iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Activists Protest Bonuses At AIG Executives' Homes

JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN   03/21/09 07:41 PM ET   AP

Aig Exec Home

FAIRFIELD, Conn. — A busload of activists representing working- and middle-class families paid visits Saturday to the lavish homes of American International Group executives to protest the tens of millions of dollars in bonuses awarded by the struggling insurance company after it received a massive federal bailout.

About 40 protesters sought to urge AIG executives who received a portion of the $165 million in bonuses to do more to help families.

"We think $165 million could be used in a more appropriate way to keep people in their homes, create more jobs and health care," said Emeline Bravo-Blackport, a gardener.

She marveled at AIG executive James Haas' colonial house, which has stunning views of a golf course and the Long Island Sound. The Fairfield house is "another part of the world" from her life in nearby Bridgeport, which flirted with bankruptcy in the 1990s and still struggles with foreclosures and unemployment."

"Lord, I wonder what it's like to live in a house that size," she said.

Another protester, Claire Jeffery, of Bloomfield, said she's on the verge of foreclosure. She works as a housekeeper; her husband, a truck driver, can't find work.

"I love my home," she said. "I really want people to help us."

News of the bonuses last week ignited a firestorm of controversy and even death threats against AIG employees. The company, which is based in New York, has received $182.5 billion in federal aid and now is about 80 percent government-owned, while the national housing and job markets have collapsed as the country spirals into a crippling recession.

American International Group Inc. has said it was contractually obligated to give the retention bonuses, payments designed to keep valued employees from quitting, to people in its financial products unit, based in Wilton, Conn. Congress began action on a bill that would tax 90 percent of the bonuses, and the company's chief executive urged anyone who received more than $100,000 to return at least half.

AIG has argued that retention bonuses are crucial to pulling the company out of its crisis. Without the bonuses, the company says, top employees who best understand AIG's business would leave.

The company, in response to the protests, said all its employees were "working very hard to pay back the government and help the U.S. economy recover."

"The people working at AIG today are part of the solution, not part of the problem," company spokeswoman Christina Pretto said in an e-mailed statement.

Besides Haas' home, protesters on Saturday also visited the Fairfield home of AIG executive Douglas Poling. They were met both times by security guards. They left letters that acknowledged some executives, including Haas and Poling, are giving up the money but that asked them to support higher taxes on families earning more than $500,000 a year.

"You have a wonderful opportunity to help your neighbors in Connecticut," the letters said. "We ask you to consider the experiences of families struggling in this economy."

Afterward, the group protested at the office of AIG's financial products division in Wilton, where they waved signs and chanted, "Money for the needy, not for the greedy!"

There were no arrests.

Mary Huguley, of Hartford, said AIG executives should share their wealth with people like her sister, who is facing foreclosure.

"You ought to share it, and God will bless you for doing it," she said.

The protests came amid new questions about the retention bonuses. State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said Saturday that documents turned over to his office by AIG appeared to show that the company paid $53 million more in bonuses to its financial products division than previously reported.

AIG said Blumenthal was wrong. It said the payments to which he referred had been made months ago and had been disclosed to the U.S Department of the Treasury.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

FAIRFIELD, Conn. — A busload of activists representing working- and middle-class families paid visits Saturday to the lavish homes of American International Group executives to protest the tens ...
FAIRFIELD, Conn. — A busload of activists representing working- and middle-class families paid visits Saturday to the lavish homes of American International Group executives to protest the tens ...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,005
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
03:13 PM on 03/24/2009
I saw this on A.Cooper 360.

The organizers had ACORN sweatshirts on..

Left out of this story.

WHY?
03:22 PM on 03/24/2009
Were the organizers doing something illegal or do you just not like their attire? If that's the case, call the fashion police who just MIGHT agree that here is a problem here.
03:00 PM on 03/24/2009
OK this won't be popular here, but for the sake of argument. Are you good working class types opposed to all the AIG bonuses? or just some.? I've tried to find the number of employees who got bonuses, (I thought I saw 4,000 at one point) However I did see a figure of over 400,(LA Times) with bonuses ranging from $1,000 to 6.5 million. So my question is, do you also begrudge the chump sitting at his computer everyday crunching numbers he has been given, to the best of ability, his $1,000 bonus. I can't help but feel that as usual in this feeding frenzy all the class warriors believe that everyone at these companies went to work everyday wondering how many of us middle class types they could rob today. I've been told how compassionate Liberals are, and yet, it seems you can't get to the tar and feathers fast enough. (note the earlier poster, I think on this thread who thought their homes should be burned, with their families in them.)
03:07 PM on 03/24/2009
As a footnote, I believe that any and all bonuses should be paid out of profits.
02:25 PM on 03/24/2009
You know "retention Bonuses" like the being paid at Fannie Mae.
10:55 AM on 03/24/2009
"God will bless you"? For returning the money - how can any sane person believe in God in these times. There is no God! And never was.
02:45 PM on 03/24/2009
Hey, when you're that rich and have that many millions of dollars, you don't NEED God's blessing. These people can buy God thrice over, and have enough money left to purchase Brunei.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mover
Father, Husband, Ret 1SG
06:58 AM on 03/28/2009
Why not? Over 90% of Americans have jobs, no terrorist attacks in CONUS or 7 years, the shopping malls are packed, housing sales are up, and rush hour is still rush hour.

FYI: This is NOT the worst economy since the great depression.

It IS the worst economy since the Carter Administration.
02:05 AM on 03/24/2009
sheesh I remember why I dropped out of this site last year - it is not a watering hole for intellectual debate, it is youtube comments with less video
09:50 AM on 03/24/2009
That's fine -- stay with Rush and Hannity!
01:24 AM on 03/24/2009
Here's my idea--AIG says they 'must' pay these bonuses to keep these bozos from quitting (yeah, sure they're going to quit....)so pay them their bonuses (with taxpayer money) and then we can prosecute the whole bunch. OR....they can forego the bonuses, keep their jobs, and do some honest work for once.
06:52 PM on 03/23/2009
Did they go by Chris Dodd's and Bawney Fwank's house?
09:51 AM on 03/24/2009
Uh -- they didn't receive million dollar bonuses from the bailout money -- nor are they responsible for the de-regulation of Reagan and Bush.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mover
Father, Husband, Ret 1SG
08:22 PM on 03/27/2009
Former Senator Barack Obama received $110,332.00 from AIG and Senate Banking committee Chair Christopher Dodd received $175,000 from AIG, and blocked any attempts to tighten them up.ow's that for a bonus?

H
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mover
Father, Husband, Ret 1SG
06:41 AM on 03/28/2009
Guess again.

The problems were born under Jimmy Carter and the changing the rules happened under Clinton at least twice (a hasty response to Enron & mark to market). This was followed by Sen. Dodd's filibustering new rules that may have prevented this crap.

Democrats own this economy.
06:36 PM on 03/23/2009
So let's see.... "AIG has argued that retention bonuses are crucial to pulling the company out of its crisis. Without the bonuses, the company says, top employees who best understand AIG's business would leave"
So I'm wondering about those "top" employees...wasn't it those "top" employee who put the company in this mess in the first place..maybe better if they all left and worked for the competition... eh AIG
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleblackcat
05:35 PM on 03/23/2009
Does anyone know if in fact there WERE any "death threats"? This is an often over-worked ploy to garner sympathy for the offender who has been caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
I think I would say that any "death threats" are more in the line of the average mom who says to her teen-age cut-ups "I'm going to kill you when you get home!" Of course she isn't going to, it's just an expression of exasperation.
That said, anyone who has the brass b@##s to accept huge bonuses (or ANY bonus for that matter) when you have done a completely crappy job should spend a great deal of time in the public stocks of contempt and anger, including they and their children being snubbed by people who work hard at doing a good job at whatever they do.
02:07 AM on 03/24/2009
I've seen plenty posted on forums. What counts as a threat to you ? The actual slaughter?
05:32 PM on 03/23/2009
How about Clinton and Gore sharing th wealth too? How about Soros and all the Hollywood crowd donating 80% of their assets to these people to make them wealthy too????
Welcome to the Gulag.
06:44 PM on 03/23/2009
You know, at least the Hollywood crowd did not ground the economy to a halt. And they actually have to do some tangible work as in performing in a movie or play.

Now what did Wall Street do? Many of them intentionally ignored all the warnings that they got from their more conscientious colleagues. And they continued to persist in their wrong ways until the system finally imploded. That's gross negligence at best, criminal at worst.

Demanding a bonus at this point in time may be "legal", but not ethical given their role in the destruction of America. This is why Americans are furious. And they have every right to be.
01:57 AM on 03/24/2009
God I'm so sick of the ignorant class wars on these sites. Class 1 workers - good, class 2 workers - BAD. What BS. What did Wall Street Do? Good grief - do you even know what WALL STREET IS??? A lot of high performers busting hump, moving, shaking and keeping things rolling and some gamblers, and unfortunately some crooks - just like the rest of the nation. The economy has not been "ground to a halt" for pete's sake. GROW UP, do a little Econ 101 studying on the way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCMinistry
Your Father
04:22 PM on 03/23/2009
Good for these people. Like them I also hate people who went to fancy schools so that they could get jobs making big money, but I love capitalism, and I hate Irony.
04:40 PM on 03/23/2009
".....so they could get jobs making big money....?" I think you mean, "...so they could get jobs stealing lots of money by defrauding people and exploiting their trust and ignorance...." As far as capitalism is concerned...well...if these guys had played by the rules of laissez faire capitalism which they created they'd all be living in tent cities right now. Dontcha love it when spoiled brats change the rules as soon as they begin losing the game, especially when it's a game THEY created!?
05:25 PM on 03/23/2009
Yup, it's almost as good as the "Joe the Plumber" lovers in my conservative Ohio town screeching about how Obama was a "Maxist" pre-election, and now howling about a corporate pay structure that is the inevitable end result of unregulated capitalism.

So which is it Adam Smith and the invisible hand, or do we concede that the government can and should play a role in economics?
04:06 PM on 03/23/2009
So the would-be "masters of the universe" have retreated to the U.S. version of Versailles---Connecticutt. Did anyone notice if the people on the bus were wearing redcaps or were any of the women furiously knitting?
03:30 PM on 03/23/2009
These people should have spent their time looking for a job. Maybe pursuing some higher education at one of our nation's affordable community college. Don't sit and pity your situation when you haven't put forth an ounce of effort to make it better.

These may be the people Rick Santelli was mad at.
03:00 PM on 03/24/2009
Many have been doing just that--including Ivy PH.Ds in their 50s who've been dismissed and have spent several years trying to find work. What are going to tell them to do--start another degree? Maybe an MBA like all of those "gifted" people who helped run our country to the ground?
01:18 PM on 03/23/2009
That is funny, but they deserve it in my opinion. Why should someone get bonuses that big when they are near bankruptcy and would be bankrupt if we did not bail them out? I hope some of the houses get egged or TP'ed!!

http://www.TheCommentDepot.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyeshinka
05:27 PM on 03/23/2009
I would like to see them burned. With the families inside. That would be really crazy.
01:59 AM on 03/24/2009
Could you elaborate on the bonus recipients' roles in the company's economic problems?
11:37 AM on 03/23/2009
While we all dither and talk about various aspects of the AIG bonuses, DNA and constitutionality of the bonus tax, everyone is missing the crucial point: why aren't the people who sold the derivative swaps and other similar deeds being prosecuted for fraud? The AIG folks didn't let the top execs know what they were doing; they sold paper that was essentially worthless;. They knew -or should have known-AIG didn't have the reserves. Madoff's is called a "Ponzi scheme" -and "hedge funds" are a nice name for gambling; CitiGroup tells us $10M in redecorating is good investment. Bull. It's all just theft. We don't need fancy names or convoluted reasoning. Theft is theft. The guy at AIG who was to get the largest bonus made $220M from selling worthless paper; why does he get to keep the profits of his crime? Madoff and family have been shielding their ill-gotten gains. This isn't complicated. They are thieves and liars who have no remorse, and they continue on. Pols protect them with their dithering on side issues. This is a cancer that has grown in the financial industry ; it needs to be cut out. Forget bonus taxes and conversation that distracts; let's try prosecuting. It's the only way to excise the cancer; then reenact the regulations the industry peeled back. Are you listening Mr. Geithner? Your old friends need to go to jail - not be touted as the solution to the problem they created.
12:40 PM on 03/23/2009
Agreed on all levels. Summers and Geithner ARE the cancer--and Obama is clinging to them like W to Rumsfeld.

Everyone talks about "class warfare" and "class resentment" on the part of the poor and middle classes. Yet, few fail to acknowledge it on the part of the wealthy. And yes, members of our government are indeed culpable because they share the same upper middle and upper class desires, concerns and issues: oversized mansions (sorry, no family of 4 needs more than 4000 sq. ft) , overpriced designer clothes for their wives, and overrated private schools for their precious spawn. They and Wall Street are all chummy, patting each other on the backs and colluding when the doors are closed while putting on a good fight (Hey, that's show biz): busy making sure that all of them will pay disproportionately lower taxes while we the lowly people have to pay for their rubbish indirectly by witnessing the decline of education, health care, public transportation and other services.
03:12 PM on 03/23/2009
I agree, but I believe putting pressure on the smaller fry can lead to catch of the big fish.

These AIG bonusees, while living a wealthy lifestyle, likely do not have the resources for a court battle. I believe that they should be pressured, in whatever way is necessary, to get them to start giving details on what really went on.

THEN we can get the bigger fish.

Pressure on the bigger fish takes much more resources, effort, time, and they are not so willing to give real details even if they are backed into a corner. They have more resources so can fight long court batles, tax levies, etc.