Obama Budget Projects Record $1.75 Trillion Deficit

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANDREW TAYLOR | February 26, 2009 11:00 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama speaks about his fiscal 2010 federal budget, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009. Vice President Joe Biden is at left, and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is at center. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama charted a dramatic new course for the nation Thursday with a bold but contentious budget proposing higher taxes for the wealthy and the first steps toward guaranteed health care for all _ accompanied by an astonishing $1.75 trillion federal deficit that would be nearly four times the highest in history.

Denouncing what he called the "dishonest accounting" of recent federal budgets, Obama unveiled his own $3.6 trillion blueprint for next year, a bold proposal that would transfer wealth from rich taxpayers to the middle class and the poor.

Congressional approval without major change is anything but sure. The plan is filled with political land mines including an initiative to combat global warming that would hit consumers with considerably higher utility bills. Other proposals would take on entrenched interests such as big farming, insurance companies and drug makers.

Obama blamed the expected federal deficit explosion on a "deep and destructive" recession and recent efforts to battle it including the Wall Street bailout and the just-passed $787 billion stimulus plan. The $1.75 trillion deficit estimate for this year is $250 billion more than projected just days ago because of proposed new spending for a fresh bailout for banks and other financial institutions.

As the nation digs out of the most serious economic crisis in decades, Obama said, "We will, each and every one of us, have to compromise on certain things we care about but which we simply cannot afford right now."

Signaling budget battles to come, Republicans were skeptical Obama was doing without much at all.

"We can't tax and spend our way to prosperity," said House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. "The era of big government is back, and Democrats are asking you to pay for it."

Obama plans to move aggressively toward rebalancing the tax system, extending a $400 tax credit for most workers _ $800 for couples _ while letting expire President George W. Bush's tax cuts for couples making more than $250,000 a year. That would raise the top income tax bracket from 35 percent to 39.6 percent for those taxpayers and raise their capital gains rate from 15 to 20 percent as well.

Story continues below
advertisement

Thursday's 134-page budget submission, a nonbinding recommendation to Congress, says the plan would close the deficit to a a more reasonable _ but still eye-popping _ $533 billion after five years. That would still be higher than last year's record $455 billion deficit.

And the national debt would more than double by the end of the upcoming decade, raising worries that so much federal borrowing could drive up interest rates and erode the value of the dollar.

Also, to narrow the budget gap, Obama relies on rosier predictions of economic growth _ including a 3.2 percent boost in the economy next year _ than most private sector economists foresee.

There is already resistance from Democrats who are upset with the budget's plan to curb the ability of wealthier people to reduce their tax bills through deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and state and local taxes.

That tax hike would raise $318 billion over the upcoming decade toward a down payment on Obama's high-priority universal health care plan. Cuts to the Medicare and Medicaid federal health programs would supply an additional $316 billion, but that still wouldn't provide enough money to guarantee coverage for all, and Obama wants Congress to come up with hundreds of billions of dollars in additional hard-to-raise revenues to pay for the rest.

Then there is the proposed clampdown on the Pentagon budget, which would get a 4 percent boost, to $534 billion next year, but would then get increases of 2 percent or less over the next several years. Domestic programs favored by Democrats would, on average, receive a 7 percent boost over regularly appropriated levels _ even as many agencies are already swimming in cash from the just-enacted economic stimulus plan.

Taken together, Obama's plan contains so many difficult-to-digest ideas that it's virtually certain to be significantly redrafted during debates later this year.

"It's going to be a tough row to hoe, but he has large Democratic majorities and a lot of popular support and we're in times of crisis," said Robert Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute. "So his prospects of him getting much of what he is seeking, while not good, are higher than ... we've seen in the past."

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., predicted Congress would pass much of Obama's plan, though with significant revisions. For instance, he's unimpressed with a proposal to reduce payments to farming operations with sales above $500,000 per year and says the plan to curb tax deductions for the wealthy faces uncertain prospects because of opposition from lawmakers from high tax states and universities whose endowments have shrunk.

A plan to devote up to $250 billion to support as much as $750 billion in increased spending under the government's rescue program for banks and other financial institutions landed with a thud.

Republicans scoffed at the idea that Obama's plan calls for much sacrifice on the spending front, citing the big increases for many agencies. they also pointed to tax increases and hundreds of billions in revenues from a contentious proposal to auction off permits for carbon emissions in a bid to address global warming.

Obama and top aides emphasized that they didn't make the financial mess.

Said the president: "We cannot lose sight of the long-run challenges that our country faces and that threaten our economic health _ specifically, the trillions of dollars of debt that we inherited, the rising costs of health care and the growing obligations of Social Security."

"For too long, our budget has not told the whole truth about how precious tax dollars are spent," he said. "Large sums have been left off the books, including the true cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. And that kind of dishonest accounting is not how you run your family budgets at home. It's not how your government should run its budgets either."

Among the many programs that would receive generous boosts are education and cancer research. The size of education Pell Grants would automatically increase every year by inflation plus 1 percent, while Obama promises to double cancer research over several years. He also wants to put the United States on a path to double foreign aid.

Obama's budget contains almost $1 trillion in tax hikes over 10 years on individuals making more than $200,000 and couples earning over $250,000. About $350 billion more would be raised through a variety of other hikes, including raising taxes on hedge-fund managers by taxing their compensation as income rather than at the 15 percent capital gains rate. Obama would also increase taxes on corporate income earned abroad.

Some $526 billion in revenue from carbon pollution permits would be used to extend the "Making Work Pay" tax credit of $400 for individuals and $800 for couples beyond 2010 as provided in the just-passed economic stimulus bill.

The budget would make permanent the expanded $2,500 tax credit for college expenses that was provided for two years in the just-passed economic stimulus bill. It also would renew most of the Bush tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003, and would permanently update the alternative minimum tax so that it would hit fewer middle- to upper-income taxpayers.

Obama's $634 billion head start on expanding health care could easily double as lawmakers flesh out details in coming months on how to provide medical coverage to all of the 48 million Americans now uninsured while also trying to slow increases in costs. Health care costs now total $2.4 trillion a year and keep rising even as the economy is shrinking.

Thursday's submission was an overview of a more comprehensive plan that will be submitted in April.

___

Associated Press writers Martin Crutsinger, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar and Anne Gearan contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama charted a dramatic new course for the nation Thursday with a bold but contentious budget proposing higher taxes for the wealthy and the first steps toward gua...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama charted a dramatic new course for the nation Thursday with a bold but contentious budget proposing higher taxes for the wealthy and the first steps toward gua...
 
Comments
2693
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (30 pages total)
photo

IM SO EXCITED IM GONNA TAKE A BATH IN THE REST OF MY FOOD-STAMPS ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 02/28/2009
- LuckyLeif I'm a Fan of LuckyLeif 2 fans permalink

Call it $2 Trillion next year, $10 Trillion in next decade, overall $56 TRILLION thanks to unfunded liabilities with entitlements, and insurmountable debt unless we sell off a few states and cut federal spending in half.

http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/anti-stimulus-package-obama-taking-us-in-exactly-the-wrong-direction/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 02/27/2009

i am still waiting to hear how giving tons of money to acorn which drove people to polls promising rewards if they voted democrat is any different than the pay for play everyone is so upset about.what is that doing in our so called pork free budget?what is the tatoo remover and pig odor research doing in our pork free budget?hope and change i hope he stops spending my money and doesnt change us into socialism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 02/28/2009

Okay lets have the federal government halt all spending, then just wait and see what happens in your states and cities. How do you think they will make up for the loss of federal funds? Face it people we are going to take a hit no matter what, this country is in one screwed up mess and you can't even get economist to agree on how to fix it!!! All you hear from the repubs is tax cut, tax cut tax cut, which would mean tax raises, tax raises, tax raises by states and cities!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 02/27/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 69 fans permalink

how about cut the spending

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 02/27/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 117 fans permalink

Basic keynesian economics. when in a recession you increase spending. In good times run a surplus. Of course it would be nice if we could use monetary policies but Bush ran interest rates down to zero already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 02/27/2009

“President Obama promised a middle class tax cut but what he didn’t tell us was that he would pay for it with a climate tax,” said Corker. “His budget will generate $645 billion through a climate tax and use that revenue to fund various programs outlined in budget. I guess his claim on Tuesday night that no one earning under $250,000 would pay more in taxes did not apply to this massive climate tax increase all Americans will pay. This is a major sleight of hand.”

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 02/27/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 69 fans permalink

he forgot....­..laughing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 02/27/2009
- Yaaawn I'm a Fan of Yaaawn 5 fans permalink
photo

If people feel they are not going to feel the weight of new taxes from state and federal, your in for a big surprise. Congratula­tions...yo­u just toasted your wallet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 02/27/2009
- Yaaawn I'm a Fan of Yaaawn 5 fans permalink
photo

Wait a second! What did I just see on MSNBC. An overview of the new taxes. Tax increases on people making over $200K to 250K. Since when did it drop to the 200K range.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 02/27/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 69 fans permalink

since Mr bo saw 250k doesn't work.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 02/27/2009
- KISHAGREEN I'm a Fan of KISHAGREEN 20 fans permalink
photo

It dropped to 200K around the end of the campaign. Remember his conversation with Joe the Plumber?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 02/27/2009
- sandals I'm a Fan of sandals 33 fans permalink

The RETHUGLICANS are complaining about spending they were on a spending frenzy when Bush was in office they didn't have a problem than signing onto his budget.
This budget shows us everything including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, were under Bush it was never on the books.
These Rethuglicans are unbelievable they are now trying to blame this entire mess on the Democrats, saying it was them for the past 2yrs that caused this problem , well guess what you are freaking wrong, it was them who put us into this MESS, with their Reaganomics, trickle down economics, none of it worked and this is what we got.
So to all you RETHUGLICANS just go away, you have destroyed our country and we don't want your ideas anymore!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 02/27/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 69 fans permalink

laughing.........i don't run from a fight or just give up and walk away........all we need is a conservative in office

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 02/27/2009

We had one the last eight years, where were you!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 02/27/2009
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

Reminds me of Chavez in Venezuela. He is helping the poor and the rich hate him. Now we see the same thing here, except we still call it the middle class. It is easy enough, FAIR TAX them all.
Make more money, pay more money, what is so hard to understand. The trickle down wealth did not
happen as we know and neither do the rich create jobs as we just experience. So what is the argument?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 02/27/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 117 fans permalink

The "fair tax" is regressive. it's just supply side economics on steroids. Trickle down economics didn't work so we want to lower taxes on the rich even more?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 02/27/2009
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

I suppose the TV People and in the media make more than $ 250,000 and that is the reason they
are all against Obama's Budget. I cannot fathom anyone from the Middle Class would object to Obama's Budget since it is looking out for us. Also Obama has said he will list all dollars spent unlike Bush who never budgeted the Iran and Afghanistan Wars. Had he done that we would have just said
okay too, since Bush got away with everything. But Bush had a good reason, no transparacies and
that included the hiding of the returning war heroes at Dover AFB. America must love to be lied to
that is what I take from this. You go Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 02/27/2009
photo

The rich have had their fill. It's our turn at the table.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 AM on 02/27/2009
- JanetE I'm a Fan of JanetE 4 fans permalink

Quoted directly from the article:

"Obama unveiled his own $3.6 trillion blueprint for next year, a bold proposal that would transfer wealth from rich taxpayers to the middle class and the poor."
----- I guess we'd all better hope we are never successful enough to earn $250,000/year.

Another quote from the article:

"Congressional approval without major change is anything but sure. The plan is filled with political land mines including an initiative to combat global warming that would hit consumers with considerably higher utility bills."
----- WHICH MEANS YOU AND ME AND EVERYONE WILL PAY FOR THIS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 AM on 02/27/2009
- Osmona I'm a Fan of Osmona 8 fans permalink

When have we NOT paid for something. Now the rich can pay along with us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 AM on 02/27/2009
- Altruth I'm a Fan of Altruth 58 fans permalink

Time to spend some Big bucks on the American working class. The Rich have gotten their share for a long time. Bush wasted almost a trillion dollars on two WARS and we have nothing positive to show for that money.

Mr. President, thank you for looking out for the little guy. Do your thing We the American People are with you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 02/27/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 69 fans permalink

like hel1 we

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 02/27/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 117 fans permalink

Actually Bush has spent closer to $2.5 Trillion on the wars and that number is expected to go up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 02/27/2009
photo

Very well said Altruth. You are telling the truth and nothing but the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 02/27/2009

The real frightening thing here is we are now talking about Billions and Trillions like it is a few bucks here and there, relatively speaking I dont think most people can get thier mind around the amount of monies. This will blow out any deficits anyone complained about in the past. It is not even real money anymore to these people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 02/27/2009

I hope Obama doesn't go out like Jimmy Carter. Why tax the rich? Many of them don't pay taxes any way--nannygate, Travelgate, no taxesgate, etc.. I don't believe in the Robin Hood theory. If I earned I want to keep my money and let me decide who I want to help, not the government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 02/26/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 69 fans permalink

well said

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 02/27/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 117 fans permalink

From the 1940's until 1980 the top end tax rates were between 74 and 91%. During that time we had the largest economic expansion in the history of the world. The middle class boomed. Single income families were the norm and wages for americans grew EVERY YEAR from 1947 until 1981. Then supply side came in and wages have not gone up since 1982. Think of that. Working people make no more now in adjusted dollars than people 28 years ago. Mean while household debt has gone up 12 fold. The national debt (which was almost nothing before reagan) is up x12. You cannot have a vibrant economy without a middle class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 02/27/2009

You wouldn't be able to earn all your money without the system and society that has been created ultimately by people paying taxes to keep it going. Grow up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 AM on 02/27/2009
- Osmona I'm a Fan of Osmona 8 fans permalink

What a naive statement. Taxes are for EVERYONE to pay. Not just the working class. The working class pays taxes and the rich are exempt. Where's the fairness in that? Besides, President O is NOT raising the riches taxes. He is letting the Bush tax cuts expire in 2011. Which was the date that BUSH set up himself. So what you're saying is President O is supposed to cut their taxes again? I don't think so. If it were me the rich would be paying now. But that's why President O is the president. HE KNOWS WHAT'S BEST.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 AM on 02/27/2009

You probably think that if you gave your money to Maddoff (The other Robin Hood). You believe in sueing him to get it back, and you probably will get very upset if you didn't get it back. Why? you decided who you wanted to help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 AM on 02/27/2009

I strongly disagree with the classification of those making over $200,000 as "the wealthy". Honestly, depending on where a person lives, $200,000 after taxes doesn't go that far. Taxes should not infringe on a persons standard of living, and Obama's new taxes certainly will. I dont understand why I should have to give more of my hard earned income to a government that has, so far, mismanaged the tax dollard they currently receive. I dont see why people who make a little more money are penalized everytime something goes wrong in this country. Its like if you make a decent salary, you get stuck with the tab for everything. These new taxes are simply not fair at all. Especially considering the fact that I dont understand any of the President's proposed programs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 02/26/2009
photo

I agree with you about regional cost of living and federal taxes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 02/26/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 117 fans permalink

Obama's taxes are just removing the tax cuts that Bush put in.

And if you make more great. Congratulations you no doubt work hard for it. But you probably benefit more from the commons then do people that make less. let's say for a moment that you own a business. You benefit more than your employees from the fact that the government built a road to your business so that customers and your workers can get to it. You benefit more than those with less for the fire department that protects your property. And the police department that does the same. Even things that you might not think of like welfare benefits you buy providing a counter cyclical balance during down times. you benefit from schools because you have an educated work force. You benefit from the department of health because you have a healthy workforce. And that says nothing about direct government support of your business as a purchaser of services. You benefit from a government that sets the rules for the market place. All this is not to take away from the fact that you work hard deserve to be rewarded for that hard work and talent. But the only times when a society really expands economically is when there is a strong middle class. And that middle class has been erroding the last 28 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 02/27/2009
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

oh cry me a river. I make less than $ 100,000 before taxes and I could say the same thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 AM on 02/27/2009
- robeson I'm a Fan of robeson 24 fans permalink
photo

Do you disagree that it represents the top 5%?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 02/27/2009
- robeson I'm a Fan of robeson 24 fans permalink
photo

Never have so many defended the few who rob, steal, and avoid contributing to the public good. The accounts in Switzerland banks debunk the propaganda that the wealthy pay their share and are patriotic. The Tarp funds make a mockery of their free market mantra, and the collapse of the economy nail shut trickle down and militarism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 02/26/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (30 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect