Seattle Post-Intelligencer To Go Online Only

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Seattle Post-Intelligencer To Go Online Only stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PHUONG LE | March 16, 2009 02:49 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

SEATTLE — The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which has chronicled the news of the city since logs slid down its steep streets to the harbor and miners caroused in its bars before heading north to Alaska's gold fields, will print its final edition Tuesday.

Hearst Corp., which owns the 146-year-old P-I, said Monday that it failed to find a buyer for the newspaper, which it put up for a 60-day sale in January after years of losing money. Now the P-I will shift entirely to the Web.

"Tonight will be the final run, so let's do it right," publisher Roger Oglesby told the newsroom.

Hearst's decision to abandon the print product in favor of an Internet-only version is the first for a large American newspaper, raising questions about whether the company can make money in a medium where others have come up short.

David Lonay, 80, a subscriber since 1950, said he'll miss a morning ritual that can't be replaced by a Web-only version.

"The first thing I do every day is get the P-I and read it," Lonay said. "I really feel like an old friend is dying."

Hearst's move to end the print edition leaves the P-I's larger rival, The Seattle Times, as the only mainstream daily in the city. The Times plans to deliver a copy of the newspaper to every P-I subscriber on Wednesday morning, spokeswoman Jill Mackie said.

"It's a really sad day for Seattle," said P-I reporter Angela Galloway. "The P-I has its strengths and weaknesses but it always strove for a noble cause, which was to give voice to those without power and scrutiny of those with power."

Story continues below
advertisement

Seattle follows Denver in losing a daily newspaper this year. The Rocky Mountain News closed after its owner, E.W. Scripps Co., couldn't find a buyer. In Arizona, Gannett Co.'s Tucson Citizen is set to close Saturday, leaving one newspaper in that city.

And last month Hearst said it would close or sell the San Francisco Chronicle if the newspaper couldn't slash expenses in coming weeks.

The newspaper industry has seen ad revenue fall in recent years as advertisers migrate to the Internet, particularly to sites offering free or low-cost alternatives for classified ads. Starting last summer, the recession intensified the decline in advertising revenue in all categories.

Four newspaper companies, including the owners of the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and The Philadelphia Inquirer, have sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in recent months.

While the P-I's Web site ensures it a continued presence in the Seattle news market, it will likely be a pared-down version of its former self _ with a heavy reliance on blogs and links to other news outlets.

The P-I had 181 employees, but Managing Editor David McCumber said the Web site would employ about 20 in the newsroom operation and another 20 to sell ads. He said he would not be working on the new site.

Steven R. Swartz, president of Hearst Newspapers, said the online P-I would not just be "a newspaper online."

"It's an effort to craft a new type of digital business with a robust, community news and information Web site at its core," Swartz said.

Hearst said the online edition will include some of the newspaper's marquee names, including sports columnist Art Thiel, political columnist Joel Connelly and Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist David Horsey. Horsey also is under contract to continue drawing for Hearst's other newspapers.

In February, the P-I Web site had 1.8 million unique visitors and 50 million page views, according to Nielsen Online. Meanwhile the newspaper's print circulation was down to 117,000, from nearly 200,000 in 1998, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

It's unclear how the online-only venture will affect the Times, which is controlled by the Blethen family and has a circulation of 199,000. The Times has had severe financial troubles of its own and has cut 500 positions in the past year.

The P-I has had a feisty rivalry with the Times that intensified when the Times shifted from afternoon to morning publication in 2000. But since 1983, the P-I and the Times have shared business operations in a joint operating agreement in which the Times handles advertising, printing and other business functions for both newspapers in return for 60 percent of profits _ or losses.

The Times, which also has been losing money and cutting jobs, has long sought to end the joint operating agreement, arguing it threatened the survival of both newspapers. However, ending the deal could be problematic because now the Times will shoulder losses alone during a weak economy, Mackie said.

The P-I's roots date to 1863, when Seattle was still a frontier town and James Watson founded its precursor, the Seattle Gazette, as a four-page weekly.

The newspaper changed hands, names and offices several times _ including when the 1889 great Seattle fire destroyed its office _ before newspaper baron William Randolph Hearst bought the P-I in 1921 through a representative. Hearst later revealed his ownership of the newspaper in an editorial, according to the P-I archives.

"Every idea, every movement, every debate in Seattle's civic life was reflected on the front page of the paper," said Leonard Garfield, executive director of the Museum of History and Industry in Seattle.

Some of the newspaper's more famous employees over the years included novelist Tom Robbins, columnist Emmett Watson and Frank Herbert, author of the science fiction novel "Dune."

Former P-I columnist Susan Paynter, who retired in 2007 after 39 years at the newspaper, said the P-I pushed the envelope on stories, running early pieces on abortion and the Equal Rights Amendment.

"The P-I was really on the forefront of telling the average person's story and why it mattered," Paynter said.

Horsey, the cartoonist who won the newspaper's only two Pulitzer Prizes in 1999 and 2003, said much would be lost when the print product ceases publishing.

"A daily newspaper tells the stories of a community and lets the people of a city know who they are, who their neighbors are, and the life and issues they share," Horsey said. "When you lose any one newspaper, you lose a piece of that."

___

Associated Press Writer Donna Gordon Blankinship contributed to this report.

SEATTLE — The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which has chronicled the news of the city since logs slid down its steep streets to the harbor and miners caroused in its bars before heading north to A...
SEATTLE — The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which has chronicled the news of the city since logs slid down its steep streets to the harbor and miners caroused in its bars before heading north to A...
 
Comments
65
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- ridah1o1 I'm a Fan of ridah1o1 2 fans permalink

If we are going to rescue local newspapers we have to give them a plan that does not include actually printing the paper. They have to switch to a fully digital model. The concept of a local news provider isn't outdated but that provider no longer needs to print the news in hard copy. You can read more about this perspective here: http://www.ricoexplainsitall.com/politcs-economy/2009/3/18/the-end-is-near-for-newspapers.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 03/19/2009

Having all the newspapers go online could be the best thing that ever happened to the old growth forests, ever. Less paper=less lumbering=less trash=less ecological destruction. I am a bit concerned about the loss of archival access for scholars in the future, though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 03/17/2009
- Gasparilla I'm a Fan of Gasparilla 30 fans permalink

Papers have a heavy recycling content. This is not news. I don't see this same amount of concern for something really wasteful, like bottled water.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 03/17/2009

Archival integrity is a very valid concern. Once printed, a paper copy could last hundreds of years if kept in a tidy, dry room. Paper copies don't need to be charged, transferred, upgraded, or otherwise, and the only compatibility concerns are the comprehension abilities of the reader. And it takes a big fire or flood instead of a small magnet to destroy them.

That said, digital solutions are popping up to meet this problem. The LOCKSS project is a good look into the future of archives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 03/18/2009
photo

Welcome to the 21st Century. Trim the fat, find your niche, and you will prosper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 AM on 03/17/2009
- LCLA I'm a Fan of LCLA 21 fans permalink
photo

My community has one daily paper which is generally poor quality. It is important to get local coverage, but they don't even do a quality job on that. I finally just let my subscription expire and switched to the NY Times on-line version. Much better quality and diversity there, and I notice that their features are often the substance of network stories in the coming days.
It's sad to watch the decline and demise of such an important institution, but quality seems to have been abandoned for the most part for so many local newspapers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 03/17/2009
- Stem Sell I'm a Fan of Stem Sell 2 fans permalink

Now that we have HP, we don't really need any other news sources. Hp does a great job at telling us how to think, and censoring dissent.

There is really no need for any other news now. All other sources have become irrelevant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 03/17/2009
photo

Now that we have HP, we don't really need any other news sources. Hp does a great job at telling us how to think, and censoring dissent.

HP even lets you post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 03/17/2009
- bascombe I'm a Fan of bascombe 29 fans permalink
photo

so now they will be easier to fact-check.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 03/17/2009
- 01202009 I'm a Fan of 01202009 46 fans permalink
photo

The P.I. has always been a second rate newspaper. It used to be held up by Hearst features from the real world fifty years ago, but now it sucks. Hearst took over the San Francisco Chronicle and now is threatening to close that paper as well. There must be money made here to slice and dice. Hearst has always been a suck on the universe. Rosebud!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 03/16/2009
- ynp7 I'm a Fan of ynp7 2 fans permalink

It's 10 times better than the Seattle Times. I'm going to miss it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 03/16/2009
- newshawk14 I'm a Fan of newshawk14 8 fans permalink

I have to agree with your assessment, I hate to see a good newspaper go
under to a less worthy competitor. I'll also miss the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 03/16/2009
- toypiano I'm a Fan of toypiano 12 fans permalink
photo

Maybe the P-I has not been as great as in past years, but this is a real loss for the Northwest.

Seattle P-I print edition will be missed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 03/16/2009
photo

Sorry to see the P-I fade away but it had become a shell of its former award-winning self.

Recent editions consisted mostly of stories from the Associated Press or articles from other newspaper syndicates. Some days, there were more stories in the news section from the New York Times than there were from the P-I. For instance, in a recent edition, there were 29 total stories in the front section but only 7 were written by P-I personnel and one of those was a summary of headlines. You can't expect to put out a quality product if you're busy cutting back on personnel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 03/16/2009
photo

lived in seattle for 8 years and can truly say, good riddance. it was a terrible paper. granted that the seattle times sucked, but not as bad as the p-i. can't say that it will be missed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 03/16/2009
- ynp7 I'm a Fan of ynp7 2 fans permalink

You're insane. The Seattle Times is a terrible paper. Far worse than the P-I could ever hope to be. They're 120% in the pocket of big Seattle business (read: Microsoft) and the unrepentant shills for the Republican Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 03/16/2009

Good luck to them trying to make a profit with a Web-only product. When you read a print product you might notice the ad for lawn chairs or a coupon for your grocery store next to the story you are reading. Online all you do is "click" on a story and, if an ad pops up or you happen to roll over one, you zot it as fast as possible.

Plus the great myth is that "young people" (18-25) will be flocking to the Internet to "read" newspapers. The current "young generation" will glean its information from myriad sources (not always credible) and not one specific source, but spend only about 2-5 minutes on any one site before moving on. ADHD personified.

There's a reason there are books, magazines and newspapers...for those people who want a leisurely and MOBILE read where you can absorb information. Tweeting and CrackBerry news bulletins are not the same as comprehending a 1,000 word printed story.

But even if I am 100% wrong, at the end of the day a publication still has to make money and nobody had come up with a model that makes an online newspaper profitable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 03/16/2009
- trunk65 I'm a Fan of trunk65 32 fans permalink
photo

At least no one is screaming for a bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 03/16/2009

The environmental upside of the disappearance of all daily papers AND ALL MAIL ADVERTISEMENT would be greatly appreciated. We can read the electronic news just fine and nobody needs dead trees in their mail box.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 03/16/2009

So you'd rather see nuclear power plants and coal burning plants fueling an insatiable appetite for electricity than see rural jobs on tree farms. Do you understand that softwood pulp is a renewable resource that does not come from the Amazon and need not come from old growth forests? Do you know that there is a "sustainable" grading system available for wood products and that most newsprint consists of 50 percent or more recycled fiber? Or do you simply echo the talking points of ignorant people who have no idea where the things around them come from and have no interest in helping industries self-police?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 AM on 03/17/2009
- Meah I'm a Fan of Meah 52 fans permalink
photo

Think of all of the trees that will be saved. I'm just saying. I gave up on the L.A. Times when they hired Jonah Goldberg.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 03/16/2009
- devanate I'm a Fan of devanate 9 fans permalink
photo

I don't think this is such a bad thing overall. I doubt that many industries use as much paper as news printing and they usually get read once and tossed aside. This is a much better way of distributing news who's time has come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 03/16/2009
- Gasparilla I'm a Fan of Gasparilla 30 fans permalink

And you think that these on line versions are going to have the lengthy versions of an investigation into the wrongdoing of a local politician, or that most people are going to sit there and read them? No, the local news will be two killed on highway 8. And there is this marvelous new invention called recycling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 03/16/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect