iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama sets firm date to end Iraq war he inherited

BEN FELLER   02/27/09 10:34 PM ET   AP

Iraq Us Election

CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. — President Barack Obama consigned the Iraq war to history Friday, declaring he will end combat operations within 18 months and open a new era of diplomacy in the Middle East.

"Let me say this as plainly as I can: By August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end," Obama told Marines who are about to deploy by the thousands to the other war front, Afghanistan.

Even so, Obama will leave the bulk of troops in place this year, contrary to hopes of Democratic leaders for a speedier pullout. And after combat forces withdraw, 35,000 to 50,000 will stay behind for an additional year and half of support and counterterrorism duties.

Just six weeks into office, Obama used blunt terms and a cast-in-stone promise to write the last chapter of a war that began six years ago. It has cost more in lives, money and national stamina than ever envisioned.

Like Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon before him, Obama came into office with an inherited war he pledged to end without delay. Eisenhower did, in Korea. Nixon didn't, in Vietnam. Obama says he will.

"Iraq's future is now its own responsibility," Obama said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, flanked Obama during the announcement. It was a symbolic statement that top military advisers are on board with a strategy some had openly questioned before Obama's inauguration.

More than five years have passed since Bush declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq, a statement that proved false as sectarian violence brought Iraq to the brink of disaster.

Obama did not claim a mission accomplished. Instead, he suggested America accomplished the mission as best it could.

"What we will not do is let the pursuit of the perfect stand in the way of achievable goals," he said. "We cannot rid Iraq of all who oppose America or sympathize with our adversaries. We cannot police Iraq's streets until they are completely safe, nor stay until Iraq's union is perfected."

He said: "America's men and women in uniform have fought block by block, province by province, year after year, to give the Iraqis this chance to choose a better future. Now, we must ask the Iraqi people to seize it."

Obama's promise to pull home the last of the U.S. troops by the end of 2011 is in accord with a deal that Iraqis signed with former President George W. Bush.

Meantime, Obama is accelerating the end of the war by withdrawing roughly 100,000 troops by the summer of 2010.

Obama was moving to fulfill in large measure the defining promise of his campaign _ to end combat operations within 16 months of taking office. He's doing it in 19 months instead, and the drawdown will be backloaded to provide security for Iraqi elections late this year.

More than 4,250 Americans have been killed in Iraq, a costly, unpopular enterprise at home that Obama criticized when support for the invasion was strong and few other politicians dared stand against it.

He applauded the armed forces for its successes in Iraq, where U.S. deaths and violence in many parts of the country are significantly down.

He never credited Bush's buildup of troops in 2007 as contributing to those improvements.

In another break from Bush, Obama promised "comprehensive American engagement" with nations across the Middle East, noting Iran and Syria in particular. The U.S. has long had a diplomatic frost with both countries over their support for militant groups, among other matters. But they hold great sway in the region, and Obama sees a diplomatic opportunity.

Obama called Bush shortly before he gave his speech to brief him on his plans. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs called the chat brief and straightforward.

In his speech, Obama said to the military members: "We will leave the Iraqi people with a hard-earned opportunity to live a better life. That is your achievement. That is the prospect that you have made possible."

As Obama spoke, the camouflage-clad Marines seemed to be taking a measure of the man. They politely applauded their new commander in chief at times, and grew more boisterous when he promised to raise their pay and provide more help for their families.

The president also told the Iraqi people they will not be forgotten.

"Our nations have known difficult times together," he said. "But ours is a bond forged by shared bloodshed, and countless friendships among our people.

Yet he acknowledged violence will remain "a part of life" and daunting problems include political instability, displaced citizens and the stress of declining oil revenues.

Obama said U.S. must end the war, both for the future of Iraq and to allow the U.S. to refocus its attention more firmly on Afghanistan.

Reaction came from everywhere.

In Iraq, where several TV stations showed Obama's speech live, some citizens applauded the ironclad withdrawal plan while others questioned whether Iraq could defend itself alone.

On Capitol Hill, Democratic leaders remained cool to the suggestion that tens of thousands of troops would remain.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said his announcement was good news because it meant an end to the war, but she cautioned that the troops left behind must have a "clearly defined" mission. Obama succeeded in winning over most Republicans, who initially dismissed the timeline as arbitrary.

Sen. John McCain, who lost the presidency to Obama, said he supported the plan.

"Let us have no crisis of confidence now," he told his colleagues on the Senate floor Friday. "Instead, let us welcome home our fighting men and women _ not just thanking them for serving in Iraq, but congratulating them on bringing us to victory there."

The president who voted against the war as senator and ran against in his upstart White House bid said the Iraq conflict is one huge, painful lesson.

Admonishing the Bush era, Obama said the United States must no longer go to war without clearly defined goals. He said it must communicate the costs of war clearly, use diplomacy as well as military might, not go it alone in security.

Said Obama to the men and women in uniform before him: "I promise you that I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary."

___

Associated Press writers Anne Flaherty, Anne Gearan, Jennifer Loven and Cal Woodward contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. — President Barack Obama consigned the Iraq war to history Friday, declaring he will end combat operations within 18 months and open a new era of diplomacy in the Middle East.
CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. — President Barack Obama consigned the Iraq war to history Friday, declaring he will end combat operations within 18 months and open a new era of diplomacy in the Middle East.
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,458
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (43 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dianhow
former Repub till W
08:45 PM on 02/28/2009
Obama said 16 months - now its 19 months for combat troops to be home. That's pretty close.
But I have a major problem with leaving 50 K troops there- no matter what you call it. As for Afghanistan. They beat Russia and many others. They will beat us too. We need to get off Muslim land - their holy land. The Shites and Sunni's will fight no matter what. Its not worth it. It could go on for several more years. JUST LEAVE - We will save trillions and so many lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:40 PM on 02/28/2009
Obama stated back in July in an op-ed piece he would leave a residual force in Iraq to do exactly what he outlined today.

I don't see why everyone is surprised by his speech today.

It's nothing new.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/opinion/14obama.html
11:23 AM on 02/28/2009
What is the plan 35,000 to 50,000 will stay and how many support personnel ,what will the rotation of troops look like and where will they be stationed and what forces are we talking about? Air Force, Marines, Army, Security Forces ,Strike Forces, Air Craft, Armored Infantry, you can expect a continued flow of military personnel and materials into Iraq. Next will be a missile defense strategy aimed at Iran. Why do we need to dominate the world with military presence. Do the people of the United States feel that it is our obligation to protect and defend the wealthiest nations on earth free of charge. Will we continue to barrow money and pay interest on it to do it. Oh that's right Iran has nuclear weapons, so did Iraq. Bring all the troops home President Obama and send Iraq shiploads of medical supplies and toilet paper. Our government is owned and operated by the military industrial complex that we have built up from the cold war. They want more, they want better, they want faster, and this is exactly why we have no domestic policy. It is our nation take it back, lay off the entertainment, the booze, the drugs, the self indulgence, and stop trying to tell other people how to live. The government isn't going to stop. Within 24 months they will be focused on Iran and ready to invade. Will you agree?
11:16 AM on 02/28/2009
Obama’s withdrawal plan was a compromise between his own campaign promise and the Gen. Odierno in Iraq who wanted to keep as many troops in Iraq as possible. After the 2010 deadline there will still be 30-50,000 troops there that will mostly leave in 2011 the deadline set by the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). This is a good time to announce this as Iraq is still the number one foreign police concern of Americans according to the latest polling, and around 2/3 think things are going good there. If that feeling was reversed, Obama would probably be criticized for cutting and running. Another reason why this was good timing is because it shows that the U.S. is committed to withdrawal to Iraqis. In July 2009 there will be a referendum on the SOFA and if it gets voted down the U.S. will have one year to get out. Obama’s statements will help get past this as well. Still, you can expect several thousand U.S. troops to stay even past 2011 as advisors because Iraq is not capable of national defense from other countries right now. For more see: musingsoniraq.blogspot.com
12:03 PM on 02/28/2009
How much military presence do we have in the region outside Iraq, including Navy and Air facilities right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBurdicks
Whatever happened to my yellow bus?
05:24 AM on 02/28/2009
We get out of this mess by getting out. Right now. Destroy equipment we can't get out in a few weeks. Modern mechanized military equipment is mostly useless anyway in the interconnected 21st Century world.
Whenever we leave, today, next week, next year, 2010, 2011, there will be a civil war, certainly Shiite vs. Sunni, maybe with Kurdish involvement. Staying longer and paying, arming, and training more dangerous local sectarians can only mean a more violent and deadly civil war when we finally leave.
Haven't we done enough damage to these innocent people already? Maybe Saddam was a thug, but neither he nor the people had anything to do with 9/11. They had no WMD. There were no Al Quaeda plotting or training there.
Look at our mess. Tens of thousands (more?) dead. Most of the infrastructure wiped out. Armed thugs everywhere. Foreign fighters hiding among the civilian population. Al Quaeda with a major footprint on the ground. WMD strewn throughout every corner of the country. Unpopular puppets posing as legitimate government. Most of the educated and trained hiding in Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere.
We voted to end this national disgrace now. What we get is maybe 8,000-10,000 out at the end of this year, then no more reductions for maybe 9 months more, and leave 50,000 behind until 2011 or longer. All couched in caveats about responding appropriately to any further violence.
Like going back in force when the inevitable civil war breaks out?
10:50 PM on 02/27/2009
I have been asking my congressman and US Senators to bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan for three years now.

I supported President Obama.

I want all our troops home now. Not in 12, 16,19 or 23 months. And I will not vote for Barack Obama again because he is putting more of our troops into Afghanistan.

I am disappointed in President Obama. I thought he knew better.
10:56 PM on 02/27/2009
Yeah, right. You voted for him. Too bad you didn't listen to him, though. He always said it would be a responsible withdrawal and for at least a year he's been calling for a 16 month timeline from the time he became President. So, you won't "vote" for him again because of 3 months?

Go away, Karl Rove-lite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chronic
10:59 PM on 02/27/2009
Get real!

This President KNOWS what he is doing.

It took 8 loooooooong years for The Republican Cr!me Synd!cate to put America in this MESS.

It will take YEARS for President Obama and The Democrats to get us out of this MESS!!
08:46 PM on 02/27/2009
Joe seems to really be enjoying CPAC, he can really let his hair down amongst his fellow skinHeads.
08:41 PM on 02/27/2009
Joe Wurlitzerburger says anyone that doesn't say nice things about the troops should be sho t.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TimeToPunt
Microbiotic
09:10 PM on 02/27/2009
Speaking for myself I've never said anything negative about our troops and in fact the only thing I ever said about the troops was "Bring them home," which in my mind is actually a rather nice thing to say about them.

Joe the plumber is desperately searching for relevancy.
08:03 PM on 02/27/2009
He promised a responsable withdraw! If that means leaveing that many in place temprary, than be it. He made it clear the Iraq people must takeing care of themselfs now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjean
Consultant
07:50 PM on 02/27/2009
so leaving 3 months later is a broken promise??? So you want him to pull out and endanger the lives of many. President Obama did say that he would do this responsibly. Most of you are not open to compromise at all. You should be part of the rethug party.
07:48 PM on 02/27/2009
THANK-YOU OBAMA for being RIGHT in the first place!!!

We shouldn't have gone in there PERIOD!

Thank-GOD your in charge now and not McHundred Years!

Thank-God your in charge now and not McBom Bom Bom Bom Bom Eye-ran!

Obama proved we are not Cut-and -Runners (once again, the Repubs are proved WRONG)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chronic
11:00 PM on 02/27/2009
EXACTLY!!!
07:11 PM on 02/27/2009
Since 2004 I devoted my life to getting a date certain for US withdrawal from Iraq because every faction there was planning on US just bleeding and never leaving. But I fear Obama made a big mistake. On the one hand he extended the date certain for withdrawal to 19 months + indefinite contingent, making Iraq, therefore, "Obama's War." On the other, he doesn't know what Petraeus and Odierno are hidding under their so-called "fragile surge victory." It could be that many factions are hidding a kick in the ass to US forces as they leave and a takedown of our Sunni Awakening tribes. As the cycle reprocesses, Obama will be forced to reinsert and will face the blame as both Iraq/Afghan wars heat up. The difference is that under Bush, thanks to Dept Treasury fraud, it didn't look like every bullet fired was a lunch sandwich taken out of the mouths of America's children. So there will be far less patience with "Obama's War" than there was with "Bush's War." OBAMA SHOULD HAVE STUCK TO HIS SCHEDUAL OR FORCED PETRAEUS AND ODIERNO TO *PUBLICLY* EXPLAIN WHY THEIR "SURGE VICTORY" IS NOT A VICTORY SO WE HAVE TO DELAY OUR WITHDRAWAL. VERY SMART PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS BEEN HAD BY OUR DUMB PENTAGON, I fear....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
07:58 PM on 02/27/2009
Yes, it's still the military who are pulling the strings. Doesn't that tell anyone that there's something wrong? Everyone raged against Gen. Betray-us. Remember? Now all of a sudden those supporting Obama's decision to leave so many troops in Iraq agree with the military too obviously. There was no excuse to go to war and no excuse to stay in Iraq with any troops. Iraq will always be a chaotic and for all intents and puposes dictatorship ruled by religious fanaticism. To put American lives on the line and 35,000 to 50,000 'residuals' of them, is tragic and just as reckless as Bush's policy.

What Obama is doing is conning us or he's a wuss too afraid to confront the generals and the republicans. This is what happens when you give bipartisanship and politics priority over American lives.
10:53 PM on 02/27/2009
Obama a wuss? Too afraid to confront the generals? What was all that hullabaloo all over the news when Obama was just a candidate? Remember how they reported that he got into a very loud discussion with Gen Petraeus about getting out of Iraq? Did you miss that? If he wasn't a wuss as a candidate, he'd hardly be a wuss as the President.

I think it was Gen Powell who told Bush, if you break it, you fix it.

Obama has to fix it. Like so much of what was left behind.
09:34 PM on 02/27/2009
Let's hope that there are enough thinking Iraqis to figure out that if they want the US O U T the best move is to become a really boring country for the military.
11:43 AM on 02/28/2009
We will never leave Iraq under any circumstances, we have fortified bases with fortified living quarters, the largest embassy in the world, a fortified and secure green zone. The government of the United States has never intended to leave. Why would they? Iraq will swallow our presence simply because they will not be able to control there own system of government as long as they remain tribal peoples divided by religious beliefs, if you don't see that you are stone blind. Why do we ignore two thousand years of history? The answer is always the same. Our judgment is clouded by arrogance.
06:36 PM on 02/27/2009
He laid it out in one sentence. Iraq's future is now Iraq's responsibility. He said it like it is. Can't interrupt that any other way.
Seeing those Marines in Huffington Post's slide show made me so upset. How many more have to die? Mr. President no matter what happens, please bring our soldiers home by August 2010, if not sooner. I still think the Middle East is unstable and anything can change in a flash, so bring our soldiers home asap. Thank you from a concerned citizen.
06:03 PM on 02/27/2009
And they call it gummy love

Cuz she just turned ninety three
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
indypete
06:22 PM on 02/27/2009
Ew!
05:59 PM on 02/27/2009
It ain't withdrawal when 50,000 troops are left in place, in perpetuity.

Many on the left put Obama in office on his pledge to "bring all of the troops home" as early as 2009. That was what Obama was saying before the Texas primary.

Tom Hayden called it right:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-hayden
06:12 PM on 02/27/2009
Really? Because I'm on the left, I put Obama in office, and on this I could care less what Hayden says.

A phased withdrawal is the only responsible approach.

Many reactionary assclowns on the right, including you, no doubt, accused Obama of cutting and running.

Now that he is working to maintain the stability of Iraq long term, you are gonna b1tch about that.

Typical.
07:39 PM on 02/27/2009
You are so right!
Repubs line in their campaign was that Dems are cut-and-runners!
And now they still beetch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chronic
11:03 PM on 02/27/2009
AMEN!!!