U.S. and NATO military leaders and troops, said Capt. Elizabeth Mathias, a U.S. military spokeswoman.

Afghanistan was to send a high-level delegation headed by Foreign Minister Dadfar Rangeen Spanta to the U.S. on Sunday "to review the joint strategy and the fight against terrorism," the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Saturday.

Afghanistan's interior and defense ministers, its national security director and chief of intelligence are on the delegation.

Pakistan is also sending representatives. Spanta and Pakistan's foreign minister are expected to meet together with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL — An operation the American military at first described as a "precision strike" instead killed 13 Afghan civilians and only three militants, the U.S. said Saturday, three days after sendin...
KABUL — An operation the American military at first described as a "precision strike" instead killed 13 Afghan civilians and only three militants, the U.S. said Saturday, three days after sendin...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:08 PM on 02/21/2009
I am praying that Obama will not escalate this mess in Afghanistan. This will just be another Iraq or Viet Nam. I don't want another young life or another dollar wasted on something that cannot be fixed. Get the hell out of there, stop giving aid to Pakistan and let their leaders take care of their own people.. Spend our money and troops protecting the US from these morons. I am sick to death of the US having their nose in every bodies business.
ChairmanOfTheBoard
Yeah, What He Said!
10:12 PM on 02/21/2009
This is sick and Obama wants to send more troops there? I hope Obama isn't the Godfather of the Bush Crime Family, where's the change in foreign policy? Watch an Obama apologist come on these boards and attack us for being upset over this
08:54 PM on 02/21/2009
Shocking! Change I can believe in! Yes, we can continue to kill innocent poor people in war-ravaged areas.

"The Great Game" lives on unabated.

Obama=Bush
08:33 PM on 02/21/2009
more "hearts and minds".
07:32 PM on 02/21/2009
Bury the story as far down as you can. Don't let people know that Liberals kill innocents too. If this were Gaza it would be front and center with bold red accusations of genocide.
07:31 PM on 02/21/2009
When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan it may have made sense to attack them because the harbored Al Queda.

The Taliban are not the government of Afghanistan any longer.

The US government has refused to go after Al Queda. Instead it makes war against Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis and Iranians.

It is time to stop the Christian war on Muslims.
07:32 PM on 02/21/2009
Add the Palestinians to the list, too.
07:39 PM on 02/21/2009
So much for separation of church and state. I did not know that the USA officially supported Christian militants to attack muslims. This is change indeed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnelld
06:31 PM on 02/21/2009
America should remove all military forces (combat and otherwise) from Afghanistan.

This continued killing and hostile action in that part of the world is immoral and can only come to no good.
05:55 PM on 02/21/2009
Obama=Bush
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunga-Din
05:19 PM on 02/21/2009
A crime against humanity
04:52 PM on 02/21/2009
Yippee! Change!!!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gunwing
04:36 PM on 02/21/2009
Guys there is no possible way to stop innocents from being killed in a War Zone. They live their by choice if they had brains and the means they would of moved out of those areas long ago, but they stayed because they don't have the means to leave. They took their lives in their own hands by doing so.

War will never be a bloodless bout between to sides that never hurts innocents. This is a fact that can not be changed if this was enough to sway your vote then you should of never voted for bush in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Peete
Proud to be Progressive!
05:18 PM on 02/21/2009
Gunwing,
I know that collateral damage in war is unavoidable; but the way we have waged the war in Afghanistan since we removed our forces to fight in Iraq has resulted in horrible levels of it.
when your method of fighting is with bombs from drones and aircraft, there is no way to be surgical in its application. Now that we are committing ground troops to battle the resurgent Taliban, we can begin to reduce the civilian deaths there.

War is h.ell, but the Bush/Cheney regime made it as horrid as it can be and they are war criminals. Lets allow the investigations of the deaths of our kids, Iraqis and Afghans, lies, fraud, torture, abuse, and theft of U.S. funds in these conflicts to get to the bottom of this. Those opposed to the truth getting out are those who are profiting from this and the brainwashed who believe the Limpboughs, Shammitys, Steals, and Pale-ins of the right wing leadership.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunga-Din
05:24 PM on 02/21/2009
I understand, Republicans kill by air. But democrats kill by ground. Curious
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snoopbuzz
06:40 PM on 02/21/2009
Sorry, Im not buying into that explanation.
07:34 PM on 02/21/2009
War is the enemy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:40 PM on 02/21/2009
President Obama must find a way to minimize such casualties. This is unacceptable.
I'm all for going after the guys who hit us on 911, but not like this.
.
06:37 PM on 02/21/2009
Well boo hoo. This IS how it is going to be.

With Robert Gates, Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emanuel, and Joe Biden all having the closest seats to President Obama, surely you can only expect more war, more death, more destruction.

Your tepid criticism here stands in stark contrast to the thousands of comments made in support of pro war Democrats, in support of their lies and misdeeds. You are part of this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:18 PM on 02/21/2009
the thousands of comments made in support of pro war Democrats
--------
Are you mentally unbalanced?
08:03 PM on 02/21/2009
While it is true that Americans died on 911, I wouldn't describe the event as "hitting us". To me that implies that the opponent made their intentions well known prior to taking action when in fact they did not. Sucker punched is closer but when their sole purpose was to kill as many US civilians as they possibly could without being threatened by those civilians then "a cowardly sneak attack" is far more appropriate.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jeffobix
08:34 PM on 02/21/2009
Don't forget the 3,000 victims weren't only American. Yet I don't see any other nation going on the kind of civilian-kiIIing rampages our military is reponsible for.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:15 PM on 02/21/2009
Whatever. That is not relevant to what I said.
03:32 PM on 02/21/2009
So what of the families, and the friends of the dead civilians? Does anybody want to believe that this incident stands in relative isolation (certainly not the Afghani people, and their leaders who have been trying to get the point across for years). Does anybody really think that our tactics are going to change, as the bombing and shelling (i.e. the next "surge") increases? And does anybody really believe that we didn't just make enemies out of those same family members and friends of the dead? I don't. I don't believe a word of it. I believe that we are quite intentionally killing whole households, in order to eliminate the one "militant" who might also live there. I believe that we b.s. ourselves by calling them "precision" strikes, and then (but only then) refer to them as "tragic errors" when we are caught in our lies. And I believe that the Afghani people see it that way as well. So, would the people who are fooled by any of this please raise their hand?
03:09 PM on 02/21/2009
As if yet another example were needed to prove the narcissism that's at the heart of the American enterprise. Once again we off civilians. And what's the story? How terrific, noble, and virtuous we are for doing nothing more than admitting that we offed civilians. Big deal. The visit from the guns-and-ammo grief counselor and, in particular, the trite palaver from our side is merely intended to soothe our own conscience and to give the illusion that we care. Guaranteed we'll soon do the same to another group of unfortunates, limited as we are by the intellectual bankruptcy that makes it impossible for us to conceive of any other way to deal with medieval types in flip-flops. Note that there's not a word to be found about our even contemplating a change in the rules of engagement, meaning that we will continue to see civilians as expendable (or, worse, implicitly culpable for being spouse to or offspring of people we don't like), just part of the cost of doing business in the grand imperial adventure. Our expensive, high-tech killers will bleat to the world about how we never aim at civilians, as if that obscured their moist-lipped, glassy-eyed excitement at blowing something up while sitting in a Lazyboy. And a policy suit in Washington will regale us with more boundlessly self-delusional nonsense about how we're doing all of this for the benefit of the long-suffering Afghan people.
03:08 PM on 02/21/2009
So, our strategy to win this war against al-Qaeda and the Taliban is to kill today's terrorists while creating tomorrow's enemy. The new part of this strategy is that we'll apologize faster for the dead children and women.

Congress got us into this mess and Congress must get us out. Of course, they've been so busy lately giving away our children's money that I can only hope that there's time for Congress to deal with this insane and unwinnable war before they get busy with the census and the next elections, when we shall again hear the Democrats beg for yet more votes and money because there still aren't enough of them to get anything useful done; like getting out of unwinnable wars that they started when they gave the military to Bush to play with and said "Here, get it stuck someplace".