Obama May Overturn Bush 'Conscience Rule' On Abortions

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR | February 27, 2009 09:20 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama speaks about combat troop levels in Iraq as he addresses military personnel at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., Friday, Feb. 27, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to repeal a Bush administration rule that has become a flash point in the debate over a doctor's right not to participate in abortions. The regulation, instituted in the last days of the Bush administration, strengthened job protections for doctors and nurses who refuse to provide a medical service because of moral qualms.

A Health and Human Services official said Friday the administration will publish notice of its intentions early next week, opening a 30-day comment period for advocates on both sides, medical groups and the public.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the notice has not been completed.

The Bush administration rule was quickly challenged in federal court by several states and medical organizations. As a candidate, President Barack Obama criticized the regulation and campaign aides promised that if elected, he would review it.

The news that he was doing so drew praise from abortion-rights supporters and condemnation from groups opposed to abortion.

"It would be a horrible move. These regulations were a long time coming," said Tom McClusky, a vice president at Family Research Council. "What they seek to do is protect patients, nurses, doctors and other health care professionals from being forced to violate their consciences."

McClusky and other abortion opponents said the Bush regulation clarified federal policies and raised awareness about the rights of medical providers to follow their consciences. But abortion rights advocates said it was vague and overly broad, and could reduce access to other services _ allowing a drug store clerk to refuse to sell birth control pills, for example.

"I think it's a wonderful step," Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., who co-chairs the Congressional Pro-choice Caucus and has introduced legislation to overturn the regulation, said of Obama's move.

Story continues below
advertisement

"That rule was actually a poorly drafted last-minute attempt to, I think, restrict health care access and I think it would have had far-reaching and unintended consequences."

Federal law has long forbidden discrimination against health care professionals who refuse to perform abortions or provide referrals for them on religious or moral grounds. The Obama administration supports those laws, said the HHS official.

The Bush administration's rule adds a requirement that institutions that get federal money certify their compliance with laws protecting the rights of moral objectors. It was intended to block the flow of federal funds to hospitals and other institutions that ignore those rights.

But the Obama administration was concerned that the Bush regulation went too far and could also be used to refuse birth control, family planning services and counseling for vaccines and transfusions.

The White House released a statement saying that Obama supports a "carefully crafted" conscience clause _ not Bush's version.

"He believes this issue requires a balance between the rights of providers and the health of women and their families, a balance that the last-minute Bush rule appears to upset," the statement said.

The administration will review comments from the public before making a final decision. Options range from repealing the regulation to writing a new one with a narrower scope.

The administration's move was first reported by the Los Angeles Times.

___

On the Net:

Health and Human Services Department: http://www.hhs.gov

___

Associated Press writer Erica Werner contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to repeal a Bush administration rule that has become a flash point in the debate over a doctor's right not to participate in abortions. The regulation, ...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to repeal a Bush administration rule that has become a flash point in the debate over a doctor's right not to participate in abortions. The regulation, ...
 
Comments
213
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
photo

Heaven help our elderly or terminally ill when these consiencious OBJECTORS refuse to administer or prescribe palliative care because the patient might get addicted.

Get over yourselves. Birth control, family planning, end of life decisions are about MY CHOICE as a consumer. I don't care what you think or believe. It's my body and my soul and I AM IN CHARGE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 02/28/2009
photo

Read the article up to this point:
"The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the notice has not been completed."
and immediately stopped as this is nothing more than speculation to stir up public unrest.

I will say, as I always have said, it is the woman's choice and belongs to nobody else, period!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 02/28/2009
- Paisano I'm a Fan of Paisano 9 fans permalink
photo

Does this mean we are allowed to abort republicans?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 AM on 02/28/2009
- lizt I'm a Fan of lizt 14 fans permalink

Yes....you do it by educating them when they are young.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 02/28/2009

I think science is beginning to tell us that education is not the only difference. Some people are just wired to be more conservative, judgemental, inflexible. So theoretically, they could be aborted. However, I happen to believe that diversity of opinion is good for us. So I want there to be moderates, conservatives, even a few right wing nuts out there to keep us mindful of how dangerous ANY political persuation can be if it goes unchecked.
I suppose this can only be discribed as a liberal view. : )

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 02/28/2009
- juzcuz I'm a Fan of juzcuz 5 fans permalink

one can only hope so... abort all of 'em!
Seriously, the key is: Obama believes this issue requires a balance between the rights of providers and the health of women and their families, a balance that the last-minute Bush rule appears to upset." Big difference between Obama and Bush - Obama is wise, compassionate, fair, thoughful, insightful, brings hope and inspires and Bush sucks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 02/28/2009
- haval2 I'm a Fan of haval2 37 fans permalink

Over turn everything BUSH and get the country out of the 19th century.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 02/28/2009

This is change i can believe in. This is so so so so GOOD. Makes me happy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

You took the words right out of my mouth!!

Thank God for Obama and his stance on women's reproductive rights!! I am so grateful Obama is our President.

The more Bush Administration repeals the better!! THANK YOU OBAMA!! WE LOVE YOU!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

Waiting to hear from the no change people on this issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

This, gay marriage and guns. Writing the plank for 2012 ought to be a piece of cake for the Resimpleton party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 AM on 02/28/2009

So now there will be no right to refuse service? What, having a baby is a disease? No - taking taxpayer money to pay for the riddance of an unwanted baby, is a disease.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 02/28/2009

No - denying a women personal freedom in a democracy is a disease. A fetus is NOT a baby.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 02/28/2009

Did you read the article?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 AM on 02/28/2009

then the rapist who impregnated her is the disease. otherwise, her personal freedoms have not been violated.

a fetus isn't a disease either. "i will not accept taxpayer $$ to dispose of your fetus" is the doctor's freedom. the least the woman could do is pay for its death herself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 02/28/2009
- rf dude I'm a Fan of rf dude 20 fans permalink
photo


And in a related story today, James Dobson resigned as head of " Focu$ on the Foetu$ "

(er, " Family ")

in protest, methinks...
--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

Wait till we find out about the "pork" in that story. It won't be an earmark, I'll bet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 02/28/2009
- popart I'm a Fan of popart 10 fans permalink
photo

let no government infridge on our right to the maintenance of our bodies whether to let it make new life or terminate our own life. these are the most personal choices of all and it is for each individual to decide life or death and not the business of a third party to interfer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 02/28/2009
- DLB I'm a Fan of DLB 41 fans permalink
photo

No doctor or health-care professional should be forced to help any woman who has requested an abortion. Abortions are an elective medical procedure. Should a doctor be forced to perform elective procedures like tongue splitting, or placing studs under the skin, as some "body artists" have had performed on them?

I can see going to the SCOTUS. The doctors and health-care professionals will win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

The issue is that some people believe that life begins at conception. Thus, use of birth control measures like hormonal pills, shots or patches are not within their range of choices to use or recommend. Abortion is not clearly and solely defined as D&C. If the Walmart pharmacist believes this, he's not going to want to give your wife he lovely pink pills. In some counties of our rural country. Women don't really have much of a choice about the pharmacist or even physician they consult. Who gets to choose in these cases? The many women who desire hormonal birth control or the professional who knew perfectly well what they were getting into when they took cellular biology?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 02/28/2009
- Amerigucci I'm a Fan of Amerigucci 11 fans permalink

If it worked that way, opthalmologists would be performing D&C's.

The procedures involved in terminating pregnancies are the same for all kinds of different events that can occur during a wanted pregnancy.

Unless it's an emergency medical emergency, abortions are performed in facilities where personnel are there to do abortions. And if it's an emergency situation, you're providing emergency medical care, something that you're trained to do and is part of the job and oath. Even then, if there are others to step in for you, hospitals make the accommodation. But if there isn't anyone to spell you, you suck it up and provide the care you were licensed to give.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 AM on 02/28/2009
- DLB I'm a Fan of DLB 41 fans permalink
photo

"The procedures involved in terminating pregnancies are the same for all kinds of different events that can occur during a wanted pregnancy. "

Yeah, right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 02/28/2009
- turk96 I'm a Fan of turk96 6 fans permalink

I'm a vegetarian. If I get a job at a slaughterhouse, knowing full well what the job entails, can I refuse to kill animals on moral grounds and retain my employment?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 02/28/2009
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 23 fans permalink
photo

While we're at it, I am wondering why health plans pay for fertility treatments, but rarely pay for contraceptives? I'm not sure they cover abortions either, unless they're "medically necessary."

I mean, isn't that a little backwards? We really need to encourage people to over-populate?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 02/28/2009
- mainemomma I'm a Fan of mainemomma 47 fans permalink
photo

Octo Mom was implanted with your tax dollars. Are the lifers supporting her? Because I have a moral objection to a woman who breeds children like rabbits and doesn't think about the impact on the children or others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 AM on 02/28/2009
- lizt I'm a Fan of lizt 14 fans permalink

Yes. I read an interesting article recently. The highest proportion of abortions right now are not in the teen years. We appear to be winning the education battle in that area. The highest rate for abortions come for women in their early to middlle 20's because they no longer have coverage to pay for consistent contraception. We support viagra for old men but not contraception for young women. Something is wrong with this set of priorties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 02/28/2009
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 23 fans permalink
photo

Conscience doesn't enter into this. If they don't have the stomach for it, they need to leave the field. They shouldn't pick and choose what medical procedures they're willing to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 02/28/2009
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 23 fans permalink
photo

Conscience doesn't enter into this. If they don't have the stomach for it, they need to leave the field.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 02/28/2009
- NWBrunette I'm a Fan of NWBrunette 53 fans permalink

Don't like the morality of your job? Get a new one. Medical pros are just that - medical pros. They don't get to shove their morals down anyone else's throat. If they don't like what they're doing, they can stop. They don't get to pick and choose. I never got to in my job, and neither does anyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 02/27/2009
- noralou I'm a Fan of noralou 23 fans permalink
photo

There is a simple solution to any angst felt by anti-choice medical professionals -- don't go into the fields of medicine where abortion is an option. Ortheopedics, Oncology, Neurology and so on...
There are plenty of jobs in medicine where abortion isn't an issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 02/27/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect