Charlie Rose Interviews Timothy Geithner: "Capitalism Will Be Different" (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Charlie Rose Interviews Timothy Geithner: "Capitalism Will Be Different" (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

March 10, 2009 08:15 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Geithner And Charlie Rose

***SCROLL DOWN FOR A PREVIEW VIDEO OF THE INTERVIEW***

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner offered a vigorous defense of the administration's fiscal policies and his own personal performance, in a lengthy interview with Charlie Rose on Tuesday night.

The Secretary, under criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike, acknowledged that expectations for actions to resuscitate the markets overtook the scope of the administration's plans. But he insisted that he and the president remain confident in their prescriptions for the crisis and swiped away concerns over a lack of a coherent message and understaffing at the Treasury Department.

"It was always our intention to lay out that broad framework of strategy at the beginning so people could see the full scope of the strategy and then lay out the details," Geithner said, when asked about the negative market reaction to his testimony on the administration's banking policy. "Now, you're right. Expectations got ahead of the policy, and part of those expectations which caused disappointment were the hope that we were going to provide a very generous benefit to the banking system on terms that I didn't think was going to be effective -- defensible for the American tax taxpayer."

The segment, a transcript of which was posted by Greg Mitchell, illustrated both the scope of the economic challenges facing the administration and the deftness that Geithner brings to the task. It was not strictly sunny. Towards the end, the Treasury Secretary said that American capitalism "will be different" and the financial system too. But he expressed confidence that a plan that involved putting banks through stress test, shoring up the housing market, and removing the toxic assets away from the books through a combination of public and private capital would, in the end, get the economy running.

"We start[ed] with a mess, a deep mess, made worse by the deepening recession," Geithner said. "And these things are pitting on themselves. And it's very important for people to understand, it's going to take some time to work through this. But what I want people to know is that we're going to do what's necessary to get through it. And these things will get traction. They will start to help unfreeze things, and they will help lay the foundation for recovery."

On other key issues, here is what the Treasury Secretary had to say.

On criticism that his testimony to Congress was vague and unprepared:

Story continues below
advertisement

"We always were going to start with a broad strategy and follow it up with detailed, concrete announcements on the details so people could see the path forward"

On the culture of bonuses and executive compensation that has been witnessed in the financial community:

"They made some exceptionally bad judgments. And not just in compensation practice and how they ran their firms, how much risk they took, but as the crisis intensified. And as they got themselves in the position where they needed exceptional assistance from the government, many of those directors made things dramatically worse by continuing to pay out really unjustifiable bonuses to their senior executives and they were losing tens of billions of dollars. That made this basic crisis of confidence much worse, because people understandably looked at that and said how could that be tenable?"

On his predecessor, Hank Paulson, whose handling of the Troubled Asset Relief Program has come under sharp criticism for its ineffectiveness and lack of accountability:

"He faced a set of constraints and judgments at that time about how best to use limited resources. And he decided at that time that he didn't have a viable way to do that. Now, we thought about it a lot since then. We think we figured out a way to do it in a way that's going to make sense for the American taxpayer."

On the possibility of letting a major bank fail:

"I'll say again, they play a critical role in our markets, in our financial system. We want to continue to make sure they play that role. Now, where they need temporary assistance through the government to get through that, we're going to make sure it comes with appropriately tough conditions so that they emerge stronger and that we're providing a level of conditions and accountability that's appropriate in this context."

On a muddled message from Washington:

"[Y]ou have to realize where we started. And we started from a deepening recession here and globally and a huge fiscal hole. And to address that crisis which we inherited, requires the government to act with substantial resources quickly. Now to make it work, you've got to make sure that those resources are going to be effective in getting people back to work and stimulating private investment. And you want them targeting areas, which again, which are going to make America stronger in the longer term. And what we've tried to do at the same time is make sure people understand that when recovery is firmly established, we're going to get back to living within our means as a country"

On whether being under-staffed is a problem:

"Absolutely not."

Watch a preview of the interview, which airs tonight.

***SCROLL DOWN FOR A PREVIEW VIDEO OF THE INTERVIEW*** Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner offered a vigorous defense of the administration's fiscal policies and his own personal performance, in a le...
***SCROLL DOWN FOR A PREVIEW VIDEO OF THE INTERVIEW*** Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner offered a vigorous defense of the administration's fiscal policies and his own personal performance, in a le...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
2622
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (29 pages total)

I just want to know where money will be made when we become a socialistic state. I say get on the government payroll ASAP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 03/11/2009

No more capitalism!

It's down on the ground; let's kick it to death!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 03/11/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 543 fans permalink
photo

I seriously doubt the capitalists are going to stop exploiting the workers any day soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

Spot on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 03/11/2009
- StL I'm a Fan of StL 2 fans permalink

YIPPIE.... we have all wanted to be more like Cuba . Keep your old cars, they get real cool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

Thank you BUSH/Greenspan/Wall Street for this CRISIS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 03/11/2009
- stunsitfel I'm a Fan of stunsitfel 37 fans permalink
photo

Throw in some Nationalism, Socialism, diving dollar because of excess spending (yet to come, along with a gold rush) and yes it's very different.

I

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

Do you take by the spoonful or by the shovel load?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 03/11/2009
- MacQ I'm a Fan of MacQ 45 fans permalink

Capitalism will be different.
It will be socialism. But it will be called something else. Maybe progressiveism

To Liberals, words are very important. Ultimate wordsmiths, Progressives.
If you don't like something, just change the word. Call it by a different name and all will be well. (Not abortion, but choice) I know one lib who wanted to refer to the unborn not as babies, not even as fetuses (that was too near live human), but as "a conceptus".
If you are caught doing something, change its meaning. Use words to explain it away (the meaning of the word "is")

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 03/11/2009
- stunsitfel I'm a Fan of stunsitfel 37 fans permalink
photo

Love it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 03/11/2009

"If you don't like something, just change the word. Call it by a different name and all will be well."

You mean like how conservatives call fairly taxing rich people socialism or communism.
Or how they call patriotism, absolute blind loyalty to the president (which is nationalism) when their guy is in and violent revolution (which is treason) when their guy isn't in.

Conservatives love their doublespeak.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 03/11/2009
- ez14livin I'm a Fan of ez14livin 4 fans permalink

as opposed to GOP Orwellian semantics: Take a word and turn it into it's opposite (or very close)

Enhanced interrogation...
We went to war with Iraq to bring them peace
Double the deficit and call yourself fiscally responsible
Rail against socialism (unless it is for your corporate sponsors)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 03/11/2009
- sixletters I'm a Fan of sixletters 12 fans permalink
photo

It has occurred to me that every position republicans have is based on fear. Fear of something real or perceived.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

Abortion? That's just way too predictable. Some people vote on one issue I guess.
Your choice though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

From Carol AB

The $173 billion government rescue of AIG is stoking resentment among investors who see it as a backdoor taxpayer bailout of Goldman Sachs and other banks.

Six months after the government stepped in save it, AIG continues to bleed red ink. Its stock and bond holders have been crushed, but one group has suffered almost no damage: banks that bought credit protection from AIG Financial Products.

Regulatory filings show that since the FED announced its rescue of AIG on September 15, about $50 billion of government money has passed through the company to banks.

"Treasury is providing a massive wealth transfer from taxpayers to Goldman Sachs and other parties and it's something that absolutely should be investigated," said Eric Hovde, chief executive of Hovde Capital Advisors, where he manages financial services-focused hedge funds.

"The whole point of the bailout is to save Goldman Sachs," said Christopher Whalen, head of financial advisory services for Institutional Risk Analytics. "The whole thing is so rancid and so hideous."

A Goldman Sachs spokesman declined to comment on the AIG bailout or what government funds it received.

Goldman CFO David Viniar in September and in December told investors the firm had no material losses from AIG. The bank says its AIG exposure was either collateralized or hedged.

Last week, AIG Chief Executive Edward Liddy told investors "the vast majority" of taxpayer funds "passed through AIG to other financial institutions" as it unwound transactions.

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE52A0TP20090311

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 03/11/2009
- CaptD I'm a Fan of CaptD 20 fans permalink
photo

Mr. G needs to wear a jacket that does not blend into the back round so that he does not look like a "talking head". Plus, he needs some coaching on "interview" speaking so that his "one to one" mannerisms don't make him look "hunched over" during these interviews!

He is a very sharp guy and his message deserves a much better delivery so that the viewers will get the true picture of what he is trying to say to them.

Perhaps in the short term, all he needs is a Press Secretary to give his "speeches" and then he can be available to answer short pointed questions which he would be great at!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 03/11/2009

Great interview. He's a really smart, thoughtful guy. I'm not really bothered by his shyness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 03/11/2009
- kepary I'm a Fan of kepary 6 fans permalink

buh bye capitalism

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 03/11/2009
- romangod I'm a Fan of romangod 2 fans permalink

You need a brain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

It seems that like jobs, they are in short supply now in days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 03/11/2009
photo

Thats a load of crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 03/11/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 165 fans permalink
photo

I watched the entire show last night and it's obvious Geithner is still locked into the old world regressive banker's cabal and afraid to dare show any vision as to how we can actually turn this around and use this emergency to create opportunity and launch us into the future as a super economy and largely self sufficient super power...

This can only be accomplished through Nationalization of our major assets from the Major Banks to Energy, our Air Lines and any other essential asset from Infrastructure to any essential Industry such as Steel or an Automotive Industry...some permanently others could eventually be once again privatized but anything other than this is just putting a band-aid on a shot gun blast...

Until our leaders realize the depth of this "emergency" and that we are far from hitting bottom there will be no cure for the harm the Republicans and so called "Conservatism" that lunacy, that still inflicts so many...has done to our world..!

The Purpose of Government is to, "Serve The People...!"

Not the sleazy brokers and bankers..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 03/11/2009

totally agree. All this approach is going to do is to preserve the status quo... we'll still have these excessively large banks with the same "too big to fail" problem, which hinders capitalism from trimming out the inefficient businesses. I'd much prefer to see a temporary nationalization, where the assets are sold off. This is a much better return on investment to taxpayers than just shoveling money into these banks in an effort to make them solvent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 03/11/2009

I can't see how anyone in this United States can think the Obama administration can just waive a magic wand and the economy would be revived in an instant. It is like expecting someone who just failed a basic math test to score 100% on a differential equation examination right after the basic math test or expecting a man who just came out of the operating table for heart transplant to run 26 mile maraton right after the surgery. People, our economy is still on the operating table, it might be able to, some day, after the heart transplant that the Obama administration is performing on it, run the 26 mile maraton everyone is expecting to occur instantly. Give it time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 03/11/2009

....or those people who think that Obama is causing the crash, despite the fact that he's only been in office about 6 weeks and the market was completely tanking well before his name was even part of the national dialog. I guess people tend to project their biases onto reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 03/11/2009
- heal57 I'm a Fan of heal57 27 fans permalink

You are quite correct. This is just another example of the education level of Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 03/11/2009
- stunsitfel I'm a Fan of stunsitfel 37 fans permalink
photo

I gave it time enough to read this blabber. Times up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 03/11/2009
- soapington I'm a Fan of soapington 42 fans permalink
photo

TV demands that the Secretary of the Treasury appear often in public and be brilliantly lucid. Geithner is nervous and awkward. He's not a TV personality. So what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 03/11/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 543 fans permalink
photo

Such is the level to which public discourse has sunk. Personality over substance is the American Way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 03/11/2009

I may be the only person in the world, but I like Tim Geithner. I can't put my finger on why, yes, he is nervous, yes he is not a stylistic or verbal talent, and yes he's very nerdy. And yet, I find him a likable person. Somehow, the combination of his "nervousness and awkwardness" and his nerdyness also instills trust in me. Yes, a partyleader needs to be able to communicate "to the average american" and needs to have communication talent, but someone appointed to fix the economic system, just needs brains to do the right thing, and he needs a lot of them, and that is exactly what his personality seems to exhume in droves.

Furthermore, strange as it may sound and nerdy as he may be, I can somehow imagine myself drinking a beer with him, and getting to know him, and somehow i can imagine that if you know him personally he is very funny and very witty. Perhaps because the nerds i've known in my life where often extremely funny and witty when you got to know them personally, I don't know, but anyhow, I trust Tim Geithner and I like him too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 03/11/2009
- Anare I'm a Fan of Anare 4 fans permalink

I totally disagree. I watched him on Charlie Rose last night. I had never heard him speak before. I was very impressed by his complete command of the situation. He was able to anticipate questions and give concise answers. He neither talked down to us nor bored us to death with wonky talk or circle speak. He was able to deflect what he needed to deflect without being glib or nasty. He obviously has a wealth of knowledge and experience with the Treasury Dept and I felt much better about his leadership after watching that interview.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 03/11/2009
- LCLA I'm a Fan of LCLA 22 fans permalink
photo

I've seen no evidence of a substantial Republican plan to to rehabilitate the economy. I've heard a lot of whining and lock-step criticism and use of buzz words like "socialism." But I've heard very little about how to fix the problem except to continue the failed policies which got us here, i.e. more tax cuts for the already wealthy.
The Republican Party today is a one trick pony. Their only solution is tax cuts. The problem is that "solution" long ago reached the point of diminishing returns. Just like the strategy of reducing interest rates to prop up the economy. We finally got the interest rates down to zero, and Paulson gave away hundreds of billions with no strings attached, and yet we still have not found the bottom of this depression.
I grew up hearing about the "Great" Depression of the 1930s. Now, just like the "Great" War had to be replaced with a number, i.e. WWI, after WWII came along, we'll have to put a new perspective on the depression of the 1930s. Thanks a lot, W... not!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 03/11/2009

They have no plan. Their philosophy says that government is the problem, so they can't figure out a way to utilize it as part of a solution. The Ron Paul crowd and free-market-fundamentalists allege that if the government does nothing and just lets these banks collapse then the invisible hand of capitalism will magically fix everything. I guess to some degree they're right, but it would entail totally destroying the economy, create a complete run on the banks, rampant foreclosures, and revaluing of assets to a fraction of what they are today. Maybe it's time to wipe the slate clean though... ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 03/11/2009

An ending is upon us. We are much like Rome during her decline. Some similarities are:

Power in the hands of a few
Few rich people with lots of "others"
They had the gladiator fights, we have MMA , video game death galore, and TV
Both have been spread thin by being in too many places at once

If we look at the USA using the cycles of the moon, we are in the waning cycle. Societies like ours and ancient Rome get built up, rest on our laurels, and then decline rapidly.

We still have further to go in this decline since we have not united. As the saying goes, united we stand and divided we fall. How much further will we have to fall before we unite?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 03/11/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

Jeebus! I didn't see one request for the entrance of the "holy rollers"
Cue: M0ses

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 03/11/2009

The Roman Republic was alot like the US too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 03/11/2009
- Hawka I'm a Fan of Hawka 9 fans permalink

If I remember correctly Rome eventually reformed itself into a new empire that lasted for another thousand years. Believe it was called Byzantine BTW...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 03/11/2009
- Chavez08 I'm a Fan of Chavez08 58 fans permalink
photo

For the few of you who may care, I will be retiring "CHAVEZ08" today and I will be annoying you with a new screen-name starting tomorrow.

Viva Revolution!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 03/11/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 201 fans permalink
photo

Why not tell us what name should we look for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 03/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (29 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect